[Closed] F1 Grid Girls under review

Obvs a model is chosen for their appearance obviously a driver is chosen for their driving ability - and possibly ability to fund their drive/sponsorship.
Their looks are neither her nor there and anyway who thinks it is is either making a poor joke or has very poor understanding

No it's not (**** nuts). Even Suzy Wolff admits it.

As a racing driver, you're representing a brand and your appearance is part of your job

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/18332772

The article:

the hard hand of evolution plays at least as much of a role in sports interest and participation as policy does—and quite possibly a greater one. And that, like it or not, tips the balance in favor of males.

Me:

It doesn't change the fact that the motivation is different. Women just aren't interested in sport as much as men even when participation is largely equalised.

Junkyard:

It really does not say that and the link is there for anyone who can comprehend to read

Hey? It clearly does say that ???

The most backward looking people in this thread are those suggesting that women who've chosen modelling for a career are inferior to those who've chosen to drive a stupid car in circles.

This.

I'm chuckling that people who admit they have been conditioned by society to regard driving in F1 as being more 'exciting' than posing in a skimpy outfit, want to ban people from posing because brainwashing makes them regard posing as less meritorious than driving fast.

In a world riddled with gender bias do the posters on here that are against grid girls let their children watch films where the male is the hero and the woman is the damsel in distress, as portrayed in so many films? Genuine question.. There are many more examples.

Another question slightly unrelated .. Is the lack of females in top motor sports due to perception, or other reasons. Guys are bigger risk takers than girls afterall (in general).. Couple that with the fact that I imagine most racers are introduced to it fairly early by their dads and it's no surprise that the pool of female talent is so small.

There are many more examples.

Yes, there are 1,000's of examples - that is the scale of the issue!

Yet in the study above, when participation is equalised, it still doesn't lead to more women competing?

Is the lack of females in top motor sports due to perception, or other reasons.

Zero men go to SWMBO's "Stitch and Bitch" sewing/knitting nights. The S+Bers are concerned that men have been conditioning into liking Mountain Biking and think it should be banned to allow Men to enjoy a more valid pass-time like knitting.

Yes, there are 1,000's of examples - that is the scale of the issue!

Is it really an issue though? I know one girl who has been a grid girl.. She loved it. But she is also a university educated, extremely intelligent lady with a very successful career.

Let's not think that girls, regardless of age, are limited by what some people see as cultural bias. I'm going to go out on a limb and give them slightly more credit than that.

For what it's worth I sent her a link to this thread. She sent me back a set of rolling eyes as a response..

I don't believe having a girls toys section and a boys toy section is sexist. Telling a girl she couldn't have a boys toy is.

But that's exactly what segregated toy stores do! They make it clear that this is boys stuff, and it dissuaded girls from wanting it. It makes (some) girls feel that they are being weird or unusual by wanting boy marketed toys. And this is negative. As I say, kids take their cues growing up from all around them. The comments you hear from parents and grandparents constantly reinforce this. I never noticed it til I had girls.

For what it's worth I sent her a link to this thread. She sent me back a set of rolling eyes as a response..

Not all women are feminists. Think about what this means...

For what it's worth I sent her a link to this thread. She sent me back a set of rolling eyes as a response..

But that's exactly what segregated toy stores do! They make it clear that this is boys stuff, and it dissuaded girls from wanting it. It makes (some) girls feel that they are being weird or unusual by wanting boy marketed toys. And this is negative.

In a world riddled with gender bias do the posters on here that are against grid girls let their children watch films where the male is the hero and the woman is the damsel in distress, as portrayed in so many films?

Yes. But we censor the more egregiously sexist films and we go out of our way to find films with positive gender bias. And our kids are aware of sexism and feminism.

My daughter has often been told "but that's girls stuff" or "really? Not many girls like that" or had some other comment. It doesn't have to be a negative comment, even positive ones point out that it is abnormal behaviour and that is negative.

Do you really think that the profit driven toy trade would eliminate 50% of their potential market if they thought they could sell more plastic tat to the opposite sex!!??!!

Perhaps the answer is the market doesn't exist because the sexes ARE different!!

Just like clothes shops then?

Yes. Try finding superhero clothes for little girls that aren't pink or tokenistic.

Do you really think that the profit driven toy trade would eliminate 50% of their potential market if they thought they could sell more plastic tat to the opposite sex!!??!!

Segregation allows them to sell more crap. A boy doesn't want a girl bike hand me down, does he? Cos they've invented this boy/girl division. They've trained girls to want the pink crap version and the boy not to.

There might be differences between sexes (and you know, this has been studied a bit) but even if there you cannot assume that any given child will like this or that based on gender. Because even if there is a difference it is not 100% on either side.

Just like clothes shops then?

Yes. Try finding superhero clothes for little girls that aren't pink or tokenistic.

Like I asked before. Do you wear clothes for men? If so why do you expect other people to give up their ambitions and wants for the sake of setting an example to your kids whilst you don't?

[quote=crosshair ]As a racing driver, you're representing a brand and your appearance is part of your job
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/18332772
br />

appearance != looks - of course you're expected to look presentable rather than scruffy, but since you seem to be taking this "where are the ugly drivers" seriously, then I give you Alain Prost and Niki Lauda (just off the top of my head).

Though I'm curious whether you read the whole of that article, or just cherry picked. From further down:

One of the main issues is that young girls have no one to aspire to growing up, whereas a young boy can grow up wanting to be Sebastian Vettel

How do you think grid girls is helping this?

[quote=rene59 ]Do you wear clothes for men?

No - I'm currently wearing what I regularly see lots of women wearing.

It's giving the girls that want to be models something to aspire to. Removing them won't increase the number of female drivers!!!!

No - I'm currently wearing what I regularly see lots of women wearing.

My little girl likes dresses, pink stuff dolls and other girly stuff. My boys liked that too. Sophie also beats the crap out of the two boys, shoots them with nerf guns and likes to ride her bike. If she wanted to be a brolly dolly that's up to her just like if she wanted to race cars. As for getting rid of brolly dollies is somthing I don't agree with. I don't care if they are there or not but it's not our place to say they can't do it. Men and woman are, on the most part, in stringently different. Our genes take care of the most primal ways. Ive met loads of promo girls / brolly dollies when I used to do photography and they loved it.

No - I'm currently wearing what I regularly see lots of women wearing.

Blimey, do you lot not keep your eyes open? What is one of the most common clothing combos for women?

[img] [/img]

One of the main issues is that young girls have no one to aspire to growing up

Because you need to be famous or on tv to inspire someone. My sister was inspired to be a vet because of our local vet not because of all creatures great and small.

[quote=crosshair ]It's giving the girls that want to be models something to aspire to.

Ah, because there's a shortage of that sort of role model in society?

Removing them won't increase the number of female drivers!!!!

In the long term, considering the wider effects it might well do - that's the whole point. Do you need that explaining to you?

Yes. Try finding superhero clothes for little girls that aren't pink or tokenistic.

It's easy. For yonks my daughter's favorite dress up outfit was a spiderman outfit.

One of the main issues is that young girls have no one to aspire to growing up

That's got to be pretty false.

Beside, you can aspire to be people who aren't your gender - that's like saying a boy couldn't aspire to be PM because we currently have a female Prime Minister.

Or Marie Curie couldn't inspire a boy to get into physics.

As utter tosh as an utter tosh thing.

[quote=plyphon ]Beside, you can aspire to be people who aren't your gender - that's like saying a boy couldn't aspire to be PM because we currently have a female Prime Minister.
Or Marie Curie couldn't inspire a boy to get into physics.

Straw men are straw manny. Clearly there are plenty of role models for boys in politics and science (there's not obviously a problem with role models for women in politics at least either). The thing is kids and people in general do aspire rather more to be like people of the same gender as them - that is a basic fact - and the lack of same gender role models is an issue.

Though I have to admit I am quite impressed at a bloke suggesting a women is talking utter tosh on this issue 😆

One of the main issues is that young girls have no one to aspire to growing up that fit in with my own prejudices

Blimey, do you lot not keep your eyes open? What is one of the most common clothing combos for women?

Beside, you can aspire to be people who aren't your gender - that's like saying a boy couldn't aspire to be PM because we currently have a female Prime Minister.

Or Marie Curie couldn't inspire a boy to get into physics.

This. If celeb role-models are highly important which I strongly doubt - If role-models were so important wouldn't we all be rock-stars or Astronauts instead of Taxi Drivers, Middle Managers, IT workers, Teachers?

[quote=rene59 ]

One of the main issues is that young girls have no one to aspire to growing up that fit in with my own prejudices

FTF Susie

FTFY - another bloke telling a woman she's wrong about female role models in the industry said woman works in 😆

You picked a fairly tame example there.

Sorry, it just happens to be what I'm wearing. It is an example which punches holes in your argument though.

Because you wrote:

I would have a problem if someone said I couldn't wear hot pink nail varnish as that's for women.

My son likes nail varnish. He's stopped wearing it though because he gets told it's for girls. Similarly molgrips already pointed out:

My daughter has often been told "but that's girls stuff" or "really? Not many girls like that" or had some other comment. It doesn't have to be a negative comment, even positive ones point out that it is abnormal behaviour and that is negative.

- there is lots of reinforcement of gender stereotypes going on.

It is an example which punches holes in your argument though.

In the long term, considering the wider effects it might well do - that's the whole point. Do you need that explaining to you?

No because studies don't back that up. In the one above, even close to 50/50 participation dissent lead to any more women competing in or watching sport.

[quote=crosshair ]No because studies don't back that up.

cite

In the one above, even close to 50/50 participation dissent lead to any more women competing in or watching sport.

I must have missed the section where they discussed the effects of gender stereotyping in society - what page was that on?

But that's rendered irrelevant. In your make believe world where literal equality prevails- the best you could ever hope for is 50/50 participation right?

And the study shows that even then, more women aren't driven to compete. The innate imperative to do pointless things better than other people isn't as strong.

One of the main issues is that young girls have no one to aspire to growing up

This is blatantly untrue. Roll out the 'straw man argument' all you like, but there are many role models for girls in all walks of life.

Removing grid girls would have absolutely bugger all impact on what girls grow up thinking they can and can't do. It would not remove the barriers to them becoming f 1 drivers. it would however remove the opportunity for them to do something that they could quite possibly have a realistic chance to do, make decent money out of, and have a great time doing to boot.

I have no problem with people thinking it's tacky or unnecessary. but that's no reason for getting rid of it.

Yes. But we censor the more egregiously sexist films and we go out of our way to find films with positive gender bias. And our kids are aware of sexism and feminism

Would you let them watch an Indiana Jones movie? Imo the narrative of those films is just as gender biased as an f1 race. Perhaps we should ban those as well.

This same shit got rolled out on the podium girls thread.

Lots of judgement about what is "worthy" employment without asking the people doing the job.

Would I object to my currently 3 year old daughter wanting to be a grid girl/monster girl? Nope. I've always taught her she can do what she wants. If it makes her happy, fair play.

This is blatantly untrue. Roll out the 'straw man argument' all you like, but there are many role models for girls in all walks of life.

No using google

Same with men

Removing grid girls would have absolutely bugger all impact on what girls grow up thinking they can and can't do

If I want to remove a wall I need to take out every brick, One brick wont make any difference till that one brick makes the wall collapse

I would wear skirts and dresses if they made them for men's bodies, and they were accepted by society. They fact they aren't is another example of gender segregation isn't it? What's your point?

My wife rarely wears them though, so that confuses the issue even more.

The problem we had was finding underwear she liked. Boys underwear is differently cut.

Would you let them watch an Indiana Jones movie? Imo the narrative of those films is just as gender biased as an f1 race. Perhaps we should ban those as well.

I don't think you really understand. Yes, many movies are sexist, because society was much more sexist. But movies can still be good stories. IJ was made a long time ago, and we will point out the sexism and the historical gender based roles when we watch. We'll also watch The Force Awakens which directly addresses and parodies films like IJ, and we'll point that out too.

However, F1 is being made right now, and it's real life. And the girls serve no purpose other than eye candy.

Removing grid girls would have absolutely bugger all impact on what girls grow up thinking they can and can't do. It would not remove the barriers to them becoming f 1 drivers.

No, but it's a step down the road towards erasing society's gender bias. My wife would've made a great engineer. But she was brought up in a family that were still passively embedded in traditional gender roles without realising it, and even at the same time as overtly trying to promote equality. They didn't stop her from studying engineering, but she never asked to. And she never asked because she just couldn't see herself doing it.

The way you perceive yourself is a massive issue. That's why people keep talking about positive role models for women or ethnic minorities. When you are surrounded by men doing something, or white people doing something, you just assume that's the way the world is because why wouldn't you when that's all you see?

We do watch Indiana Jones etc, but we make damn sure we also watch The Force Awakens and anything else we can find with proper non-token female characters. And not ones where the women succeed by becoming like the men, which is another failing of many flims.

Equality doesn't mean buggering about with the odds. It means letting things happen naturally. You telling me what to think isn't equal or fair. None of us have a right to judge anothers view point.
Or put it another way, if you are right, so am I!
If you object to the girls, don't support their employment by watching the racing. Show some moral strength rather than ranting and doing nothing.

If you object to the girls, don't support their employment by watching the racing. Show some moral strength rather than ranting and doing nothing.

I don't watch it. But I know it's there and lots of people do watch it, which is why it's a problem.

I also watch women's sport, and encourage my kids to watch it too.

Equality doesn't mean buggering about with the odds. It means letting things happen naturally.

Unfortunately, because we have had millennia of sexism, we need to force the issue so that things can start to happen naturally. Prejudice needs to be actively erased otherwise it'll persist.

Junkyard- read the study.
Even when 50/50 participation at grass roots level was achieved, no more women were inspired to compete!
So to compare that to F1, even if the numbers of girls and boys doing karting was 50/50, there's no evidence that this would lead to any more women aspiring to be professional drivers.

To cherry pick Susie Wolff again:

I'm not like other females,"

That's not a wall that needs to be dismantled, it's a biological fact.

Even when 50/50 participation at grass roots level was achieved, no more women were inspired to compete!

Yes - so as girls grow up they feel like the sport's not for them. Why is this? Maybe it's because society conditions them this way?

But do you not think you're conditioning your kids to look down on a job/person, because in your opinion it shouldn't exist?

We were brought up to believe we could do what we wanted, and whatever path that was, we should aim to be the best we can at it. Whether that's sales, science, a binman or whatever. Be the best at the thing you choose to do and are good at.

If a girl or guy's blessed with good looks and the right personality to make it in pr/grid/modelling work then why should parts of society tell them they shouldn't?

Men and women are not intrinsically motivated in the same ways.

See the problem in this sentence?

You said 'Men are this' and 'Women are that'.

So maybe 80% of women aren't motivated to compete. Fine, whatever, that's up to you. But the other 20% shouldn't be dissuaded because of that. THIS is the problem. And this cuts both ways - for every gifted woman footballer who ends up giving up on her dreams there's a male builder who always wanted to be a florist but felt the banter of his mates cut a little too deeply.

Gender equality is not the only thing that suffers with social pressure. Look at homosexuality.

We were brought up to believe we could do what we wanted, and whatever path that was, we should aim to be the best we can at it. Whether that's sales, science, a binman or whatever. Be the best at the thing you choose to do and are good at.

Right, but what you are told and what you see all around you are two different things. This is the key point. There's no point saying you can be whatever you want, when you're conditioned not to want it.

I notice it's the men giving this argument of 'we can do whatever we want'. Maybe it's the men who feel they can more than the women? Why did my wife never realise she would be a good engineer? She never identified with that kind of career.

But do you not think you're conditioning your kids to look down on a job/person, because in your opinion it shouldn't exist?

No. People can model, people can be porn stars, whatever. You should be empowered to do what you want to do. But the F1 organisers shouldn't hire women to be totty.

Formula One is a joke, a circus; it seems so distant, so far removed from real life that it's odd that this has even come up.

I think if the discussion was about a proper sport that normal people do then the question would hold some merit.

But it's men being paid millions to drive a car worth millions round a track that cost millions in some exotic location that none of us will ever see. It's a fantasy world. Looking to Formula One for morality is bizarre.

Would I object to my currently 3 year old daughter wanting to be a grid girl/monster girl? Nope. I've always taught her she can do what she wants. If it makes her happy, fair play.

That's my view. I don't see it as being any different to being a dancer or a jobbing actor getting one gig a year working in Panto. By which I mean if you to work in entertainment/performing arts you have to take whatever vaguely 'theatrical' work is available, and for 99.9pc of people in the industry that isn't going to be Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing. (I saw two ballerinas today busking.)

I'd have thought being a podium girl is more rewarding and better paid than many jobs.

The transaction is different with acting or dancing or even porn. In a strip club, you pay to go in and see strippers. They take your money in exchange for something, a skilled performance that you've specifically gone in for.

In F1, it's about racing, but they've adorned it with girls to titillate the men who are watching it. The women aren't the focus of the transaction, they're just there to sweeten it. The women are peripheral to the men.

The problem isn't the girls who are doing it, it's the organisers who have defined the job.

Yes - so as girls grow up they feel like the sport's not for them. Why is this? Maybe it's because society conditions them this way?

My personal opinion, not backed up by anything I've read, is that puberty kicks in and their imperatives change. It's not an evolutionary sound strategy for women to risk their limited stash of eggs in an ego fuelled peacock display.

Ok - so the women don't like to compete thing.

Why are there so many women in athletics or tennis? Running clubs seem to have plenty of women in them from what I can tell. But cycling clubs - not so much. If what you were saying were true it would be the case across the board. But it seems to me that more young women are more likely to be able to see themselves doing a sport that already has lots of women doing it. And the clubs and events therefore also have a decent gender balance and that makes it more likely that more women will continue to join. How many times have you read women on this forum saying they're put off by the male domination?

How many times have you said 'yeah, I can see myself doing that' ? You make decisions based on how you view yourself.

I would wear skirts and dresses if they made them for men's bodies, and they were accepted by society. They fact they aren't is another example of gender segregation isn't it? What's your point?

No, but it's a step down the road towards erasing society's gender bias. My wife would've made a great engineer. But she was brought up in a family that were still passively embedded in traditional gender roles without realising it, and even at the same time as overtly trying to promote equality. They didn't stop her from studying engineering, but she never asked to. And she never asked because she just couldn't see herself doing it.

Name all the famous female drivers who are role models for them then

You have no way of knowing this and if we want equality we need to remove all the barriers.

If I want to remove a wall I need to take out every brick, One brick wont make any difference till that one brick makes the wall collapse

Yes - so as girls grow up they feel like the sport's not for them. Why is this? Maybe it's because society conditions them this way?

Maybe women are immune to the conditioning and men are not in which case women have been right all along. Maybe it's better to do less sport, to wear a bit of makeup and to pose on podiums and the conditioning of men is preventing us from realizing that?

Seems a bit mental for a man to tell women: "You're being conditioned, and so am I. But my conditioning is the right conditioning and your's is the wrong conditioning because it makes you like stuff my conditioning makes me find boring so I want to ban one of the things you like doing."

Most women do sport so they don't get fat. It's a means to an end. Perhaps they want to become podium girls? Who knows....

See the problem in this sentence?

You said 'Men are this' and 'Women are that'.

I don't know what you are referring to? I don't say that in your quote?

So maybe 80% of women aren't motivated to compete. Fine, whatever, that's up to you. But the other 20% shouldn't be dissuaded because of that. THIS is the problem

I don't believe they are! The reason it's not 80/20 male/female by the time they get to F1 is summed up by Susie Wolff again:

"Some people get the impression it's only hard for women to get into F1, but there are thousands of very talented male racers out there trying to get in and never do," Williams development driver Susie Wolff tells BBC Sport.

She's right. Even if you are talented, there are still only 24 seats on the grid and only a handful of those - if any - become vacant each year.

In a sport requiring very masculine skill set- mainly an ignorant blind eye to mortal danger, it's inevitable that women aren't going to be as prevalent.

Deny the human condition all you like, knock down all the perceived barriers you like and nothing will change! Nature innit.

For society to deem it acceptable someone has to start. Why not you?

I'm not brave enough.

Oh that's right, it's easier to pick on someone else minding their own business doing something they love.

I AM NOT CRITICISING THE GIRLS. Would you like it repeated a few more times?

Seems a bit mental for a man to tell women: "You're being conditioned, and so am I. But my conditioning is the right conditioning and your's is the wrong conditioning because it makes you like stuff my conditioning makes me find boring so I want to ban one of the things you like doing."

What does this even mean? I don't think my point is coming across still.

I'm telling you (men) that there is a problem with gender conditioning. Now I didn't just make this up. There's actually quite a lot of writing been done on this subject by women. Did you know that?

Should we stop women from being cleaners?

You've utterly failed to grasp the idea here - or you are wilfully ignoring it so you don't have to criticise yourself. No, we shouldn't discourage women from being cleaners. We should however encourage men not to view women as cleaners or other subordinate jobs.

[quote=crosshair ]Junkyard- read the study.
Even when 50/50 participation at grass roots level was achieved, no more women were inspired to compete!
So to compare that to F1, even if the numbers of girls and boys doing karting was 50/50, there's no evidence that this would lead to any more women aspiring to be professional drivers.

All that study says is that men are naturally more predisposed to take part in sport than women [b]on average[/b] - not only does it not say what you're claiming, you're extrapolating wildly to suggest that for the smaller percentage of women who are inspired by sport the lack of female role models in motor sport makes no difference to them. You have zero evidence for that, and that report certainly doesn't provide it.

Still finding it hilarious that blokes on here think they know better than Susie Wolff about women's motivations in motorsport - and that you all seem to think arguing this point reinforces your arguments.

Deny the human condition all you like, knock down all the perceived barriers you like and nothing will change! Nature innit.

This isn't really about the numbers of women F1 drivers.

If women really do make worse racing drivers then where's the women's F1 series? That's what they do in other sports where women are clearly slower/weaker.

I don't know what you are referring to? I don't say that in your quote?

You justified your argument for sexism with a generalisation. Trying to make the same point as aracer, which is that even if 80% of women don't want to compete at sport, the other 20% shouldn't lose out.

[quote=crosshair ]I don't believe they are!

Yes, we've already gathered that - but Susie does. I wonder who might be in the best position to provide a judgement on this.

No, nothing else Susie says contradicts that point - nobody is suggesting that the natural result is a grid half of which are women, however the number of women who have competed in history is still lower than would be expected given relative natural dispositions. Given significant inherent sexism in society it would be remarkable if that hasn't had an effect - to deny that is to deny reality.

My personal opinion, not backed up by anything I've read, is that puberty kicks in and their imperatives change. It's not an evolutionary sound strategy for women to risk their limited stash of eggs in an ego fuelled peacock display.

Something like that. Since having kids I've really seen how typically female traits that annoy the hell out of many blokes are actually really useful in child-rearing.

Ok - so the women don't like to compete thing.
Why are there so many women in athletics or tennis? Running clubs seem to have plenty of women in them from what I can tell. But cycling clubs - not so much.

Maybe ask a woman that? Personally, I think women are less keen on mechanical stuff. Happy to compete on horses or running, but less so on a bike or a car.

[quote=rene59 ]Should we stop women from being cleaners?

Your strawman is strawmanny. If cleaners wore skimpy outfits and their appearance was important to their job then you might have a point. I also note that men are cleaners too (I did it for a bit to earn some cash as a teenager) - you're the one suggesting it's a women's thing!

The fact that there are not a lot of high profile female drivers suggests that they aren't good enough or motivated enough to compete at the highest level.

In your opinion, because it wouldn't suit your argument to admit there might be other factors.

As long as you get your way.

Hi pot.

Ok - so the women don't like to compete thing.

Why are there so many women in athletics or tennis? Running clubs seem to have plenty of women in them from what I can tell. But cycling clubs - not so much. If what you were saying were true it would be the case across the board. But it seems to me that more young women are more likely to be able to see themselves doing a sport that already has lots of women doing it. And the clubs and events therefore also have a decent gender balance and that makes it more likely that more women will continue to join. How many times have you read women on this forum saying they're put off by the male domination?

How many times have you said 'yeah, I can see myself doing that' ? You make decisions based on how you view yourself.

Because the things you list initially are very much less dangerous! It's simple risk/reward. Men do stupid, pointless, dangerous stuff because as long as their cock still works after the life threatening injury, it's worth the risk of death to attract a mate!
Cycling is borderline because it's possible to participate and compete in a fairly low risk fashion. The danger isn't always inherent.
I contest that the more risk involved, the lower the percentage of women participants there will ever be.

I AM NOT CRITICISING THE GIRLS. Would you like it repeated a few more times?

We should however encourage men not to view women as cleaners or other subordinate jobs.

[quote=rene59 ]You don't think people are capable of working out that because some women like doing so doesn't mean that all women do or that they can't do anything else?

I'm not sure how many times it has to be pointed out - the ability to intellectualise it like that doesn't stop it being casual sexism and part of an overall pervasive attitude in society.

Just saying hello.... ?

Men do stupid, pointless, dangerous stuff because as long as their cock still works after the life threatening injury, it's worth the risk of death to attract a mate!

Instead you've just removed an opportunity for those who like to stand and look pretty and those who like to look at them standing looking pretty which were harmless enough.

[quote=crosshair ]I contest that the more risk involved, the lower the percentage of women participants there will ever be.

This could be interesting:

skiing
rock climbing

Horse riding is an interesting one actually because it is incredibly dangerous yet it encourages so many women to seemingly contradict my argument about evolutionary imperatives.

However, I think it comes back to intrinsic/extrinsic motivation. A bit like how saving the country in WW2 was an extrinsic imperative that inspired women to take on careers not traditionally carried out by women.
Well, horse riding fits that mould too. The women I know who compete their horses by and large do so with a strong desire to see their horse do well! It's only the small percentage of outliers again that are ruthlessly intrinsically motivated to win for themselves at all costs.
Basically, their love for their steed tricks their body into thinking the mate has been found or something like that so the risks they take are more like a kind of maternal sacrifice than a guts or glory male escapade.

This could be interesting:

skiing
rock climbing

Cite figures for [b]professional competition[/b] please 🙂

Its not harmless though for the reason stated many many times on this thread

No shit what I say is my opinion just like when you say " harmless enough" its your opinion

Stating this adds nothing.

You were suggesting lack of participation, not lack of people competing. If it's danger which is the issue it should stop participation, not competition - it's no more dangerous to compete (arguably for rock climbing competing is a lot safer).

Do your own research, but for rock climbing I'd expect the numbers of women competing to be quite high relative to other sports anyway.

[quote=rene59 ]In your opinion.

So explain why that opinion is wrong (preferably by actually addressing the reasons given rather than avoiding them).

Because I don't believe women in general are that weak they look at grid girls and think to themselves that because they are the only women they see, that is all they are good for.

That's not addressing the reasons given, that's deflecting the argument onto the ground you want to argue from, try again.

You try again.

Basically, their love for their steed tricks their body into thinking the mate has been found or something like that so the risks they take are more like a kind of maternal sacrifice than a guts or glory male escapade.

[quote=rene59 ]You try again.

😆 - you do enjoy deflecting - just to remind you, the challenge for you was to explain why the reasons given for it not being harmless are wrong. Probably best to start by reading what other people are saying to work out [b]exactly[/b] why they think it isn't harmless. Half points if you can successfully state why other people think it isn't harmless.

Junkyard - I don't think it's outlandish, just Darwinism 101 no?

From a Darwinian perspective, sports may be seen as one of the cultural activities invented to promote the acquisition of status. And acquiring status is—on average, in the long run, and in the ancestral environment to which our species is adapted—beneficial to an individual’s reproductive success. That is not to say that gaining status is our (only) conscious or unconscious motive for participating in a game. Many players and observers are primarily interested in the fun of the game. The claim that sports result from [evolutionary processes] means only that sports (like many other games and cultural practices) establish a reliable prestige hierarchy loosely based on (Darwinian) fitness, and that this function is the ultimate cause of sports.

From this article:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/bering-in-mind/if-darwin-were-a-sports-psychologist-evolution-and-athletics/

If you think I'm going back to read all this pish again then you really don't know me! 🙂

Men do stupid, pointless, dangerous stuff because as long as their cock still works after the life threatening injury, it's worth the risk of death to attract a mate!

Umm.. I don't. But the point AGAIN - even if that gender stereotypes were true on average, it should not end up discouraging those who do not fit the stereotype.

Societal norms pervade society still. Why does no-one have to come out as straight? Why do people remain in the closet?

Anyway. Why are there also fewer women in snooker, which isn't at all dangerous?

You just want to close down the opportunity they have to do what they love because you happen to dislike it.

The thought that the removal of 24 jobs is going to make an impact in the glamour industry is ridiculous. And I dislike sexism - not pretty girls. I rather like pretty girls.