Forum menu
Grand Designs - ful...
 

Grand Designs - full commitment again...

Posts: 161
Free Member
 

We will never know the truth re the original membrane, it certainly didn’t look good, but I respected the builders point. Either way, as capable as the owner is, I don’t believe he did it all himself. As said before, finishing the electrics was extreme in such a big project. He must be almost impossible to work for.


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 9:00 am
Posts: 46081
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Wonder how much ch4 pays folk to be in programme. Surely something to compel folk to share on TV.

They didn't used to when I was selling kit to a few.
We as a company even got so fed up of GD builders phoning up and a) demanding huge discounts so we could be on the telly and b) because they choose nutters to make good telly, they were usually a risky total nightmare to work with, that we all but instigated 'no' to any GD...


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 9:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bless her, she was still sticking to her guns until we asked her to imagine rolling over one morning and coming face to face with my dad laying cable about 15ft away.

🤣

My wife is asking me why I’m laughing so much. I suspect there will be eye rolling.


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 9:38 am
Posts: 14289
Free Member
 

Actually I didn't like it!
If I was paying that much money to live in the countryside then I'd actually like to see it rather that live in a hole with just one window to look over the grass [that was too high].

I wonder how long it took for the car lift to break so that they were stranded?


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 9:39 am
Posts: 23339
Full Member
 

Whilst I was impressed with his skill and commitment I couldn’t warm to him.

The house was pretty cool in a retro sci-fi sort of way in a future where everything is perfect... a bit like Logan’s Run.


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 10:13 am
Posts: 5799
Free Member
 

I thought the finished building had huge wow! Factor, although I've no idea what it's like to live in. The guy's OCD was the driver for the cost and schedule overrun and nearly broke them I thought. They did well to survive. I'm pretty sure there was a magic money tree and a magic helper team and lots of other stuff were weren't shown, but.... Wow.


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 10:14 am
Posts: 1635
Free Member
 

I agree with sharkbait, I didn't like it. Although I'm sure the garage lift would get its own bullet point if it's ever put on Rightmove.

The outdoor seating was very much sitting in a shady concrete ditch

The low profile though would get you Kudos from the neighbours I suppose


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 11:29 am
Posts: 1635
Free Member
 

I've just found it on Google maps if anyone's interested:

https://www.google.com/maps/ @51.2771185,1.0358277,236m/data=!3m1!1e3


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 11:31 am
Posts: 3349
Free Member
 

As others have said, a complete nightmare to work with/for - completely unrealistic expectations of quality for the trades he'd employed/money he was paying, seemingly wanting Rolls Royce finish for Ford money.

Given that, I quite liked the result. it did seem well finished but I doubt the extra quality will ever be realised in a sale.

one thing I couldn't get over, given his OCD, was the square window in the oval hole. It looked absolutely shocking from the outside. Surely it was designed for a custom shaped window?


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 1:01 pm
Posts: 2770
Full Member
 

Wonder how much ch4 pays folk to be in programme. Surely something to compel folk to share on TV.

Sweet FA, and having spoken to someone who's been on it also adds a level of extra stress and complexity to the process. Having a film crew on site is disruptive (with some re-shoots - 'can you do that again') and you also end up with a deadline if they want to show the finish house (which is why you fairly often end up with, as someone mentions above, some turf badly thrown about to make the garden look less like a building site).

I always ponder the motivation of the people who are on there - if they're an architect then it's clearly got potential to be good exposure (and I'd guess maybe it's the architects that suggest/persuade some of the others) but for a lot it's a bit of a puzzle


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 1:45 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

For all his obsessive attention to detail i could see plenty of things that were not 100% at the end of the program, the plastering of the ceilings was all over the place and the curved looped terracing was all wonky and you could see where the shuttering for the pour was done in curved stages with a variable radius and straight bits, i bet there’s more little annoyances that the camera doesn’t show.

I had a wow factor but the place left me cold, not sure why but i have seen more impressive places that cost a lot less, i would imagine the cost of unnecessary digging down ate up a lot of money which could have built a stunning above ground dwelling.

Imagine having to work with him? i bet he gets off the ship and gives all the ropes a tug as he doesn’t trust anyone to do the job properly.


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 2:24 pm
Posts: 20979
 

What I couldn’t fathom (hehe) was why they went with a design that someone else had commissioned. All that obsession over executing someone else’s ideas! For the money they could have had their own dream house designed.


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 2:28 pm
Posts: 5799
Free Member
 

Agree with Mr Smith I thought I saw poor, or at least not outstanding, finishing at the end. I commented to my wife that his of OCD had gone into'quality' where it wouldn't show and probably wouldn't make any functional difference and although he had the skills for that, when it comes to visible quality of the finish could be match the pro trades people or would his inability to step away leave him with a poorer final finish?


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 3:32 pm
Posts: 4614
Free Member
 

I’ve just found it on Google maps if anyone’s interested:

https://www.google.com/maps/ @51.2771185,1.0358277,236m/data=!3m1!1e3

looks like a giant lady garden from above!


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 4:04 pm
Posts: 2745
Free Member
 

As others have said, a complete nightmare to work with/for – completely unrealistic expectations of quality for the trades he’d employed/money he was paying, seemingly wanting Rolls Royce finish for Ford money.

He had a very condescending manner about him, especially when he was with the guy on the roof nailing down the strip.
His job appeared to be him overseeing installation of equipment that is built to a high tolerance in a factory.
I bet everything on that site was within building tolerances, just seemed he was looking for mm tolerance rather than what is actually achievable. Had a chippy like him who moaned our 10 ton steel structure was 3mm out of tolerance on a job. Wasn't best pleased when the grownups told him to STFU and get on with it after he had tried to complain higher up about it. BTW erected steel tolerance is generally +-10mm


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 9:11 pm
Posts: 4731
Full Member
 

What I couldn’t fathom (hehe) was why they went with a design that someone else had commissioned. All that obsession over executing someone else’s ideas! For the money they could have had their own dream house designed.

I would guess the land was sold with planning permission for the design built. Obviously, he could get a new design and re-submit for planning but that would take months. I assume they thought the design was ok so went with it.

There's a couple of plots near me at the moment, both with planning permission for designs I wouldn't build!


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 9:43 pm
Posts: 5828
Full Member
 

The building looked cool at the end, but i wouldn't want to live there.
Like others i wondered on the finishing of the roof, would be annoyed if a plasterer left that at my house.
I think he was a royal pain in the arse and surprised no one lamped him during the build. His wife must be either mental or have the patience of a saint


 
Posted : 15/09/2022 10:24 pm
Posts: 3136
Full Member
 

Fair play the guy wanted it done his way and stuck to it !! I mean it was his money 🤷‍♂️


 
Posted : 16/09/2022 12:20 am
Posts: 20979
 

If Hambini built a house…


 
Posted : 16/09/2022 1:48 am
Posts: 144
Free Member
 

I thought the house was amazing but living in a hole in the ground has too many disadvantages for me. Primarily the lack of a view.

The interior level of the living area was significantly below the only outwards facing window they had. When you sit at the dining table all you see is the sky. The guy must've been a nightmare to work for but, fair play to him, he was able to turn his hand to absolutely everything. Quite admirable.

Looking at the google maps link I don't know why they didn't just build a more conventional house on the hill rather than in it.


 
Posted : 16/09/2022 10:03 am
Posts: 4614
Free Member
 

Looking at the google maps link I don’t know why they didn’t just build a more conventional house on the hill rather than in it.

plannign permission was only granted for something in the ground, rather than on the ground - the house next door looks much nicer.


 
Posted : 16/09/2022 11:29 am
Posts: 3349
Free Member
 

grahamt1980
His wife must be either mental or have the patience of a saint

She seemed a less enthusiastic at the start of the programme but was as bad as he was by the end - #stockholmsyndrome


 
Posted : 16/09/2022 11:52 am
Posts: 1216
Full Member
 

I didn’t really believe the planning restriction. Ok, that is the plan that land was sold with, but we don’t know which nimby sold the land. Looking at Google maps I reckon it was the one behind with the South facing gable end with a gap in the trees for their view.


 
Posted : 16/09/2022 1:01 pm
Posts: 2770
Full Member
 

It was supposedly to retain the levels of the hill fort that was on the site


 
Posted : 17/09/2022 8:53 am
Posts: 125
Free Member
 

Not for me I can't see how they have got away with trashing an Iron age hill fort.


 
Posted : 17/09/2022 12:52 pm
Posts: 4731
Full Member
 

Wasn't the hill fort dug up when it was a quarry? That's why it was just sand there were digging into. But I may have mis-heard.


 
Posted : 17/09/2022 1:09 pm
Posts: 1216
Full Member
 

Yes, already dug up and full of sand. There are quite few houses along that edge of the hill. Presumably if the site was intact enough to be of much value then there would be no building allowed at all.


 
Posted : 17/09/2022 1:55 pm
Posts: 4381
Full Member
 

I’ve just watched the second one, I love the idea of building a house. I’ll never do it, but if I do it’ll be a few modules that get bolted together on site.

I think that’s the smoothest GD I’ve ever watched and I really liked the end result 😎


 
Posted : 17/09/2022 5:53 pm
Posts: 2335
Free Member
 

So, most cost effective way to the house they want is to flatten a £800k house🤣

Can't see £550k building that either when they were quite double 🤣

Might be nice..


 
Posted : 21/09/2022 10:14 pm
Posts: 1110
Free Member
 

Well this series has given me confidence that brexit hasn't scared off foreign trades👍👍👍👍


 
Posted : 21/09/2022 10:44 pm
Posts: 1733
Full Member
 

They always seem surprised when it goes well over time and over budget. Have they never watched the show before?


 
Posted : 21/09/2022 10:49 pm
Posts: 304
Full Member
 

Literally put next door in the shade.


 
Posted : 21/09/2022 11:15 pm
Posts: 3032
Free Member
 

I have given up on it - it's just badly organised people , with lots of money, grandstanding. And preparing the pro folio for when they sell.
It stop being interesting when it is all about big budgets


 
Posted : 21/09/2022 11:23 pm
Posts: 4302
Full Member
 

I would love to know how a relatively young couple found £1.5m without a mortgage to buy the plot and then fund the build.


 
Posted : 21/09/2022 11:58 pm
Posts: 4302
Full Member
 

I always ponder the motivation of the people who are on there – if they’re an architect then it’s clearly got potential to be good exposure (and I’d guess maybe it’s the architects that suggest/persuade some of the others) but for a lot it’s a bit of a puzzle

Having watched a presentation from someone on who appeared on the show then you dont want to be chosen. It means the programme makers think it will make good tv which means a horrible build or massive overspends.

Asfor the architect angle the programme usually makes them look useless. If you believe the programme most of them must be incapable of designing a house that can be built,let alone within the clients budget. It makes me wonder why it takes 7 years to train


 
Posted : 22/09/2022 12:07 am
Posts: 13349
Free Member
 

Asfor the architect angle the programme usually makes them look useless.

There are few that know how to build safely and cost effectively from my experiences in the late noughties.


 
Posted : 22/09/2022 8:38 am
Posts: 8414
Free Member
 

Speeder
Full Member
grahamt1980
His wife must be either mental or have the patience of a saint

She seemed a less enthusiastic at the start of the programme but was as bad as he was by the end – #stockholmsyndrome

She made quite a sharp comment about 3/4s of the way through about him getting back to his proper work. It made me wonder whether he'd taken time out voluntarily to build his house, or whether there was another reason. (Sacked, made redundant, breakdown, etc) If that, saying that he was building his house would be a good excuse, and also account for some of the other oddities about this build, like the lack of detail, guardedness on camera. Of course, I might be thinking far too much into it. 😀


 
Posted : 22/09/2022 2:59 pm
Posts: 28712
Full Member
 

What's going on with Kevins hair ?


 
Posted : 22/09/2022 3:04 pm
Posts: 1140
Full Member
 

I counted Kevin wearing four jackets at the same time in last night's episode.

He usually wears two, occasionally three, but four is a new record.


 
Posted : 22/09/2022 3:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That was one of the ugliest houses I've seen in quite sometime, nice details in isolation but an incoherent mess. The bit where she started welling up because they had to drive by the site a few times on the way home, paint the odd room and hang some pictures had me on the verge of shouting at the TV, absolutely clueless.


 
Posted : 22/09/2022 3:15 pm
Posts: 9387
Full Member
 

Episode 1 - Something seriously dodgy going on with Latvian glass, that made no sense at all, I just don't trust him.

Episode 2 (modular build) has been, by quite some distance, the best of this series. Its up there with my top 5 of all time. Nice couple. Sensible budget, realistic build, interesting process, it obviously meant so much to them. There were aspects of the house I didn't like but the world would be a boring place if we all liked the same things.

Episode 3 - Truly awful man builds truly awful house, made out he was a perfectionist but he sounds like a nightmare to work for and probably ended up doing it himself trades just refused to work for him. He spent so much money, there are some beautiful houses for sale within 10 miles of his build for a lot less money.

Episode 4 - They got what they wanted, a lot of their time and cost costs were due to COVID so skews things slightly. House was all over the place, on a standalone site fair enough but on a street like that it just jarred. Finance is nuts though, cost of build and site could have got them a very nice house in the area.


 
Posted : 22/09/2022 3:21 pm
Posts: 46081
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Is this a new jacket record? I'm sure that's 5 layers he's wearing...


 
Posted : 28/09/2022 10:06 pm
Posts: 2997
Full Member
 

I like the design


 
Posted : 28/09/2022 10:16 pm
Posts: 2335
Free Member
 

I love the parents. WTF would we want to move here? 🤣


 
Posted : 28/09/2022 10:18 pm
Posts: 2997
Full Member
 

That house is massive. Just ridiculous for what will be 2 of them v soon


 
Posted : 28/09/2022 10:42 pm
Page 3 / 19