Forum menu
Suspension stems ar...
 

[Closed] Suspension stems are back!

Posts: 2370
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#6680291]

Saw a piece about this on road.cc - not sure if it has been done here yet (I couldn't find anything when I searched)

But here it is:

http://sta-fast.com/

😯


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 12:46 pm
Posts: 6805
Full Member
 

Always thought the Flexstem was OK for what it did bitd.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 12:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm in like Flynn


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 12:48 pm
Posts: 2370
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I thought I was the only one that liked mine! The road.cc article mentioned that the old flexstem was voted 5th worst invention in mtb history (DIRT mag).

I remember it once saving me from what would have been 2 very sore wrists at least, if not worse.

I never thought I'd see anything like them return though. Although I have toyed with putting my one back on my old retro SS for a laugh.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 12:49 pm
Posts: 342
Free Member
 

erm, is it just me or have they got totally the wrong idea..

"The uneven surfaces of off-road biking encourage riders to remove their suspension systems to cut down on weight, leading to more control but also greater discomfort"


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 12:51 pm
 IHN
Posts: 20124
Full Member
 

Can I be the first to say

How much!?


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 12:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"The uneven surfaces of off-road biking encourage riders to remove their suspension systems to cut down on weight, leading to more control but also greater discomfort"

Now I know why I was so shit at DH races!


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 1:02 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 


How much!?

This. FTFAGOS.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 1:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

is their website trying to suggest Contador has been using one?


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 1:08 pm
Posts: 1248
Free Member
 

Too long for MTBers and too short for roadies, expensive and most likely not very good. Must be for fat bikers.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 1:10 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

looks like a hole punch.
shut up and take my money!


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 1:12 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Flexstem was genius. Was kind of ok- about as effective as thick grips- until the elastomer wore, which happened pretty much immediately. And after that, meant your bars were attached to the bike by a rattly loose hinge.

OTOH I cut mine up and used the quill part as a video camera mount for the motorbike, which it was really good at, so it wasn't a total failure.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 1:18 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Have to say if the idea was implemented well at a decent price then it might be a success - more for the road/commuter bike market though.

Is the huge advert above the reply box new?

Does it go for premier members?


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 1:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

al no advert box above the reply box for me with a P.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 1:25 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

The rigid/minimalist crowd might love something like that.
I am already a fan of USE posts on hardtails

[i]I saw a kid riding a Cannondale Headshok at an XC race the other week.
It wasn't slowing him down ,and that's pretty basic.[/i]


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 1:29 pm
Posts: 8396
Full Member
 

I also liked my Flexstem. When I was using it I had 1.5 tyres and bars as stiff as scaffold poles. It made long rides bearable where before I'd end up with thumbs so sore i'd be operating the friction shifters with my hand.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 1:50 pm
Posts: 1145
Full Member
 

is their website trying to suggest Contador has been using one?
Could be what Chris Froome has spent all this time looking for...
RM.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 2:01 pm
Posts: 6805
Full Member
 

Too long for MTBers

In the UK maybe, not in many other parts especially for XC.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 2:30 pm
Posts: 9964
Full Member
 

Flex stems were at that peak before we invented decent suspension forks

Now we have decent forks

All though I do wonder if we could do with a few lighter, less travel, less clearance,suspension forks for the lane exploring thing


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 7:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No weight listed.............Hmmmmm?


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 8:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I loved my Flex stem , i thought i was the mutz do dahs. It was a 1987 rockhopper in Yellow , 21" frame (14 years old) i chromed the front forks and a flex stem when they came out 1989) ? It did make a difference when you got used to it .


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 8:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"mountain cycling"?


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 8:43 pm
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

I'm loving the left hand drive bike on the website.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 8:46 pm
Posts: 904
Free Member
 

Suspension designers spend their time fretting about unsprung weight. This makes it as high as it could possibly be. Brilliant.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 9:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No weight listed.............Hmmmmm?

Constructed from high grade carbon steel and zinc,

Shudders.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 9:13 pm
Posts: 7121
Free Member
 

They should have patented a new metal called 'Flexinium' ....maybe that would have helped with the marketing


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 9:33 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Once again, marketers sell stuff to people that is simply pointless!

Have a quick think about the physics behind shock or vibration isolation, and particularly about what sort of ride frequencies the system is required to absorb.

Now, here's a practical experiment. Take you suspended mountain bike and lock the suspension out, what happens? Now unlock it, what happens now, and how much do the suspension components have to "move" to absorb the sort of deflections that are not absorbed by the tyres?

So, on a road bike, with tiny section tyres at >100psi, then perhaps there is some energy in the frequency spectrum that a flex stem can "absorb" but on a mountain bike, with large, low pressure tyres?


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 9:37 pm
Posts: 6805
Full Member
 

but on a mountain bike, with large, low pressure tyres

Could be wrong but I don't think it's aimed at you.


 
Posted : 03/12/2014 10:02 pm
Posts: 1752
Full Member
 

Back in 1991 when I was earning £40 a week, a set of Rockshox RS1s cost about £300

I think the the Flexstem cost me about £60

Neither worked very well - but the flexstem was affordable and did take the sting out of the trail and I loved it - especially the colour! 🙂

[url= https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8662/15319051834_3164f89be8.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8662/15319051834_3164f89be8.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/pkG9pm ]flexstem[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/people/67749037@N02/ ]boltonjon[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 04/12/2014 12:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Back in 1991 when I was earning £40 a week, a set of Rockshox RS1s cost about £300

I think the the Flexstem cost me about £60

whereas the Softride stem cost as much as a set of forks, weighed about as much, and was still a load of pony.

We had a flexstem, just felt like riding a broken bike.


 
Posted : 04/12/2014 1:49 am
Posts: 6805
Full Member
 

I've still got the 1989 MBUK where they test the flexstem against the first pair of RS1's in the country that the authors mate had imported.

From memory it was the first MBUK I ever bought.


 
Posted : 04/12/2014 12:21 pm
Posts: 12335
Full Member
Posts: 8158
Free Member
 

S???????????????o???????????m?????????e???????????? ?????????????t?????????????h?????????????i????n???????g?????s????????????????? ?????????j???????????u????????????????????s?????????t????????????? ????????c??????????a?????????n???????????????'????????????????t????????????? ????????b???????e??????????? ????????????????e????????????x????????????p???????l?????????????a????????????????i?????????????????n??????????e????????????d???????????.??????????.??????????????.?????????.????????.??????????


 
Posted : 18/04/2015 5:51 pm
 LeeW
Posts: 2119
Free Member
 

I was in a shop the other day that had three (what I think were) original, boxed Girvin flexistems. I took a picture but can't post off my phone.


 
Posted : 18/04/2015 6:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Once again, marketers sell stuff to people that is simply pointless!

Flex bars and rubber mounted stems have seen some success in motocross, so I'm not sure the idea isn't entirely devoid of merit.

There is certainly feedback that I cut out by going from lock ons back to wired on grips which have more rubber for the same diameter.


 
Posted : 18/04/2015 7:22 pm
Posts: 4668
Full Member
 

I won't be happy until that suspension hub makes a comeback.


 
Posted : 18/04/2015 10:57 pm
Posts: 4668
Full Member
 

My flexstem (with Malverns 1993 Scrutineering sticker, or at least it's remains) is fitted to my Sister's Holdsworth Electra that is residing in my Gran's garage gathering dust btw. 8)


 
Posted : 18/04/2015 10:58 pm
Posts: 85
Free Member
 

Think my flexstem cost about 75 pound always used the red elastomer but we used to drill tiny holes in the elastomer to give more travel !!!!! Thought it was great at the time about 1988_ish


 
Posted : 18/04/2015 11:11 pm
Posts: 149
Free Member
 

Still have my Flexistem and looking forwards to building a bike with it!


 
Posted : 18/04/2015 11:42 pm
Posts: 15457
Full Member
 

Who made the other flex stem jobbie that used a parallelogram arrangement?
Always made more sense to me.

I can sort of see the appeal of a modern version possibly for touring or bike packing where you might want the load carrying capacity and simplicity of rigid forks but some means of soaking up bumps when you clatter your 50lbs of unwieldy bike and luggage throughvarious pot holes...

But on road bikes or MTBs as their video shows? Nah...


 
Posted : 19/04/2015 12:20 am