Forum menu

[Closed] Folks

Posts: 648
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#12240111]

(Green Ink) Has anyone noticed the new usage of 'Folks' by politicians and doctors? It appears to mean 'I have an empathy with you the general public (but really I have absolutely no understanding and a deep distain for the lot of you)'. I'm sure it works in the USA or Germany but in the UK it just sounds deeply patronising. (Green ink off)


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:20 am
Posts: 5805
Full Member
 

Folks probably stress too much about it.


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:26 am
Posts: 7097
Free Member
 

aloof distant type uses friendly reference to appear more in touch?

s/a 'hard working families' and other trite references to 'everyday people'


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:29 am
Posts: 3642
Free Member
 

#weareallamericansnow

How does OP sit with ‘peeps’?

I remember my grandfather using ‘folks’ regularly. He was a Bredon man. He’d use sentences such as ‘Some folks don’ understan’ what they’m a-doin!’


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:29 am
Posts: 20978
 

I use ‘folk’ a fair bit.

Never ‘folks’ though.


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:30 am
Posts: 12363
Full Member
 

Peaked in the 1920s, been in sharp decline recently.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=folk%2C+folks


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:30 am
Posts: 17290
Full Member
 

I go to visit my folks. Is that allowed?


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:31 am
Posts: 648
Full Member
Topic starter
 

How does OP sit with ‘peeps’?

We've never been introduced but by all accounts she's nice


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:33 am
Posts: 4506
Full Member
 

When I was still working I was encouraged to use 'folks' when addressing groups of people as a non-gendered alternative to 'guys'.


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:33 am
Posts: 648
Full Member
Topic starter
 

When I was still working I was encouraged to use ‘folks’ when addressing groups of people as a non-gendered alternative to ‘guys’.

That's cunning. That way you can be a none genderist but still a patronising git.

It's probably the people using it, but to me it flags up a sentence telling me to do something that the speaker has no intention of following themselves


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:38 am
Posts: 8100
Free Member
 

I frequently get emails just addressed to "All," which really steams my goat. Would prefer "Folks" over that.


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:41 am
Posts: 13492
Full Member
 

When I was still working I was encouraged to use ‘folks’ when addressing groups of people as a non-gendered alternative to ‘guys’.

This. I use 'folks' a fair bit these days as I habitually used 'guys' or 'ladies and gents' when addressing large groups previously. Though, oddly, I was (am) more than happy to use 'guys' to a group of (making visual assumptions) exclusively women so, to me at least, it has a non-gendered use as a friendly collective. But assumed intent is judged by the ears of the audience and all that....

Suggestions for alternatives that makes (some) people's teeth itch less? For reference I am frequently talking to groups where I know a minority there are who identify non binary or gender fluid and are not 'colleagues' so I can't use that (though I wouldn't elect to even if I could).

Group
Gang
People
Rabble


 
Posted : 16/02/2022 9:44 am