Normally use Fire XC's for everyday trails and Schwalbe Big Apples for XC/roadie sessions. The BA's have been brilliant but are limited to 2.0 - and I'd like something thinner for more speed/distance. AM thinking about their Marathon Kevlars in 1.5 flavour.
Is there much of a pay-off (because of the narrow nature) on trails, especially regarding grip and general durability? I'm talking more about rooty/rocky/roll-in stuff as opposed to swoopy singletrack.
Cheers
Spacemonkey,
I use Kenda Klimax-Lite 1.95" which come up like a 1.6".
They are fantastically fast and low drag, with plenty of grip on hardpack and dry roots....but...they are very prone to pinch-flats.
They are marked minimum pressure 40psi, and that is too low for a rocky trail....and I weigh 50Kg. Tyres weigh typically 330g for the "395G" model.
Caveat Emptor for these.
On another bike I have Kenda Kharisma-Lite 1.95" and they are nearer to size, work at 35psi and never pinch. Weight is typically 460g for the "495G" model. Winning ticket?
For all-day trail-centre rides I prefer 1.9" Kenda Nevegal and Blue Groove Stick-E Folding at 620g run at 27psi.
Let us know what you try and how it works out.
PaulD
Bloody hell, you run your PSI low - I guess that's okay if you only weight 50kg. I have mine around 45 normally. Will check out the tyres you mention even though I wasn't a fan of Kenda a few years back. Ta
Is there much of a pay-off (because of the narrow nature) on trails, especially regarding grip and general durability? I'm talking more about rooty/rocky/roll-in stuff as opposed to swoopy singletrack
Short answer - yes - massive compromise. You appear to be heading towards one extreme of the scale.
Better answer - yes - but does it matter to you? You may be light enough/skilled enough to cope with this compromise. Depends what you want most and what terrain you ride over most frequently.
Compound obviously has a big impact too.
Personally, I tend towards the other end of the scale, 'cos time spent fixing pinch flats ain't making me any faster.