Forum menu
Anyone know about c...
 

[Closed] Anyone know about chemtrails?

Posts: 497
Free Member
 

your guess is as good as anyones!


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 11:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

probably a perfectly innocent research facility.
Its not even a research facility, its a floating radar station for the US west coast to be used to monitor traffic in a region they done have ground stations.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

S'just more filthy exhaust fumes innit?
clearly remember the days that all flights were grounded due to that Icelandic volcano..

Beautiful blue skies man..Beautiful
I haven't seen that colour blue since I was a nipper.. I could have wept as the planes went up again and we watched those beautiful skies disappear behind a milky haze


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

iffoverload - Stuff

ZOMG!! Do you think the Cumbrian floods were caused by a knock on effect because they're using this weapon system to create a drought in Syria to destabilise the region?!?!?one?


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:08 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

probably a perfectly innocent research facility.

Or more likely an SBX-1 missile-defence radar station:


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Funnily enough, right next to one of our local trail spots is [url= https://www.metabunk.org/the-nerc-funded-mst-radar-facility-in-wales-is-not-a-haarp-installation.t3158/ ]a radar facility which some people have likened to HAARP[/url]

Could this have anything to do with the 2006 [url= http://www.geologywales.co.uk/storms/bowstreet.htm ]Bow Street Tornado[/url], just a couple of miles away?

[img] [/img]

(Or the storm which felled vast swathes of trees and trashed 2 of our local riding spots in Jan 2014?)

I doubt it, but it makes for funny banter.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:10 pm
Posts: 497
Free Member
 

๐Ÿ˜† jive does it best!

Anyway pretty sure nobody here really knows anything about any of this first hand, funny comments are funny, believe what you like!

interesting reply from USAF @ 3:00


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:25 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

There does seem to be a growing trend that [i]any[/i] phenomenon that can't be easily explained to five year old in less than a minute must be some kind of global NWO conspiracy.

See chemtrails, flat earth, perpetual motion, satellites, terrorists, magnets, hadron collider, basic physics, etc etc

One step closer to Idiocracy.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:33 pm
Posts: 497
Free Member
 

but why do these conspiracy theorists do this? they only open themselves up to ridicule...

many seem to be perfectly rational educated people as well.

I'm not a conspiracy nut but... is it not the case that official statements,scientific reports and media coverage in the past have actually turned out to be complete lies and ass covering or just turned out to be plain incorrect etc?


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:43 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

is it not the case that official statements,scientific reports and media coverage in the past have actually turned out to be complete lies and ass covering or just turned out to be plain incorrect etc?

Examples?

And of those examples, how many of those were exposed by randoms shouting at YouTube videos in their mum's basement?


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:47 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

Is it not some sort of #enduro slang? Oh man, I totally railed that chemt.

I've said before about conspiracy theories; the thing I like most is their ability to contradict themselves yet coexist. So you can find people who think that HAARP is simultaneously 2 or 3 different, sekrit things- and it doesn't matter to them, because what's important is that you contradict the official story. So you can totally believe that it's a mind control weapon, AND that it shot down a TWA plane, AND that it causes gulf war syndrome, simultaneously. In fact, it's even better because it contradicts the official version 3 times.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:50 pm
Posts: 33187
Full Member
 

Luckily I am married and therefore I get told what to believe without worrying about all this conspiracy guff.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 12:55 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Is it possible your wife is a lizard from the holomoon?


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 1:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it possible your wife is a lizard from the holomoon?
Being reptilian would explain why my girlfriend's feet are so cold.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 1:03 pm
Posts: 5171
Free Member
 

is it not the case that official statements,scientific reports and media coverage in the past have actually turned out to be complete lies and ass covering or just turned out to be plain incorrect etc?

Yes, but that doesn't make the conspiracy nutters any more correct. If I can't find my phone, then accuse my wife of moving it & it subsequently transpires she didn't: It doesn't mean that the Government did it.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 1:08 pm
Posts: 14484
Free Member
 

But i want a mad man who can cause earthquakes from his underground volcano lair

Just get Footflaps to build a new shed, put Binners inside and supply Curry with Garlic Naarn.

Job jobbed.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Plus there is a [i]bit[/i] of a difference between a small government department creatively massaging some figures to make them look good and an international conspiracy to project an artificial sky, convincing sheeple that the world is round and that outer space exists.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 14484
Free Member
 

but why do these conspiracy theorists do this? they only open themselves up to ridicule

It's a side effect of living in an increasingly irreligious environment. Now that you can't blame the devil, you go for the next most evil option and not the next most rational or evidenced option,


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 1:18 pm
Posts: 2622
Full Member
 

tinybits - Member
A friend of mine used to work at the met office and 3 years ago moved to San Francisco working for NASA on atmosphere projects (I'm not clever enough to understand the whole thing).
She says anyone who believes chemtrails is a complete imbecile.
Of course she works for the man so must be lying!

Similarly I have a friend who works at the Met office with a very similar opinion. (They must all be indoctrinated!) Apparently one guy occasionally protests about their role in the chemtrail conspiracy outside of their Exeter HQ. Just the one guy, though.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:13 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

Yes, but that doesn't make the conspiracy nutters any more correct. If I can't find my phone, then accuse my wife of moving it & it subsequently transpires she didn't: It doesn't mean that the Government did it.

makes you think though, doesn't it.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:17 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Now that you can't blame the devil, you go for the next most evil option and not the next most rational or evidenced option,

TO be fair we do know our govt has done conspiracies against us and has lied and misled us. The problem is they see it at every big event from JFK through to moon landings to 9/11. One rarely meets a conspiracist who only believes in one conspiracy and thinks the rest are BS though the evidence does support the view they often mislead.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:20 pm
Posts: 497
Free Member
 

some of the [s]attempts to sound clever and funny[/s] replies on here are less convincing than the majority of conspiracy theorist's drivel! kinda amusing nevertheless.

must be a bad day for the STW massive. might not be a worthy topic but still...


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can anyone explain why "The Man" wants us to believe to world is round? I can't actually think of a reason why it would actually matter either way but the Flat Earthers are convinced The Man is ****ing with us, the never tell me why though.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:25 pm
Posts: 497
Free Member
 

hmmm,if the world was round then all the trails should be kinda downhill.

i think.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:36 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

some of the [s]attempts to sound clever and funny[/s] replies on here are less convincing than the majority of conspiracy theorist's drivel!

they're really really not


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:37 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50603
 

i think.

You didn't.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:42 pm
Posts: 9010
Free Member
 

BRITNEY SPEARS does.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:44 pm
Posts: 497
Free Member
 

GrahamS - Member

Examples?

And of those examples, how many of those were exposed by randoms shouting at YouTube videos in their mum's basement?

I cannot really verify any details but you get the idea
of course this may have been done on imovie by some college kid. ๐Ÿ™‚

tip of iceberg?


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:51 pm
Posts: 497
Free Member
 

Drac - Moderator

i think.

You didn't.

why so mean?


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:54 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

if you were thinking you would know ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 2:57 pm
Posts: 497
Free Member
 

I was thinking that nobody would consider responding with that obvious and lame remark for more that 2 seconds, nevermind take the time to post it.

๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 3:09 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

iffoverload - Member

but why do these conspiracy theorists do this? they only open themselves up to ridicule...

The point is to know something other people don't. (*) Ridicule is just other people showing their ignorance. There'd be no point if you never got a reaction.

(* and it's too hard to do this with actual facts, if you want to know things other people don't it's easiest just to make shit up)


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 3:32 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

I cannot really verify any details but you get the idea

I really don't think you need to. They are all pretty well known and documented:

[url= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident ]Gulf Of Tonkin incident (1964)[/url]
[url= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal ]Watergate scandal (early 1970s)[/url]
[url= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair ]The Iran Contra affair (late 1980s)[/url]
[url= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewinsky_scandal ]Monica Lewinsky scandal (1998)[/url]
[url= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guant%C3%A1namo_Bay ]Guantรกnamo Bay (ongoing and a pretty dubious inclusion!)[/url]

What each of these clearly demonstrate is that nothing much stays secret for long and the more people you have involved the more likely it is to quickly become public knowledge (just ask Edward Snowden).

Yet people think "The Man" can cover-up daily spraying of populations with "chemicals" and the massive task involved in maintaining the illusion that the earth is round and that space exists. Despite the fact both of these would require tens of thousands, if not millions, of people to be complicit.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What each of these clearly demonstrate is that nothing much stays secret for long and the more people you have involved the more likely it is to quickly become public knowledge

What about the so-called moon landing?


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 4:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've seen these things spread across the sky turning what was a blue sky day into a cloudy ether when they all merge together......whatever it is, it looks a bloody mess!!

Who knows what really goes on in this world.....didnt something come out at that recent climate change conference where someone said something that eluded to the fact that they could spray metal particles into the atmosphere to counter global warming....it was early in the morning on Radio 4, i was still half asleep!


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 4:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What about the so-called moon landing?
You could always ask Buzz Aldrin


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 4:26 pm
Posts: 8945
Free Member
 

@ GrahamS

False flags. Making you think that they are too incompentent to make you think that they're making you think what they're making you think. Makes you think, but not what they think they'remaking you think. Something else.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 4:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Who knows what really goes on in this world.....

David Icke?


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 4:31 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

Aye, there's quite a lot of basically sci-fi mad interventions being quietly investigated in case of catastrophic climate change. They're not good options, they're just what you do if you've managed to **** the climate to the point that anything's worth trying. Stuff like salt dumping into the ocean to influence currents (because desalination's a big concern with melting ice, imagine the gulfstream goes north or south...), surface and cloud albedo, propogating algae to soak up more co2... Terraforming earth, essentially.

If we start doing any of this stuff it's because we've screwed up amazingly though.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 4:35 pm
Posts: 78469
Full Member
 

I doubt it, but it makes for funny banter.

Jesus Christ. That's the line in the sand there, if ever we needed proof. Discussion on STW truly has gone The Full Icke when JHJ is posting forum pages debunking it.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 4:38 pm
Posts: 78469
Full Member
 

As an aside, I've just done a bit of digging on STW conspiracy-theorists past and present. Far as I can tell the vast majority of them appear to be based in (non-UK) Western European countries.

Makes you think, doesn't it.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 4:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Always loved this


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 4:43 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

That is quite brilliant crashtestmonkey, thanks. ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 6:14 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

.


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 6:20 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

MY primary kids enjoyed that as well

To quote "oh my god she is so stupid does she not realise water refracts light"

Personally I like the bit where she was amazed the visible spectrum was visible....hard to tell if real or a troll


 
Posted : 10/12/2015 6:42 pm
Page 2 / 3