Forum menu
are there any advantages to going with tubs on a roadbike over clinchers?
i use tubeless on my mtb, i know its not quite the same thing but i do prefer it to tubes.
For races and TT's yes. For general riding no. Unless you've got enough cash to keep a good amount of spares to put on when you puncture
Tubs have a lower rolling resistance and because they are glued/ taped on are a fair bit lighter in most cases too.
Most tubs will require removal and repair in the event of a puncture unless you run tufo tubs which can be used with their own sealant (you can run a sealant in any tub)
Tufo are also easier to stick on with their gluing tape which centres the tub as you peel the backing off.
I use tubs for the TT's and local training runs only. Theres no point in risking the tubs on normal rides.
I'd get a set if you want a set of race day only wheels. You can get a really nice set of lightweight wheels that you can use for special events then
tubeless road tyres ?
even some shimano road wheels are tubeless-compatible (and have a ridged rim to hold the tyre)
Pretty sure I read that resistance is now pretty much as low with clinchers as with tubulars (not sure about tubeless in particular but flexy latex tubes are supposedly best, which makes me think "none" might be good too)
Tubs actually have higher rolling resistance than clinchers unless uou glue them on using shellac or some other rock solid method. Using tub tape increases rolling resistance because it allows the tyre carcass to move more, and rolling resistance is related to tyre deformation.
A German chap did the tests for a mag a while ago.
it was for every day general training use. saw a deal on some tubular rims hence the question. may be better to pay extra for clincher rims then.