Forum menu
You're riding ...
 

[Closed] You're riding along and a dog runs out and wipes you out - whose fault is it?

 Euro
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've been knocked off my bike by a dog on two occasions. Each time it was my completely my fault. Not because the dog was out of control - it was just being a dog and didn't know what would happen if it hit my front wheel with it's rear while running across my path. I wasn't riding recklessly either - i could see the dog coming but foolishly assumed it wouldn't be that dumb, but guess what? It's a dog, and although probably fairly smart as dogs go, but not all that clever in grand scheme of things. Knowing this didn't stop me from being angry at the dog at the time, but it was my fault - 100%. Maybe 200% as it was my own dog ๐Ÿ˜€

So in the OPs case, i blame the rider not the dog. However, the crazy person dog owner should not have shouted or handled your child. I'd have had more than words if it was my 8yr old.


 
Posted : 26/09/2015 9:44 am
Posts: 6990
Full Member
 

Wow. Just the idea of someone grabbing my son has got me shaking a bit. I do get quite anxious about the idea of conflict though, possibly because anytime I've found myself with someone who is being verbally aggressive it has often turned physical.

I am quite small so people probably reckon they're fairly safe.


 
Posted : 26/09/2015 12:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Definately the dog owners fault, I had a similar incident and the owner took full responsibility, there were not children involved and the dog sadly came off much worse. I was cycling along a disused line saw a guy with his jack Russell, alerted him to my presence and slowed down, he got hold of his dog, but just as I was cycling past he let go of it, why I don't know, the dog bolted and ran straight in front of my bike and I went over the top of it. The dog clearly had a broken back and was in a bad way, I stopped and helped him take it back to his car, despite been really upset, man I was gutted, he was really apologetic and kept asking if I was ok. Don't know if it survived. As for grabbing your kid, if that was mine and I'd seen it, I would have lamped him.


 
Posted : 26/09/2015 1:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Crazy person proceeded to grab my 8yr old son who was in tears and try to shake him

Assault, ignore the dog issue report him to the police.


 
Posted : 26/09/2015 7:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So in the OPs case, i blame the rider not the dog.

Idiot.


 
Posted : 26/09/2015 7:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wow that is out of order. Shaking a child = assault in this day and age. And even then, shaking someone else's crying child who has just had an accident on their pushbike? WTF!

There really are some utter t***s in the world. Pet owners who put the safety of their ball of mange above that of other humans rank up there for sure.

Needs a good talking to.


 
Posted : 26/09/2015 9:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There really are some utter t***s in the world. Pet owners who put the safety of their ball of mange above that of other humans rank up there for sure

Yes but dogs are way better than humans.

If you believe in karma its entirely possible the dog was just doing his bit to restore the balance.


 
Posted : 27/09/2015 8:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

If you believe in karma its entirely possible the dog was just doing his bit to restore the balance.

Care to explain what an 8yr old kid might have done to need his karma rebalanced by being knocked off his bike and assaulted?


 
Posted : 27/09/2015 8:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wasnt exactly being serious ๐Ÿ˜•

I haven't seen an answer to this question or I may have missed it but were the police informed of this assault?


 
Posted : 27/09/2015 8:42 am
Posts: 3394
Full Member
 

The dog owner should be in control of their dog. If not they are liable. That is one of the responsibilities of dog ownership.

But the real issue is the fact that the owner assaulted your son.
This is a matter for the police.
At a minimum it should be made clear to this guy that he needs to address his behaviour.
If there is a hint of previous then........
After all thats why we have DBS checks and the like.


 
Posted : 27/09/2015 8:59 am
Posts: 4892
Free Member
 

Care to explain what an 8yr old kid might have done to need his karma rebalanced by being knocked off his bike and assaulted?

Not tidying a bedroom?

Not eating all his broccoli?

Not washing his hands before dinner?

These seem to be our kids common misdemeanours but I could see how they could add up.

Dog owner fault and sounds like a tool, bombers and shoe based wee attack!


 
Posted : 27/09/2015 9:49 am
Posts: 6808
Full Member
 

If a dog had knocked my son off his bike I would be havin words with its owner if dog owner shock my son then talking would be low down on my list of things to do and he would be looking for a dentist.

That about covers it.

I have a dog and although it's soft it is also numb. I let it off the lead when I can but if it did something like this I would take full responsibility.


 
Posted : 27/09/2015 11:19 am
Posts: 396
Free Member
 

there was a dog walker in one of our local parks that had a cycle route through it that was deliberately setting up incidents - using one of those long ball throwing stick things to aim the ball so dog ran in front of cyclists...first time saw it thought it was accidental but seemed odd on the section of path as not really a lot of room - second time I was sat back waiting for some stragglers as other kids rode on ahead and presumably the guy was blind as well a nuts as saw him do it with two different kids - I pointed out that I'd seen what he was doing and got an anti-cycling rant - mad people in parks don't you love them


 
Posted : 27/09/2015 10:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

mad people in parks don't you love them

I think I might set up an incident where said nut job gets absolutely flattened by a bike.


 
Posted : 27/09/2015 10:38 pm
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

The dog owner should be in control of their dog. If not they are liable. That is one of the responsibilities of dog ownership.

the dog is always under control until the unique incident because as we all know "it's never done that before"


 
Posted : 27/09/2015 10:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I dont mind dogs at all. In fact, I love animals on the whole.

However when I commute on the canal, dogs that arent on leads and running everywhere are becoming a pain. Whilst their owners are on their phones no doubt on FB posting pictures of dogs & cats 'reading' newspapers etc.

Hope the lads ok anyways.


 
Posted : 28/09/2015 9:39 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

I was knocked off my bike by a sheep once.

There was no farmer there to complain to and the animal ran off and hid in the flock where I had no chance of singling it out.

It was a frustrating experience all round.


 
Posted : 28/09/2015 9:41 am
Posts: 6362
Free Member
 

Re the dog bit and ignoring any legal complications.
We have the responsibility, moral if not legal, to be able to stop. Yes I know that many people would say you can't ride around at a speed and awareness that makes this possible 100 % of the time but on a bike why not? Our pleasure at speed is less important than anyones safety.
If that means when driving a car,you annoy the drivers behind, you are correct and they are wrong.
So, unless laws say that the dog/owner was wrong, it could be the lads fault. Even if by law the dog shouldn't have been loose contributory negligenc could be said to have occurred.
Just playing devils advocate.
Re the other character handling the lad. FFS! Police. Now


 
Posted : 28/09/2015 9:51 am
Posts: 35035
Full Member
 

Fell off yesterday because of a dog running around my front wheel. steeply downhill at the time. I guess it's a 50/50 call, I should be in control, but so should the dog(owner). I do get a bit fed up with bad dog owners who seem happy to abdicate their responsibility.

I was a bit sweary ๐Ÿ˜ณ


 
Posted : 28/09/2015 10:51 am
 Euro
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

wanmankylung - Member
Idiot.

Thanks!

A lot of talk about dogs not being under control in this thread. But OP fails to control his 'pet' in this occasion too. In fact the dog owner was first on the scene and was walking (which we all know is a lot slower than cycling), so just how [i]unsupervised[/i] was his child. We all know that that dog could easily have been a couple of dwarf peado's in disguise! I change my plea and enter a revised plea of bad parenting!


 
Posted : 28/09/2015 11:05 am
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Better to say nothing, rather than carry on and prove beyond all doubt that you are indeed an idiot.


 
Posted : 28/09/2015 11:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

A lot of talk about dogs not being under control in this thread.

The dog injured someone - the law defines that as the dog being dangerously out of control.

But OP fails to control his 'pet' in this occasion too. In fact the dog owner was first on the scene and was walking (which we all know is a lot slower than cycling), so just how unsupervised was his child.
We all know that that dog could easily have been a couple of dwarf peado's in disguise! I change my plea and enter a revised plea of bad parenting!

Show me the law that says children must be kept under close control at all times.

Idiot troll.


 
Posted : 28/09/2015 11:32 am
Posts: 551
Free Member
 

Just to add to the Moronic dog person theme.....

Out riding my normal trails this weekend. Slowed down to walking pace to pass a dog person who was knelt down with arms smothered around a small ball of dog shaped fluff in a protective embrace. I rolled slowly past on the flat wide path while chatting to a friend and was shouted at by the dog woman in a hysterical voice. I cant remember the exact words but the gist of the tirade was that I should keep my distance. I replied in a confused voice "But I'm nowhere near it". The mad dog woman then stopped another member of our group and said "Can you please tell that man not to refer to my dog as it". Or words to that effect.

I now know that before referring to a dog I need to stop and check its sex first.


 
Posted : 28/09/2015 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On a slightly related note, who's fault would it be if I run over a dog on my bike and seriously hurt the dog ?

When it comes to smaller dogs, it's much more likely the dog will get hurt than the rider in a collision.

Many times I've slammed by brakes on my 29er to avoid running over small dogs.


 
Posted : 29/09/2015 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=wanmankylung ]Crazy person proceeded to grab my 8yr old son who was in tears and try to shake him - you can guess the rest.

You put him on his backside? ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

Seriously though I'm with the choir - no way I wouldn't report that to the police, and it's the sort of thing they might actually take seriously.


 
Posted : 29/09/2015 10:59 pm
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

So when this aggressive bloke grabbed your son how did you react anyway? Using appropriate physical force can be used in such circumstances right?

Also would have got a photo for future reference - assuming I hadn't gone a bit far with thee physical force bit of course.


 
Posted : 30/09/2015 8:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

on my 29er to avoid running over small dogs.

Is the wheel size relevant to the running over of dogs ๐Ÿ˜•

Does it make the tails come alive ?


 
Posted : 30/09/2015 1:53 pm
Page 2 / 2