Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop
take a look at...
http://mtobikes.com/2008-interbike-outdoor-demo-wimmer/
[img]
[/img]
[img]
[/img]
A bit like feet-forward motorcycles, technically on the ball, practically pointless...
http://www.bikeweb.com/image/tid/9
We'll all be riding those next season!
Variation on the BMW telelever
http://www.carbibles.com/suspension_bible_bikes.html
http://www.dinamoto.it/DINAMOTO/8_on-line_papers/Telelever%20or%20forks/Telelever.html
I think it could do with a few more pivots and bearings, personally.
i like the idea, but it'd be a ballache to maintain.
oh man, i now have sick in my beard.
Triumph Saxon
designer Nigel Hill
Sax Trax
how are they [i]ever[/i] going to unleash that frame's true potential without upgrading to a CCDB? 😉
saxon was the first they were ripped off by BMW ALEGIDLY
but in my opinion it still has the dissadvantages of telescopic forks
stiction increases with load
it doesnt seem to have much travel before the bottom link hits the headtube guessing 100mm
but take a look at the top pic,, the fork inners seem to pass right through the outer parts,, otherwise they would put the axle on the gold part,,, interested now ,,,
"but take a look at the top pic,, the fork inners"
Yes ade ward, there appears to be less to them than meets the eye.
by far the ugliest bike i've ever seen.
Is anything on scrapheap challenge pretty?
is there even any need for this kind of "innovation" inside the mountain bike industry?
I did like the look of the intense 951 29er though.
Depends how fast you are going. Although as Tony Foale says about FFE (funny front ends)"interest in these types of front suspension is very limited".
http://www.tonyfoale.com/
nowt wrong with scrap heap challenge i was on it once, in 2002,,, ,, whyte preston scrapheap challenge ,,i feel a link in my lifes work
Macavity
I have been doing a little reading the fork seems to operate from both ends giving up to 9 inches of travel,,
they say that each end has a different function bottom part for jumping and top for bumps ,,,, still thinking how two different spring rates can work in series ..
i am all for inovation ,, and still think telescopic forks are the work of the devil
WOW 😯 that is ****ing ugly.
am I mad? is that a 26 rear? and is the bb really really close to the back wheel?
MrNutt - Member
am I mad?
Yes.
Its a 69er, with not much travel, dam ugly and your ass is half way over the rear wheel.
Nearly 2 years old judging by the date on the link as well. I think you missed the bus on being outraged about that.
tracknicko - Memberoh man, i now have sick in my [b]beard[/b].
Are you ubernichecore then? Scarce metal frame, sans gears?
is it a URT ?
