Forum search & shortcuts

Are massive back co...
 

[Closed] Are massive back country rides with big numbers of unknown riders sensible?

Posts: 10749
Full Member
 

I thought we all had a duty, when a stranger turns up on an expensive bike and full of talk about how great a rider he is, to take him down some tight technical stuff and tyre-buzz him so he goes just that leeeetle bit faster than he really wants to.


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 10:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This just sounds really snobbish and cliquey to me.

to me too! I do my best to accommodate all comers, particularly on beginner rides and don't demand anything beyond enthusiasm and good will. Trimix perhaps inadvertently managed to sound elitist 🙁


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 10:27 am
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

As far as I'm concerned, and I'm fairly sure the law would agree, if you don't pay for a "leader" to take you around and it is simply a meeting of people with similar interests, each takes individual responsibility and accepts their destiny from that choice. Maybe if <18s are going you might need to be sure that their parents are happy with the arrangement, but the rest are grown adults capable of making their own decisions and dealing with the outcome. We don't all blame the guy who invited us to the pub when we end up breaking a leg on the way home after 10 pints, by the very action of MTBing you're accepting the risks, only you now have an even bigger backup of experience and safety than if you'd done it alone or with a couple of mates. I've been on more than one ride with relatively unknown people where I'd felt like keeling over half way round due to the distances and fitness involved. I prepared for that, packed a map and found my own way home.

I don't know, the fact that we even have to consider such things cheeses me off.


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 10:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't know, the fact that we even have to consider such things cheeses me off.

I don't think we really do though, it's just paranoia in the main I think.

I do think 'no win no fee' has a lot to answer for though.


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 10:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

grumm - at the risk of turning this into a cliquey thread and being the third person in this particular group to contribute - I'm not sure that I'd read 'fit in' in the way that you are. It's not to do with the correct riding clothes (whatever they would be?) or the type of bike you ride, it's about being upfront about the route/difficulty etc, and each person knowing their own ability and fitness. Plus we do different types of routes, so people can choose what they ride, there's always bailout options etc.

I wouldn't use Trimix's terminolgy of 'members' either - it makes it sound more formal than it is. Like Mattie_h says, it's a loose email mailing list - some people ride occassionally, other folks most weeks.

I'm not a total newbie, and sometimes i find it a bit difficult and a challenge, but still want to go out again. So far Trimix and Mattie_h haven't told me not to come back.
Oh, and I'm definitely not bothered about being really fast and not stopping on a route - this group works fine for me on that score!


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 10:35 am
Posts: 11474
Full Member
 

I can't be arsed reading through all this, but I can imagine all the legal crap and nanny state-type bollards being spouted all too well. But in the end it's simple, take responsibility for yourself. If you think a ride's too hard for you, ask properly or simply don't do it. As for the Howgills being a deadly backcountry wilderness. Erm...


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 10:37 am
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

The simple solution is to not meet random people from the internet in the woods.


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 10:38 am
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

I have a feeling that in taking these measures one is tacitly accepting further liability.

I'd urge everyone who rides to do a basic first aid course. There's a lot of misunderstanding of what "first aid" actually is. It's not all about splinting people's legs or giving them tracheotomies with biros, more assessing the situation and not making anyone's injuries worse than they are.

If you are too squeamish to do a first aid course then you should should probably lock yourself away from society, the worst thing you'll see all day is some cheesy plastic stick-on wounds. Plus you might get paired up with a lady for the CPR bit.

Stuff like head counts to make sure riders haven't been left behind is common sense too, it's far more likely to prevent a bad experience for someone than it is to assist them in suing you.


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 10:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've just remembered that I once rode in the Howgills on my own, in winter - and I got slightly lost. Can someone please give me the details of who I should be suing?

[img] ?t=1243936384[/img]

We don't really have 'back country' in England anyway - Scotland you could say that about some areas maybe.


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5122
Full Member
 

I don't know what the problem is.

I went for a ride in the lakes on Sunday (Howgills area) and would you believe it 33 other mountainbikers also turned up with a view to ride the same route.

what are the odds on that eh?


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 11:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

then you should should probably lock yourself away from society

yeah, they'd probably all be happier with that too :o)

Stuff like head counts to make sure riders haven't been left behind is common sense too

in my extensive experience, once you get past 15 head counts are almost impossible. People won't hold still. I often find there were one or 2 more riders then I ever counted during the ride 🙂


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 11:35 am
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

If you want a group ride to work then you need a certain level of ruthlessness to weed out the bits that will cause it to go wrong.

Also you need to be flexible - dont stick to a plan if the plan turns out to be crap. Life is dynamic, so make your plan adaptable. It also helps if your riding mates are adaptable.

Dont expect everyone to like the same ride as you. Humour helps.


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 11:41 am
Posts: 9071
Free Member
 

Best way is to just plan when the pub stop will be and leave it at that. As snowslave found out on Saturday, this method is a proven winner 😉


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That was indeed a genius plan Dave Routemeister, providing an extra focus to a utterly top day out, and much appreciated! 😉


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 12:47 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Just to clarify - I am NOT anticipating 100 riders turning up for the Chilterns ride 😯


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 1:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am NOT anticipating 100 riders turning up for the Chilterns ride

it would serve you right after all your gobby talk innit ??


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 17843
 

sfb - gobby talk? Moi? Nah, you're getting me mixed up with a bloke 😀


 
Posted : 02/06/2009 5:50 pm
Posts: 2522
Free Member
 

Can't believe I've only just seen this- the mind boggles- as for people complaining about the high numbers, WTF has it got to do with you? I've been on the last few rides and fair to say it's some of the most enjoyable time I've ever spent on a bike. Who would ever think about suing someone else for falling off your own bike..........dear lord, who even thinks like that!?


 
Posted : 04/06/2009 1:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

gobby talk? Moi?

perish the thought :o)


 
Posted : 04/06/2009 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've run loads of group rides with people I didn't know. I've had one ride where I had to go back to the cars with someone, as they couldn't get up the hill from the car park (the little slope at Penmachno), and clearly weren't able to even walk the route, let alone ride anything. Other than that though, people have got tired sometimes, and a few people got injured, but in any incident, people have just got together and made sure everyone is okay.

I wouldn't bother with disclaimers or anything like that, or getting leadership awards. I think if was some kind of qualified group leader, and made a point of that, I'd surely be under a higher duty of care to people I was leading - I'm sure I was told that with respect to my long since lapsed lifeguarding/water rescue qualifications.

I've never seen a case like this get as far as a court though, the only case I've heard of of this nature, where a person is doing a dangerous activity and gets hurt (actually against a juggling club, about a unicycle related injury) are because they were hoping for a payout from the insurance (and once it got to court, they lost). I suspect if you don't have hefty insurance, you'd be somewhat less likely to get sued?

Joe


 
Posted : 04/06/2009 2:00 pm
 Pook
Posts: 12698
Full Member
 

this was fun

[img] [/img]

[url=

up, roll up[/url]


 
Posted : 04/06/2009 2:08 pm
Posts: 5942
Full Member
 

Good turn out Pook.


 
Posted : 04/06/2009 3:59 pm
Page 3 / 3