Forum menu
Fat Kids - whose fa...
 

[Closed] Fat Kids - whose fault?

Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Can't be arsed reading all that so here is my retort to this point:

..a lot of the time they just can't afford higher quality healthier food, ...you'll plainly see how much more it costs too eat healthily and therefore how unaffordable it is for those on low incomes.

This gets wheeled out all the time, but it's only really true if you are comparing value ready-meals to "healthy" ready-meals. If you look at snacks etc it is often cheaper to go for the healthier option.

Mars Bar - 59p
Twix - 49p
Monster Munch (Pickled Onion) - 46p
Total: £1.54

Cox Apple - 24p
Banana - 16p
Large Orange - 45p
Total: £0.85

(Source: prices I just looked up on tesco.com)


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 2:39 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
 

I blame the parents or the adults. Simple!

Or their grandparents for not being able to bring up their parents properly.

There is no excuse at all ...


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 2:52 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

CG - sorry to hear you have a thyroid problem. I was diagnosed in my 20s after several years of related health problems. The replies along the lines of 'you have just eaten too many calories' just demonstrate a lack of understanding of the condition.

When I was diagnosed I wasn't over weight, I was fit and biking off road 4 or 5 days a week (both days at the weekend and Tuesday, Wednesday and often Friday night rides). I had found that to manage my weight I had to stick to no more than 1200 calories per day on average. Unless you have some experience of this, it is difficult to understand how challenging that is. The responses above would suggest that a diet of 1500 calories a day was 'me just eating too much' and is simplistic and unhelpful. It took over 2 years of a good hormone level in my bloods for some of the clinical symptoms to go away too.

In the years since then I have found that I can manage my weight ok as long as I am exercising. If I can't exercise then my weight creeps up. Even a well managed thyroid problem means that it is very easy to gain a bit of weight but the natural process that most people do of balancing it out by being good for a bit does not take the weight back off without extra effort through exercise. This means that people with a thyroid condition have a tougher time staying slim. It certainly isn't impossible but it is harder. Unfortunately as you get older you tend to have longer bouts of no exercise and I have a great deal of sympathy for those with other health problems which restrict their activity levels. Unless you have tried to manage your weight purely by diet,without the benefit of exercise, it is difficult to understand how hard it is.

Having said all this, the research I have read suggests that a person with a thyroid condition can be around 10lbs/1 stone heavier as a direct result of the condition. Larger amounts of weight are more related to the cycle above than directly to the condition itself so people can not really blame it on their glands!


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

GrahamS I agree 100%, Example meal: beans, baked potato & lettece & tomato less than £1 per head. I grew up poor (for this country) & my parents never failed to provide healthy balanced meals.

Another pet hate is parents saying 'you try getting a kid to eat an apple/orange/banana'


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 3:03 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

The dog we adopted last spring was overweight when we got her. She's not now. Was it the dog's fault or her previous owners?

When we adopted her, we were told to take her back in a month or two for a blodd test to check her thyroid. The vet took one look when we walked through the door and said it wasn't needed.

She's a lab, so therefore prone to weight gain.

Exercise and portion control...


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 3:56 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Labs prone to weight gain. That's genetic isn't it?


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:04 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

Labs prone to weight gain. That's genetic isn't it?

And despite that, she's not overweight.


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:08 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Still genetic though. 🙂

You're obviously starving her 😛


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

Genetics influence the base metabolic rate.

If
[i]Base metabolic rate + calories out due to activity = calories in[/i] you (or your kids or your dog) will maintain your weight.

If either side of that equation is unbalanced, you'll lose or gain weight.

She's fed enough to maintain her weight.


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:18 pm
Posts: 16174
Free Member
 

"Labs prone to weight gain. That's genetic isn't it?"

I've never known a dog yet that wouldn't eat all day long if they could, and would therefore get VERY VERY fat.

Dogs have small brains and cant comprehend that too much food intake will make them fat and unhealthy. Just the same as kids, they both have to be controlled in what they should eat.

My wife quite regularly has to operate on fat people or not as the case may be if they are too fat. I've asked the question before whether its genetics/illness etc etc and she said as % of population the true number of people who have genuine medical reason is virtually nill. The majority is just people who like too many pies !


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:30 pm
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

Education.

It's not even that there's a massive amount of overeating going on, it's just that a lot of food is very very calorie dense in a way that it wasn't before. Our parents eat meals of 400-500 Kcal (a chop, some boiled spuds and a some peas, for instance). A single portion ready made curry from a supermarket is easily 800-900 Kcal Add to that the fact that it's not that healthy food is any more expensive, it's that un healthy food is cheap (not cheaper, just cheap) add to that a lack of education about what to do with basic ingredients, and you have a real chance of getting chubby without really thinking about it.


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Sorry, I withdraw my efforts at a joke. I wasn't meaning to be THAT serious. 🙄


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:35 pm
Posts: 4789
Free Member
 

just as it is funny/sad:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:36 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

I've never known a dog yet that wouldn't eat all day long if they could, and would therefore get VERY VERY fat.

Dogs have small brains and cant comprehend that too much food intake will make them fat and unhealthy. Just the same as kids, they both have to be controlled in what they should eat.

Yep.

Our other dog is a greyhound. She eats slightly more than the lab yet is considerably skinnier and a few kg lighter. They go on the same length walks, but the lab runs constantly while the greyhound just walks next to us.

[url= http://static.ow.ly/photos/thumb/6V0N.jp g" target="_blank">http://static.ow.ly/photos/thumb/6V0N.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

People are the same; some need more/less food than others, so recommended calorie intake, etc. doesn't work.

As an individual though, if [i]you[/i]'re overweight, [i]you[/i]'re eating too much for [i]you[/i]. If [i]you[/i] don't want to be overweight, [i]you[/i] need to eat less. If [i]you[/i] don't care, carry on. [i]You[/i] are responsible for [i]you[/i]rself.

Kids and dogs however, aren't responsible for themselves. Parents and dog-owners are.


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:37 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

Sorry, I withdraw my efforts at a joke. I wasn't meaning to be THAT serious.

It's okay, I knew it was a joke 🙂


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The kid I saw yesterday was fatter than the boy in rootes1's picture.


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 4:49 pm
Posts: 4789
Free Member
 

The kid I saw yesterday was fatter than the boy in rootes1's picture.

holy crap!


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 5:02 pm
Posts: 4789
Free Member
 

lack of exercise is clearly an issue (not walking/cycling to school) playstation etc etc..

but really as mentioned above it is just the calorific density and availability of food that is the issue..

letting a kid get fat should be an offence like other forms of child cruelty / abuse etc


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 5:22 pm
Posts: 640
Free Member
 

parents - end of...

I dont normally post in threads like this but over christmas I was introduced to my brother's new 'girlfriend' a 'larger' lady, shall we say.

5 kids (not a crime) between 3years and 25, I only met one that was 16 and the three year old, the 16 year old was big (Im guessing 15+ stone) the three year old... well he was 3 months younger than my son, exactly the same height but was at least twice the size and weight of my boy.. All was revealed over dinner - boxing day so roast beef, potatoes, yorkshires etc...., within two minutes he'd picked a bit of potatoe and them tried to throw the rest on the floor - mum says ''ooh he's a fussy eater..'', and then proceeded to give him a pot noodle and half a family size bag of doritos, which he proceeded to eat with no problem at all... I was gobsmacked, my other half said I literally sat there with my chin on the floor for about quarter of an hour, even my littlun asked me why he had crisps for dinner (after finishing his own and not leaving a scrap).

Ok so we're an active family my little boy loves coming out on my bike with me and takes his balance bike anywhere that'll let him, and then spend the rest of the day chasing his younger sister round while shes on the trike, he loves swimming and indoor climbing, maybe we're the exception, but I would never in my darkest times give trash like that to a child as a main meal, and if I was my parents I would have been massivley offended to boot (which I think my dad was but was too polite to say anything) - and then on top of that they (mum and daughter) worked their way through at least 20 cigarettes in less than five hours...

They seemed to embrace unhealthy living in the same way I do active and healthy living... it was quite sad, andthe child had no real communication skills (just learnedto talk aged three) and interactive skills - just took toys off my two whilst they were playing with them, if that was my son I would be ashamed personally - he was larger than one ofthose kids in that maccy d's photo up there too...

Ive also worked on the calories in less than calories out principal and its worked for me for over 20 years - when I was boxing and had to make weight it always worked and never lost muscle as a result - Ive never heard ofthat before either and dont understand how you can 'work off' muscle - and I wouldnt take anythnig in mens health to support that as any proof either!


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 5:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ive also worked on the calories in less than calories out principal and its worked for me for over 20 years - when I was boxing and had to make weight it always worked and never lost muscle as a result

Yup, always worked for me too. My natural weight is 90kgs...always seem to hover around this, but when I need to drop weight for muay thai taking a tighter control of my calories for a few weeks mean I minimise the water weight I need to lose.

Maybe I'm being unfair, but I simply can't understand why people can't lose weight if they have no medical or psychological reason. All it takes is a little research and a bit of will power.


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 5:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

dont understand how you can 'work off' muscle

You're right you don't work off muscle; but if you go on a diet i.e. reduce calorie intake and fail to exercise your muscles e.g. by weight training, then the first thing your body will do is 'shrink' your muscles as your brain will think they not needed.

I take it when you were making a weight you still trained? probably lost fat?


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 5:51 pm
Posts: 640
Free Member
 

yep still trained like a loon, but tbh it was a bit extreme - having to measure out food every meal, making sure you ate at the right time, trained at the right time etc...

Always wanted to apply the same kind of thinking and training principals to xc racing, but as there's never been a headcase trying to take my head off my shoulders on the startline I was never as strict on myself!

McHamish totally agree with this:

[i]Maybe I'm being unfair, but I simply can't understand why people can't lose weight if they have no medical or psychological reason. All it takes is a little research and a bit of will power.[/i]

what people dont have is willpower, or want to do it badly enough, me included sometimes...


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 6:00 pm
 mmb
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ok then, after reading all this thread it would seem that most of us agree that the problem is down several factors, bad parenting, bad advertising, poor quality food, lack of excercise, poor skills in the kitchen etc. I have always thought being overweight however is not such a bad thing (within reason of course) if you get plenty of excercise to keep yourself reasonably fit eg, i weigh in at 18st and i am 5'9" tall i have a 48-50" chest depending on current weight and i cycle to work everyday, do night rides and weekend rides, i am now 41 years old and i feel that i am one of the healthier men in my age group ( i know i don't compare to most of you on this site tho) i am rarely ill, i almost never see my doctor or need hospital treatment and feel that my extra wieght is not doing me much harm, would you say that my wieght is an issue? am i a fat bastard who costs the nhs money thru my own self neglect? what are your opinions? be honest please! i'm pretty thick skinned so i won't take offence.


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 6:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

am i a fat bastard

That reminds me of one of my favourite Carter USM CDs, which starts:

You fat bastard
You fat bastard
You fat bastard...

Back to the question; dunno, I'm 45 years old, 5'9", 12.5 stone, 44" chest - does that make me a skinny bastard??


 
Posted : 07/01/2011 6:46 pm
Posts: 4789
Free Member
 

Its no coincidence that the tighter regulated food industry is the less obesity there is - compare us and the americans to the dutch or french

erm? French are getting fatter... well the dutch are just the dutch 'chocolatey sprinkles'..

not just regulation but also culture

ps chocolate sprinkles on everything is an ace idea!


 
Posted : 10/01/2011 10:45 am
Page 4 / 4