Forum menu
Roadies whats your ...
 

[Closed] Roadies whats your average speed?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sh*t, just had a Tunnocks caramel biscuit!

"that can't be done", and "that is fast".

FWIW, trying to put some numbers on this. I reckon you need to be around 3.8 w/kg or above (assuming a bloke of around 73kg) to comfortably knock out a couple of z3 hours at 20+ mph (again assuming aero is ok, not much wind, rolling course.) So going to [url= ]the chart[/url] that's about cat 3 and above. Not that remarkable.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 3:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And this isn't about ego
Sorry but pathetically, stalking is ALWAYS about ego..

Njee Bengee is world class at this level of pathological obsessional creepiness.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:01 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

FWIW, trying to put some numbers on this. I reckon you need to be around 3.8 w/kg or above (assuming a bloke of around 73kg) to comfortably knock out a couple of z3 hours at 20+ mph

IIRC that's what I was last time I tested, in February when nicely unfit, I need to be more aero ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I need to be more aero

Might be stating the obvious but aero is huge on the road bike. Reckon most people could up their average significantly just by working on moving towards a more aero position. Just try simple things like dropping your head and hunching your shoulders, trying to get narrow. You might not be able to make quite as much power but your speed will go up.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:07 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Might be stating the obvious but aero is huge on the road bike. Reckon most people could up their average significantly just by working on moving towards a more aero position.

I've always been better climbing than churning out speed on the flat, I'm not not aero, but could probably be better (couldn't we all). I always go better (comparatively) when the road tips upward though.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mtbel, at least gatsby has provided some evidence to support his claims ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:13 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

I've always been better climbing than churning out speed on the flat

That's cos you're fairly small. As a fat knacker, it's the other way round for me ๐Ÿ™‚

W/kg makes naff all difference on the flat - it's all about the W I reckon.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I just remembered 3 or 4 weeks ago that I ****ing hate roadies so I'm bowing out of your pathetic competition.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gatsby seems a good lad though.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:17 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I just remembered 3 or 4 weeks ago that I **** hate roadies so I'm bowing out of your pathetic competition.

Shame you chose to "enter" it at all really Gary. Don't let the door hit you on the way out now. Good lad.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:19 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

This all boils down to how flat the rides in question are. In some parts of the country a flat ride is properly flat, with maybe 100m of climbing in 20 or 30 miles. In others, what constitutes a flat ride is more like 500m over that distance.

And that makes a huge difference to average speed.

As previously mentioned, when I had a long flat 30k commute with one hill and some traffic lights in - to average 33.6kph my *typical* flat speed had to be around 42kph just to counter that one short hill the junctions, and a couple of lights. If you consider 42kph on the flat to be fairly easy then fair play, you are fast.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it's not me, but your door you should be worried about wee guy ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

W/kg makes naff all difference on the flat - it's all about the W I reckon.

Does make some difference, accelerating, aero, etc. If I can get lighter without losing power then I'm usually quicker. But, yes, on flat courses it's heavily biased towards the watts. I think we're talking typical rolling terrain though (whatever that means.)


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:22 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

Sorry but pathetically, stalking is ALWAYS about ego..

nah, it's really not, it's about pulling someone up when they can't/won't support their claims, or their claims distort the thread.

Plenty of people quicker than me that I ride with, I love having faster people to try and spur me on and drag me home when needs be, and some of them are [i]properly [/i]quick, and I can be blowing out my arse when they're cruising and nattering away, I'm in awe of how fast some guys are, but it needs to be put in context, fast guys are fast, average guys aren't, and for someone starting out or looking for info it's important to be able to clarify what is what, where terrain comes into play, where groups affect speeds, and which numbers come from quicker than average people and which are a result of the circumstances.


Njee Bengee is world class at this level of pathological obsessional creepiness.

yeah, but everyone knows you two don't get on ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The link I posted has just shy of 300m of climbing in 20 miles. I call it my 20-20 TT as I always aim to complete it in an hour. If I hit traffic, or a strong headwind on the outward leg, I work harder to pull it back.

This is what I was referring to when I said "I aim to do 20mph".

To date, apart from traffic snarl-ups and a puncture, I don't think I've ever failed on that route. If it takes me an hour and 2 mins, and I've got stopped by every set of traffic lights, I'm not going to self flagellate, because I know I've still ridden it as well as I'm capable. On a clear run, if I was dropping to 18mph, I'd be worried that I was losing form.

The climbs are long drags, not too steep, so suit me better than short sharp stabs, but 300m in 20 miles is far from flat, a point questioned by Njee. If he's ever in the northwest, I'd love to see if he can get round it in less than an hour. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:31 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

To date, apart from traffic snarl-ups and a puncture, I don't think I've ever failed on that route.

[url= https://app.strava.com/activities/271310358 ]You mean except the one you posted earlier, where you did 19mph[/url]?

a point questioned by Njee

Nope, don't think I did. I wouldn't say that 900ft in 20 miles is flat. It's rolling I'd say, which I believe is what you said.

If he's ever in the northwest, I'd love to see if he can get round it in less than an hour.

Gladly have a punt! And if I do...?


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I get on with everyone. haven't ever met Njee.

no one other than you two are actually looking for info from this ridiculously dull thread, trust me.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I never understand these threads, all the willy waving. Never anything to be gained. Just go out and ride ffs! if you want to know how quick you are, do a race.

On a similar note, why do testers always wish to go to the fastest course, on a bank holiday so they can draft caravans down a -3% dual carriage way and claim they do xx.xx for ten miles? Time trialling ie individual effort against others, marginal gains, perfect bike set up etc I understand. Kidding yourself into thinking you are a fast I don't.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:36 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

no one other than you two are actually looking for info from this ridiculously dull thread, trust me.

If I could go out on my bike right now instead I would - trust me!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:38 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

no one other than you two are actually looking for info from this ridiculously dull thread, trust me.

So you opened the thread, commented that you were leaving, have contributed nothing, and you're still posting. Despite it being 'dull'. You're a waste of bandwidth you really are.

Kidding yourself into thinking you are a fast I don't.

Trouble is that it's a 'stock' question among testers isn't it - what's your PB? Why wouldn't you want the fastest possible PB? I can (sort of) see the appeal of going to a fast course. It's not really any different to using aero bars or deep section wheels - it's all speed that comes from something other than your legs!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

To be fair, I've found it highly entertaining. mtbel's 'contribution' is a little confusing though.

FWIW i'm quite happy with 12mph whatever bike i'm on ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:45 pm
Posts: 1421
Free Member
 

Here's my willy waving 17mph average over 230 miles and 10k feet (although I'm not entirely sure that's right) - https://www.strava.com/activities/194190672 granted with a couple of others from the club. Most of my commutes tend to be around the 15 -16 mph depending on the route I take recently I've been doing 1200 - 1500 feet of up in 17.8 miles at an average of 16 ish. Wuwu~


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Njee, as I said, if I've got to spend 5 minutes picking my way through a traffic jam and get home 1hr 2mins after I set off, I'm still happy that I've ridden at an average of 20mph. It usually means I have to work harder on the second half, so my power output would be roughly the same at a sub hour without traffic.

I described it as lumpy, you questioned it.

If you got round that course in less than an hour, I'd be impressed that such an irritating little southerner could ride it as fast as me and I'd point you in the direction of a good pub where you could buy yourself a pint. On your own.

Saynotobasemiles, part of the attraction of testing is is the tinkering with equipment and position. I've recently got a TT bike so I'm quite enjoying trying different things to improve position etc.

I'm not a fan of drag strip courses though, I prefer loops or sporting courses because as you say, I don't think there's much achievement in a fast one-way time with a tailwind.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:46 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

I've found it highly entertaining

that's all I ever want from STW, and it rarely disappoints!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All hail the Bandwidth king... throttling STRAVA D/L speeds 24/7

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:46 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I described it as lumpy, you questioned it.

Did I? I genuinely don't think I did.

If you got round that course in less than an hour, I'd be impressed that such an irritating little southerner could ride it as fast as me

Modest fella aren't you!?

Here's my willy waving 17mph average over 230 miles and 10k feet (although I'm not entirely sure that's right)

That's worthy of a "chapeau"!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mtbel has joined a thread, 8 pages in, to criticize someone he has history with for stalking behaviour. What could be confusing about that!

as for the rest of the thread, it's interesting to see how you compare and there are clearly some very fast people out there. Not saying that because they're quicker than me - it's not difficult - but it's interesting just how much quicker they are. But then that's when the arguing started, isn't it...


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Trouble is that it's a 'stock' question among testers isn't it - what's your PB? Why wouldn't you want the fastest possible PB?

It is usually followed by a question about which course it was on (and what the winning time was too). Plenty of gift courses out there and testers tend to know which they are and will judge your response accordingly ๐Ÿ™‚

Here's my willy waving 17mph average over 230 miles and 10k feet

Now that is a ride worthy of a willy wave!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

njee20- I think the marginal gains aspect, aero wheels, aero lid, fast tyres etc is great and part of the attraction of the sport. But some plonker who had a float day on a fast course dropping his pb into every conversation makes me laugh. Did you win or podium and against who is a better reflection.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:52 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

but 300m in 20 miles is far from flat

That's quite flat by my standards.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:54 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

But some plonker who had a float day on a fast course dropping his pb into every conversation makes me laugh. Did you win or podium and against who is a better reflection.

Aye, that's a good point - and as mrblobby says the serious guys will know the fast courses and which ones to dismiss. That said... if I was doing a short 21 (say) on a local course I'd be off to the fastest course in all the land and hoping for a still day!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That said... if I was doing a short 21 (say) on a local course I'd be off to the fastest course in all the land and hoping for a still day!

Many do. But what then? It's much like any sort of racing where the fun is getting to know the people you compete against and seeing how you go against them on various courses, trying to get faster. Just having a big PB on a gift course doesn't actually make you any faster. I guess it's back to willy waving ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's quite flat by my standards.

I'd grade rides as Flat, Lumpy and Hilly.

300m in 20 miles is lumpy. Not hilly, not flat, lumpy.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 4:58 pm
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

[i]Here's my willy waving 17mph average over 230 miles and 10k feet [/i]

You wave that willy!!

There was nothing on the telly, right? ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 5:01 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

where are all these 20mph+ riders ? I pootle around 14mph (maybe 15 on a good day with the right wind) I've done over 1500 road miles this year not been passed by anyone ๐Ÿ˜•


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 5:02 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Just having a big PB on a gift course doesn't actually make you any faster.

True, it's completely psychological, and like I say, it's a bit like all the kit advantages. If you go and buy a TT bike you don't get any faster, but you do. If you know what I mean!

Qualifying which course it's on isn't really any different to having to say what bike you did it on.

I think the novelty of driving for hours to ride for 20 minutes would fast wear off for me!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 5:04 pm
Posts: 6256
Full Member
 

ditto.
but only been passed by blimmin e-bikes doing 16mph with someone barely twiddling the pedals with either clown-style foot positioning or tips of toes on pedals (surely that must cramp)


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 5:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

where are all these 20mph+ riders ? I pootle around 14mph (maybe 15 on a good day with the right wind) I've done over 1500 road miles this year not been passed by anyone

Have a look at the web page of your local cycling club. Check out the TT results. Have a look at the regular names in the top 10. Search for them in Strava. Have a look at their rides. Have a look at who they follow (probably be some cat2/cat3 racers.) It's pretty easy to figure out who the faster riders in your area are.

True, it's completely psychological, and like I say, it's a bit like all the kit advantages. If you go and buy a TT bike you don't get any faster, but you do. If you know what I mean!

Yeah, I thought this, but with kit it's more about having a level playing field with the folk you race against.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 5:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think also, as MrBlobby alluded to earlier, you can learn a lot about what works for you from trying to get more aero and that understanding helps general riding and racing.

I find TTing very good for pedaling technique and discipline.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 5:11 pm
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

[i]Have a look at the web page of your local cycling club. Check out the TT results. Have a look at the regular names in the top 10. Search for them in Strava. Have a look at their rides. Have a look at who they follow (probably be some cat2/cat3 racers.) It's pretty easy to figure out who the faster riders in your area are.[/i]

Worrying levels of internet stalkerishness right there... ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 5:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Worrying levels of internet stalkerishness right there...

Haha, just to clarify that is not what I do! Just knowing most of the faster riders in my area through club and racing, that would be one way of finding them.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 5:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

300m climbing in 20miles is pretty flat, even for a southern softy like me.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 5:37 pm
Posts: 1823
Free Member
 

Njee - I'm not getting into the argument but I live and ride in the same area as gatsby ( my name has even appeared on some of the segs of the rides he's linked, near the top, obviously ๐Ÿ˜‰ ) and some of the averages he's quoting are perfectly doable.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 6:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Andy, Njee's not disputing that they're doable, he's just going through my rides, finding all the recovery rides, rides on novelty bikes, rides with sick children etc, and using those to refute my claim that I aim for 20mph and often succeed.

I think it's a southern thing!

And thanks for the kudos, you've got some good times there!


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 6:23 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

some of the averages he's quoting are perfectly doable.

Of course they are, I've never said anything to the contrary. Thing is... he's not doing them!

As planned, [url= https://www.strava.com/activities/284717077 ]had a bit of a go on the way home[/url], not totally circular as I didn't work from home, but a relatively stiff southerly/south easterly breeze meant a lot of time in the wind. Flat, with less than 600ft of climbing, but not a total shocker.


 
Posted : 13/04/2015 6:27 pm
Page 7 / 12