Forum search & shortcuts

Brexit 2020+
 

Brexit 2020+

Posts: 14485
Free Member
 

Its really funny when Scotland is discussed on here watching people with no understanding of the situation making pronouncements that are incorrect

Its curious that one of those voices also claims to want a fairer society and some quite significant changes. But the prospect of Scotland moving towards such a thing is too difficult.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 6:47 pm
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

I personally would much rather a better fairer UK in the EU but I am not going to get that. I wouold prefer a federal UK but I am not going to get that either

What is left for me? Scottish independence

Scotland would probably need a Naval force of some sort.

for what purpose?


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 6:51 pm
Posts: 31111
Full Member
 

I do not want independence – but for me its the lessor of two evils. Remaining in the UK is damaging Scotland hugely

This is what I hear from my friends in the North… “No” voters last time, not nationalists, not after independence for purity or nationhood reasons… but they now want out from what we are making the UK into. All say they want a referendum and to kick off closer alignment (EU membership if possible, but happy to be Norway2 if need be) with every other country in Europe, and not have England make (poor) decisions on their behalf, without taking the elected Scottish government’s requests for compromise and cooperation into account.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 6:53 pm
Posts: 6936
Full Member
 

Would scotland require or seek an army? The whole basis of nationhood is having an..an army.

More worrying for the UK, which is currently struggling to reach its recruitment targets is that it is disproportionally reliant on recruits from Scotland. The SNP are also committed to removing the nuclear deterrent - the issue being that there's nowhere available in England to base Trident (Devonport isn't seismologically stable enough).

Scottish independence will undoubtedly be messy, but the Tory handling of Brexit and Covid has done more for the independence cause than anything else.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 6:59 pm
 dazh
Posts: 13393
Full Member
 

The Costa Rica route. Why on earth does Scotland need a military? Whats the realistic threat?

I think you're forgetting your history 🙂


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:09 pm
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

The SNP are also committed to removing the nuclear deterrent

Yes thats a fun one. What happens if Westminster does play hardball - apart from we are both wporse off? Play hardball - take your subs out of our country now!


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:13 pm
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

Go on Dazh - who is going to invade scotland ( apart from the english? 😉 )

What is the threat we are going to need that army and navy for? Personally I cannot see one.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How much money is this that the government won’t get? Not huge maybe £200k… old school you take from me i take from you? As i said above somewhere its all about social contracts and trust and for me they are currently not being honoured.

I was the one that spoke about taking action, drowned out by all the pointless squabbling over Scottish independence.

While your actions will help you financially, if a large amount of people did this, then its the services that Governments are supposed to provide to the public that will suffer...which is what the likes of the tories want. Mentioning social contracts and trust are irrelevant words to this Government. I keep mentioning the different economies operating, and as long as our overlords sectors of the economy works, they couldn't care less about the rest.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What is the threat we are going to need that army and navy for? Personally I cannot see one.

I agree. Judging by this squabble, It seems that UK citizens as it currently stands are more than capable of fighting amongst themselves so do not to require an actual military force.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:19 pm
 dazh
Posts: 13393
Full Member
 

apart from the english? 😉

That's exactly what I was talking/joking about. Seriously though, it sounds ridiculous until you imagine an English nationalist government lead by someone like Farage or some other unhinged narcissist with the pitch forked hordes stood behind them.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:20 pm
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

This is the document on the scottish governments position in 2014. details the answers to a lot of questions. seeing as we seem to be hung up on the military I have quoted it

https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-future/

Scotland's defence forces

The Scottish Government has carried out an initial assessment of forces levels in the years following independence[261].

Defence capabilities at the point of independence

Maritime forces

One naval squadron to secure Scotland's maritime interests and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and contribute to joint capability with partners in Scotland's geographical neighbourhood, consisting of:

two frigates from the Royal Navy's current fleet
a command platform for naval operations and development of specialist marine capabilities (from the Royal Navy's current fleet, following adaptation)
four mine counter measure vessels from the Royal Navy's current fleet
two offshore patrol vessels (OPVs) to provide security for the 200 nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). However, as the Royal Navy only has four OPVs currently[262], a longer lead time for procurement might be necessary
four to six patrol boats from the Royal Navy's current fleet, capable of operating in coastal waters, providing fleet protection and also contributing to securing borders
auxiliary support ships (providing support to vessels on operations), which could be secured on a shared basis initially with the rest of the UK

These arrangements will require around 2,000 regular and at least 200 reserve personnel.

Land forces

An army HQ function and an all-arms brigade, with three infantry/marine units, equipped initially from a negotiated share of current UK assets, and supported by:

a deployable Brigade HQ
two light armoured reconnaissance units
two light artillery units
one engineer unit deploying a range of equipment for bridging, mine clearance and engineering functions
one aviation unit operating six helicopters for reconnaissance and liaison
two communication units
one transport unit
one logistics unit
one medical unit

Special forces, explosives and ordnance disposal teams will bring the total to around 3,500 regular and at least 1,200 reserve personnel.

Air forces

Key elements of air forces in place at independence, equipped initially from a negotiated share of current UK assets, will secure core tasks, principally the ability to police Scotland's airspace, within NATO.

an Air Force HQ function (with staff embedded within NATO structures)
Scotland will remain part of NATO's integrated Air Command and Control (AC2) system, initially through agreement with allies to maintain the current arrangements while Scotland establishes and develops our own AC2 personnel and facility within Scotland within five years of independence
a Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) squadron incorporating a minimum of 12 Typhoon jets based at Lossiemouth
a tactical air transport squadron, including around six Hercules C130J aircraft, and a helicopter squadron
flight training through joint arrangements with allies

In total this would require around 2,000 regular personnel and around 300 reserve personnel.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:29 pm
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

drowned out by all the pointless squabbling over Scottish independence.

Sorry - thats partly my fault. I'll shut up


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:31 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Schrödinger’s Scotland. Simultaneously a drain on England and yet not allowed to leave. 😀


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

6 billion removed from the uk economy on the first day of trading since brexit.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_nVk25ZvTkU


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:57 pm
Posts: 5054
Free Member
 

When I say Army, I should have said armed forces.

Why does the right-wing always want to fight folk?

And in that list TJ, I'd be happy without the Typhoon's - fast-jets are a recipe for a never-ending bill.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 7:59 pm
Posts: 15555
Free Member
 

Military hardware, pernonel and equipment are expensive, hence why it's better to pool your resourses between 27 countries in a surgical/strateigic manner, than it is to run the whole show (and cost) from one country.

That might sound like the dreaded 'EU' army according to the racists, whilst conviniently forgetting that every individual member has a veto in mulitlateral military conflict.

A particular member can go ahead on thier own, see the Iraq war. but they won't nessesarily have the backing of the union as a whole.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 8:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why does the right-wing always want to fight folk?

Don't know, you should a
ask one of them.

Interesting post BTW TJ


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 8:08 pm
Posts: 78542
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Anyway we’re off topic. The point is that the parallels between brexit and scottish independence are very close, and decrying one whilst supporting the other is pretty daft.

Yet that's exactly what you're doing, saying that Scotxit is near-impossible after brexit has already happened. Isn't that "pretty daft" then?


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 8:14 pm
Posts: 66122
Full Member
 

Why on earth does Scotland need a military? Whats the realistic threat?

To deal with our most hated and most ancient of enemies, the Scots.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 8:15 pm
 mrmo
Posts: 10720
Free Member
 

Who would have guessed,

https://twitter.com/PhilAldrick/status/1346159680876326914


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 8:30 pm
Posts: 1795
Free Member
 

Well El Bent as our friends across the pond say "no taxation without representation" i have had no government representation since 2010 and never had any local representation (live in Rishis constituency) my EU representation has been removed.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 8:36 pm
Posts: 3642
Free Member
 

Schrödinger’s Scotland. Simultaneously a drain on England and yet not allowed to leave. 😀

File it along with Schrödingers Remainers. Drawbridges up. ‘If you don’t like Brexit then seeya, go live in the EU*

*Unless you want to go and live in the EU, that is.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 8:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If remain had won the referendum then we wouldn't have this useless cockwomble as 'prime minister' with his coterie of polyps as ministers during the worst national crisis in 80 years.

I rest my case.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 10:40 pm
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

Dougiedog - a lot of this stuff has had loads of smart folk looking at it for years. Unlike brexit.

Personally I would be much less ambitious with the military or have none at all.


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 10:51 pm
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

The point is that the parallels between brexit and scottish independence are very close

only somone who does not understand would say so. Scottish independence is about being social democratic, internationalist and outward looking. Brexit is none of those things


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 10:52 pm
Posts: 2553
Free Member
 

So parallel but opposed?


 
Posted : 04/01/2021 11:11 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

saying that Scotxit is near-impossible

It's near impossible to say.

Scottish independence is about being social democratic, internationalist and outward looking.

Yeah, and Brexit was about creating a progressive socialist Britain. YOU might imagine it as that, just like dazh imagines his social UK but that doesn't mean you'll get it.

Might as well imagine a social democratic internationalist and outward looking UK.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 1:14 am
Posts: 16530
Full Member
 

Scotxit

As pointed out, it'll never happen as I'm totally sober and it still look me 3 attempts to say it.😁


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 1:43 am
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

Molgrips - given the party driving it are exactly that and the population have a huge majority that are, that pretty certainly is the direction of travel. Remember tories do well here to get 20% of the vote. UKip got under 2% at all bar one euro election where they got 6%


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 1:43 am
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

Scotxit

Brexit - Exbrit


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 1:57 am
Posts: 242
Free Member
 

That 6b isn't -6bn from UK economy!!!

It's the loss of the city's cut on the tiny margins of trading 6bn shares. Equity trading isn't what it used to be before electronic trading, and reduction of middlemen.

This is real but it was expected and although the loss is non-trivial its not huge. (The loss is also the small number of equity traders and their salaries, plus clearing house operations)

And remember that the banks that remain big in equities are principally the big American banks and any profits go to the mothership.

But big money in the city isn't this, it's the more sophisticated stuff that it's so good at and takes decades/centuries to establish.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 7:03 am
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

its just the first sign and the first steps.

Its very naive to think this is not a sign of something to come. MOre and more stuff that was traded in the UK will be going to the EU

Its 100% clear that the EU intend that all trading in euros and european stuff is moving out of london. that will be a big loss.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 7:17 am
Posts: 242
Free Member
 

Duplicate post sorry! Got bad gateway so resubmitted!


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 7:41 am
Posts: 242
Free Member
 

Worth noting there was a slow drift in this euro trade to eurozone anyway as some wanted control back.

Unless anyone knows better than I do, there's no sign of the big business like structured trading, advisory, mergers etc that the city excels at being moved out?? And this is the stuff that really pays.

Happy to be corrected if there's news on this business moving out of the city.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 7:43 am
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

I know very little about the financial services stuff but its clear this is just the beginning of the move towards the eurozone

No passporting and no equivalence along with the EUs need to have all trading in the euro zone under their control means more trade will go and IIRC there is a further 6 month grace period for financial trading so the real crunch will be in the summer


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 7:53 am
Posts: 14485
Free Member
 

Yeah, and Brexit was about creating a progressive socialist Britain. YOU might imagine it as that, just like dazh imagines his social UK but that doesn’t mean you’ll get it.

Might as well imagine a social democratic internationalist and outward looking UK.

The two nations (England and Scotland at least) are just different Molgrips, they just are. Not massively so across the board but when it comes to the type of governance they actually vote for.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 8:02 am
Posts: 144
Free Member
 

I know very little about the financial services stuff

Don't bother commenting any further on it then. This thread could actually be quite useful if it wasn't for the usual know-it-alls banging on with unwavering certainty about stuff they know absolutely nothing about. Ugarizza's post seems to be actual useful information written by someone who seems to have an insight - that kind of thing is needed now post brexit, not the same rant repeated several times a day from the same doom-mongers.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 9:18 am
Posts: 31111
Full Member
 

Are they saying anything different? This is expected/predicted and part of a process of a shift away from London, not the end of it.

FT reporting … https://www.ft.com/content/a434b756-afe0-454d-9d70-ef2d42ea8d55


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 9:53 am
Posts: 18593
Free Member
 

Meanwhile the industry expert who is so optimistic about Sunderland failed to inform us when it was decided to produce the Ariya in Japan rather than the UK. The decision being made mainly due to a threat of a no-deal Brexit at the time, but also because it was already clear any deal would not be entirely tarif free and trade would not be as fluid as before.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 10:03 am
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

mdavids - like to correct me from your knowledge?

I read a fair bit around this and the EU taking as much financial services as it can into the eurozone is clearly a key aim and they have made it clear that skeleton or symbolic workforce in the EU will not do. all traders and the computer systems must be under the control of the european courts and regulators by being based in the eurozone

Remember equivalence has not been granted let alone passporting.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 10:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I read a fair bit around this and the EU taking as much financial services as it can into the eurozone is clearly a key aim and they have made it clear that skeleton or symbolic workforce in the EU will not do. all traders and the computer systems must be under the control of the european courts and regulators by being based in the eurozone

Those traders won't account for that many jobs and will be counting for increasingly less as their systems become more and more automated.

If the EU blocks outsourcing of fund and portfolio management, that would hit the structured trading business mentioned above, this has only been suggested by a few hardliners within the EU and there are ways to ameliorate the effects of such a policy - the yanks would likely ratchet up their trade war on the EU and there may well even be capital flight out of the EU.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 10:36 am
Posts: 18593
Free Member
 

If the EU blocks outsourcing of fund and portfolio management

It already has. I can no longer include British based funds in my French PEA portfolio:

https://www.amf-france.org/fr/actualites-publications/actualites/brexit-quoi-de-neuf-pour-votre-epargne

Seeing this coming I've made changes progressively and now have zero exposure to the UK. Just as well, between the under perforamance of the FTSE and weakening pound I'd have lost enough to pay for a couple of years of junior's education.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 10:50 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

The two nations (England and Scotland at least) are just different Molgrips, they just are. Not massively so across the board but when it comes to the type of governance they actually vote for.

You're ignoring a load of context with that statement, and making huge generalisations geographically. It's that kind of sentiment that makes me seethe against the idea of Nationalism.


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 10:53 am
Posts: 44822
Full Member
 

And you I am afraid molgrips simply do not seem to understand the situation

SNP - social democratic, outward and internationalist - 50% of the vote. Greens - social democratic, outward and internationalist - 6% Labour - social democratic but inward looking and insular, 15% of the vote, Lib dems 7% ish but outward looking and internationalist ( all number approximnate)

Thats 80 %ish of the vote in scotland goes to social democratic parties. The right wing are lucky to get 20%

Its a very different country politically to England.

There is no doubt at all that an independent Scotland will be social democratic and outward looking because that is the parties we vote for

Wiki information on voting intentions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2021_Scottish_Parliament_election


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 11:10 am
Posts: 31111
Full Member
 

I agree with TJ on this point... but can we all stop this topic from taking of this thread? Pretty please?


 
Posted : 05/01/2021 11:18 am
Page 136 / 306