Forum menu
which are the worst...
 

[Closed] which are the worst tyres

Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

[i]Conti Gatorskin - 700x23 Maybe I was unlucky or something, but I did stop using it after the sixth puncture. Good grip and quite quick but crap with puncture proofness.[/i]

Weird, that is the exact opposite of my experience with those tyres - slow, draggy & lethal in the wet but good puncture resistance.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 10:38 am
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

Any tyre that has the weight printed on the side and is basically designed to be fitted for a weigh-in by a German bike magazine or some internet nerds, rather than ridden. Maxxis Flyweights are a good example but I'm sure there are others.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 10:38 am
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

spesh enduro's do drift, bit uits fairly controllable, just make sure you've got your line picked out and take account of it.

maxxis swampthings, cheep, and never puncture, grip like leaches, what more could you ask of a winter tire?

conti gravity, it drifts, but at like the enduro's its predictable.

panaracer fire's, I liked them, useless in mud though.

tioga factory XC, best (budget) tires ever!

Current wepons of choice - Maxxis highroler 2.35, kevlar SPC up front at 27psi, maxxis hollyroler 2.4 (presubably DPC and steel), Its so unbelievably quick in the dry, and feels like a short travel full suss!


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 11:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Conti Mountain Kings and Explorers - I have extra hate for the Explorers as they came fitted on a bike and I used them for years not knowing any better. I look back and laugh how I bought them time and time again when they wore out as well!

Joined a club, a guy leant me some Kenda Nevegals, realised that tyres were not created equally and suddenly my tyre fettish began...


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 11:12 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Michelin Dry2. For roadies on MTBs only.

Bontrager ACX-B Tubeless Ready. About the puncture resistance of tissue paper when run tubeless. Absolute cack. Shame cos the tread is brilliant.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 11:23 am
Posts: 24
Full Member
 

dunno if anyone remembers them, but the old Tioga Red Phoenix 1.8s were truly rubbish

super narrow, to the point where they didn't seem like much more than a CX tyre, yet still managed to be really draggy...without offering anything in the way of grip

to not puncture you had to run them at silly high pressure so you got a harsh ride from them too

they were very light though, so if your bike spent more time hung from scales than it did out on rides they were probably OK


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 11:37 am
Posts: 149
Free Member
 

Amazing contrasts on here, I wonder how much the type of: bike, wheel, trail, weather, riding makes.

To answer the question tioga DH, good for making a knobbly tyre noise on tarmac, prob for a very long time - currently havea pair on the pub bike. Do agree with above some where made in softer rubber and where much better. I also have some tyres from the 80s, (scary that!!) they look like they should work, but very skinny, hard, no grip, slow, punture prone - better walking.

We really like the Contis, currently running, Explorers best in the dry. Mountain kings and Kaisers, amoungst others, but also have (and rate) High Rollers-great alround pointing down tyre, Wet Screams-great muddy DH tyre, Minions- good hard pack DH tyre, Trail Rakers-great muddy XC tyre. Super 8s and Death Grips, great on the BMX track like trails

I have some Endro Pros on my SS my ever day ride, goes any where in all weathers, they don't appear to be wearing at all so must be damm hard, I like them because i know exactly what they are doing and they are big, pretty fast and dont pinch punture.

We have had bad experiences of wrong tyre for the day/conditions. I broke my shoulder riding Trailrakers on hard pack, dramtic grip and dramatic breakaway. Or High Rollers in serious downpour conditions with no grip at all.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 11:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm with people on the conti front, I hate em, never found a conti tyre I like. Some people dribble on about 'predicatble drift', I found they just washed straight out from underneath you.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:16 pm
Posts: 257
Full Member
 

Another vote of no confidence for Continental tyres here. I had gravities for a while on my full sus bike and thought they were OK`ish, then put some 2.1" verticals on my HT, the first wet hard pack corner I tried them on I was off and in to a ditch, which was a patern that lasted until they were ditched (no pun intended) I replaced the rear conti on my HT with a WTB Wolverine, which spun up on wet tarmac! on the way to the trails. Much slidey entertainment was had.....


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:19 pm
Posts: 257
Full Member
 

Oh and another thing with contis.......an almost enless stream of pinch flats - even at 55 psi


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Panaracer Fire XCs, dump you on your ass at the first sniff of mud. Clog in seconds and then offer no grip whatsoever. I can't understand their popularity, as they really are one of the worst performing tyres in wet conditions that I've ever used. (And there's usually at least a spot of mud to be found on rides in the UK.)

Conti Mountain King 2.2. As above, except they don't really clog so badly, just afford no grip.

Highroller 2.35. Slower than a very slow thing and I'm yet to find the surface they work well on.

All IMHO, naturally.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:49 pm
Posts: 20658
Full Member
 

[i]I have some Endro Pros on my SS my ever day ride, goes any where in all weathers, they don't appear to be wearing at all so must be damm hard, I like them because i know exactly what they are doing and they are big, pretty fast and dont pinch punture. [/i]

I agree, I always thought Enduro Pros were some of the best and most versatile tyres I've ever used. Got the Eskars now (the Enduro replacement), they're excellent as well.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:51 pm
Posts: 7935
Free Member
 

Conti pros here - did a Blackmill Rat run on a set. Rolled well in a straight line and washed out from under me as soon as I wanted to turn.

I've not touched a Conti tyre since. My favourites are the Kenda Blue groove/Nevegal combo although they may be about to be eclipsed by Michelin All terrains in their sticky grey incarnation. I like Swamp things for the winter.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:06 pm
Posts: 0
 

IRC Mythos XC--switched to them from Kenda Nevegals on my Superlight. First ride out tackling a rocky downhill in the Clwydians exactly the same way as always: washed out sideways leaving me in the dirt covered in blood. Possibly jaundiced view here.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had some conti gravities that were frighteningly poor, stuck them on the commuter for 6 months, after which there was no discernable wear to the knobbles. No surprise they had no grip when the rubber compound was harder than tarmac...


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

davidtaylforth - YGM


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

conti mountain kings are crap. cost me my 3rd spot on the last lap at hit the north 1.5 as the front end disappeared from under me. would never go near em again.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Panaracer Fire XCs ... I can't understand their popularity,

They're dead cheap and durable. The sideknobs work OK if you lean on them, decent super cheap all rounder as they work OK in loose gravel or loam, OK on hardpack. Worse than useless if its proper wet as you say.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 4418
Full Member
 

Tioga Psycho II <shudders>


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like contis - a lot of my riding is done in non gnarly conditions so the easy rolling is nice as is their all roundness. I agree with others tho that once you reach their limits they let go suddenly without any warning and are not good in sticky mud.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Either WTB velociraptors, or some Michelin AM24 thingy, that's sole plus side was that it gripped on wet roots. It didn't grip on anything else, even tarmac, and despite its light weight was immensely draggy. Useless (unless your sole surface is wet roots).


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

no one's mentioned schwalbe RR/NN yet. Aren't they great or what? 😀

PS I still like the Explorers.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:50 pm
Posts: 2429
Full Member
 

Conti Verticals - they have an uncanny ability to just go right when you don't want them to.

Panaracer Trailrakers PR - a great tread pattern but the sidewalls are absolutely shocking. I've never had a tyre split along the sidewall in several places with so much tread left on them.

Specialised Storm Controls circa 1993 - absolutely dreadful on wet concrete but great in the mud.

IRC Mythos - wore very quickly - no discernable grip in the wet.

Cheers

Sanny


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My mate got himself some very light Conti Twister Supersonic and a Schwalbe Fast Fred Light for the front.

Both tyres managed to survive a marathon but after 60km in rough terrain there was some knobs missing, cuts in rubber, and they had to be run with very high pressure as well not to puncture.

Every time we were out training he shook his head and couldn't believe he spent almost £40 a tyre for tyres that were useless after just one race and good enough for some light training rides only. As far as I know that were his only lightweight tyres he ever bought, never again 🙂

Can't justify spending so much on lightweight rubber, maybe because with my performance level that wouldn't give me such time saving advantage over regular tyres (I could probably throw stones at other racers while changing the tube, so not all bad ;-)).


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:11 pm
Posts: 4306
Free Member
 

Kenda Neveragains.

Had a demo Nomad with them on. Thoroughly glad I was riding flat pedals that day as it meant I only slid down the trail on my face once. Completely unpredictable grip and absolutely no warning when the front would let go, which it did, very, very quickly. Not a great fan of the Contis with those little triangular knobs either. Lethal in the wet and whilst predictable, way to drifty in the dry.

That all said I do run a 2.35 supertacky Highroller as an XC tyre, so I'm kinda used to LOTS of grip.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:27 pm
 will
Posts: 44
Free Member
 

funny about the Maxxis Crossmarks. I love mine, bloody great in the dry, round sherwood pines etc... nothing can beat them i think, roll very fast, and loads of grip in corners i find.
Not rode them on any natural derbyshire stuff so can't comment there, but i would expect them to be just about "ok"


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All of you who hate the Enduros pass 'em this way, i love them! Not sure if i have the pros or not, but mine are foldable so i guess they might be?
They aren't the fastest rolling tyre but the grip is ace. Put it this way, i'm currently running an old enduro with a hole (and bodged patch) instead of the Nobby Nic sat on the shelf because the grip is so much better!


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:49 pm
Posts: 3633
Full Member
 

Tioga Psycho II...

<end of topic>


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:59 pm
Posts: 3090
Full Member
 

Tioga DH - no idea what was going on there


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah, I like my Spesh Enduros, and agree with the positive comments above.

Tiogas I've tried are are 'Fisher Price My First Tyre' plastic and dangerous rubbish in the wet.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 5:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My worst was a Green solid tire back in '92.

Then Tioga Pyschos and Ritchey z Maxs sucked

More recently Specialized tires have wrecked rides.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 5:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I agree with dez b about the micheling xc dry 2s. They are ok on the back, on a xc race bike, but i made the mistake of putting it on my 5 inch fs this weekend. All i can say is im glad that i can drift...


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 6:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh, and Tiogs white tigers. Appalling tyres.

on the wtb side of things, i had a pair of 2.5 dh tyres, I cant remember what they were called, but they were amazing in loose stuff, and not bad all round.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 6:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Tioga DH were the dog's about 12 years a go. Best race tyre at the time.


 
Posted : 18/06/2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Worth tyres were some Michelin XC Dry. Split up after 2 rides and punctured 5 times! Normally get a punny about every 3 month on average. Had no grip and were super skinny for a 2.0 tyre. I like the Panaracer XC pro though in 1.9. I understand some people dont like them though, as a mate took some off after a few rides and he never does stuff like that!


 
Posted : 19/06/2009 12:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

panaracer Razor Xc's 2.1 ( skinny for that tho...) are absolutely lethal, seriously when your washing out on road with mtb tyres you know they're absolute sh*t. you also know your cycling dangerously.... oops.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 6:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Clever thread.
It is fascinating how different people have such different views on the same tyres.
I'm not going to list, but I'm about half in agreement and half opposition on several of the names that keep coming up

I bet if the thread title was best tyres it could be the same ones


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 2678
Full Member
 

Kenda Blue Groove/Nevegal. The only tyres that have ever failed on me, they tore around the beading, and they wern't that old. Expensive rubbish...


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 20658
Full Member
 

I once had a set of Ritchey AlphaBite and OmegaBite tyres (F&R specific). They came with the bike and God they were dreadful. Refused to go round corners, punctured if they came within a mile of a thorn and needed 18 tyre levers and thumbs like Popeye's forearms to fit. Rubbish.

I really like the (old) Specialized Enduro Pro and the (new) Eskar tyres, very predictable, work in almost all conditions.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 6:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Continental, Michelin.

I wont have them on my car or my bikes.

I have stories, but thats for another time, except....

Once bought the Conti twister supersonics, cos they were light. Yeah they were light alright. Which meant I approached the scene of my impending doom and accident at an even greater speed, and which also meant that my bike got more [i]AIR[/i] during the crash I had the first time I used them 😆

Oh, no, I have them still, they make me laugh just to see them and think about how useless they are and how stupid I was to buy them. They have got to be one of [i]the[/i] most useless tyres ever and certainly not worth buying.

🙂

CC.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 6:43 pm
Page 2 / 2