Forum menu
Hypothetically speaking for now, a bike that will:
- handle long days in the saddle [i]comfortably[/i]
- be reasonably quick still when you point it uphill
- be tough enough to deal with greasy, stone-filled, potholed lanes during the winter
- take 28mm tyres and mudguards
The trouble is, I don't know where to start. I've never come across any obvious classics in road cycling. If one were to take on such a project, and hope to complete it within a reasonable budget, what frame would one start with?
Looking around road bikes as mine may need replacing soon, if your buying new parts is it worth self building vs off the peg? (in mountain bikes I'd never consider off the peg but with a lot less variables on road bikes it looks more worth while)
i would start with something which is available in a size which fits me properly.
i know that seems really obvious . .
but it needs to fit.
double post
Not many frames will take 28 tyres and full guards. Look at a Kinesis TK3.
what about a more cyclocross type bike like a genesis vapour
and fit 28mm tyres to it, and use cyclocross tyres in winter ?
It would have to be Ti, so 2nd hand would be the route for cost or maybe a van nicholos
Kona Honky Tonk will do all that
http://2k13.konaworld.com/bike.cfm?content=honky_tonk
its a steel road bike, not a cyclocross and has long drop brakes
what about a more cyclocross type bike...
I'm not sure a cross bike would be suitable for long (100+ mile) rides?
It's not a winter bike I'm after. More a do-it-all bike. And some of the roads I ride are so rough I don't think I gain any advantage from running small tyres.
I'm open to other ideas too though.
define reasonable budget?
[url= http://stoemper.com/taylor.php ]http://stoemper.com/taylor.php[/url]
If you need mudguards and 28mm tyres
look for Audax frames and the like, your going to need long drop callipers or cantos/mini v's/discs, which all come with there own issues.
[url= http://www.genesisbikes.co.uk/bikes/road/sportive/equilibrium-10 ]http://www.genesisbikes.co.uk/bikes/road/sportive/equilibrium-10[/url]
Genesis Equilibrium. Mine takes big tyres and guards and is pretty comfy.
[url= http://surlybikes.com/bikes/pacer ]Surly Pacer[/url]
28mm tyres tick, mudguards tick, comfortable tick, reasonable budget tick, quick when you point it uphill....well, you did say [i]reasonably[/i] 😉
define reasonable budget?
Well, my most expensive bike so far has been £400. I'm willing to spend a bit more than that 🙂
It would be an ongoing project though and I don't mind buying second hand, so open to suggestions, as long as they're not stupidly expensive. I do like a bargain though.
Probably start with a GENESIS Equilibrium 853, or the disc version if it's a one bike mission.
Or [url= http://www.xacd.com.cn/ ]custom Ti[/url]?
I like the look of the Genesis, but HOW MUCH??
Mine was about £240 for the frame new. 853 version aint worth the extra
British bike a fast audax check Spa cycles or Dawes did a nice frame and forks. American gravel race, check Salsa Warbird although that has no mudguard eyelets. Sounds like a fun build.
[url= http://www.spacycles.co.uk/products.php?plid=m2b0s143p2828 ]Spa Cycles- £305 frame + fork[/url]
I think you've pretty much described a [url= http://www.singularcycles.com/shop/index.php/frames/singular-osprey.html ]Singular Osprey[/url] in your list of requirements!
how tall are you?
I may be selling a 56cm equilibrium, complete bar wheels. I've replaced it with a kinesis GF Ti - which is nicer, but not as much nicer as it should be considering the relative cost... the equilibrium is a really good bike.
think my email address is in my profile if you're interested.
cheers,
Ian
Dawes did a nice frame and forks
I'm currently riding one. 'Reynolds' 520. It rides nice enough, but a bit meh on the cool scale. It'd be nice to have something more...interesting. I might build around this one yet though, as it does actually tick all the boxes.
how tall are you?
5'8" with stumpy legs. 56mm is probably a wee bit big.
yep - I think so - I'm 5'10" with stumpy legs too, so need a fairly long top tube for my height, generally ride 56 or 54. Reckon you'd be better with a 54
Van nich entry level mistral is a bargain surely
I've never come across any obvious classics in road cycling
It is blatantly obvious that what sir requires is a Dawes Super Galaxy. It ticks all the boxes once you remove the racks and lighten the wheels. All the rest are mere pretender johnny-come-latelys.

