Forum menu
tubeless explained
 

[Closed] tubeless explained

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Strangely I was just thinking about going tubeless today..... like STW is reading my mind......
I was going to cut off some old presta valves from some tubes and use an o-ring and the nuts you use to keep the valves in place to seal it. Any reason it shouldn't work?


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 1:12 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

fourbanger - Member

How much pressure does it take to inflate an inertube to the size of a tyre?

An amount too small to register on any gauge I have.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 1:16 am
Posts: 1748
Free Member
 

Any reason it shouldn't work?

You wanted to build a spaceship, so you ran out of Fairy, or don't have a big enough pump.

Or you chose Maxxis eXception tyres.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 1:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

An amount too small to register on any gauge I have.

ohhh.... magic then.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 1:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

there's a big thread on mtbr about tyres and rolling resistance, a german mag ran tests and tubeless setups had significantly less rolling resistance than tubed, they found the biggest factor in rolling resistance was the carcass construction not the tread or volume.
maybe having a tube in there affects the carcass in some way.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 1:55 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

fourbanger - Member

ohhh.... magic then.

Rather, gauges not designed for reading small amounts. But I guess sufficiently unadvanced technology can be indistinguishable from magic ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 2:16 am
Posts: 11646
Full Member
 

However, I am a man who says tubeless is rubbish and a faff.

Hmmm, strokes chin with wary expression, not quite sure if Waderider is being serious or is coming the **** on this one.

I've rode wi tubeless since 2007, i say "rode" but as i sacked off the bikes completely for a few years i really have only rode for a couple of those years but they have been rode tubeless, mavic slr's and stans with absolutely nae faff, nae trouble, and most importantly i have never had a puncture so never carry a tube nor a pump, nor a puncture repair kit.

Tubeless rocks a fat one, i'll never run a mtb wi tubes ever again.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 2:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Run tubeless more because for convenience than ride quality. Fingers crossed for never having to fix a puncture again!


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 6:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

this is nothing to do with floating you absolute fool. wood floats because of the air pockets inside. I'm talking of equal force against a small area and then over a larger area. read a science book..... you too shep


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 8:36 am
Posts: 17290
Full Member
 

Wood floats as its trying to get back to land. Trees grow on land.
Bricks sink as they are made of stuff and being in water makes them turn back to stuff.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 8:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

>nae faff, nae trouble, and most importantly i have never had a puncture so never carry a tube nor a pump, nor a puncture repair kit.<

Out of interest - do you ever ride solo, literally hours from any kind of assistance?


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 8:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think the OP does have a point.

I'm yet to go tubeless but I can see there will be a change. The tyre may deform less as how often do you think an inner tube will match the exact shape of your tyre and chosen rim? There will be some voids where only atmospheric air pressure will exsist and thus when you sit on your bike you're effectively pushing the inner tube info the rim. Where as in a tubeless setup the pressure should be the same everywhere inside the tyre.

So partly to do with volume of air and also partly to do with the fact the entire tyre/rim is filled with no low pressure zones.

That's my take on it.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 8:57 am
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

^. This ^

An inner tube wil not exert equal pressure on all parts of the tyre, due to a mismatch in the exact shapes of each, and there will be a small void near the beads also.

With no tube, the entire tyre volume is at equal pressure.

Whether this produces the phenomenon described by the OP I dont know, but it does make sense.

I ride tubeless for the puncture resistance, not weight/rolling resistance/lower pressure. So far, no punctures in 2 years. I had one burp, mainly due to being lazy, and not pumping up a tyre I knew to be WAY down on pressure, and riding it on a steep rooty descent.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 9:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

now someone makes sense. this sounds fully reasonable.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 9:41 am
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

The different rolling resistance is due to the difference in the tyre construction.

The tubeless one is different to the tube one, it has to be to be able to work. Its airtight for a start !


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 9:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Many people use the same tyres with or without tubes so there's no difference in construction.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 10:48 am
Posts: 11646
Full Member
 

Out of interest - do you ever ride solo, literally hours from any kind of assistance?

As I stay in the arse end if nowhere, deepest darkest Galloway which is one of the most sparsely populated area in Scotland I always ride solo coz I'm a 100% antisocial cyclist (not ashamed of it). I head out into the hills for hours at a time by myself and if something happens its up to me to get out of it but now't serious has happened yet, apart from a compound fracture of my arm/elbow yrs ago but that was manageable. I guess I could wear a camalbak wi a multitude of spares inside but I prefer to ride light wi a water bottle or two and a teeny pedros seat pack, if I run out of water there's any amount of burns to fill up from. As kids in Argyllshire in the 80's we'd ride for miles n miles with only a pair of shorts, trainers and a t shirt riding quite dangerous terrain as I look back now and nothing terrible happened to us then so all this kit I see folk carrying at trailcentres is rather amusing, massive packs stuffed to the gunnels wi all sorts but if you need that comfort zone to ride with then it obviously works for you, I just prefer to carry nothing as I'm perfectly comfortable doing so. I was always brought up in the middle of nowhere as a kid so I'm very comfortable wi it, it may be different if I was brought up in city or urban environment .


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 11:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Many people use the same tyres with or without tubes so there's no difference in construction

Yes, but the tyre must act differently, in terms of deflection etc. when tubed as there is the interface of the tube pressing on the tyre carcass to consider....


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 11:43 am
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

OK............................... ?

Over to Somafunk then for a completely different topic ๐Ÿ™‚

(TBF this one was not actually getting anywhere)


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 11:44 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

clubber - XC Jeyboy

Many people use the same tyres with or without tubes so there's no difference in construction.

Mmm. Just because you can use a non-tubeless tyre as tubeless, doesn't mean there's no difference in construction!


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 2:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pretty sure they meant that a lot of people going tubeless will do so with regular tyres and thus their experience won't be based on differently constructed tyres but purely on how the same or similar tyre works with/without tubes.


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 3:09 pm
Posts: 12529
Full Member
 

zippy, I'm confused; what about a wooden boat carrying bricks?


 
Posted : 09/01/2013 3:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And what happens to the water level if you take a brick out of the boat and drop it into the water?


 
Posted : 10/01/2013 9:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And even more complex, what if there's an aeroplane on the boat trying to take off from a conveyor belt?


 
Posted : 10/01/2013 9:45 am
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

FWIW, I've got wood.


 
Posted : 10/01/2013 10:06 am
Page 2 / 2