Forum search & shortcuts

off road GPSs? reco...
 

[Closed] off road GPSs? recommendations?

 bonj
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1967402]

has anyone actually got one of those off road GPSs that displays an OS-style map rather than just a road map, and what are your good and bad points about it please?

I have tried using my etrex vista hcx off road, thinking that I could just about cope with the fact that it doesn't display geographical features, which you could,but for the fact that the main problem of it which is that it doesn't actually know (or forgets) which way you are heading, so it is really confusing to read because you could be heading towards the bottom of the screen, or the top, you just don't know.

So was just wondering how the off road specific ones can handle this and/or why the etrex can't...

which ones are there, garmin dakota, memory map i've seen, any others?


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 11:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/satmap-what-do-we-thinkany-user-experiences ]Satmap?[/url]


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 11:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it doesn't actually know (or forgets) which way you are heading, so it is really confusing to read because you could be heading towards the bottom of the screen, or the top, you just don't know.

Sounds to me like you'd got it set to always point North. There should be a setting to always point in direction of travel (which it knows so long as you're moving - unless it's one that has the electronic compass).


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 11:57 am
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

I can see the point in having GPS to plot waymarker to tell you your route easily and quickly but can't see the point in seeing a 3"x3" square of O/S map. You need the big view with an O/S map to use it properly.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 12:01 pm
 cxi
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The new Cotswold catalogue shows a new Memory Map Adventurer model - the 3500 but I can't find anything out about on this 'ere Interweb


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 12:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@bonj in map options you should be able to set orientation to either North or Track up


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 12:05 pm
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

I can see the point in having GPS to plot waymarker to tell you your route easily and quickly but can't see the point in seeing a 3"x3" square of O/S map. You need the big view with an O/S map to use it properly.

The ones I've used allow zooming in and out. The Satmap even switches between different scale maps - I'd imagine the Garmin and Memory Map ones do too.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 12:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Garmin Dakota - not cheap mind


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 12:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd say Satmap too. It ain't perfect but crucially you can fully operate it with gloves on. The MOD recently rejected touch-screen interfaces for field equipment due to this and other practicable reasons. Satmap have also moved into supplying the military. Got to be a good sign.

The down side is that the replaceable visor is easily marked, so the unit doesn't stay pristine for long. However, almost every part can be replaced so you can have the unit remade every now and again.

I went for a GPS after three disasters within a week last year in the Lakes. I'm good with maps and I've got a great sense of direction, but the clouds came down on Highstreet and we marched off in completely the wrong direction for nearly half an hour! Visibility was down to 15 feet at times though. The following day it happened again at Buttermere. We were completely lost when a couple walked past with an ancient GPS. We used it to find our position on the OS map.

That's the thing with GPS. When you have it, you feel like you've wasted the money because you only ever need it for a couple of seconds, and then it's back on the bag again. You feel like you always know where you are, and that's because with GPS, you do! It's subtle but [i]extremely[/i] powerful.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 12:44 pm
Posts: 785
Full Member
 

Satmap used for the first time in anger this weekend over Consiton. **** me what a god send. As per previous comments, I thought I had wasted the dosh on the inital purchase back in June. Highly rated piece of kit, just need to arrange more weekends away to use it more!


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a satmap - it is excellent - best toy I have bought for the bike.

I run it with a 1:25000 map of a 70km squared sector that covers all my riding options (Tunnel Hill, Surrey Hills, Swinley Forest), which was about £80 or so.

I have uploaded loads of gpx files sourced from the web (bikely, etc) and recorded loads more from rides with groups like the Muddy Moles, MTB Britain, Diary of a Mountain Biker.

You can also trace the route you want to follow by dropping waypoints with the joystick control, or set a quick goto point to enable you to cycle to some location.

You can set it to orientate the map to the direction you are riding and also mark your tracks with red dots, which is useful when used in the trail orientation mode.

You activate the route you are going to follow and it is shown as a light brown line on the map with direction arrows (which you can reverse) and, if you set the res. to about 1:3000, you can ride at pretty much full speed whilst following the route.

You can also set it to display all inactive routes as a grey lines, so you are aware of all the other trail options in the area (useful in closely packed areas like Swinley forest).

As it just shows an OS map it is easy to break out of a route early and find your way home (even in the dark if your lights fail).

I also use it in the car with a UK 1:5000k map as I am tired of car type satnavs sending me up unsuitable roads, etc. I either trace the route or just drop a goto point and then zoom in and out as required to see where I want to go.

The company is British (Leatherhead) and was started by an ex-RAF pilot I believe so he probably has a good idea about navigation.

Andrew


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As a confirmed Satmap fanboy, I'd be much more tempted to get one of the Garmin bike computers (the mapping version) over the Satmap for the bike. I've got an Edge 305, and while it doesn't provide any sort of real navigation with maps, it is the best cycling aide I've had (racing yourself in a Gran Turismo sort of way is great fun). My cycling fitness went through the roof with that unit. It's built like the brick proverbial too. I think the latest units do have maps, and Garmin do provide OS too on their top line models. I think the key thing to look for is GLOVED operation. Essential in my opinion.

Satmap is a brilliant general GPS though.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 2:23 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

I was with Mic above, agreed, we do need more weekends away 😀


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I went for a Satmap as I couldn't give a monkeys about my cadence, heart rate etc etc

I just wanted the best mapping gps unit that was available and the Satmap fulfils that role perfectly. I does give some useful info about distance, elevation, speed etc but with about a dozen other variables that are irrelevant to me.

I've used it for walking as well as on the bike and its showed me the way in a few places that would have had me scratching my head with out it.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 4:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yup HR and loads of stats go for Garmin - edge 705, 500 or the new 800

if not got for OS mapping GPS's 🙂


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 4:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.bikemagic.com/gear-news/garmin-edge-800-revealed/8618.html ]http://www.bikemagic.com/gear-news/garmin-edge-800-revealed/8618.html[/url]

And it does OS too? That's great!

edit: Touchscreen...the deal's off!


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 4:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Satmap for me,


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 4:26 pm
 bonj
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 


Sounds to me like you'd got it set to always point North. There should be a setting to always point in direction of travel (which it knows so long as you're moving - unless it's one that has the electronic compass).


@bonj in map options you should be able to set orientation to either North or Track up

nah, I've seen that option and tried it on both settings with no joy. It seems to be random whatever setting it is on. It's as if it's trying to point towards the nearest road.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 4:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Then there's something wrong with it - that's just not how Garmin's are meant to work.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 4:29 pm
 bonj
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

will have a good look at satmap then, cheers for all replies


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 4:30 pm
 bonj
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 


hen there's something wrong with it - that's just not how Garmin's are meant to work.

well it works fine on the road.
but when i took it off road, it was always pointing the wrong way, no matter what I had the settings on. I admit that I may not have tried hard enough to try different combinations of different settings or do an objective repeatable test.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 4:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ah right - so basically it had a poor lock by the sounds of it. Suprising really as my Etrex H which doesn't have the electronic compass that yours does seems to work just fine even under trees. Maybe worth returning it to Garmin as that just doesn't seem right unless you're riding in deep sided valleys all the time (which can cause problems for any GPS).


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 4:36 pm
 fbk
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

well it works fine on the road.
but when i took it off road, it was always pointing the wrong way, no matter what I had the settings on. I admit that I may not have tried hard enough to try different combinations of different settings or do an objective repeatable test.

Sounds like you may have the electronic compass enabled which, unless the eTrex is perfectly horizontal, is a chocolate teapot. It's only active below a certain speed which is presumably why it appears to work on roads (when you're travelling faster). Turn in off by holding the "search" button (I think) down until it says it's switched off.

HTH.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 4:46 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Might be worth considering a Garmin Oregon.

I bought one earlier this year and used it to guide me along the MTB C2C.
It comes with a complete set of the UK OS 1:50,000 maps, which are pretty good for off-road cycling.
I drew the route as a track on MM, one track for each day, and transferred them across. Each day I opened the appropriate route, zoomed into the map and followed the track.
It uses AA batteries and the Lithium ones lasted a day and a half (around 18 hours) in the energy saving mode.
Had absolutely no problems with it, you can zoom in and out to see as much as you want and it is so much easier than carrying a map.
It aligns the screen to the direction you're facing, shows you as an arrow near the bottom of the screen, shows the OS map and your route drawn on top.
I think it's a fantastic piece of kit and it must have saved at least an hour a day pulling out the map, confirming where I was and then working out where I should go.
If you want an electronic map, then this is ideal.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 6:29 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

just use memory map to plan routes stick on normal garmin works great for me if you put extra waypoints in at start of paths


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 456
Full Member
 

@bonj

It sounds as though you have it set to navigate by car (on road basically). You should have a setting for navigating off road. In my Oregon it's in Setup-Routing, then you need to set guidance method to off road & Lock on Road to NO.


 
Posted : 07/09/2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Garmin Dakota 450 here. Nice, robust, touch screen simplicity with OS maps.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 7:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it possible to have car-style routing but using bridlepaths? It would be great to plan a route from A->B and get suggestions for bridlepaths. Might be difficult to write as an algorithm as roads probably will be faster / shorter option, but would be great to have a route that minimised road use automatically.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 8:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ABF

yes would be ideal but currently the inaccuracies in mapping and general trail realignment would make it pretty ineffective. Whats on the map aint necessarily whats actually on the ground even for bridleway tracks. It works for cycle - road because the under lying map data has been provided for the gps to follow. You would need to extend the same for bridlepaths etc.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 1:00 pm
Posts: 1409
Free Member
 

You can download "routable" maps for Garmins from openstreetmap, and I think opencyclemap. They should be super accurate, because of the way they are generated.

These MIGHT do routing on bridlepaths, and even foot paths (if you happen to have left your bike at home).

I can't tell you for certain though because I dont have the GPSr to go with them. I am expecting one though, so will update once I've tried it 🙂


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

I've got a feeling road maps and off road maps store the paths in different methods. The road maps are stored as vectors while the off road are stored more as pictures laying over the GPS grip or something. I forget the details, but the cux was that you couldn't do travelling sales man style algorithm on off road topo style maps or o/s because they did not have the path data in the same format.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 1:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a Garmin Oregon 550t I am looking to sell.

Any use to anyone in this thread?


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 1:41 pm
Posts: 6758
Free Member
 

couldn't do travelling sales man style algorithm on off road topo style maps or o/s because they did not have the path data in the same format.

as urbanhiker has suggested you can do bridleway routing with openmtbmaps. Its still a bit of a work in progress, i think it basically needs more user input but its getting there.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 2:32 pm
Posts: 11472
Full Member
 

I've got a feeling road maps and off road maps store the paths in different methods. The road maps are stored as vectors while the off road are stored more as pictures laying over the GPS grip or something. I forget the details, but the cux was that you couldn't do travelling sales man style algorithm on off road topo style maps or o/s because they did not have the path data in the same format.

That's pretty much how I understand it, yep. I prefer the Satmap to the Garmin Oregon or Dakota partly because it's more intuitive to use ime, partly because it doesn't have a touch screen and partly because the screen itself is significantly larger and clearer making it all-round easier to read.

Viewranger on a smartphone also works very well and is a bit of a no brainer if you already have a phone that you carry with you anyway.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 3:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do the gps other than Satmap allow you to show inactive routes on the map as well - I find this very useful.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 5:27 pm
 fbk
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Yep - Garmin (eTrex) units allow you to show any routes stored in memory on the map. You can change the colour/line style too to avoid any confusion.


 
Posted : 10/09/2010 10:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

bonj

I have the same model - eTrex vista HCx and I have the same problem.

I have mine set to "Track up" as opposed to "North up". Some of the time it works. Some times it doesn't. When it suddenly inverts (ie rotates 180 degrees when you're not looking ....that is really confusing. (BTW - In response to Simwit's suggestion...mine is set to navigate "off road")

I haven't tried turning the electronic compass off though. Will give that a go this w/e


 
Posted : 10/09/2010 2:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry dont agree with your comparison about Satmap and Garmin Oregon touch screen

Oregon = GUI touch screen, everything can be done with one gloved digit.
Sat map = 8 way joy stick, 4 keys and multifunction key, How is this easier?

Screens - Satmap has 1cm square more screen area but the Oregon resolution is better. I would say on balance they are equal?

Satmap Display size
8.7cm
Display resolution
320 x 240

Oregon
Display size 7.6cm
Display resolution
240 x 400 pixels

Clearly you pays your money etc but I have had GPS for ages and just up graded to Oregon 6 months ago. Its extremely simple to use GUI. Works with one finger which is all I can afford to use on the move with gloves its a very very robust unit. I looked at satmap and I didnt think it was robust enough to sit on the front of my bike. Have a look at he Oregon - its bullet proof - well nearly!


 
Posted : 10/09/2010 2:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Satmap not robust? That's just funny...


 
Posted : 30/09/2010 9:09 am
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

Ive got a garmin 60csx with full uk topo maps installed for £140 if anyones interested?


 
Posted : 30/09/2010 9:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Garmin Oregon here. Fantastic bit of kit fro on off road with OS mapping. Great for navigating on foot to.


 
Posted : 30/09/2010 11:04 am