Forum menu
So does riding a si...
 

[Closed] So does riding a single speed increase your fitness?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have done the route with folks with gears and they almost always get dropped

so they're either not racing you or are less fit than you 🙄 If as you seem to be suggesting, SS was inherently faster then all the racers would be on them.


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I dont mean to imply that riding in the wrong gear is a good thing. I have found that if you use the right ratio for your riding then you shouldnt really be in the "wrong" gear.

Ive commuted on my inbred (2:1 ratio) and yes, its very slow and you dont work up a sweat. Thats why i have two bikes, a fixie for commuting and a inbred for off-road commuting and the muddy stuff.


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One of the biggest changes I've noticed about ridding single speed is that it has improved my cadence - while out and out speed is not is good as a geared bike - spinning at 80rpm off road certainly gets me glowing


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 17773
Full Member
 

No it doesn't make you fitter.

It does make you more attractive to geared riders wives and girlfriends though.


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:32 pm
 kcr
Posts: 2949
Free Member
 

Seems to be turning into a debate about the merits of single speeding, but to return to the original question:

...average bloke riding an average ride. Is it (singlespeed) going to be better work out than on a geared bike?

No. The conditions in an average ride will vary (uphill/downhill, tailwind/headwind etc) and a range of gears allow you to optimise your training effort for these different conditions. A single gear is only effective when training under controlled, unvarying conditions, A.K.A a velodrome! (and even trackies vary their fixed gears for different workouts).
There's another clue about how effective SS is for training here:
try HR zone training on a ss - dificult

The science of modern training is built on zones (HR or power) so if it is "difficult" to zone train on SS, this suggests it is not as effective for improving fitness as using a range of gears.

That's a long winded answer, but for a short answer, look at people whose business is fitness. How many pros (on or off road) train on single speed? (and I mean [b]train[/b] not an occasional bimble about on a SS for fun).


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rode nothing but my ss mtb an road bike last year, the ss made me much stronger and I'd say fitter and allowed me to push a far bigger gear on the road bike. Ask my regular riding mates what they think!


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:41 pm
 AJ
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OP maybe 😉


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Genesis - so that suggests you were lazy on your geared bike...


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

KCR – there is a whole school of thought that essentially calls in to question heart rate training zones – as been to varable and effected by outside influences. – Favouring instead power based training zones eg Andrew Coogans work. – Power based training is perfectly possible on a single speed – I use this methodology – using a Garmin 305 – and sporttrack training dairy - I tend to use the SS through the winter to develop an endurance base & strength - then use a mix of all three bike the rest of the year


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:48 pm
Posts: 5975
Free Member
 

And that riding the SS forced him to be less lazy on the climbs? So did help his fitness in a particular way, although not necessarily making him fitter overall. I use an SS road bike to commute on, and geared it reasonably high for me. Instead of the 3-4 gears I'd use (and occasionally take it easy in) I'm now putting in more effort. I'd agree that you could make the choice to use one gear, but lots of folk aren't that disciplined so it helps. Oh, and it's faster 🙂


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So, exactly what I said earlier. A ss won't inherently make you fitter but if you're naturally lazy it'll force you not to be 😉


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 10:54 pm
 kcr
Posts: 2949
Free Member
 

...there is a whole school of thought that essentially calls in to question heart rate training zones – as been to varable and effected by outside influences. – Favouring instead power based training zones...

I think all schools of thought recognise that power measurement is the most accurate and effective method of quantifying your training. HR simply preceded this before power meters were generally available, and it is still a useful approximate measurement of effort if you don't have a power meter. That's why I said "zones (Power or HR)" in my original post.
Either way, it's the zone approach that matters, not the particular way you measure the zones.
Power based training is perfectly possible on a single speed...I tend to use the SS through the winter to develop an endurance base and strength - then use a mix of all three bike the rest of the year...

So by your own admission, you cannot cover all the zones with your single speed, so returning again to the original poster's question, a geared bike is more effective for training!


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 11:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep, I was lazy on my geared bike.


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 11:31 pm
Posts: 5975
Free Member
 

So if you're naturally lazy then it makes you fitter 🙂 To be fair, I was so naturally lazy I couldn't be arsed to ride the mtb SS I had 😉


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 11:46 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

You sure? apart from rest/recovery days getting fitter involves a lot of working hard

was talking about base/ endurance. LSD.

How many pros (on or off road) train on single speed?

singlespeed racers? i would have thought train what you race?

I think fitness is too loose a term. do we mean stronger or cardio, skills or a comination?


 
Posted : 14/02/2010 11:58 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Del wrote,

"you might have something there. it's taken away my choice to have a rear mech ripped off half way through a local ride.."

I have always chosen to not do that myself, and it seems to be working. Seems a strange thing to choose really. I've only ever seen one person knock a mech off- then again that was on mcmoab, and our singlespeeder had already declared it impossible to ride with his gearing anyway so I guess that's a no score draw.

Dasnut wrote,

"if you put the right ratio on the ss, you end up working at your limit almost all the time on a pretty flat route"

That's why they call it flatbiking. Or do they? I seem to recall something about mountains.

Epicyclo wrote,

"Light, tight and responsive as opposed to flaccid, rattly and heavy."

My Soul is light, tight and responsive.

Thing with this is... I've got no beef with people who choose singlespeeding, it's quite a nice way to ride and I can see the appeal. I just don't like completely spurious justifications for it. What's wrong with just saying "I like it, whether or not it's "better"?" It's like people who tell themselves mudguards make no difference, or hydro brakes are hard to set up, or full suss makes you a bad rider. All just nonsense justifications for something that doesn't need to be justified.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 12:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i don't find it makes me fitter. better at powering up (shortish)hills...yes. however, after any period of mostly mtb ss'ing i find it difficult to hold high intesity efforts for long. training hard on geared bikes helps improve that. the obvious conclusion is different bikes/training help different aspects of performance.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 12:19 am
Posts: 17388
Full Member
 

Northwind - Member
Epicyclo wrote,
"Light, tight and responsive as opposed to flaccid, rattly and heavy."
My Soul is light, tight and responsive...

And it could be even lighter, tighter and more responsive 🙂

clubber - Member
My geared bike feels just the same as my ss. Noisier, yes but flaccid and heavy? Seriously? Get over yourself!

So there's no slack in your chain and the derailleur and cassette are made of superlightium?


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 12:38 am
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Epicyclo wrote, "And it could be even lighter, tighter and more responsive"

True that, but it's already light, tight and responsive enough 😉 I imagine I could shed more weight by removing the brakes and going saddle-less too.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 2:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yesiamtom - Member
Ive never walked where a geared bike could still pedal.

So, you've got your bike geared too low for normal riding then.

chorlton - Member
Bloody hell what a workout. My abs are killing me and my legs are like jelly after a ride.

And riding in the wrong gear is more tiring than riding in the correct gear.

Sorry if I sound smug. I ride a Rohloff. Best of both worlds and all that. 8)


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 7:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd say not necessarily 'fitter' but maybe a different rider. It'd probably get you fitter initially, and certainly faster as it encourages interval training to a greater extent just by the nature of necessity. But overall a proper training program that incorporated intervals as well as tempo work would more than likely be more effective, otherwise pro's would use SS more aye!

They would kinda make your averagely fit rider with a sound fitness base faster 'fitter?' if used in the lead up to a race. Hey we would of come in the top 10 in the bikefest on our SS bikes if we'd entered the geared category a few years back and we were a combo of cripples, drunks and special needs kids all with a few weeks SS riding, point proved. 😀


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 8:41 am
Posts: 27
Full Member
 

An interesting question should be:
"So does riding a single speed increase your pleasure?"

That get's a big "YES" from me 🙂

When it comes to fitness, I think the vast majority of riders on geared bikes are less likely to push their limits. Roadies or MTB-ers. I watched a dozen or so riders (with gears) on their way up the pass from Edale on Saturday - they were working hard, but none were out of the saddle. Compare that with "pro" riders who would be stood up at least for the steep bits.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 9:08 am
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Why the assumption that because youre on a s/s you'll be working on hills?
i.e I did a local road club hill climb on my s/s that I did work on, otherwise I'd just pootle up it.

I'm not knocking s/s I rode it almost exclusively for eight years. Sitting down or standing is no sign of effort being put in.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 9:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I do much prefer to ride my ss. I can just get on and ride, its fitted with a super durable fork, Hope M4's and nice wide Conti Vert Pro's and is about as maintenance free as it can get. I always seem to be in the wrong gear on my fs bike, probably means that I'm a poor rider 😉

I don't ride it for smugness or attention and it kind of annoys me when I get smarta** comments from riders that I pass on it. Its not that I've got one gear and am showing off blah blah blah, its that my bike probably weighs 10lbs less than their 6inch All Mountain Thrasher and is much easier to pedal!


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 9:59 am
Posts: 20658
Full Member
 

I've pretty much exclusively been riding my SS road bike so far this year, commuting most days on it plus a few road rides. That's got a 48:17 (76") gear. Been doing a lot of track riding too, usually on a 50:16 (84") but I'll up that to a 49:15 soon.

I'm not sure if it makes you *fitter* but I went out for a road ride last week with some of the local club guys. I know them but I'd never actually ridden with them til then. I put up with the usual comments about being in the wrong gear, not being able to ride hills etc but it soon stopped when they realised I was first up every hill! I'm not really sure if that's me being fitter or just the fact that I needed to just go for it. As Simon1975 says ^^, I think it's mostly down to geared riders not pushing the limits as much, the ability to stick it in a little gear and twiddle.

SS on road makes a lot of sense but I admit I don't really "get it" for off-road use.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 10:08 am
Posts: 10978
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

meh


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 10:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i'm lazy.

i don't do training rides; i'm not a professional athlete, wtf would i be training for?

gears let me take it easy, they're ace, i can potter along in granny gear all day long without breaking sweat, except for porter clough obviously.

i like gears.

put me on a single speed, and every climb becomes a near-death experience, i have to go fast enough to be able to keep the gears turning. a local loop that's an easy 2hour pootle on my geared bike becomes a 90 minute interval training session on my single-speed.

it's good for me, i like single-speeding.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 10:15 am
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

If you're an average rider who doesn't really train, and just wants to ride more, SS can be good. They're easier to clean, maintain or neglect, lighter and more efficient than an equivalent geared bike, and the challenge/bragging rights of riding them makes it a good option if you want to keep things fresh, instead of just pining for dry dusty trails.

It has to be said though that most of the fit SS riders I know put in serious mileage on geared bikes too.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 10:19 am
Posts: 2
Full Member
 

I do both but do like ss'ing, especially in the mud. Fitter? No idea about the science, but I "feel" stronger/fitter after a few weeks of s/s. For me it makes me work harder as the only way to get up each climb is to really go at it, so I presume that makes me lazy on a geared bike.

I'm sure a scientific training approach would be better but that pre-supposes I want to invest time and effort in the programme and I have time for more than a ride or two a week - not the case!


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 10:27 am
 lcj
Posts: 230
Free Member
 

I enjoy riding my singlespeed a lot, so it makes me want to go out and ride, so it gets me fitter.

A geared bike could have the same effect, but for now it's the singlespeed so yes, it makes me fitter!

And after all the shouting, WGAS anyway? It's just riding bikes. 🙂


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:01 am
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

I bought a SS for riding over winter and I would definitely say it has made me fitter / faster on the geared bike.

I agree with the comments about interval training. My SS sessions tend to be shorter or have more rest breaks, my max & average HR will be higher. But I will burn more calories on a geared bike sessions (stay out for longer).

On my local loop, on the geared bike I stay in the middle ring now whereas before I would use the granny a reasonable amount.

I also don't believe the guys who say they can get up any climb on a SS that they could on a geared bike, unless they are using mega low ratios, long draggy steep climbs kill me on the SS.

32x18 btw 🙂


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Epicyclo
So there's no slack in your chain and the derailleur and cassette are made of superlightium?

There's no slack in the chain - or at least the bit that's important - the section that's under tension is exactly the same on a geared or SS bike.

The extra weight is not sufficient to make any real world difference unless you're a serious racer pushing things to the limit (do you suddenly ride dog slow when you fill your Camelbak more than usual?). While my SS is probably a pound or two lighter than my similarly spec'd geared bike, I can't say that I've ever noticed it while riding. You do notice it in the car park, mind and I guess that's what's important to some...


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:11 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

My 2p: riding a singlespeed almost certainly makes you stronger and may make you more supple also, whether it makes you fitter or not depends on many other variables.

There's a lot of BS on this thread but this is the high-point for me:

A single gear is only effective when training under controlled, unvarying conditions, A.K.A a velodrome!

There are no other circumstances where using a singlespeed is effective training?

PURLEASE!


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

DT78 - 32:18 is known round here as 'yorkshire gearing'


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:15 am
Posts: 10743
Full Member
 

I definitely get fitter on SS. If I ride gears I almost never get out of the saddle (being old and fat I worry that I will snap a chain) and am always last to the top of the hills. Singlespeeding - I'm usually up with the rest of the guys.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why would a SS make you more supple?


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:21 am
Posts: 3449
Free Member
 

I haven't read all the posts but IMO riding SS does make you fitter, depending on a few things. When I went SS on my commuter I had to work much harder on the same route to keep a decent cadence, and the only places I spin out I don't think I'd really be getting much training benefit on a geared bike anyway.

I'd have thought that would have to equate to better fitness?


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know that I get up most hills faster on my SS now than I used to with gears. That is purely because I hate walking and so I'm forced to ride faster, grind my way up, rather than be lazy and sit and spin like I used to. I have no idea if that makes me fitter.

I think riding my SS works my upper body more because I'm forever hauling on the bars trying to get uphill.

Also, I think it [i]has[/i] made me a better rider as I concentrate on flowing about more, I don't break really hard at corners and then pedal away, because it's normally the wrong gear so I'd rather not pedal... I could have done that on a geared bike, for sure, but SS just pushed me in that direction naturally.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:43 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

ooOOoo - Member
Why would a SS make you more supple?

You can pedal at a much higher cadence than you would normally on a geared bike.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:44 am
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

The extra weight is not sufficient to make any real world difference unless you're a serious racer pushing things to the limit (do you suddenly ride dog slow when you fill your Camelbak more than usual?).

[i]Some[/i] of us notice a bit of extra weight more easily than others. 😉

As for it being more efficient than a geared drivetrain, when it's on the workstand I can spin the drivetrain on my SS, backwards or forwards, much more easily than my geared bike, there's so little resistance in it. Yes it's incremental, and may not be detectable on the trail, but it's a nice feeling knowing that virtually all of the feeble power in my flabby legs is being transferred directly to the back wheel.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]You can pedal at a much higher cadence than you would normally on a geared bike.[/i]

You've not really thought that through have you?


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 11:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You know what he means - eg you learn to spin better because you're often forced to ride at higher cadence than you would naturally choose.

Souplesse it's called in France - which translates to supple in English but I'd say that he should have said "SS makes you pedal more smoothly" which may well be true.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

As for it being more efficient than a geared drivetrain, when it's on the workstand I can spin the drivetrain on my SS, backwards or forwards, much more easily than my geared bike, there's so little resistance in it.

I am guessing there's something else going on, there shouldn't be any difference.

crikey - Member
You've not really thought that through have you?

If you read my original post you'll see that I have, and you haven't.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hold on, SS is being sold as the answer to everything?

It makes you stronger because you can't spin, and makes you more supple because you have to spin?

The only thing it does is place a mechanical limitation on your riding speed thus forcing an adaptation, which you can do to a far greater extent using gears sensibly; want to push a bigger gear up hill? Then change gear. Want to spin along like crazy on the flat? Then change gear.

The weight is a non-issue; it's such a small percentage, especially in the context of mountain bikers with baggy clothes and camelbaks full of rubbish.


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 12:05 pm
Posts: 39726
Free Member
 

dunno about fitter but after doing puffer SS i feel stronger than ever

riding in a local race on my SS i managed to ride up stuff id run up in previous rounds , i managed to sit down on stuff id previously stand riding up

and consistancy - every one of my laps was 13 minutes , those on gears started off similar - but got slower 13-13.5-14-15 etc

All my riding this winter has been on an SS


 
Posted : 15/02/2010 12:05 pm
Page 2 / 4