Forum menu
Why does everyone t...
 

[Closed] Why does everyone think kona are crap?

Posts: 6886
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1470525]

My kona failed to sell on the bay, although I was offered £150, I was looking for a little more.

Anyway why have kona gone from the market leaders in the nineties to a brand no one wants, as a swear it's just another Taiwanese alu frame like a santa cruz, spesh, yeti even?


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 8:56 pm
Posts: 9095
Free Member
 

Never had one but I've ridden a few, Pahoehoe, Kula, MuniMuler, Lavadome, Caldera, King, HeiHei etc.

They are all rather heavy (relative to competition in the case of HeiHei and Kula) and farily expensive for the spec.

However, there is just something about them, they just feel 'right' when i sit on them, don't know why.

If yours is classic steel one (Explosiv ideally but maybe Cindercone) I'll beat the £150 for it (subject to correct size etc)


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I typed 'heavy and expensive for the spec' but didn't hit send.
They have a reputation for being bombproof though.


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i sold a kona cowan hardtail last year on flea bay and could of sold a dozon...just bought a steel hardtail humu humu what u callit steel hardtail thingy that had no offers for 5 days...wanted one of them for a while for a progect and it had a cheap buy it now so again happy to have a kona...taiwanese welders are some of the best in the bike industry so where there made dosnt matter..guess its marketing/magazine hype that makes people buy certain brands, kona have made some great bikes...


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:03 pm
Posts: 6886
Free Member
Topic starter
 

No its a Kona Cowan, mint though I only have the vertical dropouts not the aftermarket singlespeed ones.

I once sold a well used lavadome for £15 😳


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:04 pm
 rs
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

I guess its not worth it, what year, model, etc?


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:05 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Konas are great, love Kulas and still want an old orange/cream King Kikapu.


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:06 pm
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

Well most of people talk to there asses and think that if it comes from halfraud it's poo.
Kona are sold by halfraud true, but it doesn't makes them crap. As andrewh mention they are different. You will always be comfy on a Kona. I have on hoss and let face it, it is the most inspiring hardtail I got to rode.
MTB is now the "middle age IT crowd " sport. You have it featured in the shopping pages of stuff magazine. Most people seems to think you need a 5" FS to ride around the MM course, and that I am and above average rider where in fact I am average less I can just go down stuff not even very quickly. That tells you a lot about the sport. It's not any more about riding your bike in the middle of nowhere it's all about kit and niche.
You need a bike for pootling around the local wood, one bike for mincing the red at the trail centre, one bike for the winter, one for the casual day in the peak and one for lift assisted holidays in France.
See now people seems to think you need a fully build van the last update in terms of kit and a carbon exotica bike.

And so and so

RaNt OvEr


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:09 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

what juan said
nothing wrong with Kona I had new kona aa in 95 and only just stopped riding it this year


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:16 pm
Posts: 6886
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Wow juan that was a funny rant 5 stars!!


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:20 pm
Posts: 57375
Full Member
 

I bloody loved my old Cinder Cone. Its still performing stirling service as a singlespeed


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:22 pm
Posts: 7971
Free Member
 

Binners I could have written exactly the same thing, old school konas are ace
Their newer stuff seems to have lost some of its charm, oddly around a similar time they lost joe murray


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:43 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

For me - it's not what juan said.
Halfords also sell Boardman bikes and these are just about the best bang-per-buck you'll get.
Kona offer a downgraded specification on their bikes and hope the brand name sells the bike. And to some - it does.
In the 90s when Kona was cool they offered the innovative Joe Murray frame with top-notch components. In a way they're a victim of their own success and have lost their way a little. Which proves a big brand just can't think small.


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 9:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Was trying to sell a Kona myself recently - didn't sell. (2008 or 9 Coilair) Someone was offering 500 for it, was bought for 11 or 1200 six months before. Other than that i was out on my king kikapu, or xc gate as it has been referred to on here, tonight and it was a blast.


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 10:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had my king kikapu 2002 stolen, replaced it since but miss it still, very involving ride. have a kona steel cinder cone...which is (still) nice!


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

nothing wrong with kona. they flooded the marked a few years back and maybe de-valued the brand quite a bit. but they make a dam good frame. sure spec isnt great but if the money is in the frame the other things can be upgraded later on. still love to ride my old stinky its battered but im beating guys on £10k rigs!


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 10:36 pm
Posts: 953
Full Member
 

Loved my old steel Cindercone with splatter paint job and loving my Five-O with a chunky little build on it.
They are doing some great stuff with the magic link, I think some shonky magazine recently gave the Cadabra or Abra Cadabra a pretty good right up.


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

My first full sus was a 2004 Kona Dawg and I really regret selling it. I haven't yet found any bike frame that gives me the same confidence or (and therefore) enjoyment.
I think they went thru a period of being slated by the mags for just churning out the same bike each year, just in a different colour scheme and slight component changed.


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 10:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

what's wrong with churning out the same bike each year with slightly different spec if it performs well. Show's they got it right first time.


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 11:15 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

Hoss - best bike I've ever owned
Jake the Snake - Just ordered one
King Kahuna - Lusting after one


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 11:24 pm
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

i`ve got a hoss and love it 😀


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 11:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't think kona are crap, quite the contrary, seems a lot of ladz round here have very nice kona bikes I'd like to have a go on, unfortunately, they just ride 'em round the car park being "cool". I'm sure they are very capable bikes.

Konas and carreras are what are available in halfords "off the peg", that's what people buy. Can't expect everyone to walk in and be an STW genius!


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 11:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just rebuilt my pahoehoe ltd ed frame for courier duties, man oh man...i'd forgotten how sweet that frame is, so light (easton) snappy as ****, just a joy to ride!! Really really really good, having a ball!!

Not shit, just becoming less good.


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 11:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like Juans rant. I really do think thats the caae with MTB riding these days. But as for it being the death of Kona then I think its a bit off the mark. Its just like HTTP404 pointed out. Konas used to have the best geometry and were made from easton alloy 853 etc. The parts fitted were good and the price not too bad. Its no suprise that the older steel and alloy hardtails fetch a premium when sold on ebay and the newer ones fetch a lot less when you sell the frames. A bit like Jaguar cars the old ones had class and were innovative. The new ones are basically a Ford Mondeo both in build and spec and way more expensive for nothing more than a badge. I think Konas fall into the same vain. You might as well buy a Boardman than a Kona now. Better price and spec and the Konas have less kudos


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 11:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 seth....tis the case i reckon..


 
Posted : 01/04/2010 11:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I love my Coiler. That is all.


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 12:51 am
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

They might be brilliant bikes (and mine was), but who, off here, shops at Halfords for a new bike?.


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 1:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Because they're brainwashed by the media. Konas didn't get heavier, everything else got lighter with more fragile components that have become the "norm" and disposable.


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 1:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The French are right! 😉

I always wanted a green Explosif frame in that steel package.

Don't rush a sale.

I thought my Trek road bike was not going to sell but it did-you have to be patient in this market too.


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 1:10 am
Posts: 66107
Full Member
 

"They might be brilliant bikes (and mine was), but who, off here, shops at Halfords for a new bike?."

I would. The Boardman and Voodoo ranges and some of the Carreras are fantastic and my local branch is pretty good overall. Wouldn't buy any of their Konas though since they're far too expensive for what you get 😉


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 1:16 am
 devs
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Similar to B.A.nana my 1st full sus was a 2006 Dawg Primo. I replaced it with a Nomad which does everything just as well or better but for a far higher price. I still have that Dawg, albeit just a frame in my garage at the moment. I love it too much to get rid, the paltry sum i'd get for it would insult the times we had together and I'm sure I'd want it back at some stage. It's my backup FS now. I would definitely buy another Kona.


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 1:35 am
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

juan - Member

Well most of people talk to there asses and think that if it comes from halfraud it's poo.
Kona are sold by halfraud true, but it doesn't makes them crap. As andrewh mention they are different. You will always be comfy on a Kona. I have on hoss and let face it, it is the most inspiring hardtail I got to rode.
MTB is now the "middle age IT crowd " sport. You have it featured in the shopping pages of stuff magazine. Most people seems to think you need a 5" FS to ride around the MM course, and that I am and above average rider where in fact I am average less I can just go down stuff not even very quickly. That tells you a lot about the sport. It's not any more about riding your bike in the middle of nowhere it's all about kit and niche.
You need a bike for pootling around the local wood, one bike for mincing the red at the trail centre, one bike for the winter, one for the casual day in the peak and one for lift assisted holidays in France.
See now people seems to think you need a fully build van the last update in terms of kit and a carbon exotica bike.

And so and so

wow, juan. respect. 😀

..... but watch your third person 's'


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 1:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Got my Boardman off Halfrauds but they let me do the pdi thank god.
Better than my alu road bike


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 2:22 am
Posts: 3225
Free Member
 

Seems like Kona are the Rover of the bike world to me.

Rover 200, 25, MGZR, Facelift #1, Streetwise, Facelift #2, MG3SW

Essentially the same thing over 15 years of history...

So, Kona went to the Magic Link to give their bikes extra versatility... Rover threw some plastic, roof bars and higher ride height at the 25 to make us think it was more versatile...

[img] [/img]

I guess you'd struggle to sell a rover on ebay too - the similarities are almost spooky 😉

[/jest]


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 2:59 am
Posts: 2176
Free Member
 

I loved my Pahoaoeohoeoaoeohoeoaohoe:
[img] http://newimages.fotopic.net/?iid=ydiecu&outx=800&quality=70 [/img]


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 6:09 am
Posts: 7363
Free Member
 

I had an old Stinky Six which I sold to fund something that didn't quite work out. That bike was absolutely brilliant, bit of a push uphill sometimes but well worth it. Had a few trips over to Whistler and tried quite a few rentals but always come back to the Stinkys. As has been said above, it's difficult to put your finger on it but they just feel "right".

Problem is, to me, is in the spec when bought new, off the peg so to speak. They do seem to compromise on cheaper components than some other brands. However, I'm now in the process of combining 2 bikes into one and when I've sold the surplus I'll be in the market for another Kona. I love 'em.


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 7:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've still got my 97 steel caldera. bought the frame back in 97 and swapped all the bits off another bike and it'still going strong. Upgraded/dated to a P7 2 years ago but I still take it for a blast round Dalby now and then and it still feels great, although nowhere near as cpable as the P7 (63mm of travel up front only just takes a bit of the sting out compared with 140mm!). I've thought about selling it a few times but don't suppose I'd get anywhere near what it's worth to me. Plus the graphics on th frame are ****ing cool!


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 8:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

kona are still flogging the dead-horse that is the faux-bar, which was considered a cheapskate money-saving giant-leap-backwards design about 15 years ago.

i'd be very happy with a kona coiler for my 'dodging-trees-in-wharncliffe-and-the-alps' bike if only they'd build it properly*.

(* with a chainstay pivot; they wouldn't even have to pay any royalties to speccy - cos Europe is outside the US)

i've ridden a few faux-bar konas, and the brake jack is horrific.

(i can get a Carrera Banshee with a chainstay pivot for £600, ffs)


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 8:23 am
Posts: 39729
Free Member
 

its about now i post a picture of my team mates bike - a very good reason for why ill never buy another kona ....

pre paligap they were ace - my mates stinky got replaced when his chainstay snapped due to them just "welding" on a disk mount without doing any calcs

My mates kula supreme did 2 races - rode over some roots and TT/DT welds gave up. That doesnt nark me as much as paligap were super super unhelpful

I toured on a kona jake - it was an awesome off the peg bike for that and light off road racing.


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 8:36 am
Posts: 1116
Full Member
 

when I've been looking for new off-the-peg bikes for friends, which is usually the ~£600 hardtail end of the market, Kona are always terrible value for money compared to the competition, and below average spec/frame

the Jake and some of their town bikes (Dew etc) do look cool, but again they are pricier than the competition

i've heard many stories of frames snapping. i know they've made some great frames in the past, but personally i wouldn't consider buying a new Kona at all


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 9:14 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

what's wrong with churning out the same bike each year with slightly different spec if it performs well. Show's they got it right first time.

Nothing if you like riding bike. Everything if you just like buying them and taking a picture in front of your house.
i've ridden a few faux-bar konas, and the brake jack is horrific.

I was going to comment on riding skills but I won't. However one word for that: D.O.P.E. (you can even be pedantic and point out it's not a word).
Problem is, to me, is in the spec when bought new, off the peg so to speak. They do seem to compromise on cheaper components than some other brands. However, I'm now in the process of combining 2 bikes into one and when I've sold the surplus I'll be in the market for another Kona. I love 'em.

Yes as said kona are designed for people who ride bike. As much as it hurts to admit it, while riding component get used/broken/trashed and so.
So yes you'll only have a LX rear mech rather than a XT one (and I am willing to bet a waxing of my crack that no one on here will be able to tell the difference in shifting during a blind test) which lets face it, it's going to make a hell lot of difference when you're going to bash it on a bit rock.
My gf's bike have some old 7 speed sram shifters and a deore rear mech, and lets face it, it shifts very well, actually it might even shift as well as my LX/xtr rapid rise combo.

Once again the "lower spec" argument is all about being a ponce. I'll be the first to admit I like nice and shiny kit. But if I had to buy a bike off the peg, how I feel when I sit on it will be my first choice. And you just cna't beat kona for that.


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 9:20 am
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

It's a shame because they had a great (thoroughly deserved) reputation. I'm sure Kona is making more money and selling more bikes than ever but purely out of snob value (I'm not ashamed to admit it) I would never consider buying a bike from Halfords. I'm sure Kona won't lose sleep over that 🙄

My old Stuff frame is a keeper as it appears to be indestructable, and depending on the build, is versatile enough to cope with anything.


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 9:23 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

wow, juan. respect.

..... but watch your third person 's'


D'ooh
:'(


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 9:27 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

seth-enslow666 - Member

I like Juans rant. I really do think thats the caae with MTB riding these days.

Cough cough cough "I like Juan[b]'s[/b] rant."
Sorry I couldn't resist 😀


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 9:28 am
Posts: 4880
Full Member
 

If only they revived the Ti hardtail .Anyone got connections to Sandvik ?How about a campaign .Bring back the Kahuna or the Hei Hei .Still got a pic of the Score from about 2001 .Out of bounds Ti h/t .Ahead of their time i think .Could have rivalled the Hummer for sure .Why oh why didn't they make it ?
BTW i've got a Four Supreme and it does me fine .Will be interesting to compare when i get my Spicy in May though .
Finally why the hell did i sell my 97 Caldera frame !


 
Posted : 02/04/2010 9:31 am
Page 1 / 2