Forum menu
Nike 6.0 Riding Sho...
 

[Closed] Nike 6.0 Riding Shoes... reviews?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1583257]

Has anyone used these as an alternative to 5.10's...?
Do they last as long? Are they as grippy? They look amazing but unsure if they would be as good in the real world. Thanks.


 
Posted : 07/05/2010 10:18 am
Posts: 3775
Free Member
 

you could always get them resoled with stealth rubber - think details where in this months magazine (or may have been MBUK)


 
Posted : 07/05/2010 10:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They are pretty damn grippy, but nothing like 5.10 stealth rubber. Decentish quality, too but I usually ride with SPDs so mine haven't had much of a thrashing. I like the super high top ones, 'cos I always clatter my ankles on the cranks. They look badass, too.


 
Posted : 07/05/2010 10:24 am
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had a pair last year fairly grippy, not as good as 5.10, Etnies, Osaris or Duffs that I have or have had recently quality wise.


 
Posted : 07/05/2010 10:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Vans, namley Rowleys,

mmmmmmm waffle.


 
Posted : 07/05/2010 10:41 am
Posts: 1714
Full Member
 

not as grippy,don't last as long but look pretty good. Use mine for the dirt jumps on my hardtail where i don't want masses of grip. Am40's are my trail riding shoe of choice, despite the dodgy appearance they are truly ace,prefer them to my 5.10's.


 
Posted : 07/05/2010 11:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Great trainers for general use, but not the grippiest on flats. Mind you, I don't rate my 5050 pedals much either, so it may not be the trainers grip that's the problem.


 
Posted : 07/05/2010 11:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Use mine for xc, local woods, Woburn messing etc. As above they are nowhere near as grippy as 5.10's, but good enough, plus light and look ok.


 
Posted : 07/05/2010 11:14 am