My Superstar Compon...
 

[Closed] My Superstar Components I850 Seatpost

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Now I'll happily admit that I may have got a dud one but this is my experience of the I850 Seatpost...

I'd had my eye on a gravity dropper for a while but was a little shocked by the price, then I heard about the Superstar Components I850 Seatpost, and for £60 I figured it was well worth a try.

Seatpost arrived and I gave it a go before fitting it onto my bike, it seemed rather stiff to move but I put this down to the fact I was doing it by hand rather than with all my weight sat on it. Fitted to bike and it now refused to budge at all.

Emailed Superstar and they came back with...

"Rather than sending it back which would just incur costs for us both you should service it"

Not the "we will send you a replacement" that I was expecting.

Anyway I followed the instructions they sent and regreased the thing, it then worked as well as when it first arrived i.e. stiff as hell to move but figured that after a couple of rides it may ease up a bit.

So my first ride with it I'm up in the Clwyds at the top of the first descent, pull the lever...nothing...it had jammed solid again, however I found that excessive swearing while angrily bouncing up and down on the thing that must have looked to passers by like I was trying to get my saddle up my arse managed to free it up a little and I got it to descend. It worked brilliantly for the whole descent then at the bottom I thought I would cycle it through it's up and down positions a few times to loosen it up, this required more bouncy swearing.

I didn't even bother trying it again until the last descent when no amount of bouncing would free it up again. Not impressed.

I didn't email Superstar back, after their last response I can't be ****ed to deal with them, I just put it down to experience, plus I got the small satisfaction of throwing the thing down the garden, kicking it about a bit and then binning it. Buy shite buy twice as they say.

I now have a gravity dropper, it's superb.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That does sound pretty p!ss poor...


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

* feigns surprise *


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Rather than sending it back which would just incur costs for us both you should service it"
Classic superstar. Wrong in law. Sending back faulty products bought by mail order is at the retailers expense.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:12 am
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

You should have demanded a refund. I had 2 of the i900 posts which refused to work properly. First time they replaced it, second time I demanded a refund.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:13 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I'm really surprised at that attitude, I've had nothing but joy and wonderful service from Superstar........ and then I woke up.

I can't believe the cocky little get is still in business.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:19 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

I didn't email Superstar back, after their last response I can't be ****ed to deal with them, I just put it down to experience,

An odd attitude to take after spending £60 and being fobbed off.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:21 am
Posts: 39664
Free Member
 

epic fail - another great service story for fruitloop


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

is that true TJ? as when I had 3 sets of faulty wheels, I ended up stumping up each time for postage (which was £12 a go) which ended up being a pain.

The mail order company (not superstar) told me thats just how it is, and one of the hidden costs of buying mail order.

Oh yeah as for the i850 post, I have read about trouble getting it moving apparently there is a knack to it, read here:

http://www.mtnbikeriders.com/2008/05/22/sette-ryde-st-850-seatpost-reviewed/

If you aren't going to keep the post how much do you want for it as I wouldn't mind having a look at one especially if its cheap 😉


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

* feigns surprise *

<joins the Greek chorus intoning, "No... really?!">


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:25 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

An odd attitude to take after spending £60 and being fobbed off.

not really. Depends on whether the ball ache of extracting that £60 out of SSC is worth ... £60 or not.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:25 am
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

yeah, but you could at least try once


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Richc - perhaps not clear cut as that but fairly clear. Sale of goods act and distance selling regulations are onerous on retailers and they often try to wriggle out of their obligations.Government advice on this

Q4. Do I have to pay to return the goods?

When consumers exercise their right to cancel they are under a duty to take reasonable care of the goods and to “restore” them to the supplier. The term “restore” does not permit the supplier to demand that the consumer send back or deliver the goods, but only that the goods are made available to the supplier for collection.

The Regulations permit the supplier to include in the contract a term requiring the consumer to return the goods to the supplier at their own cost. The supplier may charge for the direct costs of recovering the goods if, on request, the consumer does not return them; this must not be more than the direct costs of recovery, such as postage or, for larger items, the cost of a van collection. Once the consumer has cancelled the order all money paid must be returned within 30 days of the date of cancellation.

[b]The business is not entitled to charge for recovery of the goods if the consumer also has a statutory right to cancel the contract under other legislation, (for example because they are defective)[/b] or if the term requiring the consumer to return the goods is an ‘‘unfair term’’ within the meaning of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 and The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts (Amendment) Regulations 2001.

http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/consumers/fact-sheets/page38102.html#Q4DoIhavetopaytoreturnthegoods


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:28 am
 Smee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well - you learn something every day. When did that change then?


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The 'i850' is just the Sette Ryde ST-850 that pricepoint in the U.S were knocking out for $30. There are loads of reviews/comments on the web about that post and how you get it to work (just bouncing up and down on it wont work).


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Goan - explain why considering the advice from the government posted above?

Its a basic concept that you should not end up out of pocket if someone else does not fufil their side of the contract - and the contract is that you pay money and the rettailer supplies goods in working order.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We all know by now that Superstar are horrible at dealing with people- rude and often legally wrong.

I don't know how many times I'll have to say it, but DO NOT BUY FROM SUPERSTAR. He'll screw you over, and his products WILL fail the majority of times.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:37 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Does anyone know of any servicing instruction for the ST-850/i850? I've had my Sette Ryde ST-850 for a while now and think its about time it got a clean and re-grease.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had one of these posts from superstar and the email he sent to me solved the problems. It just needed a little jiggle and it worked fine. Also the bottom of the email says if this doesnt work send it back and we will have a look

Whats the problems with that???? He is trying to save you the hassle of sending it back, and gives you the option of sending it back if it doesnt work.

Whats all this threats of leagal crap, cant you bloody read? Smells of trolls to me, its the same superstar bashing crew as always just changing their names using the STW loophole by the sounds of it.

Nip


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What a surprise a first post ever from a new user name, being used to bash Superstar on STW.

TROLL ALERT *********TROLL ALERT ******TROLL ALERT ******TROLL ALERT ******TROLL ALERT ******TROLL ALERT ******TROLL ALERT ******TROLL ALERT ******TROLL ALERT ******TROLL ALERT ******TROLL ALERT ******TROLL ALERT *********TROLL ALERT


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tango. SSC told the customer he would have to pay to have the faulty post returned which is wrong in law as per the quote above.

Many other examples of SSC doing their best to ignore consumer law have been seen ( but prattling on about it all is both pointlesss and dull) but I note the unfair terms and conditions in breach of the law that were on his website have now disappeared.

BTW tangobrave - you have been outed. Have a look on the shedfire / SSC conspiracy thread


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:53 am
 Pook
Posts: 12698
Full Member
 

I've never had a problem with SSC - and he was v helpful at Hit the North when i needed something doing quickly.

Just to provide the other side of the argument.

* these comments may be revised if TangoBravo is shown as Fruit. Poor show.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 9:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its the same superstar bashing crew as always just changing their names

To be honest I've never 'bashed' superstar but I can't help but feel a strong sense of deja vu every time a thread about their stuff comes up.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

sootyandjim - Member

Does anyone know of any servicing instruction for the ST-850/i850? I've had my Sette Ryde ST-850 for a while now and think its about time it got a clean and re-grease.

you've changed man :SHAKES HEAD:


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hmmm see the [url= http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/i-cant-deny-it-i-love-a-good-conspiracy-warning-shedfire-ssc-content ]other thread[/url] - looks quite possible that TangoBravo is Neil from SSC in disguise...


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fruit, you're doing a great job of loosing any potential superstar customers.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

if thats the case, what a muppet 🙄


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ditto. I've bought from SSC in the past and had no problem but posing as someone else is straightforward dishonest from a business so I defintely won't buy anything there again now. 🙄


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:12 am
Posts: 39664
Free Member
 

so thats why tangobravo was slagging on one off yesterday .....tool


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

looks quite possible that TangoBravo is Neil from SSC in disguise...

What a douchebag.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:15 am
Posts: 103
Free Member
 

Having bought from SSC in the past and been prepared to buy again. With the "unusual" contributions Tangobravo/Fruit has made I don't think I will be buying again.

Will the real Fruit please stand up?


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:16 am
Posts: 7130
Full Member
 

Well, I did buy some pads off SSC before - both face to face and online. However, after this (tango/fruit) I will never buy anything from that idiot again. Unlucky Fruit, but you are losing customers.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:17 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So Fruit is Tango and he's whinging about trolling? Aren't multiple logons a banning offence?

Remember, buy SCC pay twice.

Oh the irony.... Fruitnut/tango/nip wrote..[i]Smells of trolls to me, its the same superstar bashing crew as always just changing their names using the STW loophole by the sounds of it.[/i]


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:19 am
 Drac
Posts: 50558
 

WTF?

Well another supporter of SSC here pads have been great but if TB is Fruit and he's coming on here posting acquisitions about other manufacturers and acting childish when some one complains about a product then I too will think twice about buying from them again.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oh dear, poor show.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I feel perfectly within my rights to repeatedly bash him- I've never been treated so badly as a customer. Ever, in anything, bikes or otherwise.

Glad to see that what goes around comes around.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Probably worth saving this thread before it gets deleted....

So Mark, when are you going to ban him for multiple logons and trolling? Or is he ok because of the advertising? Time to show that you really are impartial and fair?


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:26 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

already saved since the other threads started evaporating


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:26 am
Posts: 8738
Full Member
 

Heh nice, I was going to defend SSC's service but can't be bothered now.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:27 am
 Drac
Posts: 50558
 

Chunky I've sent an email to Mods before this thread gets out of hand, they may just lock it for future reference rather than pull it.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:27 am
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

what happened to AB's new thread ponting this out??


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The other threads seem to have dissapeared already


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm melting... meltiiiiiiiing...


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another user of SSC pads with no complaints, however, if this is true, it must be a worse banning offence than any rudeboy committed?


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:28 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

oh this ones good too 🙂
http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/broken-adjustable-seatposts


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yup, it does seem odd that AB's thread has gone.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nice one stoner, perhaps an email to 2Pure who have a big advert on stw explaining that SCC are slatting one of their products.

Mods, your comments on the above please?

I have a feeling this thread might be gone soon....


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it time to get out the octopusses?


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:34 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm sensing Solicitors will be writing a warning letter to someone this afternoon....


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

this has got far beyond octopuses


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Litigation octopuses?


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about other Cephalopods? Is it time to bring out the cuttlefish? Or *shudders* the nautilus?


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:37 am
 fbk
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Blimey - as others here, I've used pads from them without any problems at all but this stinks.

I guess that'll be a fair chunk of business lost - I certainly won't be using SSC again!!!


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:38 am
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

TJ, I may may be wrong, but what you've quoted above are the rules for cancelling the contract/purchase/service, which you have 7 days to do under the distance selling regs. Not sure if the same applies to returning faulty goods for a replacement.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:38 am
Posts: 6985
Free Member
 

disgusted, the whole situation needs dealing with.

as i said more eloquently in a longer post, now pulled.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why are these threads being pulled? Are the mods based in China?


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mike - the cruicial bit

The business is not entitled to charge for recovery of the goods if the consumer also has a statutory right to cancel the contract under other legislation, (for example because they are defective

So if a product is faulty the buyer has the right to cancel the contract under the sale of goods act ie reclaim their money. they have to allow the retailer to reclaim the goods but not pay for the return.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:42 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Fruit in PR disaster shocker!

Who'd a thunk it.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:42 am
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

Some of TB posts were clever in the way he wrote them, not to bring to much attention to himself.

I like his style, although I would never spend my money on his tat...just because they are cheap or colourful does not mean I trust them on my bike.

Got a set of SSP V2 pads I got with a second hand pair of brakes. They have and always will stay in the box of products I will never use...alongside some broken mud guards a few bent mechs and a picture of a nun doing a wheely
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

(the nun doing a wheely picture does not exist).


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:43 am
 sv
Posts: 2815
Full Member
 

Heres me about to order an 850i - the flaming seatpost shim is arriving tomorrow! Seconds thoughts or what?


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I hate cephalopods. Specially fossil ones. I'll unleash my geology/crank bashing hammer on them when it turns up.

For what it's worth, my last pair of superstar pads fell apart last week. Usual braking material/backing plate parting of ways.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This thread isn't being deleted. Presumable the Mods feel that one thread on this is enough.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:45 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sheesh, I write/sprout some sh1te on the forum however it it was linked to my business I most certainly wouldnt muck around. Why is this happening? Stay away from forums for a while whatever your name is. Thats the advice I'd give.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:46 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I like the guy. Met him a couple of times and seems very genuine. I think his products are good, his external BB seem much better than any others I have tried.

Hes made a mistake. I dont think he should be lynched. I think his customer service is better than Brants but no one seems to care about his tactics...


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I met the guy. He was rude and seems to think all his customers are liars until proven otherwise.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:53 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Outstanding stuff. 😆


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

rolfharris - Member
I feel perfectly within my rights to repeatedly bash him

Would that be with a rock? 😀

Only joking.

If this does turn out to be fruit then you have just lost another potential customer.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:55 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All I am saying is back off from forums.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:57 am
Posts: 0
 

An odd way to run a business.

BBB_Rich, didn't he sponsor your recent event? So hardly un-biased opinion of Superstar.

I have had a few bits from Superstar, brake pads and bottom brackets. They have varied in quality from rubbish to average, on the plus side they have all been cheap. This thread has put me of buying from him again.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He sponsored my university team and I still think he's a tube that sells tat.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:58 am
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

Mike - the cruicial bit

"The business is not entitled to charge for recovery of the goods if the consumer also has a statutory right to cancel the contract under other legislation, (for example because they are defective"

So if a product is faulty the buyer has the right to cancel the contract under the sale of goods act ie reclaim their money. they have to allow the retailer to reclaim the goods but not pay for the return.

Ah, missed that bit.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:58 am
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

With such a loss of potential customers I see a sale coming soon to an internet retailer near you 🙂
entertaining stuff


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 10:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Heres me about to order an 850i

Just buy one from Lesiure lakes instead.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 11:00 am
 Del
Posts: 8273
Full Member
 

i thought neil's smartest move ever was not to re-register after the xmas purge. he is the worst possible advert for his own company. what a weasel.
LOL!


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 11:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.shedfire.com/2009/08/26/asshat-of-the-week/ ]The shedfire bit that outed Fruit[/url]as tangobrave

As it was on the thread that was deleted I thought I would post it again.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 11:04 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

I think his customer service is better than Brants but no one seems to care about his tactics...

In terms of tactics I dont recall Brant trashing competitor products or shilling his own with pseudonymous posts either here or at MTBR.

With respect to customer service, I think that's always going to be personal.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 11:05 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

i thought neil's smartest move ever was not to re-register after the xmas purge

exactly what I thought del.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 11:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now this is interesting-

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/new-uk-law-criminalizes-stealth-marketing-techniques


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 11:07 am
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

Lol oh dear.


 
Posted : 27/08/2009 11:12 am
Page 1 / 5