Forum menu
Single speed bikes ...
 

[Closed] Single speed bikes - I just don't get it???

Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

whats there to get? it's a bike.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 10:50 am
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

[i]The whole niche / lets grow 'wacky' beards thing winds me up[/i]

define a wacky beard? i think mine is 'traditional' i'd like the circumstance to shave it into a decent set of burners though


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 10:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bunch of luddites...mate bought one..steel rigid for a while....then fitted rebas...then swapped to On One scandium frame...thinking about putting gears on it now....quite sweet really watching mountain bike evolution all over again!

Not really practical for real hills either...cue response from online riding gods who ride up 1 in 3 hills in the 36-16

oh and they are really anti-social cos you can't chill with your mates on climbs either!

And yes I have ridden one!


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 11:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

they're an anti social bunch.

Well i find i am, faster on the climbs as you need to commit to them therefore you reach the top generally quicker than the average geared rider. So you end up waitng at the top and have recovered nicely for when the others arrive all puffed out. = anti social

Along the flat, if your riding with a fast bunch who are big ringing it, your spinning like a fool and breathing heavy, therefore can't speak to clearly = anti social

On the descents, you need to pump the terrain more to retain speed, put in bursts of power now and again, i find this not a problem on the techy stuff, but the fast pedally flowing trials i can't go a fast as i'd like to, about the only negative, this can mean you maybe holding up riders behind you =anti social.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 11:41 am
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

Not really practical for real hills either...cue response from online riding gods who ride up 1 in 3 hills in the 36-16

You're right, they're impossible to ride in the Lakes or the north Pennines. Just can't be done. Nope, impossible.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 11:56 am
Posts: 10747
Full Member
 

Anybody who rides with me will tell you I'm a better stronger rider on SS. If I have gears I always be at the back on climbs, but with SS I'm nearer the front. I get off and walk about the same amount on both.

Part of that is because I'm 100kg and I'm fearful of getting out of the saddle and putting the pressure on with gears because of destroying the drivetrain, and snapping a chain. The other reason is because I get lazy, and on SS you can't do lazy.

And it's right to call it single SPEED because we go the same speed everywhere - up down or flat.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 11:59 am
Posts: 3651
Full Member
 

For me it's just another bike. When I fancy a change from my full sus I jump on the singlespeed.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 12:47 pm
Posts: 99
Free Member
 

Can't afford gears. I have two bikes and can only afford 10 gears across both. ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 5:18 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

the whole stupid beard thing does look a bit sad, is it still going?


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 5:33 pm
Posts: 99
Free Member
 

Can't afford razor blades. ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 5:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For me:

I want something cheap, that I can use to get to work every day and that either won't get stolen in Glasgow or if it does won't matter a huge amount.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 6:03 pm
Posts: 3449
Free Member
 

I've recently dabbled- although only on my commuter so maybe there's something about MTB SSing that I'm missing, but FWIW:

Lighter
Cheaper to run (in theory- doubt I'll see this for a while yet)
Keeps you working a bit harder (good thing)
Coasting down anything that looks like a hill is boring
Some hills are very hard work (and offset the lightness to some extent)

So while I'm not in a huge hurry to put my gears back on my commuter, neither am I about to rush out and take the gears off my MTB. I guess there's an attractive simplicity to it, but (for me anyway) it wasn't the revelation that some might make it out to be- it's just a bike with no gears on.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I got one recently for riding around Delamere. Not particularly hilly, very muddy (especially over winter) and also good excercise.

I'm hoping the SS will save my Full Suss bike's bearings and drive train from getting knackered and also give me a little more fitness so that when I take the full suss out into the peaks or wales I'll be able to go longer/faster etc.

So far I really like it and find the riding a little more challenging and exciting.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

I like SSers, they make me laugh and remind me of religious people. It never ceases to amaze me how illogical people can be.

Ive got 27 Single speeds - all mounted on one bike so I dont have to ask those questions about what gear ratio to use.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 6:21 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

after 20 years of riding mountain bikes I love sinlge speeds.....I own a big bouncy thing (no, not a space hopper) and race an ultra light hardtail as well, but the joy of stomping past a load of wheezing, granny gear spinning "real" mountian bikers on big climbs in the peak district, scotland, north wales is amazing.

If you don't get it, don't do it.

I personally think anyone who gobs off about a topic based on narrow minded stereotypes "bearded luddites etc.." without having had personal experience of the topic is a big hairy nob face....so there! ๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 6:34 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

after 20 years of riding mountain bikes I love sinlge speeds.....I own a big bouncy thing (no, not a space hopper) and race an ultra light hardtail as well, but the joy of stomping past a load of wheezing, granny gear spinning "real" mountian bikers on big climbs in the peak district, scotland, north wales is amazing.

If you don't get it, don't do it.

I personally think anyone who gobs off about a topic based on narrow minded stereotypes "bearded luddites etc.." without having had personal experience of the topic is a big hairy nob face....so there! ๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 6:35 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

sorry for the double post......ok.....so i'm an IT luddite......bugger it's not a stereotype


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 6:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 6:49 pm
Posts: 0
 

I've got a rigid SS and a geared full susser (and had a hardtail too at one point). Each have their advantages and disadvantages and both can be fun to ride. There's nothing to "get" with SS other than it's a different style of riding.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I never intended to get a mono-ratio. I was asking around for a nice light hardtail, and a mate gave me his old steel oner frame, then I found that it was a really enjoyable bike to ride in the endlessly rainy muddy claggy summers we get these years.

It's nice to have a few bikes to choose from....


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 7:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This thread is why I love STW. Pointless, amusing and deeply deeply uninteresting to 99.73% of the population ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 7:34 pm
 devs
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Part of that is because I'm 100kg and I'm fearful of getting out of the saddle and putting the pressure on with gears because of destroying the drivetrain, and snapping a chain.

I'm 110Kg and love getting up and stomping. I have snapped 4 chains in the last 2 1/2 years but have only had one gut to stem incident. I vowed to just change chains after 0.75 on the wear indicator now. I want to try this SS thang tho. It looks fun. I've got all the kit I need now and this winter either my 853 or 456 will become SS.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 8:34 pm
Posts: 2011
Free Member
 

I cant speak for serious off road use on the SS(see other bike)but cant be faulted for canal work commute (nice and flat all 8 miles) and also quality for arsing around on the local jumps and "urban riding" so it has my vote.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 10:19 pm
Posts: 149
Free Member
 

I have too many bikes, all sorts, ride them all but my 'bag of bits' SS is my fav, just grab and ride, but I do live in Devon so only little hills really!?!


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 10:30 pm
 aa
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bikes are cool.

Pushbikes that is.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 10:36 pm
Posts: 5401
Free Member
 

Hardtails look better singlespeed.

No worry about chain slap.

Don't have one myself, but can see the attraction.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 10:41 pm
 nbt
Posts: 12486
Full Member
 

Kramer - Member

Hardtails look better singlespeed.

No worry about chain slap.

Don't have one myself, but can see the attraction.

Suck it up big boy, you can try mine next time we have a ride and see if you can overtake me on the descents *then* without doing a superman in front of the walkers ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 10:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

See, I ask a simple question and get all of this back, ๐Ÿ˜†

For the record I ride a full sus bike, lots and lots of gears, and every other bit of new technology that is in the modern world, (apart from grizzly bears zip tied to the handle bars). Although I do have a beard, shaved short to match my ever balding head!

Before moving Down Under I used to ride my bike around Hamsterley, in all weathers, and never had trouble with my gears. The bike got very muddy, took it home, cleaned it ready for next time, easy.

Now I live in a world of almost continuous sunshine, and still no trouble with my gears, and no desire for SS either.

I also don't see the point of road riding, or bmx's!


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I bust a mech on a ride a while ago and did a successful trailside singlespeed conversion, It was rubbish. Spinning out on every descent and grunting up every climb at a stupid low cadence.

I can see the appeal for winter flat woodland or for a jump bike - but for every day trail riding - dinnae be so daft laddie


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 10:54 pm
 aa
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bikes are cool.

it dont even matter yo.

singlespeeds have their place

as do road bikes

and shoppers

etc


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 10:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Got a full suss but spend far more of the time on my rigid ss these days
Think you either get it or you don't
I find it more of a challenge especially in the Peak, Scotland or Wales
Got tired of the bills for a full suss as well


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its just another bike isn't it. What's all the fuss about? Mike Ferrentino has a point this month .............


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They're fast. I know 'cos I got overtaken by a bloke on a Pompino with 52/12 ratio (down A316). Anybody from here BTW?


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 11:37 pm
Posts: 33979
Full Member
 

I looked under the bridge, and guess what I spotted? Yep, a troll. Not only that, but an Australian troll. Singlespeeds are great. I've got one. Hardtails with 6" travel forks are great as well. I've got one of those as well. 6" travel full sus is great too. Got one of those. Guess what. The SS is the one I ride most. If you don't understand why, then maybe one day when your IQ gets higher than your shoe size, you may just begin to get an idea.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 11:41 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

It might of been me going so fast I jumped through time and space and onto the A316. You'd never achieve that sort of movement on a geared bike.


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Count Zero, calm down, ๐Ÿ˜›

When your IQ is as high as mine, then you might read my previous reply and not that I am an English Troll, not an Aussie Troll, ๐Ÿ˜†

But then again, you do ride SS more!


 
Posted : 22/07/2009 11:53 pm
 dano
Posts: 41
Free Member
 

How many gears does chris hoy use on his track bike?

ohh thats right 1!


 
Posted : 23/07/2009 12:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its all about personal preferance and mine is single speed, i ride a 2009 spesh p1 cro mo, i had a flow moe with 9 gears untill it was nicked from my flat at xmas last year, if it suits you to ride ss then ride ss, i have personally found i ride quicker on my ss than on a geared bike as i found i became lazy on climes relying on my gears to get up hills but i was on a crack-n-fail rize a few weeks ago for a ride and i made it up a clime easier than on my ss but it felt like i was cheating, is was slower and less rewarding on the crack-n-fail but like i said its all down to what YOU prefer, try a ss and see if you like it, if you dont then dont worry it wasnt for you!


 
Posted : 23/07/2009 12:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I understand that different riders prefer different bikes, all I wanted to know is why do some riders prefer SS? Simple question I thought ๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 23/07/2009 12:24 am
Posts: 2607
Free Member
 

I did say at the outset that you'd opened up a whole kettle o' worms with this one Todd!

... Unfortunately, it's often difficult to ask the question 'why?', beacuse certain biking 'cliques' can instantly regard this question as some sort of challenge to their zealously-guarded worldview... This said, I'm sort of 50:50 as to whether you are trolling or actually genuine in your seemingly naive questioning?

I am satisfied to see that pretty much everything I predicted at the outset of this thread has come to bear (pun intended). Singlespeeders really do have much bigger cojones, don't you know..? ๐Ÿ˜‰

On a more [i]zen[/i] note, aside from the practical aspects of mud clearance / lightness / low mantainence etc. ... I think some riders prefer a singlespeed [i]hardtail[/i] - they're always hardtails - simply because it makes riding a more simple, zen-like experience... Which can't be a bad thing, surely?

I was forced to go 'singlespeed' during one ride last year when my rear mech fell to bits mid-ride. I must've found exactly the right ratio or something, because it was actually quite a good experience, flowing along nicely through the woods - I didn't miss gears at all - although I was only on gently undulating terrain (Swinley). Suffice to say though, by the time we got on the road to go home, I could barely keep up with my mate on a geared bike - who is waaay less fit than me - as I was spinning out like crazy.

As for several claims that 'it makes you less lazy (and therefore faster) going up hills'. FFS! That philosophy really seems to work for Lance, Contador et al. ๐Ÿ™„

... Otherwise - I'm really enjoing this pointless, amusing discussion so far on a topic that 99.7% of the population wouldn't comprehend!

(p.s. Welcome to Aus - I think most in the UK are asleep right now)


 
Posted : 23/07/2009 1:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

no_eyed_dear, It was a genuine question that seems to have been lost with some people. If some people want to get upset with the issue and throw abuse, then I am quite happy to throw some back. Does that make me a pommie troll? ๐Ÿ˜†

I knew that it would open up a can of worms, everybody has an opinion on here, and don't they know how to voice it!

Interesting to hear some of the opinions/excuses to ride SS though.

It does quieten down in the UK right now, then the forum starts to pick up late this arvo.


 
Posted : 23/07/2009 2:17 am
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Never ever seen the point of singlespeeds, there's not a single advantage to be gained by a singlespeed over a working geared bike.
Pointless.
Tractors are cheap and good in the mud but I wouldn't drive one every day.


 
Posted : 23/07/2009 8:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

over a working geared bike

there's your advantage right there!

๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 23/07/2009 8:22 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]Tractors are cheap and good in the mud[/i]

There's another advantage, for a non-singlespeeder you're selling them quite well.


 
Posted : 23/07/2009 8:30 am
Posts: 27
Full Member
 

[url= http://www.sheldonbrown.com/singlespeed.html ]Sheldon Brown:[/url]

"Riding a singlespeed can help bring back the unfettered joy you experienced riding your bike as a child"

Click link above for a very good article from Sheldon ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 23/07/2009 8:44 am
Page 2 / 3