XTR M9000 11sp rear...
 

[Closed] XTR M9000 11sp rear cassette Q

Posts: 172
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Looking at the cost of going 1x11 on my xc race bike in the next few months and trying to weigh up the pros / costs of XTR m9000 vs SRAM XX1.

I wanted to double check, does the XTR m9000 11sp rear cassette require a XD rear freehub or is that just required for the SRAM 11sp cassettes? The cost of XTR 11sp rear cassette vs SRAM 11sp XX1 + XD freehub for a DT Swiss DT240 rear hub might be a deciding factor.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 12:50 pm
Posts: 4429
Full Member
 

I've got an M9000 11-speed cassette, fits on a normal Shimano freehub no worries.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 12:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Xtr 11sp cassette fits on a standard (10sp compatible) freehub body.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 12:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Only the SRAM stuff needs the xd driver. Why would you not go for the extended range that SRAM gives?

I've not looked at prices so I don't know which is cheaper.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 12:53 pm
Posts: 20947
 

Yeah, normal free hub for xtr 11speed, xd for sram

While sram is more expensive, it has a wider range and (much) lighter cassette.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 12:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The XTR cassette fits on a normal freehub. Think I'll see a lot of people racing this set up this year, just makes sense to me.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 12:54 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I've not looked at prices so I don't know which is cheaper.

And therein lies your answer 😉

FWIW, I'm using an XX1 cassette with XTR mech and shifer which, cost aside, is the best combo IMO!


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 12:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

njee, looking to go down the same route myself. How are you finding the hybrid setup? did you need a long cage mech to handle the sram cassette.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 1:40 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

It's fantastic, medium (GS) cage mech is fine on a hardtail, not checked how close it is if you've got a frame with a lot of chain growth.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 1:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And therein lies your answer

Well I'd assume that SRAM would be more expensive due to new freehub etc. but you can never be quite sure with bike parts!


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 1:42 pm
 LeeW
Posts: 2119
Free Member
 

I'm running a Sram cassette with Shimano shifter/derailleur, finally managed to get a Mavic XD freehub body so I can put my new wheels on the bike.

Just as an aside, the Sram cassettes are milled from steel rather than being aluminium/Ti, the steel will last quite a lot longer than the alu meaning although it may be slightly more expensive, it should work out cheaper in the long run.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 1:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Has anyone tried the shimano cassette with XX1 mech & shifter?

I have XX1 already and was requiring a new cassette.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 2:08 pm
Posts: 384
Free Member
 

Has anyone tried the shimano cassette with XX1 mech & shifter?

I have XX1 already and was requiring a new cassette.

Not exactly but I run XTR cassette and rear mech with Sram X01 gripshift and it works perfectly.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 2:49 pm
Posts: 6409
Free Member
 

I have XX1 already and was requiring a new cassette.

why would you go for one with less range that is heavier?


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 3:07 pm
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

I have XX1 but miss the multi release shifter and general more solid, quality feel of Shimano shifting. If I were buying again I'g go for the hybrid setup Njee has. Put the pennies you save (compared to XX1 mech/ shifter) on the slightly cheaper XTR mech and shifter towards the XD freehub and SRAM cassette. Best of all worlds.

I don't think anyone really knows about the durability of the new XTR cassettes but Lee makes a great point that the XX1 cassette wears really well so could actually work out cheaper in the long run- certainly compared to the Shimano cassettes I've used previously anyway.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 3:10 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Just as an aside, the Sram cassettes are milled from steel rather than being aluminium/Ti, the steel will last quite a lot longer than the alu meaning although it may be slightly more expensive, it should work out cheaper in the long run.

As Dan says, whilst you're right, there's no aluminium in an XTR cassette, just steel and ti. XX1/X01/X1 have the 42t made of alu, and some people have found it wears if you use it too much (no surprise), if you don't then longevity is very good. Better than XTR (10 speed) IME.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 3:15 pm
Posts: 3817
Full Member
 

40T on XTR is Alu.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 3:21 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Apologies, so it is, hadn't realised that.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 3:27 pm
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

I have XX1 cassette and XTR Medium mech's on two santa cruz full suspension bikes and its been spot on on both, no issues at all.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 3:34 pm
Posts: 6859
Free Member
 

FWIW, I'm using an XX1 cassette with XTR mech and shifer which, cost aside, is the best combo IMO!

I presume the indexing all works fine for you in this setup?

I don't think I understand why the XX1 cassette needs a wider freehub if the spacing is just the same? Or is the reason for the different freehub with SRAM just because of the 10t sprocket?

What are the advantages, other than your cassette weighs a bit less and costs a lot more?


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 3:54 pm
Posts: 20947
 

Or is the reason for the different freehub with SRAM just because of the 10t sprocket?

Bingo


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 4:02 pm
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

I don't think I understand why the XX1 cassette needs a wider freehub if the spacing is just the same?

Both 11 speed XTR and XX1 cassettes are wider than 10 speed. Shimano decided to hang the biggest sprocket over the freehub a bit more towards the spokes while SRAM designed a new freehub which also allows for the 10T sprocket.

What are the advantages, other than your cassette weighs a bit less and costs a lot more?

Possibly wear rate also as mentioned above. A cheaper cassette could be a false economy in the long run. More gear range too if that is important to you


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 4:30 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

What are the advantages, other than your cassette weighs a bit less and costs a lot more?

As said, it gives you a better range, it lasts longer and it weighs less, what other benefits could a cassette (or any component) possibly deliver!?

I presume the indexing all works fine for you in this setup?

Flawlessly. Better than the XX1 shifter did.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 4:48 pm
Posts: 2294
Full Member
 


FWIW, I'm using an XX1 cassette with XTR mech and shifer which, cost aside, is the best combo IMO!

So that should mean that an XX1 cassette should work with an XTR Di2 shifter and mech too 😛

Time to start knocking out some overtime for a bit of bling for the bike maybe!


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 4:52 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

So that should mean that an XX1 cassette should work with an XTR Di2 shifter and mech too

Yes, definitely.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 4:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Adam_Buckland - Member

Not exactly but I run XTR cassette and rear mech with Sram X01 gripshift and it works perfectly

Did I read that correctly - XTR rear mech with SRAM (grip)shifter shifting properly? Is the cable pull the same?


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 5:05 pm
Posts: 172
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks all for the above.

Certainties for me are therefore XTR 11sp rear shifter and XTR 11sp rear mech (this ends up being approx £145 cheaper than XX1 equivalents).

I'm still weighing the cassette up on a cost basis although I'll most likely just plump for an XTR 11sp initially:

- XTR 11sp cassette e.g. £151.99 at Merlin
or
- XX1 Cassette £229.99 (CRC) + Roval / DT Swiss XD Freehub £90 at LBS = £320


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 5:50 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
Posts: 6409
Free Member
 

prices on the SRAM cassettes seems to have gone up recently,


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 6:19 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Certainties for me are therefore XTR 11sp rear shifter and XTR 11sp rear mech (this ends up being approx £145 cheaper than XX1 equivalents).

Lighter too.


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 6:33 pm
Posts: 20947
 

Love how XTR is now the 'budget' alternative 😆


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 6:57 pm
Posts: 384
Free Member
 

Did I read that correctly - XTR rear mech with SRAM (grip)shifter shifting properly? Is the cable pull the same?

Yes that's right it seems that both Shimano and Sram's 11 spd off road groupsset share the same pull ratios and spacing so all parts are interchangeable and in me experience work flawlessly


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 7:39 pm
 leth
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Slight thread hijack.

To all those running a mix of Shimano and Sram bits, would say a SRAM XX1 crank with narrow wid chain rings be compatiable wit a Shimano rear cassette. or vise versa?


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 7:59 pm
Posts: 6409
Free Member
 

Of course


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 8:00 pm
 leth
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nice quick answer.
That opens up som options on the new build


 
Posted : 29/01/2015 8:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

why would you go for one with less range that is heavier?

Coz I have a 2nd pair of wheels with a normal freehub on it (and can get shimano at trade 😉 )


 
Posted : 30/01/2015 2:53 pm
Posts: 6409
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 30/01/2015 2:59 pm