huge dog off the le...
 

[Closed] huge dog off the lead

165 Posts
51 Users
0 Reactions
411 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

just came bak from walk in local woods... theres a woman with 2 huge dogs...dont know the breed but lets say it was like a lion (no joking)..she had two of them and one was off the lead and came bounding over to my screaming petrified miniature whippet..i was scared too ! had to lift my dog off the grounf and clutch him tight... her dog just came bounding over and she never called her dog back or even tried to but him on the lead ??? obvioulsy i shouted at her, but she ignored me and whort i was crazy.... surely you cant have these dogs running off the lead with no attempt to call it back wen situations arise ????


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 9:51 am
 xcgb
Posts: 52
Free Member
 

Troll alert!


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

Probably looked pretty scary, but big dogs like Great Danes tend not to be aggressive. Totally wrong not to call them back though


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 9:53 am
Posts: 39520
Free Member
 

do what i did last week - ride into the ****er at 20kph .... obviously not intentionally but the stupid ****er ran out from behind a parked car that its owner was sat in watching the dog do the toilet ....

bet she puts it on a lead next time !

*i do not condone this and it was a complete accident - as noted by my somersault of the bars and the bruised ribs my G/f now sports !


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 9:54 am
 Nick
Posts: 607
Full Member
 

I like most of the Internet hard-man would have put the dog in a headlock and ripped it's heart out with my teeth, it's the only way they learn.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 9:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd have fired a shot over it's head.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 9:56 am
Posts: 6984
Free Member
 

sounds like a leonberger - make my pooch look tiny!

but ive told you before about picking up your dog
let it defend itself, or flee, whatever it wants. If you pick up your dog, in front of mine, my dog will be more interested and think about jumping up to see what you are holding out of range AND your scared dog will be more scared.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 9:58 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Got chased by a dopey looking, but still pretty scarey Rhodesian Ridge Back the other week - blimey they can run


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 9:59 am
 al_f
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

elaine anne - Member
dont know the breed but lets say it was like a lion (no joking)

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

No, I'm not getting you. Sorry...


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:00 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Leonberger? 🙂

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[b]Troll Alert!! Troll Alert!! Troll Alert!! Troll Alert!! Troll Alert!![/b]


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:02 am
 xcgb
Posts: 52
Free Member
 

Hainey I agree !


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:04 am
Posts: 8950
Full Member
 

Lion dog?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:05 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]screaming petrified miniature whippet[/i]

Are you sure?

Also, the only time my dog has jumped up at someone is when they have picked up their dog when she's approached. She is the most playful, non-agressive dog btw, and EVERY owner I've come across is quite happy for their dog to have a play with mine if I let her. Except the one donut who picked their dog up, of course. I can't recall this dog "screaming" though.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:08 am
 xcgb
Posts: 52
Free Member
 

OK I'm going to fall for it then

If you have a small dog and it is being hassled by a big dog DO NOT pick it up! big dog will just jump up to see what you are holding, Miniature whippets are quick enough to get out of the way and are tougher than you give them credit for. They are dogs not babies remember and will sort out the pecking order themselves

if big dog has yours by the neck then different approach needed!


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:14 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

*chewkw to the thread please, chewkw to the thread*


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My dog spends 99% of the time off the lead. If it sees another dog then it will approach it, sniff its ass, perhaps run around with it a bit, take a piss then move on. Does this regardless of whether the other dog is bigger or smaller than him. I never call my dog back [b]IF[/b] the other dog is also off the lead. I will call him back if the other dog is on a lead.

Amazes me that people with dogs the size of rats always pick up their dog up when they see another dog....How dare other people have a dog off the lead in the great outdoors when they are walking their precious little rat dog in the same county.

[i]screaming dogs[/i]...... Brilliant!!


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:31 am
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

THE SIZE OF THE DOG DOES NOT MATTER.

If someone has a dog off the lead and can't control it, they can't control it. If someone lets their dog come up on me or my dog uninvited, that is just a lack of respect and ignorance. Plenty ignorant people have small dogs too. 'these dogs'? I've had more grief from jack russels than any other breed!


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:37 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can I resist this thread?

Its really simple - the dog must be under control and its a criminal offense if it gives someone reasonable cause to be scared. Just causing annoyance and nuisance is wrong but is not a criminal offense just a civil one.

Either way its an irresponsible dog owner


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

By the sounds of it, the dog was under control - just that the owner didn't choose to stop it running up to you...

Definitely antisocial irrespective of what the law is.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:44 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

The only Big Dog you need to be worried about coming at you is this one:


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:44 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]criminal offense[/i]

Not that again?? Call the bloody police! "That dog sniffed my dog's arse. Arrest the owner!!"
Reality check please.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How is a dog running over to play with another dog ever going to be a problem? My dog is off the lead almost all of the time and will come back if I shout him.

As with the guy above, I won't shout him back if he's off to play with another dog - if the other dog won't play, he quickly gets the message and moves on.

I get totally p1ssed off when over-protective owners snatch up their dogs when mine approaches - he's neither big, nor scary - a fluffy white stunted lurcher.

Dogs like playing with each other. Fact.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

>surely you cant have these dogs running off the lead with no attempt to call it back wen situations arise<

But no "situation" arose. Clearly the dug isn't in the habit of attacking other dugs.

Relax...


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But no "situation" arose

No but that doesn't actually make it ok - plenty of people (and particularly kids) are scared of dogs (even more so, ones that look like lions 🙂 ) and don't like it. Letting your dog do it is antisocial.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My step dad had a karabash. That was very lion like. Used to break out from his garden and eat people's pets - literally. Nasty horrible big dog, badly trained, bad tempered, and extremely powerful and fast. The size of this dog did definitely matter! It was bred for dangerous stuff in dangerous places, and coupled with bad training, made up a pretty dangerous combination.

Blame the owner or whatever (I did!), but they had to get rid of it before something horrible happened.

It shouldn't have been allowed as a pet, full stop, let alone out in public.

You don't necessarily know the difference between a monster like that and a friendly big dane or something running up - my sympathies are with the op.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:51 am
 Nick
Posts: 607
Full Member
 

what's a dug?


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:53 am
Posts: 6984
Free Member
 

guilty till proven innocent.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:55 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Nick - Member
what's a dug?

That'd be one a them Irish breeds.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:56 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

a scottish dog
If my dog is not aggressive and it runs up to someoene elses dog why should I react call it back muzzle it?
Nothing happened a dog came over to your dog and went away. I walked past a gang of hoodies on a street corner and nothing happened can we ban them as they looked a bit iffy?
IME little yappy yorkshire terrier /jack Russells are more likely to bite you /attack you


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:56 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

snowslave - seriously though, do you think the owner of such a "pet" would take it out for "walkies" off the lead??


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Scottish dogs are dugs

Irish dogs are dags


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 10:58 am
Posts: 8950
Full Member
 

A big dog recently...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:01 am
Posts: 3410
Free Member
 

I'm sure someone will be along shortly to tell you it's down to you to MTFU, not the owner to actually show some consideration and control their dog.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

DezB - unfortunately, this dog could get out of it's own accord. That's when it did it's damage.

But I've also had an occasion where a ninja pit bull tough guy status dog on a lead saw my daughter sat on some grass about 100 yards away, and made a run straight for her, snarling in a most unfriendly and evil manner - it was dragging the yoof on the lead behind it and it took 3 of them to hold it back. She wasn't even aware - only 3 at the time, just picking daisies, and for some reason the dog just went for her.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:09 am
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

Dogs like playing with each other. Fact.

SOME dogs like playing. SOME dogs are aggressive and will fight rather than play. I don't know your dog. You don't know my dog. Please show the minimum respect and don't assume you know my dog or I know your dog isn't aggressive. I don't and I've had several bad instances with stupid people not controlling their dog. Let them meet properly and see if they play - don't let your out of control mutt run up on me or mine. My (therapy dog trained) rotty will always get the blame if it kicks off - just because he is a rotty.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whippets come in minature sizes? WHY WASN'T I INFORMED?!


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 for XCGB and David_R.

If a big bloke walked towards you in the street or came into the pub do you run home or phone 999 just becuase you don't like the look of him and he looks like he "could" be a bit handy?

By picking up your dog you are reinforcing to the dog that he has to be scared of everything and that any dog approaching it is a threat, this is not too smart and can leed to a nervous dog that is likely to feel more scared more easily and possibly snap at other dogs thus actually starting the fight.
My mother in laws precious King Charles gets picked up and kissed at every little thing and is totally unmanagable as a result. I took my new puppy rund to meet her and the first thing she did was go for his throat as she now equates any dog with danger.

I agree that the owner should have called out to you asking if your dog was alright with other dogs or reassuring you that hers was a big dappy thing (assuming it was), but you need to remain calm and assertive or else your dog will pick up on this and start to feel snappy and nervous too. Your calling to her and her not responding was irrsesponsible and she should have headed and responded your call.
On the other hand if her dog was a slavering beast that would eat you dog for breakfast then it was irresposnible to have it off the lead- but if this was the case your picking it up wouldn't have changed anything and it would have attcked both of you- which it didn't.

Getting worried yourself and scooping up your dog just turns it into something far more interesting that the other dog will want to know.

I don't want to sound rude here, I'm simply trying to offer some advice as an experienced trainer of working dogs. Sounds like you could both do with an opputunity to socialise and get to know more big dogs that way you will both feel calm happy and confident when surprised by one. You admit that you were scarred too.

A call to the local RSPCA or Dogs Trust Dog shelter would give you a chance to take your dog and both get to know and get used to some large dogs in a controlled enviornment thus leaving you both calm and happy campers when another big lad comes over to say hello, albeit in a less than restrained way.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:13 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Nice one Matt. Very er, practical advice.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:31 am
 mrmo
Posts: 10717
Free Member
 

as someone who hates dogs, call it phobic, the one thing i hate with a passion is dogs running upto me, the dog MAY be being friendly but frankly i don't give a $hit! What really winds me up is that when i then proceed to disuade the dog the owner gets uppity. If i kick the dog it is your problem not mine. When i have a dog run my to me and try and bite my leg i will kick the $hit out of the dog to the point i am no longer concerned by the dog.

To many times i have had the "its never done that before" excuse. Keep your dog under control, you may be surprised to hear some people don't like dogs.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dezb - unfortunately that is what the law is no matter how much you wish it weren't. You have a statutory duty not to cause alarm fear or distress and you can be fined and your dog destroyed if you do not. Read the dangerous dogs act.

practical matt

I agree that the owner should have called out to you asking if your dog was alright with other dogs or reassuring you that hers was a big dappy thing (assuming it was)

this is 100% wrong. The owner should only let them run free if she is sure it is OK.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tandem- you read me wrong guvnor.

I'm assuming that she had control of teh dog and that it was not dangerours.

If anyone is scarred or distressed then yes the dog needs to be controlled, if you have it out and you can control it and it runs up to someone who is distressed the yes you call it back and put it on the lead. If it runs up and no-one says anything then you as a dog owner make the first move and ask if it is alright and act appropriately and if you're a **** who has a big dog and you can't control it then you don't deserve to have that dog - which I believe is the same as your point.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:36 am
Posts: 6984
Free Member
 

i dont like spiders coming near me, but when i asked myself what would TJ do..... the answer was obvious.

I called the police and misquoted some legal sounding stuff i found on a wiki.

all humans have an obligation to ensure that i have a happy and fulfilled life.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Matt - this is where you are wrong - it should not be running up to people unless invited. Its not good enough to call it away after it has caused distress.

soobalias - no matter how you wish it that is the law.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:46 am
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

I let my dog off the lead whever I can, dogs who are sh1t scared of him may not be socialized properly (or they have been bitten by a bad dog). I dont really care if my dog scares another. If there are horses / children / TJ about I will try to get him under control, but he may be off chasing rabbittz and wont listen to anyone then.

Anyone mentioned dog sh1t in bags on trees yet?


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Majority of the time its the owners of the precious pooches which are the problem, as already stated. Constantly picking them up and acting scared will instill the same issues in your dog. MTFU.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:52 am
Posts: 6984
Free Member
 

best of luck TJ, let us know how your test case goes wont you.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No need - go read the dangerous dogs act. Its statute and requires no precedent


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:55 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

mrmo

If i kick the dog it is your problem not mine

No you have accpeted that you are phobic it is quiote clearly your problem deal with it.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ - fair point.

I didn't express myslef clearly enough. I was thinking in terms of just generaly being in the same place at the same time, not running down strangers or trotting up to someone to sniff them.

It's not easy to prove H.A.D if there's a marked out rugby pitch between the dog and the IP which is what I had in mind when I meant going towards them, I wouldn't wait till they had a muzzle in their crotch.
Even if someone at this distcance was a bit wary then the lead should go on.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Matt - fair enough - some of the dog owners here seem to theink that the dog has a right to run around freely and its up to everyone else to learn how to deal with their mutts

soobalias

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1991/ukpga_19910065_en_1#l1g3

Keeping dogs under proper control

(1) If a dog is dangerously out of control in a public place—

(a) the owner; and

(b) if different, the person for the time being in charge of the dog,

is guilty of an offence, or, if the dog while so out of control injures any person, an aggravated offence, under this subsection.

(2) In proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) above against a person who is the owner of a dog but was not at the material time in charge of it, it shall be a defence for the accused to prove that the dog was at the material time in the charge of a person whom he reasonably believed to be a fit and proper person to be in charge of it.

(3) If the owner or, if different, the person for the time being in charge of a dog allows it to enter a place which is not a public place but where it is not permitted to be and while it is there—

(a) it injures any person; or

(b) [b]there are grounds for reasonable apprehension that it will do so,
[/b]
he is guilty of an offence, or, if the dog injures any person, an aggravated offence, under this subsection.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 11:58 am
Posts: 6984
Free Member
 

just cos you are a scardey cat is not grounds for reasonable apprehension

"dangerously out of control"

allowing it to enter a space that isnt a public place, that doesnt include your over inflated sense of personal space.

like to hear you explain that a dog approaching you was that, to a judge, like i said good luck and let us all know so we can toast your legal victory.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ - manly handshake and say no more about it?

I get where you're coming from on that one, I spend my days trying to prove HAD and similar but in a more urban environment. Wish I could put some of our scroats on leads- it'd solve a lot of problems.

I'm leaving this thread well alone now.

toodle pip. 😉


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TandemJeremy - Member

Can I resist this thread?

Its really simple - the dog must be under control and its a criminal offense if it gives someone[b] reasonable cause[/b] to be scared. Just causing annoyance and nuisance is wrong but is not a criminal offense just a civil one.

Either way its an irresponsible dog owner

Edit :- Ta Matt. You obviously understand the law and your responsibilities unlike some of the muppets on here


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:05 pm
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

TJ, just so you know- not everyone obeys the law all the time, whether its the REAL law or something you found on Wikipedia.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You obviously understand the law and your responsibilities unlike some of the muppets on here

You must label yourself in that bracket then too?


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Clearly not Scruff. However it would be nice if dog owners did. That is real law - look at the source - directly copied from the statute


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OT slightly... but I would be interested to know if the large and very scared looking pitbull that was roaming towards my local park yesterday ever got caught...

It came from inside the Police station opposite our house and disappeared towards the park... the worried looking WPC that was 'giving chase' 'gave up' after about 75 yards and retreated into the safety of the cop shop..


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I understand the law clearly. Its not rocket science.

Statute - criminal offense - letting your dog harm or scare someone ( subject to being reasonable that it caused fear)

Against civil law / bylaws - letting your dog cause nuisance or annoyance


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:09 pm
Posts: 14832
Full Member
 

TJ, as long as you continue to cycle through red lights, as you openly admit to doing, don't bother lecturing anyone on following the law 🙄


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think that you think that you understand the law. But I think that you think that the law is equal to what you interpret it as. Which its not.

😉


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

TJ, this is law wot IZ about Rocket Science n'that-

[url= http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/index.html ]http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/index.html[/url]
😛


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...had to lift my dog off the grounf and clutch him tight.

Oh dear...

+1 for size of the dog doesn't matter... Friends had a Chihuahua, they would laugh when it attacked people's ankles.. They didnt laugh when I threatened them and they certainly didn't laugh when it was put down as it was an agressive dog.

I haven't read all the comments, but to me those dogs seemed to be under control, didn't bark at you, didn't attack; you're dog on the otherhand, screaming at them/you and then lifting it off the ground, thats just wrong.. Although if an owner screamed at me, I'm not sure I would do exactly what they said, I might call them, I might not.. Either way if I call them or not, I would still call it "under control". Now if it was people who don't have dogs, I would call them straight away, as some people are scared of dogs.

Yes I'm a dog owner. I'm going now, before I get people angry and stir the pot even more!


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Find so me evidence then - the statute is very clear, the civil stuff is less so and open to interpretation but appears pretty clear to me.

If you could actually find anything to back up your view you might have some credibility - I have posted numerous references to guidance for dog clubs and legal experts on previous threads - however you prefer to ignore the law to justify your inability or unwillingness to control your dog


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:16 pm
 Nick
Posts: 607
Full Member
 

Some people (my wife) are pretty scared of dogs, childhood memories etc, in my experience people who have dogs have absolutely no comprehension of this "he's only playing".


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:16 pm
 xcgb
Posts: 52
Free Member
 

Yunki Are you SURE it was a pitbull? not sure I would be after catching a glimpse thats the trouble with the DD act arguing what is a pit and whats a staff cross etc


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ,

You see things as very black and white in your eyes only. Any dog doing anything which pisses you off then the owner should be prosecuted. That is in your opinion only.

Lets be clear.

If a dog is off leash and runs up to someone and takes a massive chunk out of their leg then yes, you are right and i think everyone is in agreement. The owner is liable, should be prosecuted etc etc.

If a dog is off leash and runs up to another dog wagging its tail to say hello but because the owner of that dog (and lets be kind) is a complete ****wit and wants nothing more than to turn their pet rat into a quivering wreck of an anti-social dog by picking it up out of harms way then my friend i would fail to see how that is illegal?

Edit:

however you prefer to ignore the law to justify your inability or unwillingness to control your dog

- Again another TJ prejudiced assumption, my dog is under perfect control at all times.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:20 pm
Posts: 218
Free Member
 

Cant really be bothered to get involved and only skipped through the thread but the extract of the act highlighted by TJ i.e. Clause 3 subsection (b) reads as though it is only appilies to a place which is not a public place.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

. Any dog doing anything which pisses you off then the owner should be prosecuted. That is in your opinion only.

And I have said that where and when?

All I want is to go about my business unbothered by your dog. I don't want it running up to me in any manner and that is my clear legal right


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 1960
Full Member
 

Ah this again

Well done elaine anne, you've managed a reasonable quality troll here although, given TJ's hair trigger reaction times to threads about dogs running about anywhere, it would have to be marked down as having a low level of difficulty to initiate a controversial discussion.

I'm now off to walk my dogs off the leash, with no 100% guarantee they'll come back when I call. I may even let them go near other dogs and people. Perhaps I should mug a pensioner and desecrate a church as well.

Enjoy your afternoon people.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Marcus - it does read like that - wrong subsection perhaps


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ - Are you sub 5' and a parking attendant? Talk about officious jobsworth.

And C3 subsection (b) only applies to a non-public place. Off back to college with you till you can read statute properly.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it does read like that - wrong subsection perhaps

Perhaps you better phone your local MP to inform them the law as it currently stands is null and void due to an incorrect subsection classification.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All I want is to be left alone by your dogs - reasonable dog owners will ensure that this is so. I know STW is full of plonkers but the attempts to justify their dogs that are not under proper control are laughable as is the attacks on me for wanting dog owners to actually obey the law and control their dogs

I quoted the wrong subsection - try this

For the purposes of this Act a dog shall be regarded as dangerously out of control [b]on any occasion on which there are grounds for reasonable apprehension that it will injure any person, whether or not it actually does so, [/b]but references to a dog injuring a person or there being grounds for reasonable apprehension that it will do so do not include references to any case in which the dog is being used for a lawful purpose by a constable or a person in the service of the Crown.

is the correct subsection


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:35 pm
 mrmo
Posts: 10717
Free Member
 

junkyard, i do deal with it, i stay away from dogs i don't know. If a dog is as the law requires, under control in a public place no one has a problem.

The problem arises when dogs are not under control, somthing the law is clear about. As such i will do what i neccesary to get the dog to go away and for me to feel happy again.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

on any occasion on which there are grounds for reasonable apprehension that it will injure any person, whether or not it actually does so

Again you misread this. 'reasonable apprehension' will cover actual aggressive behaviour. A dog just running up to you is not aggressive behaviour. If that was the case, the courts would be chock-full of cases about dogs running up to people. I'd recommend hiring a solicitor to have them explain this clearly to you.


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]All I want is to be left alone by your dogs - reasonable dog owners will ensure that this is so[/i]

+1

but I've a strong feeling that people who own dogs as companion animals rather than working animals are very unlikely to be reasonable......


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dougal - I am not misreading that. It is clear that you must be in fear of being injured and that fear must be reasonable.

The dog running up to you with no aggressive intent is a different thing - thats causing annyance and nuisance. Differnt bit of law.

As I said earlier in this thread there are two different things - "dangerously out of control" and "not under proper control" ( there is also close control - but that is irrelevant to this particular debate)

Its the latter of these two that is the issue when a dog runs up to you without agressive intent - for example the dog that started sniffing around my food when I was having a picnic - muddy paws on the jacket I was sitting on and nose at my lunch. Now that dog is clearly not dangerously out of control but clearly is being a nuisance by not being under proper control


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know STW is full of plonkers

Of course you do! 😉


 
Posted : 17/03/2010 1:03 pm
Page 1 / 3