Riding kit spending...
 

[Closed] Riding kit spending as a percentage of your actual bike spend

7 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
76 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

A few of us were having a debate whilst riding on saturday as to how much you should spend on your cycling specific kit, not including the bike. There were 2 obvious schools of thought: Those who have a very expensive bike, but only budget to mid range kit. And those who have a middle range bike but good kit.

By kit I mean cycling clothes, helmets, shoes, lights, hydration packs etc etc.

My take is that I actually get more enjoyment from having high quality high performance kit than having the absolute cutting edge bike. Nice kit makes the actual riding a far more enjoyable experience. Having just done the sums, my kit adds up to 170% the cost of my MTB, but there is some roadie kit in there too.

What do people on here think?


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 8:30 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

No idea about spend ratio, but I'd agree that decent clothing makes way more of a difference to your ride than say xtr over lx, carbon bars etc.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 8:32 am
 cp
Posts: 8952
Full Member
 

similar to you really in that I certainly find spending the money on kit makes such a difference to comfort levels, though no intention of doing the calc!

Sometimes cheap kit is good, though most of the time it's not. I really don't get on with any of the Aldi stuff - just doesn't fit right. I've just 'invested' in some decent dhb stuff from Wiggle - and it's in a different league comfort and fit wise.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 8:33 am
Posts: 785
Free Member
 

I wear what works for me irrespective of cost. some kit is expensive, some not.

At a guess 50% of the 4 bikes I'm currently running

Plum


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 8:34 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

There were 2 obvious schools of thought: Those who have a very expensive bike, but only budget to mid range kit. And those who have a middle range bike but good kit.

I'm in the third group, expensive bike and nice kit 😳

I keep kit a lot longer than bikes though, in fact I don't think I've bought any notable bits of kit this year. I've also only got 1 MTB, but have 4 helmets, 5 pairs of sunglasses, and at least 15 pairs of shorts, so it's not really a fair comparison!


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 8:39 am
Posts: 598
Full Member
 

jeez, I didn't think it was that much.

Below is only stuff I ride with, I haven't included buff's and merino stuff I use for walking.

My riding kit is 27% ish of the bikes value (orange 5 pro)

Lights: £300
Pack/bladder: £65
Shorts: £45
Top: £40
Socks: £8
Shoes: £40
Knee pads (no laughing at the back) £75
Helmet: £65
Jacket: £100
Glasses: £30
Gloves: £30


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 8:40 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

0% I suppose
I think cycling specific kit is fairly irrelivent as long as you're comfortable riding the bike (haven't bought any new riding kit in a few years and never buy ther latest gimickey clothing, instead I only really replace clothing when it dies, I used to go through aboout 4 pairs of gloves a year but have given up wearing gloves now.
I s'pose my main 4 bikes(have 8 in total)might be deemed "very expensive".


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 8:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

fourth group.... hair shirt brigade here..

mid range bike with reliable parts.. I own a midrange helmet.. some bargain gloves and some £8 padded undershorts as my only cycling specific kit..


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 8:47 am