Forum menu
Universal standards...
 

[Closed] Universal standards we are grateful for in cycling.

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#5520218]

We all know that headsets, bottom bracket standards, hub spacing, propriety parts and the like are the bane of our (well at least my) lives.

So lets list some things we are grateful are all the same on all bikes.

Pedal thread sizes.
left hand and right hand threads in the pedals.
mech bolt thread sizes (onto the hanger).

What other things have become a standard that we are thankful for?


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 10:47 am
Posts: 6256
Full Member
 

Bar diameter (at least the bit where grips, shifters and brakes go)


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 10:51 am
Posts: 0
 

Valve types (OK there's really two to choose from for tubes but it would be a huge pain if there were loads of differing standards. Although most shocks use the same type don't they?).


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:15 am
Posts: 33
Free Member
 

Round wheels. Square ones are shite.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

^That.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:18 am
Posts: 7097
Free Member
 

Hex drive cap head metric machine screws, M4 & M5 bolts in normalspeak.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:21 am
Posts: 6256
Full Member
 

Do actually see Woods type valves too in continental Europe, but since every pump pretty much swings all 3 ways, it's hardly an incompatibility.

Brake and gear cables are pretty much universal too.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:22 am
Posts: 2607
Free Member
 

Round wheels

(Edit: Damn! I'm am unoriginal too!)


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:22 am
Posts: 13863
Free Member
 

The fact that chains/cassettes/dérailleurs are largely cross compatible between brands, given the plethora of standards (plethora is the collective noun for standards, isn't it) elsewhere is nothing short of a miracle.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:24 am
Posts: 7097
Free Member
 

Rim diameter* - because that led to standard sized forks and frames that all put the axles in the same place, leading to wheels being interchangeable on frames, and same for tyres on wheels.

* slightly less so now 700c and 650b have joyfully arrived in MTB land.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:32 am
Posts: 2350
Free Member
 

The fact that chains/cassettes/dérailleurs are largely cross compatible between brands, given the plethora of standards (plethora is the collective noun for standards, isn't it) elsewhere is nothing short of a miracle.

So not true.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:38 am
Posts: 6256
Full Member
 

Only 3 different hub-cassette formats worth worrying about, plus a general requirement to match rear mech and its shifter, and the right chain for the number of sprockets on the back.
edit: and matching rear mech with cassette size (more of an issue with road bikes), and total teeth capacity (more of an issue with MTBs).


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:42 am
Posts: 13863
Free Member
 

richpips - Member

So not true.

Realise it's not true in all cases, but I can buy a SRAM 9sp cassette, a KMC chain, and a Shimano derailleur and they'll all play together just fine.

I think I've done better tan the madman above talking about interchangeable wheels in a world of 26"/27/5"/29"/700c/120mm/130mm/135mm/142mm/150mm/157mm/QR/9mm/10mm/12mm/X12


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 11:49 am
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

Pedal thread sizes.
nope, BMX pedals are bigger

mech bolt thread sizes (onto the hanger).
nope, new syntace/shimano standard.

I'd stick my neck out and say saddle rails (SDG/Kore I-beam, old skool seat-pins and selle italia whatsitcalled asside).


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:09 pm
Posts: 13863
Free Member
 

thisisnotaspoon - Member

I'd stick my neck out and say saddle rails (SDG/Kore I-beam, old skool seat-pins and selle italia whatsitcalled asside).

Racking my brain to think of somethign that's actually universal - headset bolt?


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:13 pm
Posts: 20978
 

nope, BMX pedals are [s]bigger[/s] [b]smaller[/b]

ftfy


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:15 pm
Posts: 20978
 

somethign that's actually universal

As eluded to above, shifter, grip and brake clamp diameter.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:20 pm
Posts: 79
Free Member
 

I find having two wheels as standard to be quite reassuring


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I always feel a bit disappointed that pneumatic tyres are universal.
I'd love to see solid tyre nichemongers talking about how they make the trails come alive.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:28 pm
Posts: 18196
Full Member
 

Having the seat on the back end. It was rubbish when bikes used to have them at the front.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:31 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

chainring bolt diameter?


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:33 pm
Posts: 13863
Free Member
 

MidlandTrailquestsGraham - Member
I always feel a bit disappointed that pneumatic tyres are universal.
I'd love to see solid tyre nichemongers talking about how they make the trails come alive.

Always wondered if you could do some sort of reverse d30 thing for tyres - something that's generally firm, but goes soft when there's an impact.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:35 pm
Posts: 47
Free Member
 

Cotter pins are the worst thing I've ever had to endure, I seem to have spent most of my childhood replacing them.

The newer cotterless crank designs in which ever flavour are so much better!


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:37 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

These used to be a universal standard on all my bikes ,and someone has left one in my pigeon hole today 🙂

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 12:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There are very few 'standards' in cycling.

These are the only ones I can think of:

Bottle cage bolts

The distance between the holes in the frame that said bottle cage bolts go into
(although there is a bit of 'play' in most cages!)

The diameter of the water bottle itself

The diameter of the handlebar's grip and lever attachment area

Chain pitch for derailleur systems

I reckon these 'standards' are the most widespread and longest lasting. No-one has successfully tinkered with them in almost 100 years.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 2:01 pm
Posts: 9583
Free Member
 

Std threaded BB shells - not universal but should be. I'm happy to say I've not yet specified anything but a BSA BB on any frame I've been associated with )


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 3:12 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

As eluded to above, shifter, grip and brake clamp diameter.

I thought I'd seen some "woman specific" small diameter bars.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 4:52 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

700c.

all my bikes are 700c.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 4:59 pm
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

I think bottle cage mounts might be the winner?

What about modern sized shock springs (i.e. excluding old narrower ones)?

I thought I'd seen some "woman specific" small diameter bars.

Titec IIRC?

And road bikes are different anyway.

Maybe wrong, but I think bar end plugs are universal* though?

chainring bolt diameter?

Spiderless cranks? And cheep ones are riveted.

Chain pitch for derailleur systems

There's a very dead 1" (or is it 2", for 2 links?) standard. And belt drive?

*may require percussive instalation.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 4:59 pm
Posts: 8161
Free Member
 

chainring bolt diameter?

Try telling that the M960 set I can't use because I can't afford new rings.

Bugger.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

Think he meant the diameter of the bolts, not the BCD?


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 5:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Aren't there aero drinking bottles that need a special cage? It really might just be the drinking bottle cage bolts that are the only true universal standard


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 5:13 pm
Posts: 9097
Free Member
 

Crud catchers? Front ones anyway, the clamps on the rear ones aren't wide enough for me ISPs
.

Brake and gear cables are pretty much universal too

Leaving aside hydraulic and electric systems, road and MTB brake cables are different.
.
.
Oooh!!! I've got it! Inner tube patches!
(except for tubs and tubeless obviously)


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I find having two wheels as standard to be quite reassuring

Check thread title - I spend most of my riding time on something similar to this:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 5:22 pm
Posts: 20978
 

The bit of metal that goes on the end of brake/gear cables? It's proper name escapes me...


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 5:23 pm
Posts: 8396
Full Member
 

Air. All my tyres take air.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 5:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Racking my brain to think of somethign that's actually universal - headset bolt?

Nope, my rigid has a special top-cap with an integral nut, which threads onto a screws onto a bolt thats about 15mm across inside the steerer. One of these: http://www.amazon.co.uk/FSA-Compressor-Carbon-steerer-spare/dp/B0038ZTHDA


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 5:29 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

I think we need a standard definition of universal standards.
For me it's a single standard for all components (e.g. bottle cage bolts), as compared to where you have competing standards (e.g. 44mm and 1 1/8" head tubes). It's not about single products or proprietary parts that aren't standard (e.g. riveted chainrings).


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 5:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I am thinking against things like FSA ****ing retarded 386 bolt pattern where I had to file the cranks and laser cut some steel plate to get some normal 104 chainrings to fit.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 6:22 pm
Posts: 6256
Full Member
 

Brake and gear cables are pretty much universal too

Leaving aside hydraulic and electric systems, road and MTB brake cables are different.

But half the inner brake cables come with both ends attached, and you chop off the bit you don't need.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 6:42 pm
Posts: 4389
Full Member
 

Pedal threads - Theres only 2 types as far as i know, 1/2" and 9/16"
Chain pitch - distance between links
cable widths - are there just 2? gear and brake cables?
Oh and wheel size - i never hear anyone talk about different sized wheels so there must just be one size.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 6:48 pm
Posts: 163
Free Member
 

Does all Single Speeders having beards count as a universal standard?!


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 6:48 pm
 mrmo
Posts: 10720
Free Member
 

cable widths - are there just 2? gear and brake cables?

nope, nothing like it. Mavic and Campag were/are a different nipple size, then some gear cables are different thicknesses.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 6:55 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Round wheels

Careful now, if anyone from Giant is reading this they'll be on to the new egg-shaped wheel standard in a shot. Of course, you'll need new forks/frame/pedals/saddle for it.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 7:05 pm
Posts: 9097
Free Member
 

round wheels

Common, but not universal
.


 
Posted : 16/09/2013 7:18 pm
Page 1 / 2