Forum menu
Hmm.
A good mate of mine was stopped while cycling on a quiet road in Lanarkshire this morning, at about 11am.
Reason: no lights, dressed in dark clothing. They threatened to charge him, but instead, just took his details, and warned him that they 'didn't want to see him cycling dressed like that again or he'd be convicted'. Of what, they wouldn't say.
Mate is an ultra-clean guy and has to be for his job within the public sector. He's worried that this is going to affect his job and thinks he might have broken some law.
Thoughts/comments?
Troll face
As he wasn't charged/cautioned I doubt he'll make it onto any sort of record that'll get back to his employers.
Sounds like an over zealous copper to me.
IMO they have close to zero chance of convicting him for being dressed in dark clothes riding at 11am (pm yes with no lights etc)
If I where him I would have got the coppers numbers and made a complaint
Thanks mcobie, it did sound that way to me too- they made a point of taking name, DoB, address, all the rest of it. Which sounded like a caution.
If it had just been advisory then fair enough, but to threaten to charge seems off to me.
Merak- not sure what you mean.
BoardinBob- well, thats what he's telling me, and as I know him and you don't, I'll go with his story, thanks.
BoardinBob- well, thats what he's telling me, and as I know him and you don't, I'll go with his story, thanks.
A fiver says pavement riding or jumping a red light
Maybe they could be out looking for pedestrians at night, walking in the road head to toe in dark clothing instead.
No red lights on this road for many miles- rural Lanarkshire. Or pavements, for that matter.
Would you like a grid ref, let you check it out on Google Maps?
Would you like a grid ref, let you check it out on Google Maps?
Yes please. I'll keep any eye out for him on the way home. 😉
From the Highway Code:
Rule 60
At night your cycle MUST have white front and red rear lights lit. It MUST also be fitted with a red rear reflector (and amber pedal reflectors, if manufactured after 1/10/85). White front reflectors and spoke reflectors will also help you to be seen. Flashing lights are permitted but it is recommended that cyclists who are riding in areas without street lighting use a steady front lamp.
Note the "MUST", basically there's a law to back it up. So they could have charged (it's not up to the police to "convict") him under the Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations but decided to let him off with a warning.
Tell him not to be a d*ck and get some lights.
dunno i got pulled over on the a92 riding home from uni on my TT bike mid afternoon with lights and a high vis vest on
No red lights were jumped or pavements ridden on.
his argument was it was illegal to ride on the road when there was a a cyclepath adjacent*
i had a similar outcome to your mate.
*While i admit it probably isnt clever i wasnt prepared to risk a near new set of tubs on that shambles of a cycle path & i was riding along at a fair clip which would just be dangerous on a shared use path..
Edit: White stone - last i checked we dont live in the arctic circle and thus its not dark at 11am.
Thanks mcobie, it did sound that way to me too- they made a point of taking name, DoB, address, all the rest of it. Which sounded like a caution.
No, if he was being charged, they'd have told him he was being charged with X offence, and would be cautioned. That info asked for is the standard info when you're stopped by the police.
He hasn't committed a crime, if any officer was insane enough to charge him with something then the PF would throw it out. He should also make a complaint.
Real policeman or plastic plod?
Tell him not to be a d*ck and get some lights.
At 11am?
It is allowed to tell a police officer to stop being a moron. Or, the way I've phrased it is "why not phone a superior for advice before you really embarrass yourself".
It's pretty dark in Scotland but I don't think the middle of the day counts as "night" 😆whitestone - Member
From the Highway Code:Rule 60
At night your cycle MUST have white front and red rear lights lit. It MUST also be fitted with a red rear reflector (and amber pedal reflectors, if manufactured after 1/10/85). White front reflectors and spoke reflectors will also help you to be seen. Flashing lights are permitted but it is recommended that cyclists who are riding in areas without street lighting use a steady front lamp.
Note the "MUST", basically there's a law to back it up. So they could have charged (it's not up to the police to "convict") him under the Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations but decided to let him off with a warning.
Tell him not to be a d*ck and get some lights
Oops! Missed that. Still it's Scotland and never gets light (runs for cover!)
Maybe they could be out looking for pedestrians at night, walking in the road head to toe in dark clothing instead.
They do.
I once overtook a panda car doing about 30 on a DC in a built up area, assuming this meant something was up I slowed down and paid a bit more attention.
Sure enough a mile up the road there's a (presumably drunk) guy dressed in black walking down the road. He's doing nothing specifically illegal either, although I'm sure there's some nuisance they can charge him with if necessary.
sounds like a cyclist hating knobber to me.Sounds like an over zealous copper to me.
assuming OP is accurate
(and I have no specific reason to doubt the op)
Ben, from my reading, Police can't ask for your name or address if they've just stopped you to give you some advice- they can only do this if they intend to caution or charge.
I might be wrong, I'm neither a cop nor a lawyer.
A police officer can stop and question you in the street or any public place if you are suspected of either committing an offence or the officer believes that you have witnessed a possible offence.If you are stopped and questioned, you are expected to be co-operative. If asked to do so, you must give your name, address, date and place of birth and nationality to the officer. If you give false information you are committing an offence.
https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/scotland/law-and-rights/legal-system-s/police-s/police-powers-s/
no its standard practice for the police officer to ask name and address - you are under no obligation to give it unless your being formally charged/cautioned.
Ah, I see- so they can ask. Thanks TR.
Ben, sorry, will read through that.
no its standard practice for the police officer to ask name and address - you are under no obligation to give it unless your being formally charged/cautioned.
Not true I'm afraid - failing to provide information is an offence.
Plus, it's a red flag to a bull with a police officer who wants to throw their weight around.
I'm sure there is something he's not telling you, although this does come to mind...
http://www.bikehub.co.uk/news/judge-condemns-cycling-to-an-uncertain-future/
Maybe the local Pollis were looking for someone fitting his description and just wanted to check him out?
I'm sure there is something he's not telling you, although this does come to mind...http://www.bikehub.co.uk/news/judge-condemns-cycling-to-an-uncertain-future/
br />
Overturned by appeals court anyway - [url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/shropshire/6303427.stm ]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/shropshire/6303427.stm[/url]
Have that bookmarked on phone if I ever need to prove that point again.....
Although that was overturned b r
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/shropshire/6303427.stm
EDIT: Damn! Too late again!
You certainly don't have to give your name and address to police in England. From those bastions of Policing standards the Met (in relation to stop and search or stop and account)...
"The police officer will ask for your name and address and date of birth. You do not have to give this information if you don’t want to, unless the police officer says they are reporting you for an offence."
http://content.met.police.uk/Article/Frequently-Asked-Questions/1400009364853/1400009364853
Law is clearly different in Scotland (which Ben's link was referring to). Different rules apply in the case of a vehicle stop, where you do have to. I doubt stopping a cyclist counts as a vehicle stop, but if they were traffic police that may be the line they were taking.
[I]Although that was overturned b r[/I]
Yes, I know.
But only after an awful lot of effort, and grief for the cyclist.
Yes, one of the things different about Scottish law is you do have to provide details. On the plus side, if you're arrested and say "no comment" then that can't be held against you.
plod has been told to get some names and details in his log book probably for an assesment, makes them look as if theyre actively patroling,
I'm aware from the 'other' activities you get into, Ben, that there may have been times you've had to provide details, so you'll doubtless know the position more than anyone- and yes, this was of course Scotland.
Only been charged the once, and the Procurator Fiscal threw that out. I caused "alarm and distress" to BAE Systems 😀
If the police suspect you of committing an offence, or if they think you are a potential witness to an offence, you have to give them your name, address, dob, place of birth and nationality, and they can arrest you if you don't. Section 13 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995. Then there's some bits of the Road Traffic Act under which you to give your name and address and dob. But other than that you don't.
and amber pedal reflectors, if manufactured after 1/10/85
I'm sure we're all rocking these... Is this why bikes come with no pedals?
[quote=thegreatape ]If the police suspect you of committing an offence, or if they think you are a potential witness to an offence, you have to give them your name, address, dob, place of birth and nationality, and they can arrest you if you don't.
Assuming all is as cody's mate described though, there was no reason for him to give his details, as any offence the plod might have suspected him of was totally fabricated. Plod might have thought he was committing an offence and therefore required to give details, but he was wrong. Personally if I was pulled over and told that (in England, Wales or Scotland) I'd refuse to give my details on point of principle - I'd give plod the benefit of the advice that if he wants to arrest me for not committing any offence he's lining himself up for a whole heap of shit to fall on him.
Bike thieves posing as Polis ?? :O
If you buy a bike without pedals, legally speaking it's an incomplete bike and as such is not required to come with reflectors of any kind, frame mount, wheel mount or otherwise.
If I where him I would have got the coppers numbers and made a complaint
+1
as far as i can recall you are under no obligation to give personal details to the police in a "stop and account" or a "stop and search" unless they are reporting/arresting you for an offence.
they are however obliged to give you a receipt stating the reason they stopped you and asked for your details....you should always ask for a receipt. they wont tell you that you are allowed to ask for this because the paperwork pisses them off.
I thought that if you were suspected of committing an offence, then they have to tell you what offence they suspect you of? If not, then in the situation described i'd be asking exactly what it was, and making notes on my phone of the officer's number and name, all as politely as possible. I'm also someone who would not want to compromise my employment with something silly, but I realise this isn't going to happen with something at the roadside just by having my address taken. Also, the situation itself sounds very odd, and I wouldn't accept a PC trying to throw their weight around like that, without a proper (polite) discussion on why they have taken that view and chosen to enforce it in that manner.
If you buy a bike without pedals, legally speaking it's an incomplete bike and as such is not required to come with reflectors of any kind, frame mount, wheel mount or otherwise.
This, and this is why OEM bikes with SPD's have crappy reflectors built in, or attached to a platform that clips in making the pedals nigh on unuseable
The OP's friend should have told the PC that he was a 'Freeman of the Land' - that tends to smooth things over in situations like this 🙂
his argument was it was illegal to ride on the road when there was a a cycle path adjacent
That's complete BS - you are under no obligation to ride on a cycle path!
Rule 63 of the HC: "...Use of cycle lanes is not compulsory and will depend on your experience and skills, but they can make your journey safer..."
maccruiskeen - MemberThe OP's friend should have told the PC that he was a 'Freeman of the Land' - that tends to smooth things over in situations like this
Definitely this!
