Forum menu
Once and for all (a...
 

[Closed] Once and for all (again) Summer Season designed with 130mm forks in mind?

Posts: 4996
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#2396583]

Brant? โ“


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 12:20 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

From the on-one website:

The Summer Season was indeed designed with 130mm forks in mind

{Porn link removed - Mod}


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 1:03 am
Posts: 9300
Free Member
 

^ ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 1:05 am
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 1:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But Rockshox 130 and 140mm forks have the same crown to axle height, and Fox are lower for more travel.
So it could have been designed for 140mm forks.
Marzocchi are higher CTA so you'd need to fit a 120mm.

Or just ignore all the bollocks about fork travel and suitability and just set the correct sag to give the right dynamic ride height.

It doesn't matter if you know how to set up your fork correctly.


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 1:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

as skyline proves, its really not worth thinking about that much. my mate ran one with 140 pikes and still managed to beat the rest of us to the top and bottom of every hill.


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 7:06 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Look at the On-One website - the off-the-shelf bike comes with 150mm forks, but states that it's designed for 100-160mm.


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 9:53 am
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

I could have sworn brant designed the bike to run with 100mm forks


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 9:55 am
Posts: 4016
Full Member
 

I thought it was originally designed to use a 100mm fork and still have a slack HA


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 10:41 am
Posts: 4996
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Well i'm with Cynical. Just wanted to make it official. If he says so and the website says so and i say so it must be right. :mrgreen:


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 11:01 am
 sv
Posts: 2816
Free Member
 

I could have sworn brant designed the bike to run with 100mm forks

+1.


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 11:15 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

On a serious note...it's a slacker version of the 456, which was meant for 4-6" forks (and presumably optimised at 5"), so Shirley the SS will work as intended at 130mm?


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 11:24 am
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

The Summer Season was initially conceived on the little drop/step off the edge of the millpond wall, towards the bottom of mmmbop in Ragley Woods, when Benji was trying to sort of hop a Cotic with 160mm forks around a techy corner and the fork was just soaking up all his techy moves. It sort of looked like a trials motorcyclist, sort of pumping the fork to move the wheel.

Me, Ed, Timk and Benji then went to Mooch afterwards, and over a grilled halloumi sandwich, I decided to make some frames that were 2degs slacker than normal, so you could get the same slackness as a normal 456 frame, but with a lower, shorter fork.

The summer season wasn't really "designed", it was kind of just a modified 456. "Make that, but with 2degs off the head angle". There also exists two frames, one 16in, and one 18in, which were ANOTHER 2degs slacker still, but I've never ridden either. Timk has one I think.

At that time I was riding a rigid, geared on-one 29er.

When the frames landed, I fitted mine with 130mm Revelations, and left them on full travel, cos it seemed rude not to. Then I got into sticky dual ply tyres, and stuff.

It was this experiment with slack head angles that led to me doing more slack head angle stuff with Ragley.

I have no idea whether on-one have changed any of the geometry since I left, which is now 2yrs ago.


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 11:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Interesting stuff, thanks for the insight Brant.

More importantly, what other kinds of cheese sandwich have influenced your designs?


 
Posted : 24/01/2011 2:17 pm