why didn't MTB...
 

[Closed] why didn't MTB tyre & rim manufacurers go down the TUBs route for MTB tubeless ?

30 Posts
19 Users
0 Reactions
61 Views
Posts: 10957
Free Member
Topic starter
 

i accept it would require dedicated rims

would it be better?

[sits back] slurps tea [/sits back]


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 12:49 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Dunno. Would they be more likely to roll off the rims than road-sized tubs?


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 12:53 pm
 Sam
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

You can get MTB tubulars, if that's what you mean by 'TUBs'

[[url= http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4136/4909632649_d06a35b1bc.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4136/4909632649_d06a35b1bc.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

They roll very fast, offer great grip and allow you to use very light rims, but in case of puncture you are pretty much screwed. I guess that's why they don't really get used outside of racing.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 12:55 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Ooh. Those Dugasts are rather lovely.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 12:56 pm
Posts: 1173
Full Member
 

And rims
http://www.wheelbuilder.com/store/edge-composites-26-xc-tubular-mtb-rim.html

They are light but expensive and hard to fix on the trail.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 12:57 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

It was tried out in the early 90s too IIRC (& bombed).


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 8685
Full Member
 

As you say probably a lot to do with requiring a big change in rims rather than allowing people a ghetto option. Tyres would likely cost more and they're more of a pain to repair. I'm assuming you're talking about tubs with sealant in them to? If so if would depend on how long the sealant lasts, would need to be a long time for most people as presumably you couldn't replace the sealant so would be new tub time.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 10957
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[img] http://www.flickr.com/photos/singularcycles/4909632649/sizes/m/in/photostream/ [/img]

cool

ok, so they are available - all be it in bling format

whats the pro's / cons against tubeless

and why hasn't the industry taken this path mainstream?


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 618
Full Member
 

Just this second I emailed Chipps a review of the Reynolds MNT-T wheels for the next issue:-)


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 1:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tubs are available for CX aren't they ?
It wouldn't be too much of a leap of technology to go from a heavyweight, wide CX rim & tyre to a lightweight, narrow 29er XC rim & tyre.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 1:16 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

and why hasn't the industry taken this path mainstream?

They're not *that* mainstream in the world of roadbikes, really only finding themselves on race bikes. I certainly would ride tubs on a training ride - easier to change a tube than put a spare tub on.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 1:18 pm
 aP
Posts: 681
Free Member
 

I rode on Sunday over "those 3 hills" on tubs. No punctures, plenty of grip and feel - shame I'm not very fast. I used Tufo Flexus Cubus tubs with one scoop of Stans in each on Ambrosio Nemesis rims on Record hubs. The wheels are noticeably lighter than the Neutrons with Crossblasters I used last year.
Tufo make 26" tubs for mtb so it's quite do-able.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 1:51 pm
 Sam
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.tufo.com/ ]Tufo[/url], [url= http://www.a-dugast.com/ ]Dugast[/url], [url= http://www.geax.com/en/products/?cat=2&prod=1 ]Geax[/url], [url= http://www.fm-boyaux.fr/ ]FMB[/url], [url= http://www.challengetech.it/home.php ]Challenge[/url]. Plus I've seen prototypes from Schwalbe and Continental. They are definitely becoming more popular.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 2:21 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Tubs are pretty old had. Been around for years on the road and fell out of favour in the early 80's. Because people had to carry spare tyres around. they were messy to repair (lots of sticky tape or glue.

They are expensive to repair (needing a needle and thread).

If the tub rolls off the rim it hurts on tarmac and isn't much better for off road.

I can think of 2 good reasons to have them - weight (negated by need to carry a couple of spare tyres) and rolling sweetly.

Punctures, rolloff, messy, expensive, impractical are the reasons not to bother.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 2:35 pm
Posts: 34504
Full Member
 

I thought the 'evidence' for them rolling faster was mostly heresay anyway.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 2:44 pm
 Sam
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

nickc - Member
I thought the 'evidence' for them rolling faster was mostly heresay anyway.

Depends what you are comparing. On a like for like comparison across modern road tyres it's true there is little difference, and there is also a constant effect of glue increasing rolling resistance. However high thread count clincher mtb tyres simply don't exist. The highest TPI I've ever seen for an MTB tyre is 120. Most tubless rated tyres are 60. Tubulars are usually around 300. This does make a noticeable difference. To the best of my knowledge no empirical test has be done comparing rolling resistance over rough terrain between tubeless mtb tyres and tubulars. However my personal experience on a subjective level is that they feel noticeably faster.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 3:26 pm
Posts: 1173
Full Member
 

Tubs didn't do too well at the worlds this year though. Lots of top names punctured.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

A well glued tub won't roll off a rim. My aching thumbs on saturday after spending an hour removing 2 cyclocross tubs can attest to this....

In fact, one of the reasons cyclocross riders and trackies use tubs is that the tub stays stuck to the rim in the event of a puncture and is rideable just enough to get you out of trouble. It is almost impossible to ride a punctured clincher as the bead flops out so you are more likely to crash with a blowout


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 3:56 pm
Posts: 1189
Free Member
 

perhaps because MTBers like to change their tyres a lot? Having to re glue tubs every week because the conditions have changed is not going to be fun.

It will be interesting to see how well road tubeless takes off in the next few years. The tubeless system seems to be the best compromise of ease of use and puncture resistance etc.

For comparison, how many cars on the roads run tubs and how many are on the equivalent of UST? (i must admit i know nothing about motorbikes though, which would be the best comparison)


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 3:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

anyone using a reflec tub rim offroad? set of hubs im interested in are attached to reflex rims and initially I said i just wanted the hubs but now im kind of tempted to try them (guy has grifo tyres too)


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 4:04 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

fontmoss, for CX? they're great and very popular


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 4:06 pm
 LS
Posts: 1174
Free Member
 

Reflex rims are fine offroad. I use 28s for racing with no bother.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 4:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ok now im properly tempted 🙂


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 4:09 pm
 Sam
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

Do NOT use Reflex rims with MTB tubulars - anyone got that pic from SSEC?


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it'd be grifos - i remember seeing your wheel at SSEC, was that a reflex?


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 4:32 pm
Posts: 66011
Full Member
 

matthewlhome - Member

"Perhaps because MTBers like to change their tyres a lot? Having to re glue tubs every week because the conditions have changed is not going to be fun."

Makes sense, even changing with tubeless is enough of a pain in the baws.


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 5:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bontrager are working on a system too apparently...


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 5:48 pm
 Sam
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

it'd be grifos - i remember seeing your wheel at SSEC, was that a reflex?

Yep...


 
Posted : 28/09/2010 6:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

does any one want to buy some TUBULAR mtb wheels ?? im selling a brand new set of Reynolds, carbon fibre tub wheels....never used still in the box....2010 model ?

£1100 in shops. i want £550 o.n.o..

07530192197

billy whenman

whyte racing


 
Posted : 30/09/2010 8:08 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

try the classifieds.


 
Posted : 30/09/2010 8:09 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

[i]For comparison, how many cars on the roads run tubs and how many are on the equivalent of UST? (i must admit i know nothing about motorbikes though, which would be the best comparison) [/i]

The vast majority of motorbikes are 'UST', with only some off-road and/or little ones running tubes.


 
Posted : 30/09/2010 8:47 pm