Forum menu
Bloody smug b***ard...
 

[Closed] Bloody smug b***ard motorcyclist

Posts: 91169
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Do you defend the wheelying through no mans land and almost hitting someone tho?
of course he doesn't ..

So what's the argument then? 🙂


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

By the way, the reason people argue like this on forums is the language/text barrier.

Yes in real life we just nod politley agree with everyone and have almost no opinion on anything we are bland and rarely speak up etc 🙄
We are bored and argumentative FFS admit it to yourself FFS man 😆


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

LHS - I simply did not say that at any point. Part of the reason I stopped riding was the speeds I was going at were getting faster each year despite the touring BMW and it was all going to end in tears.

I [i]was[/i] a fast smoooth skilled rider tho - the stealth type you don't notice hopefully. It would take me a while now to get back up to speed

Most of my motorcycling friends have taken a step back over the last few years.

All I tried to say was that car drivers perceptions of the speeds and the danger of motorcycles is usually very wrong. MF in particular was slating motorcyclists without actually having any idea of their capabilities and was bigging up his inexperienced friend as a super safe rider.


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:34 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

It's sunny out you know.


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:36 pm
Posts: 35074
Full Member
 

[i]The public roads however are no place for scaring people, even if you know what you're doing.[/i]

This pretty much sums it up for me, I'm a completely average driver and lapsed motorcyclist, I understand the point that PP and TJ are making entirely. You can do stuff on a bike that appears to be dangerous, but it's not really, but if you scare the crap out of Mr and Mrs average whilst they're on the way back from Tesco, then in reality it's just as bad. Consideration for other road users is the missing piece of this particular puzzle.


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:37 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Do you defend the wheelying through no mans land and almost hitting someone tho?

Not my argument! I'm fine with the one I've got, ta.
🙂

What happened? Did I miss that bit?


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:38 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
Topic starter
 

We are bored and argumentative FFS admit it to yourself FFS man

Well it's true, I am argumentative in real life, and also bored out of my f*cking BONCE at work.. but arguments in real life seem far less acrimonious in general...

In fairness to MF's friend - you don't know if he's safe or not. If I rode a bike I'd make damn sure I was safe about it because I'm that way inclined.

PP, if you weren't arguing about that, what were you arguing against? I'm lost now!


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:39 pm
Posts: 14
Free Member
 

Where do you live Molgrips? I'll put my money where my mouth is.

*2 blokes on a Vespa looks a bit gay

I have 1000cc's of Italian v-twin if you'd prefer to look a bit less gay and a cheap (Lidl) intercom if you want to hear what goes on in a motorcyclists' head.


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

nickc - same as scaring redsocks when out in the lakes - only MF ws playing the role of the redsocks 🙂

When out on your MTB even if you slow down and be polite you will still scare the crap out of some folk 'cos they wander along in their own little world


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:40 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I have 1000cc's of Italian v-twin if you'd prefer to look a bit less gay.

That actually sounds MORE gay to be honest.


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:40 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

but if you scare the crap out of Mr and Mrs average whilst they're on the way back from Tesco, then in reality it's just as bad. Consideration for other road users is the missing piece of this particular puzzle.

That's very true, and 99% of the time it's doable as well, but you can't account for the odd person who's really not watching what they're doing, never sees you approach, and ends up scared witless no matter how wide a berth you give them, which I have no doubt does happen.


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:41 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I have 1000cc's of Italian v-twin if you'd prefer to look a bit less gay.

Cheers, but we shall hpoefully have our own Italin V-twin next year. Probably a Multistrada or an ST3 I think, possibly a Guzzi or 'Prilia maybe... 🙂

EDIT
I love my Vespa. Cool as you like, classy black, 72mpg and £72 insurance. 🙂


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

L twin I hope 😆


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 4:50 pm
Posts: 35074
Full Member
 

PP; very true.


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 7:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

£72 insurance

Being old has it's advantages as that's about what it costs me to insure my CBR600F fully comp. It doesn't manage 72mpg though...


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 7:16 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Are we all friends again now? 😉


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 8:05 pm
Posts: 17851
Full Member
 

nickc - Member
The public roads however are no place for scaring people, even if you know what you're doing.

This pretty much sums it up for me, I'm a completely average driver and lapsed motorcyclist, I understand the point that PP and TJ are making entirely. You can do stuff on a bike that appears to be dangerous, but it's not really, but if you scare the crap out of Mr and Mrs average whilst they're on the way back from Tesco, then in reality it's just as bad. Consideration for other road users is the missing piece of this particular puzzle.

Bing Bing - EXACTLY!!

Tried to write this a few times, but didn't manage it so eloquently and kept giving up.
Consideration for road users is the key phrase that I was missing. Excellent!


 
Posted : 22/06/2010 8:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have 1000cc's of Italian

You catch it in a cup or something?


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 9:36 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

You catch it in a cup or something?

I lol'd.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 9:40 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Being old has it's advantages as that's about what it costs me to insure my CBR600F fully comp. It doesn't manage 72mpg though...

£72 - That's for me and Mrs PP to ride, by the way, including commuting.
Scooters can get hammered on the insurance sometimes, becasue they are seen as very nickable....

I was insuring a Ducati Monster for about £30 more last year.....


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 9:46 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

Do you defend the wheelying through no mans land and almost hitting someone tho?

Well I am a bit septic on the "almost". I'd like to have the motorcycle point of view as I suspect he left plenty of space. As for training:
Car, 20 hours of practice on the street with an instructor on your side. mostly out of peak hours.
Bike, 25 hours on a track at slow and fast speed to learn basics manoeuvres such as emergency stop, emergency dodge (both side), slalom U-turn. Another 25 hours on the road. And safety checks on the motorcycle.
That what a motorcyclist have to protect himself. Now, compare it with useless airbag, ABS and tell me where the coolness is ;).


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 10:38 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Drifted in and out of consciousness reading a few pages of this one... one thing that hits me is the assumption that experience, time spent driving, and miles done are a measure of safety, my boss does a large mileage per year, been driving for many years and drives like a bellend, cutting in at the last minute, on phone etc... also these old boys dordeling about causing pile ups and going for a spin the wrong way up a motorway. Then there's the reps on the motorway catching up on a bit of paperwork or clinching the deal on the phone doing 95 mph while undertaking.... Yeah experience and mileage are a true measure of a driver 😆


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 11:22 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'd like to have the motorcycle point of view as I suspect he left plenty of space.

Hah, cos they always do, right?! You're really weird, Juan. Really.

+1 for Dobbo.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 11:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Molgrips - whats plenty of space to a motorcyclist and a car driver are not the same.

dobbo - car driving and motorcycle riding are not the same - thats the point that the car drivers on this thread cannot grasp.. Think of walkers reactions to MTBs. Teh MTBers are always going too fast too close to the walkers even when we know they are not.

Its a simple point that people just cannot grasp. What appears to be unsafe to a cr driver may not be in anyway. The car driver simply does not have the knowledge to make a valid judgement.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 11:45 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I was a fast smoooth skilled rider tho - the stealth type you don't notice hopefully.

Until I'm bouncing off your windscreen.

The problem with road safety is that you are at the mercy of everyone else. This is particularly true if your on a bike.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 11:49 am
 69er
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ in 'I know better than you shocker'...

The car driver simply does not have the knowledge to make a valid judgement.
and now you're not allowed to argue!

FYI I have a car licence, motorbike, lgv, I cycle on the road and off road and I even ride horses. This equips to make the following judgement:

TJ is a c&nt.

I thankyou.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 11:52 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Molgrips - whats plenty of space to a motorcyclist and a car driver are not the same.

Teej, we've been over this already on this thread. I do appreciate this. We have also established however that motorcyclists do sometimes ride like dicks, and do dangerous stuff.

Some riding I see makes me think 'oh that's dangerous'. Now, you have no way of knowing if what I think is dangerous really is, or if it's just me being anti-motorcyclist.. do you?

For example, my wife is frequently horrified when riders zip past on country roads in short spaces, with approaching cars. I usually defend the cyclist using the exact same argument you are using. However, sometimes riders take the piss, as I am sure you will agree.

From the sound of it, MF's case was one of the piss-taking ones. He's not a nervous old grannie - I am sure that if he felt it was a near miss, then it probably was. In any case, who f*cking cares? Are you trying to prove that MF's judgement is slightly more conservative than yours? Why would you care?

We've been over it, leave it.

And Juan - you're an idiot defending someone you don't know doing something you didn't see in a place you don't know, just because they like bikes and you also like bikes. Really - think about it.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 11:52 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

dobbo - car driving and motorcycle riding are not the same - thats the point that the car drivers on this thread cannot grasp.. Think of walkers reactions to MTBs. Teh MTBers are always going too fast too close to the walkers even when we know they are not.

False. Take motorcycle couriers, city riding or motorway riding.

And yes I do have a motorbike license.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 11:53 am
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Surely motorcycle riders should also ride with consideration for other road users, by not scaring them with teir actions?
Im fully aware that what a car driver perceives as a dangerous speed / manouvre (sp) by a bike rider may not be anything of the sort from the riders perspective. But surely in an ideal world the riders should factor this in and think about their actions and how other perceive them first?
Put the rider in the pedestrians shoes in this scenario:- car comes flying up to a pedestrian crossing and slams the anchors on at the last minute whislt someone is crossing, scaring the crap out of the pedestrian, before coming to an abrupt stop. The driver knows they are able to stop in time, but the pedestrian doesnt know that. You wouldnt do it if you were a considerate driver would you?
Whilst this arguement is about perspective, it should also be about consideration.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 12:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Think abut it in relation to MTBers and ramblers.

Most on here slow down to what they deem is reasonable and pass with plenty of room when passing ramblers but many ramblers see this as passing too close too fast.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 12:35 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

TJ, you've just re-written my example!


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 12:37 pm
Posts: 14
Free Member
 

I have 1000cc's of Italian v-twin if you'd prefer to look a bit less gay.

That actually sounds MORE gay to be honest.

Any excuse to dress up in leather


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 12:49 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Im fully aware that what a car driver perceives as a dangerous speed / manouvre (sp) by a bike rider may not be anything of the sort from the riders perspective

Exaclty.. when I am passing walkers on the trail I slow right down to a walking pace so they are not annoyed with me. I could easily and safely whiz by and a fair clip but I don't.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 12:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bigyin - indeed - but on this forum MTBers complain that ramblers get upset even when left with plenty of room( from the MTbers perspective)

Its all about your perspective. On this thread MF and Molgrips are in the ramblers role 🙂


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 12:56 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm on the side of co-operation, safety and understanding...


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Indeed, I think we're all in agreement about the pespective side, but there has to be consideration on the part of the bikers, which i think is Molgrips / M-F's point.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 1:05 pm
Posts: 7869
Free Member
 

Is this still going? I thought peace broke out 2 pages ago....


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 1:13 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

FFS are you still at it?


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No - my point was, from about 2 pages in, TJ is an argumentative sort and won't ever let something go.

It has been funny to continue to read his posts 😆


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 1:19 pm
Posts: 7869
Free Member
 

mastiles_fanylion - Member
No - my point was, from about 2 pages in, TJ is an argumentative sort and won't ever let something go.

It has been funny to continue to read his posts

Errrr, right. Pot, kettle, black.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 1:20 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
Topic starter
 

TJ is an argumentative sort and won't ever let something go

I did actually get an admission out of him once. I think it was about recovery drinks.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 1:21 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Its all about your perspective. On this thread MF and Molgrips are in the ramblers role

And you are in the motorbike courier role, f**cking everyone off and acting like a knob? 😆


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 1:25 pm
 Amos
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 Junkyard!

Sometimes drivers drive like dicks and soometimes motorcyclists ride like dicks sometimes i drive like a dick and sure sometimes even JT drives/rides like a dick it's frustrating but we're only human (mmmmmaaaannnn) So can't we all try a walk a mile in each others shoes and then life can carry on nicely in STW world


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 1:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Errrr, right. Pot, kettle, black.

But I eventually learnt to stop rising to his posts - I did admit to doing so a few pages ago.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 1:28 pm
Posts: 7869
Free Member
 

mastiles_fanylion - Member

But I eventually learnt to stop rising to his posts - I did admit to doing so a few pages ago.

Yet you're still here, pick, pick, picking away. Good job you don't suffer from 'last word-itis'. Bit like Mrs Boblo..... Ah well.


 
Posted : 23/06/2010 2:19 pm
Page 6 / 6