Computerists... Is ...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Computerists... Is Windows defender enough?

17 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
89 Views
Posts: 169
Free Member
Topic starter
 

New laptop and the free McAfee trial has expired. I have Windows Defender as standard, is it any good ? what are you all using?
TIA


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 6:14 pm
Posts: 77691
Free Member
 

Yes.

Uninstall McAfee, Defender should kick in.

Keep Windows up to date, watch out for side-loaded apps when installing things, don't click on stupid shit.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 6:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes. Never had an issue only using defender. And I look at some dodgy crap let me tell you.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 6:18 pm
Posts: 2329
Full Member
 

Defender + Malwarebytes here; Malwarebytes cleared off some things Defender missed for me.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 6:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I’d usually say yes, but recently my Son managed to download ‘Chromium’ and Defender and MalwareBytes couldn’t touch it - had to install my work license for ESET to remove it.

Now, Chromium is sort of legit, it’s not a virus and it’s debatable whether it’s Malware, well unless you’ve ever tried to use a PC with it installed or indeed tried to remove it, then there’s little doubt.

Still Defender is better than any other free AV we’ve seen and unlike them does come with an element of support.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 6:29 pm
Posts: 3209
Free Member
 

My McAfee trial also expired recently, Defender looks a totally capable replacement.

Saying that, I'm currently trying out Bitdefender Free - a very minimal interface which I like and no constant pestering to upgrade to the paid version.

EDIT - I have kept Defender enabled for periodic scanning - belt and braces and all that...


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 6:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chromium is the open source project behind Chrome. It's not generally intended for downloading to install for end users (except Linux where it's often packed up instead of the full Chrome on the more open source distributions).

Shouldn't be anything dodgy with it, though it could have been packaged by a dodgy download site with lots of junk.

Anyway, Defender is generally fine enough, but it doesn't deal with adware, nagware and just generally badly written software that doesn't uninstall properly (*cough* McAfee *cough*).

Defender + some common sense on what you download and careful check on where you are downloading from + occasional use of MalwareBytes.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 6:42 pm
Posts: 77691
Free Member
 

EDIT - I have kept Defender enabled for periodic scanning - belt and braces and all that...

You really don't want two AV products running.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 7:07 pm
Posts: 15227
Full Member
 

Defender is fine, but as mentioned above, if a user has admin privelidge and insists on running dodgyvirus.exe, then that's that


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 7:19 pm
Posts: 169
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks all much appreciated.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 7:58 pm
Posts: 91097
Free Member
 

Chromium is sort of legit

Why only sort of? What problems did it cause? It's respectable in Linux land although I never understood what it was for.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 8:11 pm
Posts: 16242
Full Member
 

Bitdefender is excellent.

Free for private use, not a resource hog and regularly comes out on top in tests.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 8:18 pm
Posts: 3209
Free Member
 

You really don't want two AV products running.

I don't. Defender only runs periodic scanning i.e. it's not real-time. As recommended by Windows when I installed Bitdefender.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 8:38 pm
Posts: 77691
Free Member
 

Why only sort of? What problems did it cause? It's respectable in Linux land although I never understood what it was for.

Chromium itself is legit, it's the project name for the Chrome browser. But because it's open-source, by design it's trivial for people to publish their own versions - Opera is based on Chromium, for example. Therefore someone could create a rogue version loaded with trojans.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 8:43 pm
Posts: 2144
Full Member
 

Therefore someone could create a rogue version loaded with trojans.

Greeks, surely?


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 9:19 pm
Posts: 5807
Free Member
 

In short, leave Defender and Windows updates enabled, and don't use an account with admin privilege for normal day to day stuff. Create non-admin accounts for children to use. Don't bypass UAC without looking at what you're actually permitting. Do these few things and it's very unlikely you'll have problems.

If you're going to be pestered over the holidays by various relatives to clean up their last year's worth of unwise browsing activity you can't do much better than follow the guidelines on [url= https://decentsecurity.com/holiday-tasks/ ]Decent Security[/url].


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 9:39 pm
Posts: 91097
Free Member
 

Therefore someone could create a rogue version loaded with trojans.

Ok well that is true of any OS software or indeed any software isn't it? Although the latter less likely of course.


 
Posted : 17/12/2017 9:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Trouble with AV software is you never really know how good it is. If it doesn't detect stuff, you will not know about it. The amount of times I have changed to new AV software at work and suddenly you get all sorts of new detections that you never knew you had before.


 
Posted : 14/03/2018 10:11 am