Forum menu
* signs up for life subscription *
😆
2 wheels + pedals
Can be ridden in the dirt
Makes you grin from speed, fun, simple inappropriateness etc
Maybe not your first bike choice but a good 2nd or 3rd
Yes to all 4 I'd say
thf a CX bike could be as valid as long-travel FS bikes to many mountain bikers. 'MTB' is a broad thing these days and imo anything from a CX bike to a DH bike is fair game for having fun off-road.
Maybe it isn't interesting enough every month, but what I liked about Privateer was that when it's well-written there's not much about bikes that isn't worth reading, maybe sometime later if it's not grabbing you the first time you open it. ie The life of an Israeli XC Pro? Read it on the train one day and thought it was a really good article. Good mags are worth keeping and going back to sometime. I'd like to see longer, more in-depth articles, about CX riders, XC races, frame builders, product engineers, DH courses, anything that's beyond consumer magpie stuff really. There's always the site for when you're short on attention span or want product info.
I like variety. I'm never going to read every article and love it some just don't interest me. If every mag was solely full of the same crap every week no-one would buy that either. The magazine is distributed to so many people it just can't stick to the same stuff, it needs to appeal to more and more readers each month.
Some months are good some aren't so. That's what you guess with years of buying the same blokes writings.
This issue was probably one of the most "reflective of this forum" issues ever .. and it gets dissed?
Maybe it isn't interesting enough every month, but what I liked about Privateer was that when it's well-written there's not much about bikes that isn't worth reading, maybe sometime later if it's not grabbing you the first time you open it. ie The life of an Israeli XC Pro? Read it on the train one day and thought it was a really good article. Good mags are worth keeping and going back to sometime. I'd like to see longer, more in-depth articles, about CX riders, XC races, frame builders, product engineers, DH courses, anything that's beyond consumer magpie stuff really. There's always the site for when you're short on attention span or want product info.
This sums it up for me
I loved the last issue. Spot on for me.
There's a nice article describing why we make things "harder" for ourselves (e.g. singlespeeding, yep - that's me), a £1.somethingishK bike test for real budgets in real life and loads of good articles with great photography.
That reminds me, I really should subscribe.
This and.... I enjoyed this edition as there were many more tested women's bits and bobs than usual.I will always subscribe as a thank you for this forum.
The advice I got regarding my flooring saved me a monumental **** up.
WHAT!!! There is a mag associated with this forum, fancy that. Is there a big hitters section?
I used to enjoy the 'Fish out of Water' articles that used to appear in the mag a few years back, after all, I actually have interests in activities beyond mountain biking.
Oh, and the "Mountain Bike Magazine" tag was dropped about two years ago now! 😯
I have subscribed again but only for digital version so I can have MBUK and Singletrack on my iPad for the same price of one magazine before and now I am living on a pension I have to live on a budget 😀
It's a bind but someone's got to do it. As for CX being in Singletrack it's just another passing fad like SS, 69ers, 29ers, and 650b etc etc etc. doesn't mean you have to follow the trend, read about it take from it what you will, forget about it if it doesn't make you wasn't to become suckered in to the trend.
Me, I am looking forward to the rebirth of 26" wheels so I am trendy again 😆
(good being a relative term to the normal level of Dirt journalism)
Yep purple text on a black background
Not wanting to miss the chance to have a pop at Dirt, purple text on a black background is a failure of design; the mangled attempts at English are a failure of journalism, or at least of sub-editing.
TBH since Enduro mag launched online, I've not bought any bike mags other than if there was something specific I was looking at or had a long train journey to read it on.
I'd say Enduro or Wideopenmag are the two most relevant and interesting ones out there right now - good content, no wierd "into the wild" style escaping society with a bike and bivi bag stuff and no mincey whimsical stuff about what riding represents or some such oddness.
Better pics too.
I like the cx stuff. My most ridden bike is my cx bike. As long as they don't start covering cx racing it's fine by me
(Though maybe stw need some fresh blood/younger/not a mate/not a contact from the industry/different demographic/someone from outside the NorthWest writer, someone with a different view point)
MBR gets my vote, though STW can still entertain.
(Though maybe stw need some fresh blood/younger/not a mate/not a contact from the industry/different demographic/someone from outside the NorthWest writer, someone with a different view point)
Good idea.
MBR gets my vote, though STW can still entertain.
MBR stopped getting my vote many years ago. Their ability to publish even the most basic of routes the wrong way round. Their constant assertions that the only bike capable of being ridden off road was a 6" travel full sus (preferably a Specialized though Orange was also permissible).
What did it for me was when they casually dismissed a £2000 hardtail as only good enough for being a road based winter hack bike.
****ing idiots.
I leave my copy in the bathroom all month - find I've managed to read it cover to cover by the time the next one lands on the doormat. Makes a better pile of mags than MBR too...
You can please some of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time.
But you cant please all the people all of the time.
It's about biking, I like bikes, but not all the articles rock my boat. The wider the coverage the better imo.
Start a niche publication if you want just one topic covered 🙂
Why not volunteer to write a piece for the mag on this issue then?
Please can we stop trotting this one out?
*s*****
Edit: 100!
Well I still enjoy it. I like pictures. Lots of pictures. I like proper beer. I like bikes. I like new places and different people. I like shiny new bikes. I like being a bike geek. I like the silly back page of "stw brought yo you this month by..."
If you don't like it, don't buy it. Simples
GrahamS - MemberWhere can I buy "Riding CX Bikes Up Hills For Fun Instead Of Round Muddy Fields In Pain magazine?"
There are a great many non-mtb subjects out there that don't have their own mags, perhaps ST should cover all of those as well 😉
ampthill - MemberIf I had a rant it would be carbon wheel reviews. For example issue 86
The ENVE jobs. £800 per rim. Not a pair or even a wheel. That's just a carbon hoop, with some holes. The first line of the review is something like "testing really posh kit is completely pointless but we like ridding with free nice stuff"
At least it's mountain bike kit. The SRAM hydro brakes review in the current issue is exactly the same, except offtopic to boot. And the cx shoes for that matter, £275. Stuff that'll only be of interest to the nichest of the niche.
There are a great many non-mtb subjects out there that don't have their own mags, perhaps ST should cover all of those as well
Well if the other "non-mtb subjects" involve riding bicycles, off road, through forests and up and down hills, for fun, then yeah I'd be happy to see them covered. 😉
You're not supposed to ride a CX bike! It's a sport based on the carrying of bicycles. Sometimes you get tired running, and have to ride for a little bit.
[quote=Northwind ][s]You're not supposed to[/s] I can't ride a CX bike!
FTFY
I'd say Enduro or Wideopenmag are the two most relevant and interesting ones out there right now
Glad that someone else likes them. Really enjoy Enduro and Wideopen, IMB as well
scotroutes - MemberFTFY
Le me, doing it wrong:
[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8500/8320590904_26d1cbc116_b.jp g" target="_blank">
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/53860438@N06/8320590904/ ]cross[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/53860438@N06/ ]Northwindlowlander[/url], on Flickr
Turned out to be a lot more fun than doing it right.
If it floated in the bath it would be better.
It never ceases to amaze me what people will turn to in search of suitable grot.
Le me, doing it wrong:
Granny to big ring?
Brave post.
[quote=Northwind ]
Le me, doing it wrong:
cross by Northwindlowlander, on Flickr
Turned out to be a lot more fun than doing it right.
Is that what you call mountain biking then?
It's what I call fannying about.
Well, I still like it. 🙂
I enjoy the Cross stuff too.
And the Fat bike stuff.
I usually only get ST so it's fine by me if they diversify a bit.
Not so much the reviews these days, but still enjoy the travel stuff, perspectives from other places and people.
Quite like Cycle Active too, they have some good road routes, but it's very samey.
How do you lot turn corners with those blinkers on? "i only ride mtb, I only want to read about mtb, nothing else exists"
I'm a cyclist, I like any bicycle, Singletrack, please stay diverse & open to New ideas & experiences
How about an Offshoot mag.
"STW Forum" Covering Bikes, Sheds, Beer, Stoves and Travel.
I subscribe as a sub to the Forum really, but I do like the mag hanging around the house, It reminds me to get out and ride. Although as said before I find it difficult to actually read the text in it.
"STW Forum" Covering Bikes, Sheds, Beer, Stoves, Travel and Relationship Advice
FTFY
Stw lives in the bathroom and performs well for throne and bathing entertainment.
ratherbeintobago - Member
"STW Forum" Covering Bikes, Sheds, Beer, Stoves, Travel and Relationship Advice
FTFY
Yes I thought about that, hopefully it will be a supplement that can be thrown away before reading.
Or Perhaps just an, Agony uncle Chipps column
I think the OP is being a tad harsh on STW.
Lets not forget MBUK of oldish days featured mtb, jump/DJ etc all in the mag. It makes it slightly refreshing. Plus in a mtb I like to see articles/sections that are interesting- health, diet etc. It all helps riding. I do think STW might become too Calderdale-centric though. It'll shrink the UKwide reading (i.e. buying public) if it does. I think it has a great USP though still.
Not so long ago in Dirt there was an article on Yoga (4 pages) from a top rider. I liked that.
Talking of Dirt - I found a few old copies from 2011 under the bed. Compare them to todays Dirt and its shocking. Todays Dirt is a thin, insulting mag. I imagine people still buy it for nostalga or to look 'lifestyle'. It used to be full now its thin- full of ads still but the content has shrunk right down.
Forget the font/colour - Dirt really have lost it.
Plus lets not forget the great Earthed series of DVD's had DJ, 4X, BMX racing, DH, mini moto-bikes, etc added in.
The dull mountain bike vids are the likes of Vanderman in Canada riding northshore then dusty crap whilst drowling on like its bloody surfing on wheels.
right everyone off to the front page and do the survey
There's a front page?
The reason why I buy Singletrack is because it has a broader spectrum of articles.
right everyone off to the front page and do the survey
And make sure you read the question more carefully than me... 😳
Not looking good for the "i hate everything but MTB" crowd so far according to the poll
What about bikes that don't get ridden on mountains?
+1
I find it amusing that a load of trail centre warriors are complaining that the latest issue of STW isn't "mountain bikey" enough for them 😉
What about bikes that don't get ridden on mountains?
What like the Orange 5's that get ridden mostly on the Col du Surrey Hills, Alpe de Cannock, and the Dalby glacier?
Might have to complain about one of the road bike mags. They had a whole multi page article with Boardman HT and some other bikes with bars that were nearly flat, and tyres wide enough that you can actually see them.
It's winter - of course there's gonna be articles that deviate a bit from what is done much more during the main season.
I enjoy having my eyes opened to all types of bike riding. The pics of different riding locations are great and informative, some are simply sublime.
Gear reviews are honest with a good cross-section of products.
The very first piece that Mike Ferrentino wrote in the mag was brilliant but unfortunately he never again reached that dizzy height.
I've no complaints whatsoever. 😀
[i]ST lost me when they started putting roadie stuff in[/i]
Where? When?! They would've lost me too, but they've never done this.
There was a threat, but it wasn't followed up.
: )"mountain bikey" enough
and what is 'mountain bike' these days anyway? Do we need to redefine it because of what some riders on some bikes can do? Where on the sliding scale of XC racing>Ultra racing>bikepacking>just trails / trail centres>EWC>DH is this 'real MTB' that gets mentioned? Is that even in the right order? Prob not.
Ah f-it I'm just taking my bike up the woods to do some tracks. Been doing that since I was 12, nothing's changed.
Lets not forget MBUK of oldish days featured mtb, jump/DJ etc all in the mag
It also did features on riding through the Channel Tunnel before it opened to trains, attempting to mountain bike across/under the Channel in scuba gear, uphill riding being dragged by a parachute and helidrop riding with the RAF team getting dropped off by Wessex then blown over by its downdraft whilst riding back down again!
The good old days!
A cyclocross bike is not a mountain bike. The clue is in the name.
rOcKeTdOg - MemberHow do you lot turn corners with those blinkers on? "i only ride mtb, I only want to read about mtb, nothing else exists"
That's hardly the point. I'm interested in other things, but this [i]is[/i] a mountain bike magazine, advertised as such. Maybe there's a case for them to change that, and start producing Singletrack Assorted Biking Magazine... but in the meantime they should deliver what they promise. If I buy a steak I expect a steak, it doesn't mean I hate oranges.
But I can see that there's room to deviate into parallel interests; that's been done effectively in the past after all. But cx-porn component reviews are a daft way to go about that. If you want to engage mountain bikers on the subject of cyclocross, write an engaging article about cyclocross. That could be of interest even to people who'll never do it.
Cyclocross would've been a good name for 'mountain biking'. When those French guys were riding in the dirt and over jumps on fat tyres in the 40s they should've called it le cross. But some Americans got IP on the name 'Mountain Bikes' in the 70s and here we are. They were also called ATBs when I started riding off-road. That's a better name too.
jump/DJ
Seeing as this has been mentioned, dirt jumping isn't mountain biking either, and given the choice of that or 'cross, I'd rather read about 'cross.
If I buy a steak I expect a steak
Any particular cut? And how would Sir like it cooked? Pepper sauce, garlic butter, no sauce? )
(spot on about articles on riding cx bikes vs cx bike tests btw)
For me cx riding is like going back in time to my MTBing in the 90's.
Yeah it's great have 150mm travel each end and big brakes, but sometimes its fun going back to basics and having your teeth rattled about
Enjoying your subscription hora?
A cyclocross bike is not a mountain bike. The clue is in the name.
So.....?
Should the mag [b]only[/b] feature bikes that meet your [i]precise[/i] definition of a mountain bike?
What would that be exactly? Hardtails only, with mid-length front forks, short stems, 26 inch wheels, 2.1 tyres, triple chainsets, disk brakes..
That photo up there ^ that Northwind posted looks as much like "mountain biking" as any else to me. Why should it be excluded based on the shape of the handlebars?
(Blimey - and I thought roadies were supposed to be the snobs)
If you want to engage mountain bikers on the subject of cyclocross, write an engaging article about cyclocross. That could be of interest even to people who'll never do it.
[i]That[/i] I do agree with! 😀
personally, cycling mags are too focussed on ... cycling.
it'd be great to see the occasional article on climbing / kayaking / paragliding / ski-touring / spelunkying / fell running / etc.
i'm not suggesting STW start writing these articles, i'm sure they could 'buy' old articles from other niche mags for a knock-down price.
(or maybe, it would be an interesting job for the journos to write articles for a wider audience - where a little background explanation is required)
Enjoying your subscription hora?
Nope.
As with any mag I visit WHSMiths when the new ones are released and flick through- if its a good month I'll buy it and do. Very rare but I bought mbr this month as I liked the Sticks Pass/Hevellyn route that they had in there (going to do it as soon as its spring).
If I see a heavy 29'er-bias in STW mag etc I wont buy.
applause 😆aren't most CX bikes sold to commuters anwyay, because there is a bit of a pothole at the end of their road that looked at them funny once?
I was about to say CX is closer to the riding that I normally do than DH, but pedants will point out CX is racing around a field for an hour, so I'll change it to I could ride a CX bike on most of my local trails and enjoy it while a DH bike would only be fun on about 2 tracks and would sap my will to live on anything else.Saying CX is as close to MTBing as DH is ludicrous.
Some of you are starting to sound like the old timers in the CTC moaning about anything except touring bikes appearing in their magazine - CTC is now a [i]cyclist[/i] organisation not specifically a [i]touring[/i] one, some people seem to have issues with this. Lots of threads on here about CX and road bikes so the odd appearance in the mag seems sensible and really doesn't bother me. ST seems to me to be an offroad focussed [i]cyclist[/i] magazine and I like that about it, I guess mainly coz I consider myself to be an offroad focussed cyclist.
OK I'll check out Cyclist.
Front page poll is interesting. I think the point is that we all want different things so it's hard for one magazine to try and please everybody!
However, one thing is for sure- BMX is bottom of the barrel 😆
I like Singletrack, in the same way that I like Cyclist and liked Privateer, they have proper articles aimed at the type of riding i do myself, I ride all types of bikes, I enjoy a pint of brown beer and i'm not adverse to a bivvy trip.
When I look at MBUK or Dirt, they are fun, but they are essentially catalogues full of shiny stuff and i know i am never gonna do backflips on my bike (on purpose) or ride a DH bike at full chat.
In MBUK, every photo seems to be in the sunshine with some guy wearing flouro pyjamas, i can't relate to that, i'm middle aged, spend most of my riding time in the dark and mud it seems, and ride for pleasure and for the social aspect, not to win medals and be "gnarly".
I'm going with the original poster here. I stopped buying ST a few years ago as everything seemed to have taken on a hipster vibe with too much lycra and discussions on different coffees. FFS at least talk about tea!
TBH though it just saved me £4 a month so i wasn't too fussed, same with Dirt really. My issue comes from the idea we should pay for some form of subscription in order to read articles on the sodding website... so i go to enduro or pinkbike instead!
FFS at least talk about tea!
Hear hear!
hatchleader - you think that all website content should be provided free, or you don't think the standard makes it worth paying for?
ahwiles +1, i assume we all have other outdoor interests or generally just enjoy being out. I would like to see a feature once a month on a different outdoor topic. Trail running, rock climbing, anything outdoors. Buy it in, get the team to do it, all good.
FFS at least talk about tea!
I agree with this.
My issue comes from the idea we should pay for some form of subscription in order to read articles on the sodding website
The idea of readers paying for content is slowly gaining ground again in web circles, thanks in large part to The Sun's paywall. Good on ST for charging, I say.
[quote=hatchleader]so i go to enduro or pinkbike instead!
Then you are [b]not[/b] the demographic that ST is aiming at.
When you've spent £4k on the Orange and £40k on the Audi, a £40 annual subscription is pocket change.
I agree with the post above - the articles seem to be aimed at people with huge amounts of disposable cash. Why not review more stuff that is within the average rider's range of affordability? Perhaps its not as fun as a journo to ride around on avg-good stuff when someone's willing to lend you a 6k bike to test for a month... OK, its nice to see some high end gear but not all the time.
I do however like a lot of the lifestyle type pieces, overseas trips, photography etc.
TBH though it just saved me £4 a month so i wasn't too fussed, same with Dirt really. My issue comes from the idea we should pay for some form of subscription in order to read articles on the sodding website... so i go to enduro or pinkbike instead!
So if no one buys the mag, and no one pays for site content, how does it get produced? Advertising only? My free newspaper tells me this isn't a great model.
FWIW I've subscribed since the start and found every issue worth the cover price in terms of a mild diversion from everyday tedium every few weeks, I'm not sure what people expect from a hobbyist magazine. Sometimes I like more content than others, sometimes I think the articles are complete crocks others are really interesting.
Keeping this site running is a pleasant side effect 🙂
For the record, the most I've paid for any bike bit is £600 (Superlight frame, from an ad here, 2001) and my daily drive is a 2001 Pug 205 🙂
Cyclocross has no place in a mtb mag IMO, and that's coming as someone who rides one and has occasionally raced them over the last 15 years. Cyclocross is essentially a roadie winter activity, based on riding around fields.
To me mtbing is about riding forests, hills and mountains.
I still love STW, I look forward to the next issue coming out and even have a little ritual when I get it.
It has changed over the years, but then so has everything else?
I look at the latest issues of WhatmountainbikeriderUK? and sometimes can't tell who's version I'm reading.
STW is different and all the better for it.
It's fair enough if the content reflects it, mag or site. You can choose to pay for more content n TV, same can apply online. I'm far less likely to pay to read longer web articles though, simply as I really dislike e-readers etc, videos aren't that much of interest generally either. Ipads are better but I don't have one and prefer paper and content that's less throwaway.Good on ST for charging, I say
Bunyan Velo is full of the escapist weirdo stuff that I find motivating, they could get up to tenner a time off me for a fair qty of that sort of content. Quarterly, good volume, loads of imagery. But as an e-reader I generally CBA with doing more than looking at the trip pics briefly.
TBH though it just saved me £4 a month so i wasn't too fussed, same with Dirt really. My issue comes from the idea we should pay for some form of subscription in order to read articles
Digital Sub is only £25 - so about £2 a month for full website access, plus 8 digital mag issues, Premier card and discounts, and an archive of all previous mags and books.
Seems pretty reasonable to me to be honest.
I too would like to see more articles for the common average earning man BUT stw isn't that kind of mag, I see it as an aspirational mtb mag. I also flick through it in smiths and buy it if there's enough in it to interest me. Whenever I see reviews of kit priced upwards of £200 I switch off. I'd like to see articles aimed at the everyday british MTBer. Things I'd like to see:
.best chinese light from ebay under 30 quid. I'm not gonna buy one of these 200 quid jobbies, I bought 2 cree lights from ebay and they're great. Or how about 'the best way to cable tie a cheapo light to your helmet' I can see why they include reviews of the expensive kit though, it's so they can encourage the makers to take out the advert on the opposite/next page. Fair enough the mag is a business and has to make profit but high end kit just doesn't interest me.
.Best pedals under 60 quid
.Best helmet under £100
.Best mech under £100
etc etc
.Loads of route and ride reports - I'm out every week on 2 wheels and info on routes is the single most useful/interesting aspect of any mag I buy. If there was a mag that did maps and report of 5/6 routes every month then I'd buy that all the time. How about a section entitled 'local rides' where a local from a differnt place every time explains and shows off his/her favourite local ride. Can I do the first one? It isn't all about the riding in iceland on glaciers!
anyway.. meh.
hatchleader - you think that all website content should be provided free, or you don't think the standard makes it worth paying for?
Bit of both- these sites have adverts down the side for a reason. Why do i have to pay for articles i will only read a few of when i can get better quality journalism elsewhere for free.
Then you are not the demographic that ST is aiming at.When you've spent £4k on the Orange and £40k on the Audi, a £40 annual subscription is pocket change.
Its down to a question of value. by that note you would say that a £40 sandwich is pocket change! A £40 subscription is a lot of money when theres nothing your interested in reading!
I don't want to see 'best X under £Y'. I don't want to read about shopping for bike parts.
I would rather read about riding and interesting stuff, which is why I'd read STW over most mags. It can be a bit up itself occasionally but that's better than endless bike roundups. There are other shopping based mags for that.