Forum menu
I knew there was some intelligence in there somewhere neal, it's taken a long while to squeeze it out, but well done
Yawn 🙄
I tend to agree with your analysis~ as you can see, those are quotes
Yes, of course you do.
(Insert Jimmy Hill picture here)
Seems odd that you would bring it up at all if you think already knew there was such an easy explanation.
.
So what the theory regarding the burnt vehicles then ?
"The government" staged the whole thing to hide a car insurance scam and burn out a few vehicles they no longer needed ?
But removed a few parts and panels first to sell on eBay for a bit of extra cash.
Why does there have to be a theory?
No doubt there are several theories surrounding the cars floating around the net, but as far as I'm concerned, it's just interesting.
As for NORAD... it certainly seems odd, especially when you take into account other factors such as the Hijackers links to Saudi High Officials, who also happen to be close allies of the Bush Family, as mentioned in the original link.
[url= http://fortressamerica.gawker.com/the-case-that-the-saudis-did-9-11-explained-1683728623 ]Here is more detail on further allegations of that aspect[/url]
As for NORAD... it certainly seems odd
Not really.
Explain why you thinks it's odd ?
Explain why you think it isn't odd...
Explain why you think it isn't odd...
🙄 because I don't it think it differs from the norm.
You asked the question. Why didn't NORAD intercept the planes, so you obviously think they were expected to.
soooo..... Explain why, or Explain why you mentioned it.
Or is it like the cars you mentioned earlier, where (after its explained) you will claim you knew the simple explanation already, but for some bizzare reason, decided to bring it up anyway.
jivehoneyjive - Member
Loons who try to deny any planes hit the towers are a sorry reflection on how decades of lies by governments can lead to complete mistrust of reality.
Your earlier comment. So with that I'm calling you a troll and closing this thread.