Forum menu
ultimate town bike
 

[Closed] ultimate town bike

Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#755326]

I was wondering about a new bike project (I've pretty much got everything I do and more covered, and have enough pride and not enough skills to try a bmx!)

Edinburgh is pretty hilly, has cobbles and crappy road surfaces. It strikes me that a short travel fs could be a good town bike. 1 x 9 & narrow slicks.

Anyone done it? How much could I get an old scalpel or similar for? Any thoughts on avoiding brake dive?


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 8:32 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Or no front suspension and 1.6 slicks and carbon fork?


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 9:45 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

nteresting! Are they that good? Suppose a soft suss post might do it


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 9:47 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Carbon forks? Certainly are, and with a fatter tyre you'll hardly notice any road buzz. I've never cycled around Edinburgh though (love your City BTW) just thought that set up might be a bit more efficient, especially when climbing.


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:12 am
 IA
Posts: 563
Free Member
 

Eh? Why do you need sus for a town bike? Admittedly on the crap edinburgh roads 23mm slicks at 120psi are a bit uncomfy, so something bigger is nice.

For Edinburgh I have my ultimate town bike, it's a specialized tricross single, running 42:18, with some semi slick-ish cross tyres on at about 60 psi. Gets me up all the hills fine (even with a pannier and bag full of stuff) comfy and fast round town, and it's great fun for occasionally ragging round the pentlands.


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:14 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I'm not sure how seriously to take this, but what advantages would narrow slicks and full suspension have over wider slicks and not faffing about with the full suspension? Or a nice big sprung saddle. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:16 am
Posts: 3364
Full Member
 

Go to your local tip shop & buy a sh!tter for less than the cost of a pint. Then if it gets nicked or you're too drunk to remember where you left it, buy another one.


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:25 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I just like the idea of the comfort coupled with the speed of lighter (ie narrower) tyres, and it's an idea rather than a plan, up for discussion.

My good road bike (on light 23's) just feels so nice on the commute.

Your ultimate town bike sounds good IA, My commute has too much elevation/drunkness/fatigue for a ss/fixed to be fun.


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:26 am
 ton
Posts: 24281
Full Member
 

i have just built up a 29r inbred with big apple tyres on.
big balloon things they are.
sound for rough old road commutes.


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rigid bike with mahoosive slick tyres!

A mate of mine has a Surly 1x1 as a commuter with massive 2.3 slicks on it and is a very comfy ride and plenty fast enough.


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:42 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Edinburgh is pretty hilly, has cobbles and crappy road surfaces. It strikes me that a short travel fs could be a good town bike. 1 x 9 & narrow slicks.

I watched a woman ride the Kapelmuur on a Dutch bike with a child in a seat on the back.

I saw no evidence of light weight, skinny tyres or suspension.

Get a grip, cynic-al..!

๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:43 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Used to ride stuff rigid that I now use 5" on...s it ever about need? ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:45 am
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

It strikes me that a short travel fs could be a good town bike. 1 x 9 & narrow slicks.

If such a bike could talk, it would beg to be put out of its misery. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:48 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

This is awesome:

[url= http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/05/06/business/600-bikes.jp g" target="_blank">http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/05/06/business/600-bikes.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

[i]is it ever about need?[/i]

No, sometimes it is about wrong, foul and perverted lust. This is one of those times. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:54 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Jeez BigDummy you've lost weight! You're still hot tho.


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 10:57 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

BD - I made the mistake of clicking on that pic and reading the article. It has to qualify as one of the [i]weirdest[/i] things I have ever read.

Can you go back to octopron, please - I find it less distasteful than *that*.


 
Posted : 03/08/2009 11:03 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.velorution.biz/images/riese_delite_silver_l.jp g" target="_blank">http://www.velorution.biz/images/riese_delite_silver_l.jp g"/> [/img] [/url]

I knew this existed. Gents, I give you the Riese & Muller Delite.


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:12 pm
 taka
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

do them eletric bikes have altonators on them?


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

short travel, easy gearing, for commuting, this should get you moving

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ditto bigger tyres. Even regular touring tyres will get you over cobbles ok. FS for the road is just wrong.


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Im thinking something small but long with about 100mm each end and a slack head angle should do it. 1x9 sounds good to me and about 1.5" tyres as you will need the extra cushioning and the suspension for blasting down the stairs that all old cities have.

Not sure what fits that criteria but it sounds fun. Meta 4x?


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

There you go. Get rid of the Pikes and put some 100mm Rebas on Ultrega cranks 717s and save a bit of weight elsewhere and you have a sweet street bike.


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I-ache I think something shorter might be OK, and tyres would need to be reasonably beefy, maybe 1.25". I'm off to scour ebay.

Ditto bigger tyres. Even regular touring tyres will get you over cobbles ok. FS for the road is just wrong.

Not nearly as fast as narrow tyres though, and "wrong" always appeals...


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dunno what route you take Al but sus is pretty well essential for a fast run down leith walk - and leith Street has a bump on it that you can get a bit of air off. Add in some cobbles and speed bumps and Als suggestion is not the most stupid thing I have heard on here.

1x9 hardtail with 1.6ish tyres and a short travel fork for me tho. Can you still get those softail frames?


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You might be ok with 1.25 tyres it just depends on how you want to ride. If the same style as you would on a normal road bike then yep go narrow and short travel if you want to mix it up a bit and have fun on the way down the hill you should get longer travel. You can always flick the pro pedal leaver if you want to firm it up and effectively shorten the travel. You cant make travel longer if you see a sweet drop with an iffy landing.


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not nearly as fast? The difference between 28mm tyres run a little soft and 23mm @ 120psi is gonna be a smaller difference than a fs frame soaking up your pedalling energy vs a rigid frame. Plus the weight difference is much smaller.

Mind you, a Moulton is a cool bike.


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

George wishing he'd've fitted suspension for that tricky section down Leith Street.....


 
Posted : 04/08/2009 12:56 pm