Clive Woodward
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Clive Woodward

13 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
64 Views
Posts: 293
Free Member
Topic starter
 

If Woodward gets the job how divisive will it be for the english chances at the world cup.


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 7:36 am
 j_me
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

NaN


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 7:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He was Johnsons coach in 2003 was he not so I guess they get on well. Similar very conservative mindset. He will make sure they are well prepared tho. Expect nothing adventurous in gameplan or selection.

He will forever be associated with a ruining a lions tour with his selection of the over the hill england team on mass.


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 7:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

After burning all his bridges with his infamous rant, he can only be good for England who have not exactly set the world on fire since 2003. I don't think he is conservative or unadventurous - look at all the inovation he brought to the rugby world during his stint in charge, which eventually worked. I presume he will be MJ's boss, but will be surprised if he is closely involved in team selection or tactics.


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 8:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

His selection was always conservative. Training methods were good and only innovative in the rugby world - just taken from elsewhere.

Just look at his selection for the lions. A disgrace


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 8:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Apart from the lions, not sure how his selection was conservative - would you pick anyone else when you have 8 world class forwards, and 5 world class backs at any one time.


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 8:28 am
Posts: 10839
Full Member
 

He will forever be associated with a ruining a lions tour with his selection of the over the hill england team on mass.

Unless you're English, in which case he will forever be associated with a world cup winning England team.


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 8:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

😆


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 8:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fair enough


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 8:36 am
Posts: 6910
Full Member
 

His time has passed. He was the right man for that transitional period were rugby union became a serious sport - when there were still a lot of relics from the amateur game knocking about who needed to be told what an athlete looks like.
A rugby CEO-type like Woodward is nothing new nowadays, so he'll probably just stand around being a general guru / mentor, but not offer anything really substantial.


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 8:56 am
Posts: 293
Free Member
Topic starter
 

agree he just seemed to get professionalism and was blessed in that he had a juggernaut pack and a kicker who couldnt miss. Dont think there is a lot of love lost between Johnson and him.


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 9:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The danger is that people get sucked in by Clive's success in the 2003 World Cup when, in truth, England would have won if a trained chimp had been in charge.

Jeff Probyn

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/apr/25/jeff-probyn-clive-woodward-martin-johnson-rfu


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 10:30 am
Posts: 6910
Full Member
 

Probyn sounds like a tit in that piece to be fair, clearly an axe to grind. Winning world cups is never easy or predictable, no matter how strong you are - ask NZ.
England hardly steamrollered everyone in their path in 2003 anyhow did they? They won the final by an arse hair IIRC.


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 10:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

England were not at their best in the Finals, but to be fair entered the tournament ranked Number 1 in the world, beating allcomers home and away including south africa, new zealand and Aus.

Probyn misses the point. Woodward was not the best coach, but moved heaven and earth to ensure players had the right environment to allow them to develop into elite players and secondly to become successful. This task appears easy with hindsight.


 
Posted : 26/04/2011 11:26 am