Forum menu
afaik for some of the councillors if they'd actually bannered themselves under the Socialist Party on the voting form rather than the Green party they'd not have been elected.
If the conservatives called themselves something else, perhaps "The Legalise Gay Marriage Party", they'd lose votes - this is a truly daft line of reasoning. The Green party have the economic policies they do because they were what were argued for by their members.
In any case, if you don't think the Greens have more of an environmental focus to their policies than any of the other major parties then you must be looking at a different policy document to me.
ffs. we're back to that "they're just a bunch of closet commies" bollocks
Why do right-wing ranters both here and the United States use such childish schoolyard taunting language?
๐
(Insert favourite picture of politically-correct ironing here).
Bless.
Ernie - no don't put me in your right wing BS narrative
ffs. we're back to that "they're just a bunch of closet commies" bollocks
I'm talking about the Green party council elections in Brighton - many were surprised at how a green agenda has been compromised by what the Grauniad refers to as Watermelons
As a natural Green who is more left wing I'm ****ing incandescent at the direction the UK Green Party has gone - very similar to the 1983 Labour Party manifesto
As a natural Green who is more left wing I'm ****ing incandescent at the direction the UK Green Party has gone - very similar to the 1983 Labour Party manifesto
It's gone in the direction its members wanted it to go in. Maybe if you were more than just a "natural Green" and were instead an "actual Green" you could have done something about that.
I'm talking about the Green party council elections in Brighton - many were surprised at how a green agenda has been compromised by what the Grauniad refers to as Watermelons
That's right, I seem to recall there's been a load of infighting with tactical voting within the council between the watermelons and the mangos
One's green on the outside and pink in the middle and the other is yellow on the inside.
I live outside the Brighton constituency but spend plenty of driving around it and working on the streets...
On the face of it I like the changes the Greens have implemented...I'm quite content with the 20mph speed limits (OK, perhaps I don't always abide but my average speed has certainly dropped).
They've converted loads of urban dual carriageway (where traffic tends to compete to get away from each set of lights and the speed inevitably creeps up over the limit) and made the inside lanes bus and/or cycle lanes. The traffic queues may be longer but they move quicker as the pinch points have been eliminated.
The cycle lanes seem to be well designed - the London road has cycle lanes that loop behind the bus stops so that reduces conflict and tailgating buses, Old Shoreham Road has cycle lanes on an 'outer' pavement that stops traffic crossing into it and also has advance green lights so cyclists can get a head start across junctions. I've not been down Edward Street for a few weeks but that dual lane drag strip will apparently have inside lanes replaced with cycle lanes and shared bus/cycle lanes but wide enough for buses to pass cyclists.
I work in most of the major towns in East Sussex and parts of Surrey/Kent, and Brighton & Hove seem to be streets ahead in moving away from a painted line and some green tarmac to keep bikes in the gutter.
Regarding motorbike V car pollution, got to admit I was surprised I didn't get flamed universally! There are arguments in both directions but it seems pretty clear that pollution controls on bikes in general are way behind cars, #1 on Google results is http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2005/dec/21/travelandtransport.transportintheuk . Even if you argue that the bike is less polluting, its not comparative, i.e. a bike might emit 75% of the pollutants but only weighs 25% of the average car. Maybe pollution controls are more important than dissuading the use of bigger bikes.
Even if you argue that the bike is less polluting, its not comparative, i.e. a bike might emit 75% of the pollutants but only weighs 25% of the average car. Maybe pollution controls are more important than dissuading the use of bigger bikes.
I'd get better mpg out of any of my motorbikes by loading it into the back of my pickup truck. Even the 125s, err... especially the 125s.
the London road has cycle lanes that loop behind the bus stops so that reduces conflict and tailgating buses
I love that. My visits to Brighton tend to be limited to the occasional bike ride there, I've always been impressed by the cycle lanes that loop behind the bus stops. It's such a simple and effective solution which allows cyclists to keep moving without the need for unnecessary stopping and starting.
I wish we had such a cycle friendly road infrastructure in Croydon. I guess that in the end it's the difference between having the active involvement of cyclists in road infrastructure planning and having people who [i]think[/i] they understand the needs of cyclists.
