Which is lighter? C...
 

[Closed] Which is lighter? Carbon or steel?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Food for thought:

Lightweight fat, box section carbon frame with flared sections at bb etc.
Or
Skinny tubed steel frame.

Ride through mud.

Which would now be the lightest?

I'm thinking the round, skinny tubes of the steel bike would probably hold significantly less mud than some of the moulded offerings I have seen.


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 10975
Free Member
 

1gm of steel will always be lighter than 2gm of carbon, what type of mud?


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 11:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is one covered in gt85? Is the carbon one going quicker?


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 11:28 pm
Posts: 10975
Free Member
 

What is the temperature, wind speed & humidity?


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 11:31 pm
Posts: 18158
Full Member
 

What about feathers? They're pretty light...


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 11:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What tyres?


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 11:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

African or european?


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 11:51 pm
 timc
Posts: 2509
Free Member
 

how fast is the treadmill?


 
Posted : 25/04/2012 11:54 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

If its local mud, then the extra weight of the mud will be counteracted by the amount of brake pad it grinds away.


 
Posted : 26/04/2012 5:46 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

What about feathers? They're pretty light..

my riding "style" is based on a ton of feathers being thrown down a hill.
๐Ÿ˜€ - or like drunken kung fu - on a bike.

The carbon would be lighter.


 
Posted : 26/04/2012 6:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

African or european?

Wait a minute -- supposing two bikes carried it together?


 
Posted : 26/04/2012 7:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Everyone knows a lb of lead is heavier than a lb of feathers as feathers are lighter. We also know carbon is lighter than steel so a lb of carbon is lighter than a lb of steel. Mud weighs more than carbon but less than steel so therefore the mud will make the steel frame lighter. The result is that a really muddy steel frame will end up being lighter than a carbon one - simple physics really.....


 
Posted : 26/04/2012 7:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

scotty38 - Member
Everyone knows a lb of lead is heavier than a lb of feathers as feathers are lighter. We also know carbon is lighter than steel so a lb of carbon is lighter than a lb of steel. Mud weighs more than carbon but less than steel so therefore the mud will make the steel frame lighter. The result is that a really muddy steel frame will end up being lighter than a carbon one - simple physics really.....

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/04/2012 8:10 am
Posts: 362
Free Member
 

If Paris Hilton has sex in a forest and no one is there to film it and post it on you tube would she make a noise?


 
Posted : 26/04/2012 8:18 am
Posts: 348
Free Member
 

If the carbon frame failed and there was no one there on a heavy skinny tubed steel 29er to comment about how "steel is real, man", does it still fail?


 
Posted : 26/04/2012 8:23 am
Posts: 25921
Full Member
 

I hear that a pound of gold is heavier than a pound of steel or carbon, if that helps

That's why I don't have a gold frame


 
Posted : 26/04/2012 8:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

scaredypants - Member

I hear that a pound of gold is heavier than a pound of steel or carbon, if that helps

That's why I don't have a gold frame

Well now that's just daft and I think you're reversing Troy weight and Avoirdupois for comic effect there.....


 
Posted : 26/04/2012 8:59 am
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

Everyone knows a lb of lead is heavier than a lb of feathers as feathers are lighter. We also know carbon is lighter than steel so a lb of carbon is lighter than a lb of steel. Mud weighs more than carbon but less than steel so therefore the mud will make the steel frame lighter. The result is that a really muddy steel frame will end up being lighter than a carbon one - simple physics really.....

That made me chuckle


 
Posted : 26/04/2012 9:09 am