Forum search & shortcuts

F1 2021 - spoilers ...
 

[Closed] F1 2021 - spoilers here

Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

This is the whole problem right there. Masi missed the opportunity to call a red flag with 5 laps left to go.

Absolutely. Although I think as it stands the decision whether to use VSC, SC or red flag is purely safety based, so under the current regs I don’t think he should be allowed to throw a red flag purely to create a better finish. However, if the regs were changed as lawman suggests, so that everyone knows that any incident near the end will always be a red flag, that would be a different matter.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 10:44 am
Posts: 3000
Full Member
 

You would run the risk of the race running out of time, maybe? If there had been earlier red flags for rain or accidents....can't recall whether red flags stop the "race clock"


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 10:48 am
Posts: 1505
Full Member
 

Does that then create the risk of teammates of say Max in the last race scenario 'accidently' hitting the wall so that a gap can be closed under a red flag and present an opportunity to win though?


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 10:49 am
Posts: 10546
Full Member
 

I'd say, if a crash happens within 5 or 10 laps of the finish, Red flag it then release all driver from the pit lane in race order and at the correct time intervals prior to red flag.

Every one back out on track as if nothing happened, just all probably on super softs.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 11:03 am
Posts: 12392
Full Member
 

Does that then create the risk of teammates of say Max in the last race scenario ‘accidently’ hitting the wall so that a gap can be closed under a red flag and present an opportunity to win though?

Nobody would be dishonest enough to pull a stunt like that, surely.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 11:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not again anyway.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 11:08 am
Posts: 43970
Full Member
 

Well, thank God that year’s over and the shambles in Abu Dhabi is all forgotten about.

😂😂😂😂😂


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 11:13 am
 Bez
Posts: 7443
Full Member
 

Any decent lawyer sees that “any” there and calls it out for the ambiguity that it clearly is.

I’d just replace “any” with “some but not necessarily all” across the entire document and ask the FIA whether they were still happy with their regs, or whether they’d prefer “any” to be interpreted a little less creatively.

Anyone can see that it’s entirely unambiguous. And if you disagree with that statement as written then you’ve shot down your own argument.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 2:44 pm
Posts: 6859
Free Member
 

Anyone can see that it’s entirely unambiguous. And if you disagree with that then you’ve contradicted your own argument.

Anyone. Any... one. So you mean some, but not all people?


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 2:56 pm
 Bez
Posts: 7443
Full Member
 

Well, it’s up to you to interpret it; the point is merely that anyone who sides with Red Bull’s interpretation of “any” isn’t free to disagree with it 🙂

Anyway… looks like Aston Martin haven’t retained any of their staff this year:
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.aston-martin-announce-departure-of-team-principal-otmar-szafnauer.7orq4yhy6bKbh4hEgAb36v.html

😉


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 3:30 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
 

If they wanted the race to end without a safety car then they could have pulled the safety car in with all the lapped cars still in place. But, that way Verstappen wouldn't have won, so clearly no point in doing that


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 5:58 pm
Posts: 9108
Free Member
 

But, that way Verstappen wouldn’t have won, so clearly no point in doing that

Depends what you think the objective was.
I still think they were trying to engineer an exciting close final lap battle and add drama right at the end, rather than contrive a win for MV, that just happened as a result of what they were trying to do.
I still don't think what happened was right, but I'm of the opinion that it was done for the show, rather than for MV per se.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 6:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I still don’t think what happened was right, but I’m of the opinion that it was done for the show, rather than for MV per se.

I really want to believe that but I’m struggling. It was very very obvious Lewis would have been a sitting duck with Max on new tyres - there was only ever going to be one outcome from the decisions they made and if they didn’t see it coming they really shouldn’t be in charge just as much as if they had engineered it for Max to win on purpose.

I’ve been watching F1 for 40 years and I’m struggling with wanting to watch it ever again because of what happened. It despicable. The only reason I have now to watch it is to hopefully see MV being royally thrashed by Lewis preferably, but George Russell can do it as well. I just really want Lewis to get his 8 titles.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 6:49 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
 

The rules weren't so much as bent as thrown entirely in the bin to engineer a situation where only Max could reasonably win, it's pretty clear what they were up to tbh


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 7:04 pm
Posts: 10637
Full Member
 

Masi isn't a media genius, he wouldn't have been thinking about the news, the media, a new champion, more fans, etc, etc, he probably was just thinking about what RB said to him, "one lap of racing" ...he's a racer, that would've almost certainly gotten through and that's what he did. Not to gift MV the championship, but to give MORE racing and let the title be decided on the track. The trouble is, it needed more thought, he needed to consider the time required to do it properly, the effect his delay had caused to Mercedes in that they now couldn't pit, etc, but he didn't do any of that, it was too late...he made his decision for "one racing lap". And Redbull got everything they wanted. A very easy win at a race where even 3 laps from the end, it looked like they'd lost the championship.

I don't think it was planned, it was just a massive, heartfelt reaction to the situation in which he (Masi) then did everything to get "one racing lap". Redbull won because of that extremely well phrased and delivered message.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 7:04 pm
Posts: 14134
Full Member
 

We should probably close this thread!! Time to move on! 🤣🤣🏎💨💨


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 7:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Re: this any/all/some ambiguity....

The FIA is a French organization. Does anyone know whether the regs are drafted in French? And if so, is the ambiguity still there in its original language?

Or are we getting our knickers in a twist over a poor translation?


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 7:17 pm
 Bez
Posts: 7443
Full Member
 

We should probably close this thread!! Time to move on!

We should at least have a sin bin for anyone who brings it up again once the 2022 thread starts 😀

Or are we getting our knickers in a twist over a poor translation?

I believe translations are available but the English version is explicitly deemed to be the definitive one.


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 8:00 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
 

We should probably close this thread!! Time to move on! 🤣🤣🏎💨💨

If we closed this thread I'm pretty sure the bitterness will spill over to the 2022 one, so maybe better if it's contained in here lol


 
Posted : 05/01/2022 11:37 pm
Posts: 12392
Full Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Genius!


 
Posted : 06/01/2022 9:29 am
Posts: 3008
Full Member
 

Brilliant 🤣


 
Posted : 06/01/2022 10:02 am
Posts: 12392
Full Member
 

My God, people are still arguing about Abu Dhabi.

https://twitter.com/SpannersReady/status/1480470634564141059


 
Posted : 10/01/2022 2:26 pm
 Bez
Posts: 7443
Full Member
 

Mehhhhhhhh

I’ve started on the cheese and biscuits


 
Posted : 10/01/2022 2:34 pm
Posts: 10967
Full Member
 

I wondered if Masi had a sideline managing immigration rules for the Australian open...


 
Posted : 10/01/2022 2:56 pm
Posts: 14134
Full Member
 

Hobnobs for me! 🙂


 
Posted : 10/01/2022 2:57 pm
Page 119 / 119