On an OS map.... ac...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] On an OS map.... access/classification

10 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
128 Views
 Pook
Posts: 12684
Full Member
Topic starter
 

1:25k specifically....

We all know that pink _ _ _ _ _ is a bridleway, and pink ---- is footpath...

But what about black _ _ _ _ _ _ _ and -------, or black ..... ?

On the ground I know these are nice paths but I'm curious as to the legality of them


 
Posted : 25/11/2010 11:59 am
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

it's green on 1:25k pink on 1:50k


 
Posted : 25/11/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] ?w=3d5d9246[/img]

I think we have had this before - small dots are paths but it depends on landowners access - the rest are boundaries IIRC ?

[img] ?w=20d73167[/img]


 
Posted : 25/11/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

The black dashes represent a path/track/road on the ground but do not signify any Right of Way.

[edit]Oh, and as foxyrider says, the long thin black dashes represent (local authority) boundaries[/edit]


 
Posted : 25/11/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

But what about black _ _ _ _ _ _ _ and -------, or black ..... ?

Boundaries


 
Posted : 25/11/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 Pook
Posts: 12684
Full Member
Topic starter
 

it's green on 1:25k pink on 1:50k

yeah you're right. Using an online mapping thing and hadn't gone all the way in!

Still, the black dots and dashes.... Like boundaries, but not. Specifically "....."

Paths but not Rights of Way makes sense.

Cheers all.


 
Posted : 25/11/2010 12:08 pm
Posts: 7914
Free Member
 

Sometimes a boundary is also a path as its a handy way to define them instead of an imaginary line


 
Posted : 25/11/2010 12:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Out of interest... anyone seen a Military OS map?

They're great... lot's of other stuff marked on them, including useable trails (not necessarily legal). I had a stack for the Lake District, wish I'd kept hold of them.


 
Posted : 25/11/2010 2:13 pm
Posts: 106
Free Member
 

Always worth bearing in mind that there is no guarantee of an actual path on the ground where a right of way is marked.

In open country many old ROWs were originally drawn *very* approximately on the definitive maps (which may not have been that accurate themselves). On Lakes OS maps for example you often see a non-ROW path and a ROW marked close together where the non-ROW shows the actual line of the path on the ground. The park authority people have gradually been fixing some of the worst examples eg. [url= http://www.streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?X=333334&Y=515624&A=Y&Z=115 ]this footpath[/url] where the ROW used to be marked straight over Browncove Crags (a 500-foot high cliff).

The ROWs marked over Scafell Pike bear only the loosest relationship to actual paths on the ground and [url= http://www.streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?X=321351&Y=507586&A=Y&Z=115 ]this one[/url] is entirely imaginary (another one that goes over a cliff).

There's another impressively bonkers example [url= http://www.streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?X=325350&Y=503650&A=Y&Z=115 ]here[/url]


 
Posted : 25/11/2010 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

anyone seen a Military OS map?

Orienteering maps are well worth a look too.


 
Posted : 25/11/2010 3:07 pm