Forum menu
The Cost of Mountai...
 

[Closed] The Cost of Mountain Biking.

 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#8341117]

Looking at the cost of some new bikes and makes me think that I can actually buy a car or motor bike for the same price. Or, spend the thousands of pounds on something else, holidays, family, etc.

Even the cost of some components!

What do you lot think? Is the sport overpriced? Are we too gullible (drunk)?

Ok, I'm off to polish the shiny Hope bits on my bike.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:21 pm
Posts: 405
Full Member
 

Yes. It makes my life complete however. I'm on my second bike build of the weekend.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:24 pm
Posts: 4731
Full Member
 

The prices are set to what will sell.
No one 'needs' to spend £1000's on a bike, but that's no different to most things on sale. Some may say we're too gullible, but it's down to what we want to spend money on.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It is expensive, and seemingly getting more so.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:28 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

It's only expensive if you make it that way. Plenty of fun to be had on a reasonably priced bike.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:29 pm
Posts: 4016
Full Member
 

It can be expensive or cheap as you like.
Today I had a great ride on my hardtail. Frame cost me £25, forks £130 , wheels are on their 3rd frame.
And it's only a sport if you're racing 😉


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:33 pm
Posts: 10634
Full Member
 

Chris King hubs are now almost £900 a set...Hope are still less than £200. 10 years ago a set of Hope hubs was £160 and a set of Kings was £500.

I think top end gear has gone up A LOT in recent years, but the mid level and entry level stuff is comparable to what it was, and the entry level stuff is pretty decent these days. I think you've just got to re-base rather than bow out.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:34 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Currently looking at some new rear shock absorbers on our car. I am 'concerned' about the cost of them, however, even some very good ones, fitted, are still cheaper than the front forks on my bike!


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:35 pm
 ton
Posts: 24281
Full Member
 

i was sat thinking about my bike spending in the past. i was thinking or trying to remember if i had spent money on the bike when it could have been spent elsewhere.
i dont like cars, i have a nice house, i dont smoke, i like the odd pint, i have no debt, my wife works, i go on holiday when i want, i dont buy expensive clothes, i have a £10 per month phone, i dont pay for sky, i use my bike for transport to work, and always have done.

cycling expensive.........nah. 8)


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:35 pm
 JAG
Posts: 2432
Full Member
 

Plenty of fun to be had on a reasonably priced bike

Never was a truer word said - well written 🙂

But if people want to spend money on this stuff (and we all enjoy spending money) they can. I don't have to and I believe in free choice and the good old market economy.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:38 pm
 km79
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is the sport overpriced?

Only if you feel you need to spend too much. The quality and performance of 'budget specced' bikes are more than most people will ever need.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:44 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Going back to what Simon said though, 'it an be as cexpensive or cheap as you like'.

However, then you get some MTBers that look down their nose at somebody riding a Saracen or whatever.

I agree with Simon though.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:45 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

However, then you get some MTBers that look down their nose at somebody riding a Saracen or whatever.

That's their problem. Just ignore them.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:46 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Howay ton, cycling is your expense, lol.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:47 pm
Posts: 12809
Free Member
 

It can be cheap, but it's a hobby, a passion, people will pay what they can.

In some ways it's gotten cheaper. Stuff that was top of the range a few years ago is bargain basement now - okay it might lose a bit of carbon hear in favour of alu or steel but it's still the same functionally. You can build a bike with a Deore group set for not much money and it's all great, well made, long lasting kit that's nice to use.

The 'expensive' bit is seeing stuff you'd like, that you can't afford. £2k carbon wheels or Hope Hoops for the same sort of money they were 5 years ago that are better than they were 5 years ago - that's not getting more expensive, that's market growth.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:48 pm
Posts: 1668
Free Member
 

Mountain biking expensive!? Try horses.. If I/we didn't have them I could buy a new carbon Santa Cruz every six months..


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:48 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I admit, I did own Saracen at one point! Very solid, but obviously heavy, lol. But had some good times on it. Paid about £400 brand new for it. A complete bike for less money than my current forks!


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:50 pm
Posts: 46084
Free Member
 

However, then you get some MTBers that look down their nose at somebody riding a Saracen or whatever.

Who cares when I'm having more fun than they are?


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:50 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

"You could buy a car for that!"
"Yeah, but cars are shit." 😉

A good mate of mine is still riding the 456 he bought for something like £300 on eBay six, seven years ago. I think he's replaced drivechain, brake pads and tyres, and maybe a stripped crank or something, but apart from that it's had nothing added to it. I've probably gone through about ten bikes in the same time. He seems to enjoy riding as much as I do though. You don't *have* to spend loads of money to enjoy MTBing.

On the other hand, I do like my nice kit, it all gets used properly in so far as I am able, and I don't buy it on credit or anything, so anyone grumbling at me about how much my bikes cost will be mentally tagged "bellend" and henceforth ignored as a complete idiot. 😀


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:52 pm
Posts: 46084
Free Member
 

I had soooo much fun on my £300 value 26" HT bike this morning, pulling away from riders on carbon Cannondales and Santa Cruz's and chasing down eldest_oab on his shiny 'new' £600 Orange Five,


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:53 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

My hardtail is 7 years old. 9 speed, hope wheels on narrow wheels. Maintained on a pretty limited budget and still a lot of fun.

I've just bought a spendy full sus but that's a want not a need. Arguably no more fun than the hardtail.

Agree that top end kit is getting silly though. I used to default to XT. It's now slx or deore.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:54 pm
 ton
Posts: 24281
Full Member
 

food, ale and bikes are my passions. i dont want to eat, drink or ride the same one for the rest of my life.

hence my journey goes on....... 😆


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:55 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Matt, you've also raised another good point, lol.

All this wheel size crap. At one point it was just one wheel size, then, well we all know, lol.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Diesel, bridge tolls, parking, uplifts, cafe stops. It's all expensive. But cheaper than some other hobbies.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:59 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So, ton's next bike is actually a spin cycle connected to the bar at his local with real ale and good food. That actually sounds very good, lol.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 9:59 pm
Posts: 5300
Full Member
 

Looking at the cost of some new bikes and makes me think that I can actually buy a car or motor bike for the same price. Or, spend the thousands of pounds on something else, holidays, family, etc.

Can you buy a top-end race car for that price?

I expect that some will disagree or sniff at the idea, but you can get yourself a very nice, well-specced MTB for £500. In fact I seen one in Decathlon a few months back for half that. Might not be up to the "race-car" standards that the average middle-aged STWer is used to, but by no means prohibitive to enjoying any aspects of mountain biking.

My MTB cost me £400 in 2009 and I still think it is a fantastic bike. It's one of the best value things I've ever bought.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:01 pm
Posts: 1336
Full Member
 

I don't feel the need to spend thousands on bike. The capability of the bikes at the entry level is so much better than it was than when I came back to mountain biking 15 years, look at the Voodoo and Boardmans, Calibre and Pinnacle bikes. Look at the value you can get with 2nd hand 26 inch bikes. My Prophet frame and forks came to less than 200 and they are minted.

15 years ago I could get the same Bridleways on my Kona Caldera as I could on 6K full suusser today. What limits me is my ability and my bottle, not my bikes

If people are looking down at your bike that's their problem, not yours.

Whatever you do, don't get into triathlon, the gears not that expensive so long as you don't get your head turned by TT bikes, But the race prices are extortionate. Ironman UK is not far off £500. Most 1/2 are between 125 and 200. To balance it off I mix it with fell running which is like the Audax of the running world. last week was £8 for a really well mashalled fell half marathon.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:03 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Butcher, what do you mean by 'top end race car'?


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:06 pm
Posts: 9096
Full Member
 

I don't car how expensive bikes are, I'm happy floating around in the middle. Middle of the range stuff is excellent these days.

Plus there's no ongoing expenses enforced by law like tax and insurance. Riding is mostly free.

Nothing to whinge about here.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:08 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

An alternative way of thinking then.

Instead of paying hundreds, thousands for bikes and components, should we better off paying for better MTB trails?


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:10 pm
 cp
Posts: 8970
Full Member
 

My current most fun bike cost me £150. It's blimmin ace fun (SS CX)

It is what you make it, and prices for kit are what they are because people will pay it. You don't have to pay lots of money, and perfectly serviceable bikes are available for relatively modest cost.

Personally, although bikes are probably my biggest outlay after basic living expenses, they're a bargain. It's a damn sight cheaper commuting by bike than by car, and puts way more smiles on the face than just about anything.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The market's changed, that's all. There's alot more "cyclists" (I use the term loosely 😉 ) about these days with big money who're willing to spend big. Hence, the manufacturers have to make expensive components.

There's still plenty of good stuff about at decent prices though.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:18 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ok, apart from the financial cost, the fun factor and the environmental benefit.....what else?


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:19 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I don't agree with daveforlforth, sorry. Is it not just a case of 'shiny things sells'?


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:22 pm
Posts: 5300
Full Member
 

Butcher, what do you mean by 'top end race car'?

Could mean lots of things. But you compared the price of bikes to the price of cars. And yes, you could theoretically spend more on a new bike than a new car. Which yes, is kinda mad when you think about it!

But the bikes many of us ride (and I say us, but maybe this doesn't apply to me, riding a £400 bike..!) are highly tuned bikes using the latest technology, designed for maximum performance.

If you were looking at cars fitting that description, you could be looking at Ferraris, Porsche, Lamborghini.. And everything in the middle. Nissan GTR, Subaru Imprezza (probably more comparable to my bike). If you want the equivalent of a Ford Ka, then you're probably looking at a £150 bike.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:23 pm
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

Just got back into bmx and I am so glad the way even a high end bike is max £750 unless you start really trying to spend money. You would not get a high end steel single speed MTB for anything like that. The extra material costs are an insignificant difference, it is just it is deemed that the market will pay more for MTB.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:33 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Butcher, very good points.

For my riding and performance lately, a wheel barrow would be far better! Lol


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:34 pm
Posts: 1428
Free Member
 

I think its also about making stuff last. I bought a spesh enduro ex demo 5 years ago for about 1500, still using it and racing it and its an awesome bike. Better than its rider. I must be the last 26er left at some races and most of the other riders have had 3 bikes in the time I had this one.

Of course the 2 shocks, 2 forks, 3 complete drivetrains, 3 dropper posts, 3 pairs of wheels and multiple saddles, bars, pedals I have had over the last 5 years have pushed the cost up a tiny bit..


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:44 pm
Posts: 963
Full Member
 

I ran some old bike prices through a basic inflation calculator out of curiousity recently. Well, actually it was an attempt to persuade myself that these high prices I'm looking at for n+1 aren't so bad!!

On the whole, the prices I paid for factory bikes in the last 20 years would be roughly comparable to today's. E.g Orange 5 Pro (2004), Cannondale F900SX (1999), Marin Rift Zone (1997) - each contemporary price, adjusted for RPI inflation, would be about the same for an equivalent model in 2017. It's similar when looking at parts - I've not bought a complete MTB since 2004.

There have obviously been some exchange rate falls (2008/9 and 2016) and market development at the top end, but also some tech improvements and earlier gains from exchange rates (mid 2000s).

The "cheapest" way seems to be to buy reasonably nice parts individually and sell them on while they have some value - popular (but not overly expensive) frames / forks / wheels / drivetrain etc seem to re-sell quickly for decent money. Complete bikes seem to depreciate alarmingly in comparison.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 10:59 pm
Posts: 31089
Full Member
 

I agree with Simon.

And Ben.


 
Posted : 11/02/2017 11:07 pm
 felt
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Not sure about you calculation, however, I think that the majority on here will agree that depreciation on new MTBs are very high.


 
Posted : 12/02/2017 1:15 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

I think that the majority on here will agree that depreciation on new MTBs are very high.

Which is down to what you do with them and the non transferable warranty. Also being happy is not the same as being right.

On general pricing people only seem to be able to see the top end and ignore that it used to exist (and as pointed out forget about inflation) the quality of an entry level groupset has improved vastly over the years.


 
Posted : 12/02/2017 1:22 am
Posts: 8945
Free Member
 

Mi byk Iz srscn. The shame.............


 
Posted : 12/02/2017 1:41 am
Posts: 67
Free Member
 

I've got a fairly decent fs, now 7 years old. Doesn't get ridden as often as it used to pre kids but nothing wrong with it except a lot of my riding mates now have 29rs etc and I get dropped on hills when I didn't before so am considering buying similar new bike. Expensive? Yes. Do I really need it? No, but otherwise i'll be buying new windows which I've managed to put off for the last 10 years. Life's too short.


 
Posted : 12/02/2017 2:09 am
Posts: 963
Full Member
 

In 2004, an Orange 5 Pro cost £2,200. In 2017, the same model is £3,395.

Inflation calculators says that £2,200 is equivalent to between £3,100 and £3,300. (Depending on inflation definition and whether you end in 2016 or 2017).

You could say that the spec is slightly lower today (Hope hubs and XT in 2004; mainly SLX now), but 2017's model does come with a dropper and other modern developments.


 
Posted : 12/02/2017 9:09 am
Page 1 / 2