VW Transporter as a...
 

[Closed] VW Transporter as a bike van - what to look for when buying second hand?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

As per title really... What should I look for when buying a VW Transporter as a bike van second hand?

e.g. most suitable models, obvious mechanical pitfalls to be aware of, good places to buy etc

Any advice much appreciated 😀


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 9:51 am
Posts: 2053
Free Member
 

Are you looking at a T3, T4 or T5? (guessing it wont be anything older than that?)


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 9:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

2.5 5cyl 130ps T5 is the most popular, 35mpg is achievable easily but bags of torque. Don't go for 184ps with auto, you'll be lucky to get 20mpg, flying machine that begs to be thrashed. I did 34K in 6 months in one, was putting £100 a day in it.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:03 am
 IHN
Posts: 20093
Full Member
 

Are you after a T4 or a T5? Any T4's are getting pretty long in the tooth now, early T5's are not too expensive (I have a 54 plate T5).

I have the 104bhp 1.9TDi engine, you can get an 88hp version which I wouldn't fancy, and more powerful versions that you don't really need. SWB will fit in a standard car park space, LWB won't, normal height roof will get in 95% of multi-storey carparks, mid/high roof won't (and generally cost more on ferries, as does the LWB)

TBH, you just need to look for all the standard stuff - service history, belts changed at appropriate intervals etc. Cenral locking can go a bit squiffy, so keep an eye out for that, make sure it all works.

Are planning on leaving it as a van, or doing a camper conversion?


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:03 am
 IHN
Posts: 20093
Full Member
 

Oh, the 104 will get high 30's mpg driven normally and that's with a full camper conversion in the back), heavy foot will reduce that quite a lot


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:05 am
Posts: 2258
Full Member
 

i have a 2002 t4 88bhp
has it had/does it need a cambelt soon? it is very expensive to do because there is a front belt for the cam, and a rear belt for the fuel pump. if it does need doing, knock some off. i got my local garage to do it, and using geniune parts including pullys and a new water pump and new 'fan belt' it was nearly 800 quid.

is the clutch ok? get it warm, and give it max throttle up a steep hill, max torque is around 2000rpm, so it will slip there. 500 odd quid for a new clutch.

other than that, just the usual stuff. oh, and make sure the side door opens and shuts properly.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:06 am
Posts: 2053
Free Member
 

Have a good look on [url= http://www.vwt4forum.co.uk/ ]here[/url], you'll soon get an idea of common issues with both T4 & T5. They're pretty helpful over there.

I've got an early T4, pre-facelift interior 2.4D AAB engine, camper conversion. Love driving it, when you get to a hill you just plant your foot and wait a week till you get to the top!

The common issue with the T4s is a rattle from the engine, commonly mistaken for tappet noise but its actually the push rod in the vac pump, not a major issue. If you test one that rattles, pump the brake peddle, if the rattle stops its the vac pump, not a knackered engine! 😀


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ideally looking for an early T5 SWB, will be leaving it as a van, but may tidy up the back a bit to give the option of flooring for an airbed. Comfortable cab up front would also be preferred.

Advice about the fuel economy is much appreciated, as is the parking size issues... thank you.

At what mileage is the Cambelt Service on a T5?


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:09 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

IIRC 60k or 5 years. Get them to change the water pump when doing it too. It's a known weak point.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:15 am
Posts: 9018
Free Member
 

88bhp model does 0-60 in over 20 seconds. I wouldn't want to be in something thats that slow for overtaking etc.

We looked into a T5 but would have wanted the extra row of seats/RnR bed in the back etc and in the end, decided that the extra cost/faff etc wasn't worth it over a big, fast estate that'd be cheaper to buy and run.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

A VW Caddy Maxi is another option I would consider.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:26 am
Posts: 2980
Free Member
 

If its a T5 ask whether its had a new half-shaft. They tend to go about 50-70k. £400 to fix. Otherwise they're great.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:27 am
 IHN
Posts: 20093
Full Member
 

As I usually do on these threads, I will plug Amdro as an excellent T5 conversion. Did mine last year and lived in it, literally, for six months around Europe, no problems at all. And unlike most conversion, you get a boot space that stays in place even when the bed is folded out.

http://www.amdro.co.uk/


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:27 am
 IHN
Posts: 20093
Full Member
 

[i]If its a T5 ask whether its had a new half-shaft. They tend to go about 50-70k. £400 to fix.[/i]

Mine's just hit 75k, how would I know if it needing replacing?


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:28 am
Posts: 2258
Full Member
 

my 88 does 40mpg measured on a mway run, 35ish otherwise. It came with a black box thingy on the pump which gave loads more torque, but made the mil light flash. I took it off.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:29 am
Posts: 2258
Full Member
 

Halfshaft get noisey/click with lots of steering lock. They normally fail early because the cv joint boot gets damaged and all the grease falls out.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What's the difference between T26, T28, T30 etc different models?


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:37 am
 IHN
Posts: 20093
Full Member
 

[i]What's the difference between T26, T28, T30 etc different models? [/i]

Power, I believe. T26 - 88bhp, T28 - 104bhp, T30 - 134bhp (I think)


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:40 am
Posts: 1294
Free Member
 

Isn't T26/28 etc to do with the load carrying rating (or whatever you call it)?


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:47 am
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

What's the difference between T26, T28, T30 etc different models?

it's the gross weight it can carry. 2600, 2800, 3000 kg. empty van is roughly a tonne.

theres also a T32 which is 3200 kg. the t32 has different running gear & is more expensive to lower etc - if you ever wish to.

if you are thinking of a camper conversion avoid the t26. mostly t28s & t30s out there.

HTH


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:49 am
Posts: 2258
Full Member
 

re load rating, yes, it is the same with transits

t26 = GVM or MAM of 2600kg, etc.

transit T260 = GVM of 2600kg, etc


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:49 am
 IHN
Posts: 20093
Full Member
 

Well, there you go, learn something everyday


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks Chaps 😀

Ah I see, not too important as I'd hope my bikes would weigh considerably less than that!


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 11:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Worth looking at the alternatives unless you're dead set on a VW, where you'll pay quite a bit in scene tax. Vivaro/Trafic/Primastar in top spec is a good alternative option imho.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 11:24 am
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

Vivaro/Trafic/Primastar in top spec is a good alternative option

especially if you are not looking for aftermarket upgrades.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 11:25 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I had a very brief ownership experience of a facelift 2011 Transporter T30.

It was a lovely looking van, but they're not as well built as VW would have you believe.

In the first few months of ownership (800 miles) it needed a new steering rack, new driveshaft on driver side and new side windows as the factory ones would not stop leaking.

After a long battle with VW, I eventually got my money back where upon I ended up saving myself around £12k and buying a brand new Citroen Dispatch which has a lot more bells and whistles.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 11:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

note the t32 needs a slightly different class of mot that not all garages will do - not a big deal just a bit more inconvinent if you dont need the extra payload


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

cam belt and water pump for a t5 is £300 with any reputable private dealer not sure who quoted you £800 but tell them to take a running jump, just had mine done and a service for £288.

all round fairly bullet proof van, id make sure its ply lined though or you can get it done reasonbly cheaply that made a big difference to ours.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 6:34 pm
Posts: 406
Free Member
 

Check the exhaust manifold for cracks. If you get slight fumes in the cabin - it's gone. To replace it you need the front of the van off - expensive!

Also, dual-mass flywheel go about 80,000 miles - check if this has been done. Needs to be replaced along with the clutch. More pennies!

Got an 08 T5 130 T32 LWB myself and converted it to have 6 seats and a bulkhead. Love it!!!


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 6:40 pm
Posts: 2980
Free Member
 

Mine is for sale.

130 swb kombi. Fsh, new front tyres. Just serviced. 76k. Silver with privacy glass. Driveshaft at 65k!


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 7:00 pm
Posts: 7630
Free Member
 

I've driven the lowest power model (88hp) and it doesn't have enough grunt, avoid them.

I'd agree about the Vivaro/Trafic alternative too- these along with the Transporter are my favourite vans. Again, avoid the basic engine and you'll be fine.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 7:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Mikertroid

Have you got a link or more details? Cheers.

Paceman


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 7:35 pm
Posts: 966
Free Member
 

some good words on here.

re. the engine. DO NOT rule out the engine basic 1.9 84hp. Google Pendle Performance and £275 and your 84hp becomes a reliable 135hp with a whopping 100nm more torque AND better fuel economy.

all the 1.9's are the same but in different states of tune. i would not pay more for a higher-output 1.9.

2.5 5-pots are great as they have a 6-speed box, but they can suffer from expensive issues.

i have a pendle'd 1.9 with a 5-speed box and it drives so well. i drove to the s.of.France at a steady 80mph and returned mid-30's mpg.

join the vwt4 forum and swot up


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 8:51 pm
Posts: 3125
Full Member
 

There are differences between the 1.9 84 and 102bhp engines, they can both be remapped but the 84 doesn't have an intercooler which the 102 does so it has to work harder.
I've had a few t5's over the years, a 2.5 130bhp kombi and a 1.9 104bhp standard van. Both would do 40mpg driven gently, the 6 speed box of the 2.5 is nice but they're often a lot more expensive. If you want a decent spec aircon, electric windows/mirrors etc then a 2.5 is generally more likely to have them but you'll reduce your choice of second hand vans significantly.
The 2.5's have more problems than the 1.9's and are less reliable overall. The 1.9 has the big advantage of being in huge amounts of VAG stuff so anyone can repair/service them and parts are cheap, worst case a new engine is easy to get this isn't the case with the 2.5.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 9:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

T5`s of the 1.9 flavour have poor gearboxes. When mine failed at 62K VW were to paraphrase "yes and what should WE do about it????"
Dont buy on reliability its a hoax.
Powersteering pump,turbo relief valve,gearbox and assorted electrical niggles on a 57 plate.....
Buy a big japanese people carrier instead


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:02 pm
 tomd
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I switched my car for a 2004 T5 van last year. It's the SWB 104 model. Fuel seems to be around high 30s mpg, up to 40mpg if driven carefully.

I'm really happy with it, great bike wagon. I don't miss the car as it fits in normal spaces and almost every car park. Only downsides are higher running costs for insurance, fuel, road tax but I had factored that in.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:03 pm
 DrP
Posts: 12109
Free Member
 

Not that it's something I'm planning on any day soon, but one of my 'life plans' is to convert a panel van.
Was looking a lot at Transporters, but TBH I couldn't justify the higher price of these compared to vivaros/primastars - You're looking at 4-6k for a good base mode, plus 2k for a lifting roof....
Then you can knock yourself out on the innerds! Like a child, I spend many an hour sketching away the internal design of my imaginary campervan!!

DrP


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:23 pm
 tomd
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's a bit vain but when I chose a van it couldn't be white, a transit, the vauxhall/nissan/renault thing, the fiat/peugeot/citreon thing. This left the Transporter or Merc Vito. I think they're just a bit nicer.


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 10:31 pm
Posts: 2980
Free Member
 

Paceman, ill mail you details tomorrow night. On a fairly dismal MTB week in wales. Both my riding partner and.I have been felled by manflu :'-( !!


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 11:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Theres one for sale in the STW classifieds at the moment a VW25


 
Posted : 15/03/2012 11:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers Mikertroid and Flux 😀


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 10:29 am
 IHN
Posts: 20093
Full Member
 

[i]I switched my car for a 2004 T5 van last year. It's the SWB 104 model. Fuel seems to be around high 30s mpg, up to 40mpg if driven carefully.

I'm really happy with it, great bike wagon. I don't miss the car as it fits in normal spaces and almost every car park. Only downsides are higher running costs for insurance, fuel, road tax but I had factored that in. [/i]

Whoah, hold on, are you me?


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 10:32 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

I'm not sure which/if any of the Transporters are fitted with the 2.0TDI, but if you're buying one with this engine that's got no warranty, then AVOID! I'm sure many people will pop up saying they've had no issues with the VW 2.0TDI engines, but this engine is dog and not a patch on the 1.9TDI for reliability.

2.0TDI (Pump Duse) engines produced from '53 to '07 suffered cracked/porous cylinder heads and oil pump faliure. I'm also hearing of fuel pump failures now on the newer 2.0TDI Common Rail engines (not a cheap part replace).


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 11:24 am
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

My neighbours advice (he buys broken, fixes and sells Vito's as a bit of money on the side) when I asked about T4's and Vito's was get one that says Ford Transit on the back. Not cool, but you can get one with a fraction of the miles on the clock.


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 12:08 pm
 tomd
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whoah, hold on, are you me?

No I don't think so. I think T5 vans are a pretty common bike mobile though!


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I got rid of my motor last year and bought a renualt trafic sport, has everything I need, electric pack, air conditioning, bluetooth hands free and it looks not too bad and pretty nice to drive although I expect the transporter maybe a nicer drive...plenty of room for work stuff and bikes, 39.4 mpg
[img] http://www.flickr.com/photos/49017178@N04/5555957567/ ][img] http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5293/5555957567_7ddea34aca.jp g" target="_blank">http://www.flickr.com/photos/49017178@N04/5555957567/ ][img] http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5293/5555957567_7ddea34aca.jp g"/> [/img][/url] [url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/49017178@N04/5555957567/ ]traf[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/49017178@N04/ ]Doubledunter[/url], on Flickr[/img]


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 1:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had a T5, it was always in the work shop. Bought a Toyota Hiace with astronomical miles and doubled it. Bought a new Hiace in 2008 for the low emission zone. 31mpg is on the heavy side but always have a ton of stuff on board. Change the oil every year, should go on forever. Oh, rear wheel drive makes it a blast in the wet! Most used Hiaces will have been driven by the owner.
My 1st car was a T2 bay window camper. They don't build em like that anymore.


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 2:47 pm
Posts: 2980
Free Member
 

paceman, I'm struggling to send you a PM; can you send me one with your email. I must be a biffa!!


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 6:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Should I be concerned about mileage with T5 Van?
i.e. if the relevant servicing has been done should a higher mileage example be worth considering?

Mikertroid, try nathshaw AT hotmail DOT com

Cheers

Paceman


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 7:03 pm
Posts: 2980
Free Member
 

Sent you the info


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 7:41 pm
 Neb
Posts: 543
Full Member
 

There's a lot of rubbish posted on this thread. A 1.9 or 2.5 engine is the PD engine, the newer 2.0 engines are common rail and supposedly more efficient. in both the 1.9 and 2.0 engines, the 84bhp versions are identical to the 102bhp, but with a different map. if you were to remap them, they'd be the same. ie, so why not save £2k by getting the 84bhp + remap than buying a 102bhp... I've a 2.0 and it averages 38mpg, it was cheaper insurance, cheaper tax and has better MPG than my previous Mazda 3. The driving position is significantly better than any car I've ever driven, its ace!

If you're considering a vivaro or Renault/Citroen/Peugeot have a look at the common faults, gearboxes are a very common fault and very expensive to fix...


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 9:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 16/03/2012 10:04 pm