[img] 
[/img]
They look better in real life.
seatpost looks a bit tall on that frame............watch out it dont break the frame... 😉
It's a 400mm post with 120mm in the frame.
Well within the manufacturers design limits. 😛
[img] 
[/img]
better late than never
[url= http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5192/5863640828_5a8ba5e727.jp g" target="_blank">
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/15253377@N00/5863640828/ ]Buttercups[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/15253377@N00/ ]z1ppy2[/url], on Flickr
none of the pictures so far feature a bike in a field of buttercups 😕
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh go on then, I'll ask.
Why?
all three are [i]near[/i], rather than [i]in[/i], the fields you see! 😮
😀
Rape!
[img] 
[/img]
so tally for the thread so far remains at 0. can i nominate it for deletion? 🙂
This any better? I suppose technically you could say random yellow (and other colour) wild flowers on a landscaped colliery spoil heap, but we must occasionally feed the pedants.
[IMG] 
[/IMG]
looks good to me. i am quite pedantic generally, but up til now it was just blatant misrepresentation!
Oh dear, yes mine was actually taken in the field 😉
Depends on your level of pedantry.
The track in my picture runs through the middle of the field, so I consider it to be one field with an unfenced track through it.
Some people might, wrongly of course, consider it two fields, one each side of the track.
I'll take another picture with the bike further up the bank so it is definitely [b]in[/b] the field, if it will make you happy.