Forum menu
Recommend me a new ...
 

[Closed] Recommend me a new chainring for my single speed

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#911056]

I'm currently running a Truvativ Stylo SS crankset with a 38t chain ring. Its a bit of big ring for 29er single speed but I've had fun hammering along on it at high speed all summer. Winter is approaching and I fancy something a bit more manageable for the cold weather. The idea of getting up the hills more quickly also appeals if I'm being honest!

Anybody got any suggestions on what a good replacement would be? Also, would I be able to keep the exisiting chainring bolts?


 
Posted : 30/09/2009 5:09 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

Surly stainless steel ring.


 
Posted : 30/09/2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ta,

I thought the Surly rings would be suggested but I was wondering if there were any other alternatives. Despite them looking good I always find Surly bits are a bit of a faff to get hold of. Guess I'll have to see if Charlie the bike monger has any. My LBS is sh%te at getting in one off orders.


 
Posted : 30/09/2009 5:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

These are pretty cool looking:

http://www.evanscycles.com/products/renthal/cnc-hard-anodised-4-arm-chainring-ec019374?utm_source=froogle&utm_medium=froogle&utm_campaign=froogle

Renthal are an MX component manufacturer moving into MTB parts. What's nice is they are designed and MADE in England! Blimey. Don't know where else you can get em from, haven't googled.


 
Posted : 30/09/2009 5:37 pm
Posts: 24856
Free Member
 

I've had good life out of my Planet-X / On-one SS SS (that's singlespeed stainless steel) one. Not sure what sizes they do though.


 
Posted : 30/09/2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 5349
Full Member
 

^ What he said.


 
Posted : 30/09/2009 5:43 pm
Posts: 1774
 

I've had an unramped Thorn 32T chainring that's holding up very very well after a couple of years.


 
Posted : 30/09/2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

email me - I can make whatever you want in Stainless or ally & cheaper than a surly ring.

ihavemine at googlemail DOT com

something plain knocked up as a test piece - more blingy bits coming soon...
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 30/09/2009 11:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I use Thorn chainrings on both my Rohloff bikes.
No shift ramps and the bolt holes are recessed on both sides so they are reversible.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 2:09 am
Posts: 23
Full Member
 

Fitted a Goldtec 34t on my SS a few months ago. Very solid ally, blinking cheap and made in Staffordshire. Google BETD or Goldtec.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 6:56 am
Posts: 17783
Full Member
 

Or something a bit nicer.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 7:33 am
Posts: 4116
Full Member
 

Crotchet, can you do a 30T middle ring?


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 8:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Given up trying to get Boones. Even the new supplier seems to be having problems.

I quite like the look of the E-13 Guide rings.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 8:38 am
Posts: 8401
Full Member
 

I got 3 years from my Thorn ring before reversing it and I only did that because I was changing the chain.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 8:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Guess I'll have to see if Charlie the bike monger has any.

I got a Salsa 32T one from Charlie, looks good, fits well, cant fault it for £25.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 8:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 fot the E13 guide ring. Very good and never dropped the chain on my 1x8.

Love my Boone rings, but they are stupidly difficult to get still


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 8:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Get something in stainless steel. Don't worry who you get it from, it's stainless steel, it's a chainring - end of. Pay a bit more for something nice looking and vice versa.

I have used numerous so called hard-wearing aluminium rings over the years and they all wear out quicker than a steel one, which is obvious really. I did get taken in by some of the reports on here of how 'brand xyz blingy aluminium' rings last ages, they don't.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 9:16 am
 devs
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Will I die if I use a normal Deore 32t ring or does it have to be one with no ramps etc?


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 9:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

I still reckon these look nice & industrial.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 9:50 am
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

I've a Surly and an On-One, both are running well.

Will I die if I use a normal Deore 32t ring or does it have to be one with no ramps etc?

I tried this. I'm still alive, but had loads of problems with skipping chains which switching to an On-One ring solved.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 9:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've never used a ramped ring on my singlespeed. I wouldn't risk it having once had a chain come off on a steep grunty climb.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 10:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@ChrisF

Too much fibre?

'pologies.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 10:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

DeVs - Member
Will I die if I use a normal Deore 32t ring or does it have to be one with no ramps etc?

I use a standard 39T Shimano ramped ring with no issues. I cant see how the pins can interfere with the chain on a single speed.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 10:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think the problem with ramped rings is that they are designed for the chain to easily slip off and on again, as you would want with front gear shifts. This makes it slightly more likely for the chain to fall off if for any reason it experiences sideways forces.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 10:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

poppa - Member
@ChrisF

Too much fibre


Que?

It may be right that ramped rings don't work any differently. Don't they have some teeth shorter than others to help with changing?


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 11:02 am
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

It's not the ramps and pins that are the problem, it's the shorter teeth.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 11:23 am
Posts: 26
Free Member
 

Middleburn chain rings are worth a look.

Light and well made.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 11:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hmm...decisions, decisions. I've kinda opened the flood gates for suggestions here. Thanks for the ideas, I'll give it some thought and then get the credit card out.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 12:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Second the BETD Goldtec 34t. Looks nice (although mine is hidden with a bash ring) and is very well made and should last for ages. Bit cheaper than Surly as well i think?


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mackem> 30t rings? Can't imagine any issues - other than the cost of drawing up & running a single piece. Could we build enough demand for a larger run?


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 1:16 pm
 Doug
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about a different approach. I got a 180mm[url= http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Models.aspx?ModelID=4011 ]FSA X-drive BMX[/url] style crankset from CRC for £30 instead of over a ton. Sold the ring and spider for £22 on that auction place then bought a couple of [url= http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Categories.aspx?CategoryID=575&CurrentPageIndex=0&SortExpression=PRICE_ASC ]BMX chainrings at £5[/url] a piece in different sizes and a few spares.

They also have 170mm on offer.

Fitting is a bit fiddly as you have to get all the axle spacers in the right place but it is mega strong and stiff.


 
Posted : 01/10/2009 1:42 pm