Forum menu
A question about ru...
 

[Closed] A question about running.

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3184485]

Want to start running but having not run more that 100 yards in 25 years, how easy is it when you first start?

I am pretty fit when it comes to cycling but I imagine the muscle sets will be different even though they obviously both use your legs.

My plan of attack is to start off with slow, short distances and gradually build it up. Would this be the correct approach? Any good tips for a novice runner would be very much appreciated as I don't want to knacker my knees?


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 2:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

walk away from your house* for 10mins, turn around a run slowly home.

see how you feel the next day, and the day after (1 rest day is good, 2? - why not? you've earned it).

build up slowly from there

if it hurts, go slower, if it still hurts, stop.

(*ideally, run somewhere nice, like a forest, or near a lake/river, or hills, or etc. don't feel guilty if you need to drive somewhere to do this, even if it is only for a 5min run)


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 2:54 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

stretch after. you may not have too but I find if I don't stretch for ten minute after I'm crippled a day later.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 2:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hmmm...

There have been a couple of threads about this sort of thing... I'll try and find them. If you are starting from scratch and are prepared to start slowly then it may be worth completely re thinking the way you use your feet....

Did you ever run? Have you ever had any running related injuries?


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 2:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think the consensus is to build up very slowly, no more the 10% per week


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 2:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Give this, or something like it, a go:
[url= http://www.coolrunning.com/engine/2/2_3/181.shtml ]Couch to 5k[/url]

Worked pretty well for me; not just as as gradual buildup, but also as a motivator to keep at it - felt like I should be keeping up with the program, so I went out running on days I probably would otherwise have given it a miss.

Dave


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 2:57 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

and the day after.

i would recomend having a rest day. seriously.

other than that sounds like good advice. i as managing about a mile when i started running lat year - first few times out i was walking 1/3-1/4 of that.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 2:57 pm
 emsz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]My plan of attack is to start off with slow, short distances and gradually build it up. [/i]

perfect.

I did the same, went 3 times a week, for 2 miles then 3 then 4. soon build up some stamina and speed, I didn't need special trainers, and don't seem to get injured much, so lucky *touches some wood* but some on here think that getting your gait analyzed and some new trainers is a good way to avoid lots of injuries. Lots of shops offer this services (which is why I'm suspicious of it, LOL.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Did you ever run? Have you ever had any running related injuries?

The only running I have done is the 100/ 200 meters at school and I use to play Cricket.

I will still want to ride three times a week which are Tuesday, Thursday and Sunday and hope to fit in two runs in between.

Is shoe fitting important? If so, do I need to find a specialist shop?


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

getting your gait analyzed and some new trainers is a good way to avoid lots of injuries

This x 10 - especially if you are a bit heavy

I've gone from a 10 min trot to a 40 min run three times a week in about two months, I'm convinced that my supportive shoes have helped no end.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:19 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

My approach is;

Run for an hour using an HRM to gauge the effort you're putting in (i.e. run at the same HRM you know you can ride all day at).

Get home feelign like you've had a good exercise.

Be unable to climb any stairs without going sideways and doing them one at a time for a week.

Wait a month.

Repeat.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:22 pm
 emsz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd say if you don't get injured doing the sports you already do, you'll probably be OK.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:25 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

Read about forefoot striking and heel striking.

I used to be utterly crap at running and hate it passionately until I learned how to do it properly... night and day. There are those on here who will say not to worry about such nonsense and just run, but then again there are those who naturally fall into a decent stride and I wonder if there's a lot of overlap there ๐Ÿ™‚

It was just a crap experience from start to finish until I started to land forefoot first. Then I got even better again when I realised my hip flexors were really short and they needed stretching out so I could push my foot back much further...

Oh yeah - don't just chug out slow junk miles - it won't help much. Mix it up, sprints, hills etc.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd say if you don't get injured doing the sports you already do, you'll probably be OK.

Not quite sure how that follows.... the sport he is doing now is cycling... which doesn't involve repeatedly pounding your feet into the ground.

Gait analysis and all that jazz is nigh on essential if you don't have 'neutral' gait. If your feet/arches/ankles are perfectly neutral, you'll probably be fine with normal trainers. I over pronate like crazy, so can't run more than about 10 paces without pain in shoes other than my running shoes.

Go and get analysed, and you'll know whether you need special shoes.

Dave


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:29 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

I'm doing the NHS couch to 5k thing, using the podcasts. Done a month now, and it's going fine. I find that I want to do it more often than 3 times a week as it recommends, and run for longer once I've started, but have tried to stick to the program rather than risk overdoing it.

I got some oxymoronically named barefoot running shoes as well. That's going fine too, even for me on the wrong side of 18 stone. In fact, although it feels a bit of a strange way to run, it's definitely less tiring for me than traditional running, if that makes sense.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:30 pm
Posts: 0
 

Read about forefoot striking and heel striking.

Don't worry about such nonsense and just run: the most important thing is to build up distances and times very gradually. Switching between running and walking works well.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:30 pm
 emsz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Oh yeah - don't just chug out slow junk miles[/i]

hmmm, sort of agree with this, iDave had me doing sprints to get my 10k times down (which worked more than I belived!! Still amazed at how fast i can run a 10k now compared to just a few months ago, BUT...I luv going for long slow runs in the morning, I feel like I could just run and run, sometimes do 15-20k, now, I guess there just "junk" but I feel sooooo happy after them, I could never not do them


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I started last week, did three runs of a mile each in around 8 minutes which I know is poor, but have never been able to run more than a few hundred metres and haven't tried for about 17-18 years, I did used to be a really good sprinter in school though. I'll go a little further tonight or tomorrow. Bought some asics trail shoes for my supinated feet and also forefoot striking seem to have completely eradicated the bad shin pain I used to get.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:34 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

a mile each in around 8 minutes

8 min miles aren't slow.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:36 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Just don't overdo it to start with. And think in terms of time spent, not distances run. Enjoy it. And, really, really, really: a bit of warm up before you start and a but of stretching when you're finished.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:37 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

I enjoy junk miles ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

8 min miles aren't slow.

Hmmm I assumed it was but I think pacing myself is a problem of mine, on a bike I find it difficult to just pootle along.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:43 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Oh yeah - don't just chug out slow junk miles - it won't help much. Mix it up, sprints, hills etc.

Personally I'd ignore this till you're comfortably running 3 or 4 miles.

It's good advice to get quicker, but you need to build a base you are capable of comfortably maintaining just like bikes, before worrying much about speed, hills etc. If you run off road you'll probably get a reasonable mix anyway. Don't be ashamed to walk the hills to start with, you really won't feel the pain (as a 'trained' cyclist) till a day or so after.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i think if i tried running i'd trip and fall onto my belly ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm pretty confident 'Junk miles' is just one of the those made-up Junk Terms trotted out by the likes of Runners world magazine.
Pretty much every mile on a mountainbike would be a junk mile using the definitions they have ๐Ÿ™‚

[i]Go and get analysed, and you'll know whether you need special shoes.[/i]

If you do take this course, also realise that your gait will change over time. So most beginners will be analysed as over-pronators because they haven't developed a suitable muscle structure. But whereas if you're analysed as left-handed your pretty much likely to stay left-handed, unlike your gait which may well change a lot.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:46 pm
 emsz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can do 6min 45sec miles. :mrgreen:

*Showing off*


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I guess it all depends on why you want to run

If it's just a keeping fitter thing, just go out and run and don't worry about pace or form


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:47 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

I can do 6min 45sec miles.

*swoon*


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 396
Free Member
 

personally i think the oft repeated +10%/week is utter bo110xxxx
starting at 20minutes = 12weeks to run for an hour?

20,22, 24,27,30,33,36,40,44,49,54,59


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

The term "junk miles" means miles that contribute nothing to your fitness. For example a competitive athlete (say a good 5-10k club runner) would seldom run slower than 7 (ish) minute miling during training.
To run slower adds little in terms of competitive preperation. Those miles may have some minor benefits but running always puts you at risk of injury and even fit athletes get tired running slow 10 milers for example.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

20,22, 24,27,30,33,36,40,44,49,54,59

or, from quite short runs (3 or 4 k), to running for an hour, in only 3 months.

(sounds quite good to me)

i'll be very happy with that rate of progress when i finally man-up and enter a marathon...


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:51 pm
Posts: 76
Free Member
 

I saw that couch to 5k thing but it sounded a slow process so i just borrowed my mates shoes and ran 5k outright in 30mins i felt great but knackered and had to recover for two days! Doh - i need my own shoes and learn to warm up and down before my next attempt


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What about shoes? I live on the edge of a town so footpaths and woods are only a couple of minutes away and this would be more appealing than pavements. Are trail shoes okay to cross over onto tarmac or is it just marketing?


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:56 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

I can do 6m 45sec miles too.

Just the one though. The rest would be about 9 minuters after that.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:56 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

You might have just turned it into a four pager with that last question MM ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:57 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

I can do 6m 45sec miles too.

*swoon*

What about shoes? I live on the edge of a town so footpaths and woods are only a couple of minutes away and this would be more appealing than pavements. Are trail shoes okay to cross over onto tarmac or is it just marketing?

I run 95% off road in Roclite 295s. They are fine with the odd bit of tarmac I hit joining up sections. The treads/lugs might wear down a bit quicker though.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 3:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i once rode my bike a mile. i wasnt timing it, but if you were to minus the time that would've added up from my stops to get my breath back and have some snacks i think it would've been under 7 minutes.

can i join your club now? ๐Ÿ˜ฅ


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Like I said surfer, just like mountain biking. ๐Ÿ˜€
Most of the miles don't contribute to fitness, and there's the ever present chance of falling off, but you'd be laughed at if you told the majority of riders not to waste their time with them ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

Personally I'd ignore this till you're comfortably running 3 or 4 miles.

It's good advice to get quicker, but you need to build a base you are capable of comfortably maintaining

Intervals are not just for building speed. They build stamina as well. I think you need some longer runs to condition your joins and tendons and things, but only some.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

I can do 6m 45sec miles too

Thats a dangerous game of oneupmanship you are playing DD


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 4:01 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Thats a dangerous game of oneupmanship you are playing DD

To be fair, he did add the caveat that he would be blowing out his arse for the rest of the run.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 4:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Are trail shoes okay to cross over onto tarmac

yeah, some of the really agressive 'fell' shoes feel a bit weird on tarmac*, but you really shouldn't be looking at the likes of 'mudclaws*' or 'walsh*' just yet...

(*not unlike running in cheap football boots - you can feel the studs/lugs through the soles)

'trail' shoes are pretty good for everything really. Even if you decide/find out you prefer a more fore-foot running style, a little heal cushioning can help nicely if you want to control your speed running down a steepish hill...

oh, yeah, you're not allowed* to do hills (up [u]or[/u] down) for a while, it's really hard work, and a good way to hurt yourself.

(*says me)


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 4:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

most novice runners train themselves to be slow runners

run 30 secs, walk 30 secs is a great way to avoid this. when you can do that for 20 mins, make it 60 secs on, 60 off. then start to do some 1 mile runs, with 3 mins walking between. it's easier to get fast then develop endurance than the other way.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Ah, Jimmers got there first.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Intervals are not just for building speed. They build stamina as well.

I'm aware of that but I think it's easier, when starting out, to just run till you can do 30 minutes briskly without bringing up a lung.


 
Posted : 26/09/2011 4:06 pm
Page 1 / 3