Forum menu
New to full suspens...
 

[Closed] New to full suspension...

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3339948]

After only having a hardtail MTB for a while, I'm about ready to take the plunge into the exciting world of dual suspension!

Have started to test ride a few in local bike shops, and I have what may be a rather dumb question, but that's never stopped me asking them before...

With a dual suspension bike with exactly the same frame size as my hardtail, do I need to raise the saddle a bit to compensate for suspension sag? It's just that I started out with the seat post at the same position as my hardtail, but then as soon as I started riding the thing, it seemed like I was too low, and assume this was as a result of the rear shock compressing by an inch or so?


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 7:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The difference between the Bottom Bracket and the top of the saddle won't change as the suspension action kicks in so no, in theory you won't need to change the saddle height. In practice, the full suss frame you tried may have had rather different geometry to your hardtail so it would feel very different.
If the bike feels too 'soggy' you may need to readjust the suspension settings.


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 7:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks Muddydwarf, that makes sense. So the rear suspension only acts on the back wheel, and the distance between BB and saddle is fixed? Hmm, interesting, must've been the different geometry of the frame as you say. Guess I would have to set the saddle higher on the FS bike to start with.


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 7:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Take a look at the bike and look how the suspension actually works, You'll see that the distance between the BB shell and the saddle is fixed (what bike BTW?) and that the rear wheel will pivot around either a single point on the frame (bikes like an Orange 5 or Commencal) or will use several linkages to actuate the shock.
The rear swingarm moves independently to the front half of the frame where you sit.


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 8:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hi Muddydwarf. It was a Giant Trance I tried this morning. I'm not at the shop anymore, but looking at the pics on the Giant web site I see what you mean.

I think what was throwing me was that I was finding the saddle too high while sitting astride it with my feet on the ground - so was adjusting it down. I now realise this distance (saddle to ground)[i]will[/i] be affected by suspension sag. What I should have done was adjust saddle position relative to my feet on the pedals, which is constant. Silly mistake - thanks for clearing that up!

So, that begs another question - will a full suspension bike be a bit more difficult to get your leg over when initially mounting it, because the saddle is about an inch higher [i]relative to the ground[/i] before the rider's weight compresses the rear shock?


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 8:54 am
Posts: 7972
Free Member
 

yes its more difficult

does it matter, no


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 8:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yeah, no biggie... just like to know what I'm getting myself into! There's many a time I've struggled to get going again after bottling out on an obstacle. And, if I know its gonna be even harder on a FS it might give me an excuse to buy some of those new Shimano trail pedals with the little flats as well as the SPD clips - that way I can get a bit of momentum up before clipping in ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 9:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another reason you probably had to set the saddle higher is that with FS bikes the BB is usually higher than HT bikes. This is so the pedals don't hit the floor whenever the suspension compresses. As you say its the distance between the BB/pedals to the saddle that is the important measurement not the distance from the floor to the saddle, there are too many variables in all bikes for that to work.


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 11:18 am
Posts: 10498
Free Member
 

You'll also notice that as the suspension sits into it's sag you may feel a slight sensation of rotating backwards.But then again you might not.

On my FS the saddle sits a fair bit higher than on my old 26" HT, to the point where my missus thought it was too big for me, especially when you put it up against my road bike


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 11:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

PerthMTB, sounds like your saddle is too low. You should not be able to sit on the saddle with your feet touching the ground.


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 12:14 pm
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

PerthMTB, sounds like your saddle is too low. You should not be able to sit on the saddle with your feet touching the ground.

What? You mean my cycling proficiency instructor was wrong all those years ago? He must have been right surely, he had a moustache and everything!


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 12:24 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

it might give me an excuse to buy some of those new Shimano trail pedals with the little flats as well as the SPD clips

In theory they are a good idea but in practice they are rubbish. The SPD part is heavier so always point down. It makes it a bugger to clip in as as you have to rotate the pedal with your toe first.

Agreed you should not be able to touch the ground easily when on the saddle. When sat on the saddle put your heel on the pedal at the bottom of its stroke. Adjust the saddle height so that your leg is just about dead straight


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 12:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hi Capt. Are we talking the same pedals?

I'm thinking these, which are double sided...

[url= http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Models.aspx?ModelID=67249 ]Pedal[/url]

Anyway, thanks everyone for the advice on full suspension, will be finding out myself soon enough - made the mistake of going back to the shop this afternoon and ended up buying the Giant Trance ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

Will be collecting it tomorrow! Oh well, Christmas has come early this year....


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 12:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You should not be able to sit on the saddle with your feet touching the ground.

of course you should - as soon as you sit on the saddle you will 'sag' into the middle of the suspension travel, at which point the saddle height won't be a lot different from a hardtail. It might be lower if the bike has a lower BB.


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 1:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Turnerguy - I don't think you should be able to sit on the saddle with feet on the ground on a full suss or a hardtail.

If you can then you won't be getting anywhere near full extension on your legs during the pedal stoke, so you'll be riding very inefficiently.


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 2:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On the point of saddle Hight, I reckon you should just be able to touch the floor when in full sag. To counteract the ineffciencies that mchlptchr is refferring to you should drop you heel whilst at the bottom of the pedal stroke, this will give you greater leg extension without the need for full (road style) saddle heighht. If you were to have you leg full extended (well, keeping a slight bend at the knee) you wouldn't beable to shift your weight behind the saddle very easily for the steeper stuff. I guees its all about comprimise. Could just get an upp-downy post.


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 3:54 pm
Posts: 7972
Free Member
 

what on earth are you lot on about?

ground to saddle height means nothing, its all bb (well pedal) to saddle height. thats made obvious by how bikes are sized by their seat tube not ground to top tube.

and if you cant get off the back of your saddle with at full height then there's no way you'll be able to reach the pedals at their lowest point.


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 4:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Turnerguy - I don't think you should be able to sit on the saddle with feet on the ground on a full suss or a hardtail.

I was assuming that touching the ground with any part of your foot counted - I meant sit on sadde and toe on ground. I was imagining the OP having to trackstand all the time ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 11/11/2011 4:11 pm