Forum menu
F1 2019 (spoilers o...
 

[Closed] F1 2019 (spoilers obviously)

Posts: 7136
Full Member
 

He wasn't far off last time tbf


 
Posted : 20/05/2019 3:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

IMHO he'll be in at 1 race, the Monaco GP in a McLaren in 2019.....what else is he going to do - even if he leaves McLaren that leaves him mid season with nothing to do.


 
Posted : 20/05/2019 4:12 pm
 DM52
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Something fairly serious must happen in the next 3 days if he was going to drive Monaco!

I really hope he gets a full Indycar season next year with McLaren next year, he has no other racing commitments after the WEC super season concludes at Le Mans and he only needs a few points to wrap up the championship there.


 
Posted : 20/05/2019 6:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bob Fernley parts company with Mclaren. Salutary lesson in making sure your gear shifters are compatible when you order stuff online:

https://www.bbc.com/sport/motorsport/48341341


 
Posted : 21/05/2019 1:34 am
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

RIP Niki Lauder.  One of the sports legends gone, sad times.


 
Posted : 21/05/2019 6:37 am
Posts: 9205
Full Member
 

Sorry to see him go, proper character and what a man. 🙁


 
Posted : 21/05/2019 8:00 am
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

hols2

Member

Bob Fernley parts company with Mclaren. Salutary lesson in making sure your gear shifters are compatible when you order stuff online:
> https://www.bbc.com/sport/motorsport/48341341

Amazing. Wonder why they wanted to make their own wheel in the first place? Arrogance or?


 
Posted : 22/05/2019 10:16 am
Posts: 13282
Free Member
 

$50k - $100k each and they've made them before. So why not?


 
Posted : 22/05/2019 10:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Amazing. Wonder why they wanted to make their own wheel in the first place? Arrogance or?

My assumption is that they're just used to making everything in-house, so basically just arrogance. I'm sure that you'd want to do your own stuff once you were established so that you could wring every last millisecond out of the car, but buying stuff in when you're starting from scratch is just commonsense, surely.


 
Posted : 22/05/2019 10:48 am
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

eddiebaby

Subscriber

$50k – $100k each and they’ve made them before. So why not?

Well because there's already an off the shelf solution that's known to work and used by a lot of other teams, and also because being a new team, you might experience delays, run out of time to get your steering wheel working, order one last minute from Cosworth only to find out that the wrong one was ordered leaving you with no gear shifters. 🤦‍♂️

My assumption is that they’re just used to making everything in-house, so basically just arrogance. I’m sure that you’d want to do your own stuff once you were established so that you could wring every last millisecond out of the car, but buying stuff in when you’re starting from scratch is just commonsense, surely.

Exactly!


 
Posted : 22/05/2019 10:57 am
 Bez
Posts: 7441
Full Member
 

Oh, man. I'd have paid the $50-100k just to be a fly on the wall when they opened the parcel from Cosworth.


 
Posted : 22/05/2019 1:15 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Ah...the McLaren Indy debacle that serves to prove that McLaren's hitherto weakness for gross incompetence hasn't entirely been forgotten, but seemingly grasps to Fernando's coattails like shit to a blanket.

Perhaps the first question that I'd ask is why would the Indy campaign be headed by proven F1 maestro Bob Fernley, while the F1 campaign is co-managed by Indy maestro Gil De Ferran? It's easy to point towards isolated incidents like the steering wheel, but this leads me to suspect that the relationship between McLaren and Cosworth was dysfunctional, I can't believe that Cosworth didn't ask "what about the gear levers?".

Something is clearly very wrong with the Indy management structure, either Fernley was unaware of fundamental problems like the spare car being at the paintshop and not at the circuit, or he was unable to ensure that such problems were addressed. We've seen this before at McLaren and are seeing it now at Williams; poor communications across departments lead to fundamental and insurmountable problems.

Credit to Fernando though - he declined the offer of having a seat further up the grid bought for him, which would have been an affront to sportsmanship.


 
Posted : 22/05/2019 1:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We’ve seen this before at McLaren and are seeing it now at Williams

You forgot to add Sick Bikes to the list.


 
Posted : 22/05/2019 1:55 pm
Posts: 13282
Free Member
 

Blimey Mercedes! Let’s hope Max can keep them honest...


 
Posted : 23/05/2019 5:17 pm
Posts: 17852
Full Member
 

I saw an article that said it looked like Mercedes had improved this year on one of their main weaknesses; low-speed corners, so would probably be quick at Monaco where they have traditionally struggled.


 
Posted : 23/05/2019 5:37 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

in some snippet of an autosport utube video there was the suggestion that the red bull high rake may not work as well with the new aero rules


 
Posted : 23/05/2019 9:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"with the new aero rules"
proposed new aero rules - dont think its been signed up to yet...


 
Posted : 24/05/2019 8:50 am
Posts: 731
Free Member
 

On the subject of the speed Merc have found at Monaco, Maximum Verstappen said in Spain that Red Bull were no quicker than them anywhere in Spain. Fast and medium speed corners Merc were faster as usual, but in the tight Monacoesque final sector where Red Bull have traditionally been faster, the were pretty equal. With the proper Monaco setup Merc have found something else.

It might be closer in qualifying if we're lucky. Merc have just refined their car year after year, smoothing off all the rough edges (not without some errors along the way of course). Ferrari seem to have gone the wrong way this year and are getting left behind, Red Bull, maybe lacking Newey's undivided attention and having to adapt to a new engine, just aren't really there.

We need a wet race or 10. It's a silly sport really, and it's always had dominant teams, but it really could do with being a lot closer.


 
Posted : 24/05/2019 9:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the red bull high rake may not work as well with the new aero rules

This was posted earlier, but Merc are the only team that haven't just been following Red Bull's aero philosophy for quite a few years.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/47838557

They're also the only team to have won championships for quite a few years. The Mercs have generally been very fast, but difficult to set up, especially regarding tyre management. However, Merc put a lot of effort into understanding the tyres and seemed to have sorted it out last year. The tyres were changed this year, with a thinner tread, so that's apparently caused problems for Ferrari.

However, Ferrari's tyre problems may also be related to aero - they designed a lower drag setup than Merc, but that seems to have limited their options on balancing the front and rear downforce to address the tyre problems.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/47527705


 
Posted : 24/05/2019 2:05 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

proposed new aero rules – dont think its been signed up to yet…

my mistake, I ment this....

A simplified front wing with standardised endplates, tweaked dimensions and no upper flaps. This will encourage aerodynamicists to direct more of the flow to the underbody (where it is less sensitive to the disturbed wake of the car in front) than the outer body

The deletion of the upper flaps at the outer ends of the wing will make it impossible to create the vortices that are generated by the current, highly complex endplates to enhance the outer-body aerodynamics. This will further encourage the so-called ‘inwash’ aero philosophy of directing airflow to the underbody, rather than the current emphasis on ‘outwash,’ which is highly sensitive to the air from the car ahead and therefore makes it harder for cars to follow one another closely

Tweaks to the front wing’s dimensions and the limiting of under-wing strakes to two each side to further discourage outwash aerodynamics

Winglets mounted on the brake ducts currently play a part in directing the flow to the outer part of the body. These are banned from 2019, as are blown axles, which currently use air directed out of the centre of the wheel at high speed to energise the flow down the outer surfaces of the bodywork further back

Barge boards are lowered by 150mm (to make them less powerful in directing the airflow) and moved forwards by 100mm to make them less sensitive to the airflow being disturbed from the car in front

The rear wing endplates will no longer be permitted to have horizontal gills. These equalize the pressure between the inner and outer faces of the endplate to give a faster flow over the top of the wing for more downforce, but they introduce an extra disturbance to the wake, which worsens the performance of the car behind

The DRS opening will be increased from 65mm to 85mm. Together with an increase in width and height of the wing, this will make the DRS around 25-30% more powerful so as to allow it to be effective on those circuits with too short a straight for the current system. The FIA will also review the length of DRS zones at every circuit in order to maximise the effect of the changes

The increased height of the wing will take the 'rooster tail' wake coming off the back of it higher into the air than currently. More of the energy from that wake will be diffused into the free air around it before it returns to the level where it will be affecting the following car

which are obviously not new rules


 
Posted : 24/05/2019 2:30 pm
Posts: 13811
Full Member
 

https://twitter.com/SkySportsF1/status/1131900150673055744

looks more fun than F1


 
Posted : 24/05/2019 4:40 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

oops finger boy sticks it in the barriers


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 12:26 pm
Posts: 20666
Full Member
 

oops finger boy sticks it in the barriers

Damn, I missed that!
Monaco is normally only worth watching for the crashes, it's often one of the dullest races on the calendar.

Edit: just seen it on Twitter. Still dull.
Wonder if they have time to fix it before qualifying...?


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 1:39 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

another fiasco at team vettel


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 3:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's like they're doing it on purpose!


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 3:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Finger boy bottles it again.

Excellent.


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 4:01 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

mr pole strikes again.


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 4:04 pm
Posts: 7136
Full Member
 

Finger boy bottles it again.

Being 1 place lower than possible is bottling it these days? I would rather he was able to give Mercedes a run for their money.


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 4:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stuffing it into the barrier in FP3, nearly going out in Q1 and hitting the barrier in Q3 I’d say is bottling it.

I’d rather Ferrari be taking it to Merc but Vettel cracked under pressure as usual. Just a shame LeClerc went out in Q1.


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 5:20 pm
Posts: 20666
Full Member
 

I’d rather Ferrari be taking it to Merc but Vettel cracked under pressure as usual. Just a shame LeClerc went out in Q1.

LeClerc to come through the field from 16th and take out Vettel.
Hamilton and Bottas to cruise off into the distance for another 1-2.


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 6:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I hope someone can keep Merc honest come the race but I can’t see it.

Ironically, wasn’t it Vettel that bumped LeClerc into the bottom 5 in Q3? What stopped LeClerc getting out again?


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 6:30 pm
Posts: 13811
Full Member
 

Im guessing Ferrari thought they'd done enough for LeClerc to get though.


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 6:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They miscalculated and thought his lap was enough apparently.

Was watching it on the sky app on a tablet that is scabbed off the inlaws account (to tight to pay for it myself) and an ad break came on during the last few minutes (thought it was strange) then after the ads the football was on?! So I missed Hamilton's lap and switched back over just in time to see him getting out the car


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 6:49 pm
Posts: 18032
Full Member
 

Well the race might be a procession but you have to admit watching an F1 car round Monaco is pretty exciting.


 
Posted : 25/05/2019 11:22 pm
Posts: 1744
Full Member
 

Just don't understand Ferrari's reasoning with regards to LeClerc, the set the quickest time in FP3, said to the team "we need to go out again". And the statistician just ignored him. Almost as though they want him to fail.


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 9:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Apparently, the statistical model didn't include the other drivers trying really hard when elimination loomed.


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 9:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Any chance of rain during the race? I’m getting conflicting reports depending on where I look.

Monaco is up there with Melbourne for the borefest factor but I’m hoping the weather might spice things up a bit.


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 10:37 am
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

about 10%


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 10:41 am
Posts: 20666
Full Member
 

Apparently, the statistical model didn’t include the other drivers trying really hard when elimination loomed.

Worst. Statistical. Model. Ever.


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 10:50 am
Posts: 1534
Full Member
 

Never been a fan of Monaco, I remember years ago (i think Mika Salo in a tyrrell?) Loosing a part of his front wing and staying out as he would have lost more time stopping during a wet Monaco race.
I only really try and watch Spa and Suzuka these days.


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 11:03 am
Posts: 14116
Full Member
 

I'm the opposite daviek - I love Monaco. I just love to see the cars being driven so close to the edge. The slow motion shots of them skimming the barriers are fantastic.

Even a dull race can turn with one mis-judged corner.


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 12:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think Monaco would be much more exciting as a different format. The race itself is usually boring because overtaking is virtually impossible so the leader can just cruise along and conserve his tyres, but seeing an F1 car being driven flat out is exciting.

Instead of having all the cars on track at the same time, use a flying lap elimination format. Each driver would have three timed laps (plus an untimed warmup and cool down lap). Cars would be released onto the circuit one at a time, one lap apart, so there'd be three cars on flying laps at any given time. After the first session, the slowest four drivers (totaled over three laps) would be eliminated and the surviving sixteen would repeat, with another four eliminated, and so on until there were just four left fighting for the win. This way, drivers would have to push flat out on every single lap, so there would probably be plenty of cars stacked into the walls and a good chance of an upset by top drivers in a lower-ranked team.

Will never happen, of course, but I think something like that would be much more exciting than a bunch of cars cruising around line astern because it's impossible to pass anyone.


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 12:41 pm
Posts: 14116
Full Member
 

Yep - dull as hell! 🙂


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 3:27 pm
 Pook
Posts: 12698
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I was screaming "SLOW DOWN CHARLES!!"

Gutted he's retired


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 3:39 pm
 Pook
Posts: 12698
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Come on Lewis!!!


 
Posted : 26/05/2019 4:34 pm
Page 14 / 38