of course I want cheap and easy. Why wouldn’t I. Who wants expensive and difficult. I see that Royal Caribbean have just announced they are building the world’s biggest cruise ship yet. I bet that one ship is going to do more environmental harm in just its construction phase than everyone on this forum does in their lifetime. All this small scale green washing is just a complete farce so yet I do want cheap and easy until there is real global action
Fine piece of whataboutism there.
Not really. This is a problem that can only be fixed globally. As long as things like this carry on there is nothing any individual or even a nation can do to fix the problem. Why should I compromise my lifestlye when companies are building ships for others to make the most of what they want to do. I fully accept this is completely defeatist but IMHO thats where we are at as a country and a civilisation.
Why should I compromise my lifestlye
Why should you drive a bit slower, for example? Is that really a difficult concept, on a cycling forum of all places.
Benefit of 20mph - no need to get wound up about overtaking roadies. Still had the white van from Richard Small Energy ltd. overtake the lot of us though.
Why should I compromise my lifestlye
I take it you live off-grid with no kids as a "sovereign citizen" in a libertarian paradise then?
Why should I compromise my lifestlye
This is basically “why should I share?” but in grown up words.
”Down with whatever they say next!”
Well, they've hoofed me in the slats 23 times in a row, but maybe this time he's pulling back his right leg for a different reason...
I’ve posted this in a similar thread on here but it’s relevant to both.
There’s an article in the Guardian today about parents campaigning for safer streets. There’s some demonstrations today in various places, part of a campaign called “safe streets now”. “Brake” is another campaign group worth looking up, formed after the unnecessary death of a woman caused by a lorry going too fast with faulty brakes. I was in charge of first attendance at the scene of that “accident”. Perhaps if graphic images of the death and injuries on our roads were in the papers more instead of sanitised photos from a distance then it might help? Cigarette packets have graphic pictures on them, why not pictures to accompany vehicle adverts?
Anyway, on a positive note, I’ve re-joined Cycling UK and I’m re-joining the local campaign group. Also, going to batter my MP toady Rowley with letters.
North East Derbyshire District Council are introducing Public Place Protection orders as part of an interesting campaign against speeding, dangerous driving and nuisance driving.
Campaigning might help, anything to stop the average of five deaths a day on our roads?
I'm expecting some sweateners for pensioners as well coming up to the election. Desperate.com
Perhaps if graphic images of the death and injuries on our roads were in the papers more instead of sanitised photos from a distance then it might help?
This. The sanitisation of the reality absolutely breeds ambivalence in people.
Also put body cams on first responders. If NOK give their blessing get it out there.
It’s 30 miles each way mostly on the motorway .
Things not on many Motorways… 20mph zones, full time bus lanes etc. Sunak isn’t offering anything to you… or any driver… other than to put the brakes on the modernisation of city and town streets designed to keep people (including those of us in cars) moving… which will make some people feel he is on “their side” while doing bugger all to actually help them on their drives in anyway whatsoever.
It’s all signalling, no manoeuvres.
But then that’s all he has the time left to do.
Its thoroughly depressing coming back from Europe and using British public transport.
Spent a week nipping between France and Switzerland, part side hustle, part break. Only required a motor vehicle once to get to an isolated property.
Trains, trams and buses just seem to work there.
That’s because they view public transport as a public utility and spend 2.5x as much per head on it as we do outside London.
The notion that public transport needs to cover its own costs is hugely economically damaging, and results in the kind of car dependence we have.
Is that really a difficult concept, on a cycling forum of all places.
This a mountain bike forum not a roadie forum. I ride my mtb off road not on road as that’s the whole point. If I want to ride on the road I would buy a road bike
lorry going too fast with faulty brakes.
So the real problem was faulty brakes resulting in an inability to stop. Driving with faulty brakes should carry severe punishment
@chrismac I use my mountain bike on the road to get to trails and link bridleways. The roads over the tops I use are 60mph limits and only just wide enough for two vehicles. This limit appears to be the target for a lot of vehicles. The example I gave of the lorry fatality was because it was the catalyst for the formation of “Brake”. I could give you hundreds of graphic examples from North East Derbyshire and the Peak District where excessive speed has been the major cause of serious and tragic “accidents”. Speed limits need reducing on most roads, and I include motorways in that, along with proper enforcement and consequences for breaking them.
I've been getting gradually more pro-Active Travel and decided to volunteer for a local 'Bairns on Bikes' scheme, meaning I had to do a Cycling UK ride leader course the other day. The course was pretty good but it has pretty much radicalised me. The amount of paperwork and planning needed just to take some kids to a park to play is, quite frankly, something we should be ashamed of as a society.
So anyone having a moan about how hard it is to be a motorist, please kindly ram it all the way up your hoop until it pops out and then ram it right up there again.
This a mountain bike forum not a roadie forum. I ride my mtb off road not on road as that’s the whole point. If I want to ride on the road I would buy a road bike.
Right you are, we should all be exactly like you. I'll cancel my subscription and get a roadietrackworld one henceforth. Can't have me on the road on my mountain bike, getting to the trails from my front door. You might be (t)rolling along in your car at 30mph.
Right you are, we should all be exactly like you. I’ll cancel my subscription and get a roadietrackworld one henceforth. Can’t have me on the road on my mountain bike, getting to the trails from my front door. You might be (t)rolling along in your car at 30mph.
Not at all. Just because people have a different opinion to yours or mine is what makes the world go round. I just thought the point of a mountain biking forum was to discuss mountain biking not road riding. I too have to use some bits of road but don’t seem to have the issues others seem to have on a daily basis. Perhaps the parts of the Peak District I ride in are graced with considerate road uses on using all forms of transportation
This a mountain bike forum
Are you absolutely sure about that?
My PCP for my car ended last year, and since then I've been without a car for most of the time - occasionally borrowing one. However, I would class myself as a petrolhead, (and motorsport fan) but I had to laugh when I saw a You Tube video about Rishi ending the war on the motorist. There isn't, or wasn't really a war on the motorist - nearly all transport policy is massively in favour of the motorist.....
This is even more in favour of the motorist, and active travel will suffer. We need less cars/lorries on the roads and more active travel, I don't know why people can get this into their heads. Building more roads isn't the answer....
Building more roads isn’t the answer….
But we do need more gravel roads to ride our Gravel Bikes on
. There isn’t, or wasn’t really a war on the motorist – nearly all transport policy is massively in favour of the motorist…..
This X a really big number.
If there truly was a war on motorists there'd be some enforcement of the widespread utterly shonky driving that I see every day including a lot of extra speed and red light cameras.
We fundamentally need a war on the motorist not necessarily in taxing them but in hammering dangerous, careless and downright incompetent driver behaviours.
- Phone use
- Drink and drugs
- Speeding
- Red light offences
- Close passing
- Road rage
- Unsafe and uninsured vehicles
- Lack of lane discipline
- Illegal tints
- Stupid and antisocial modifications
- Antisocial driving
- Disrupting police operations through sharing of enforcement operations through social media
Tackling that lot at scale would be a war (maybe a crusade?) on motorists and that's long overdue.
Until Covid I drove about 20,000 miles a year and at my peak in the mid 00's my mileage was 35,000pa and I'd still have supported every last one of those.
I would add to your list antisocial parking. As the default parking behaviour is either partly or completely on the pavement or verge.
I can theoretically be prosecuted for cycling on the pavement but you can park your car their.
Is driving on the pavement not illegal?
Near where I live the pavement is half bike lane and half pavement.
If cars are parked in the bike lane (which is apparently legal) I have to commit an offence to pass it.
It's time to reclaim the built environment from cars.
It’s time to reclaim the built environment from cars.
👍
Disrupting police operations through sharing of enforcement operations through social media<br /><br />
This is shared by the police in the first place. <br /><br />Secondly they are rarely carried out by police officers. They are usually staffed by civilians in police marked vehicles which in itself is technically illegal as they are impersonating a police officer which is a crime. Where I live they also have a habit of parking in the most stupid of places blocking pavements and obcuring lines of sight for road users
@chrismac If both of your statements are true then you need to report them - let us know how you get on!
Until Covid I drove about 20,000 miles a year and at my peak in the mid 00’s my mileage was 35,000pa and I’d still have supported every last one of those.
Same here, drive many miles a year, both personal and for work, and would support all of that being enforced. It'll never happen though as it's politically poisonous to do so.
Near where I live the pavement is half bike lane and half pavement.
If cars are parked in the bike lane (which is apparently legal) I have to commit an offence to pass it.
There is a road in Llanrumney in Cardiff that had lovely large cycle lanes painted on the tarmac, perfect for the local school etc. Every resident just uses it as a parking lane instead with no enforcement whatsoever. https://maps.app.goo.gl/xsqnb2ptGCyjr9yc 9">This was the street view in the middle of the day, during the evenings it's completely full of parked cars.
They are usually staffed by civilians in police marked vehicles which in itself is technically illegal as they are impersonating a police officer which is a crime.
Sorry but that sounds like “sovereign citizen”esque made up quasi-legal bollocks.
Bruce
Full MemberThere are a significant number of the carcentric on here. See Top gear threads, what car for spirited driving.
I'm carcentric- daily driver is a big fast estate, I'm doing an engine swap in an MX5 which I'll take to trackdays etc. But I live in a 20mph limit and it's great, it'd be idiocy to change it back. I use the bus for every trip into the city because it's convenient and better. I want better buses, more active travel, more cycle lanes, support 20 limits. I don't do any of the <fun> stuff in my cars in towns after all, it makes no difference at all to the average petrolhead.
Truth is the weight of public opinion can't be about car lovers, because there's really not that many of us. It's mostly about misinformation and pandering, at this point.
Sorry but that sounds like “sovereign citizen”esque made up quasi-legal bollocks.
I suggest you dress up like a policeman and park up in a van that looks like is a police vehicle and see what happens
So far any attempt to use this defence in court has resulted in the prosecution withdrawing the case.
Impersonating a police officer is a breach of Section 90 of the Police Act To quote
“Any person who with intent to deceive impersonates a member of a police force or special constable, or makes any statement or does any act calculated falsely to suggest that he is such a member or constable, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction”
Sitting in a van liveried as a police vehicle, in a uniform designed to look like a police officers should be a pretty clear breach of the act
Is driving on the pavement not illegal?
It's an odd one for sure. To get the car on to it then you're driving on it, but it seems that people, and the authorities, just accept it.
I was somewhere yesterday where it seemed normal to park a vehicle wholly on the pavement outside a house, not even two wheels on/two wheels off, with zero room for pedestrians or anyone needing more space.
Yet like you say, at best it's often breaking the law to ride on the pavement, or cyclists are portrayed as sub-human for using them.
Yesterday during rush hour (to be fair the vehicle drivers weren't rushing anywhere, due to too many cars on the road), I witnessed a woman park most of her car on the pavement the other bit was on the double yellow lines. In making this manoeuvre she managed to prevent a pedestrian already on that bit of pavement from continuing, she got honked at by two drivers and best of all, she managed to park bang opposite the 'parking enforcement officer (whom I was standing next to). She opens the door, steps out of the car and shouts across to me 'oh, shouldn't I be parking here', to which I point at the 'parking enforcement officer's small white vehicle and reply as nicely as I can - NO. On seeing this this quickly gets in her car and moves on.
They are usually staffed by civilians in police marked vehicles which in itself is technically illegal as they are impersonating a police officer which is a crime.
Round here they are not marked as Police vehicles, they are "CREST", they are manned by civilian staff, and I was very tempted when they advertised today that there was a vacancy.
should be
Bless you.
I’m sure your questionable internet based interpretation of the law invalidates all the mobile speed cameras that are out there then.
Funny that none of the lawyers who specialize in speeding cases mention it?
“Oh, was it a mobile speed camera that caught you? Don’t worry about it, we’ll definitely get you off because they were <checks notes> impersonating police officers.”
Next you’ll be on about Habeas Corpus and Magna Carta…
By all accounts Sunak’s transport strategy is more roads and more short haul aviation, putting us at complete odds with the global consensus. I really don’t get what his game is - it’s not even making him more electorally popular.
Its a speed camera in a van. It doesn't mater who operates it. A chimpanse could do it. The vans are used as a deterent if you get caught by one you are speeding and not paying attention as they are quite obvious.
They are usually staffed by civilians in police marked vehicles which in itself is technically illegal as they are impersonating a police officer which is a crime.
This is absolute, 100% mince. Stop paying attention to the barrack room lawyers on Petrolheads.
The Sooner the petrol heads and the impatient realise that roads are not a place to entertain yourself and rush about the better.
They share the roads with horses cyclists and pedestrians. They were all there before cars and you need to behave in a way to keep all other road users safe. From the holes in the hedges of minor roads some of you are not doing this.
If you want to drive fast book a track day or go and race.
Every week there are reports of people killed or seriously injured by cars. Your spirited driving, making progress having fun will be less fun if you have a large accident.
Every other road user will be missed by someone.
Just grow up.
I really don’t get what his game is – it’s not even making him more electorally popular.
I'm not sure even Rishi knows TBH.
It seems to be doubling down on doubling down, and squashing anything his 3 or 4 processors supported.
As last week unfolded I sort of realised very few of the big names in Tory politics were even trying to court the wider public, they're after the support of the misserable gits that make up the membership, this is all to secure their position in the aftermath of their coming defeat.
Rishi is hampered in this fight for the future by two things; 1) he has an election to try and fight, 2) He's just a disconnected money-bitch, he really belongs in the boardroom of some fintech outfit seeing the world through the lens of shareholder's interests.
Thus he has no understanding of 'normal people' so when a couple of SPAGs tell him the plebs are crying out for infrastructure projects to be canned, and won't notice if they re-announce existing plans and/or some stuff thats already happened, importantly the rhetoric will keep the shareholders members happy...
importantly the rhetoric will keep the shareholders members happy…
If Sunak was acting in big corporate interests, he would extend HS2 to Glasgow, announce a massive scrappage scheme, commit to building a million houses, actually build 100 new hospitals...all of which involve shovelling massive amounts of taxpayer money into private accounts. He'd also commit to going back into the EU ASAP. He's doing the exact opposite of all of that.
He’s doing the exact opposite of all of that.<br /><br />
Because his primary interest are with the disaster capitalists, hedge fund owners, private equity and kleptocrats which sponsor Tufton Street and thrive on shock events such as leaving the EU or Kwasi’s budget. Relying on insider knowledge to pump a few billions into staking short positions while their political poodles do all their bidding. Anyone who thinks the Tories are at all concerned about the welfare of man on the street are just deluded when they are just diverting public money in their mates’ accounts.