Forum search & shortcuts

Titanium fatbike fr...
 

[Closed] Titanium fatbike frame

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#8352105]

Looking at replacing my frame on ICT.
Please post photos of Ti fatbike builds.


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 9:02 am
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had a carver ti. Fat bike lovely frame

Or you now have choice of travers frame or fat ti stooge


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 9:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I like the travers but I run Blutos and haven't seen any builds using them.


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 10:19 am
Posts: 6300
Full Member
 

A couple of quick questions, if you don't mind: why? and are you looking to match the geometry of the ICT?


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 10:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got a 2015 Lynsey fatskey frame with helix tubes and sliding drop outs, I love it, blutos in the summer and makwa forks in the winter, and nexties.
It's about 26lb and rides nicely, good at climbing and with the relatively short wheelbase, it's trail friendly.
I've had other fat bikes and this is my favourite and looks sublime


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 10:43 am
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

I still have a ti fat bike frame to clear from my PACT project.

Sized like a large mukluk. 4in tyres.

SRAM 1x or modified middleburn cranks (with longer axle not stock one that is too narrow)


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 11:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

My intitial thoughts would be to try and match geometry of ICT. Perfect size but heavy.


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 1:14 pm
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

if its weight based , surely its only 2kg?s difference between TI frame and ICT frame

you would be better fitting it with carbon rims

Ive got an ICT - doing a custom build on it, ordered 100mm carbon rims - waiting for them to turn up

you'll loose more then the weight difference by using carbon rims tubeless won't you?

Just a thought


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 9:27 pm
Posts: 44022
Full Member
 

you would be better fitting it with carbon rims
Which you could also fit to a lighter frame... 🙂


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 9:43 pm
Posts: 13647
Free Member
 

if its weight based , surely its only 2kg?s difference between TI frame and ICT frame

That sounds like a big difference to me


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 10:19 pm
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thats cos I was guessing

I dunno

but ICT rides great, so rather than change frame, I would change wheels


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 11:21 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

Travers titanium Bat Fastard 4.8" of floatation and Lauf Carbonara Forks

https://flic.kr/p/QnCpe7


 
Posted : 18/02/2017 11:34 pm
Posts: 6300
Full Member
 

If you are looking to save weight wouldn't carbon be the way to go? The Sonder Vir Fortis, for example, seems to have pretty similar geometry to the ICT and should save a bit of weight.


 
Posted : 19/02/2017 1:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

here is mine with blutos

[URL= http://i915.photobucket.com/albums/ac360/lestershaw/LynskeyNexties_1.jp g" target="_blank">http://i915.photobucket.com/albums/ac360/lestershaw/LynskeyNexties_1.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]


 
Posted : 19/02/2017 10:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Have looked at swapping rims but will only save about 350g / rim (Already run tubeless) where as a ICT frame is I think 7lbs and a Ti mukluk for example is 4.5lbs. What weight is a travers for example.
Not built for carbon. Ideally a titanium frame will last forever.


 
Posted : 19/02/2017 9:50 pm
Posts: 1712
Free Member
 

"Not built for carbon. Ideally a titanium frame will last forever"
Many folk will point out both snapped Ti and Carbon frames - I have cracked Ti but not carbon.
I believe my fat tyres go a long way to 'protecting' a frame from trail 'wow/flutter' - but a carbon frame would be lighter - does any manufacture state max loading weights ?

[url= http://forums.mtbr.com/fat-bikes/ti-fatbike-does-make-sense-987544-2.html ]http://forums.mtbr.com/fat-bikes/ti-fatbike-does-make-sense-987544-2.html[/url]

For cost I'd go carbon- for looks I'd go Ti 🙂


 
Posted : 19/02/2017 10:34 pm
 Andy
Posts: 3348
Free Member
 

Ti frame will last forever if it has a lifetime warranty with the supplier reputation to back that up. Titanium frames do break. Its how the supplier deals with it that counts.

Dont want to put you off as am following this thread with interest as seriously considering Ti for next fatbike. Just worth going into it with eyes open.

Edit eg. The ti lynskey on one 29er im selling cracked after 7 years and lynskey repaired it without question. Id happily buy another Lynskey. My Tripster only came with a 3 year warranty and if it was to crack id be reliant on the goodwill of Kinesis as its now out of warranty


 
Posted : 19/02/2017 10:35 pm
Posts: 1712
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Mike Curiak's held liquid fuel for long hauls..
http://dirtragmag.com/mike-curiaks-moots-snoots-expedition-fat-bike-for-sale/


 
Posted : 19/02/2017 11:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Posts: 17397
Full Member
 

Ti is good if you're going to give your fatbike the 4WD type experience. Scratches etc polish out, and you don't feel bad chucking it down a gully or over a 7 foot deer fence.
[url= http://www.murucycles.com ]Go Australian - Muru Cycles[/url]

For just general trails, it's hard to beat carbon because nothing can approach it for lightness.

(I'm going to get rid of my carbon fatbike to get a Ti one)


 
Posted : 19/02/2017 11:24 pm