My first 2013 runni...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] My first 2013 running thread

10 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
45 Views
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I've run 2 marathons, 3:36 and 3:30 (didn't push myself very hard 2nd time, prob could have gone a bit faster).

1. Am I daft aiming for a sub 3:00 time on 16 weeks (3 sessions per week) training?
2. Would I be daft to try phasing in flat shoes over these 16 weeks?


 
Posted : 03/01/2013 4:14 pm
Posts: 12872
Free Member
 

possibly you could do one or the other, not sure it'd be wise trying both!


 
Posted : 03/01/2013 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Running. Ruuunnnning. Run. Ning. Um.

Nope, you lost me there. 😕


 
Posted : 03/01/2013 4:21 pm
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

Well, you might have gone quicker if you weren't wearing your stilletos, so I'd say go for both.


 
Posted : 03/01/2013 4:31 pm
Posts: 10331
Full Member
 

Trying to make sure you can get away from dodgy dates? 🙂

I used to have a nice pc program that would answer that sort of question but it doesn't seem to be around any more (RunCoach ). Shame as it worked really well and gave you a training program and times to follow to do it. Maybe something similar exists online now


 
Posted : 03/01/2013 4:33 pm
Posts: 4154
Free Member
 

8min/miles to sub 7min/miles in 16 weeks... I think thats a big ask(in my very limited knowledge)

Check out the tritalk forum in the training sub-forum there's a "sub 3 hour marathon" thread

Good luck


 
Posted : 03/01/2013 4:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You're not daft aiming for it. Whether you achieve it though is another matter. Sub 3 is a big step from 3.30. Good luck.
My son has entered Manchester marathon which will be his first, he's aiming for sub 3.30 which I think he should manage, he's a fit lad but not been running long. He did Abbey dash (10k) in 37 mins. which was a fair effort for a first one.

Make sure you get your weekly long steady runs in 😉


 
Posted : 03/01/2013 4:50 pm
Posts: 1070
Full Member
 

I'm no expert but would say:

1) No
2) Probably.


 
Posted : 03/01/2013 5:21 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ta all, even Rick & Rickos (shakes fist)

I guess my Q is should I aim (i.e. base my training) around 3:00 (and risk injury?) or aim for 3:15. My programme suggests your marathon goal time is 30-35s slower than your fastest 10K speed, so I guess a 10K TT is what I need to do.

I'll speak to my local running shop about Q2.


 
Posted : 03/01/2013 5:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have considered the same thing, but based on running 6 days a week. My first marathon last year was 3.29, and I saw good improvements at half and 10k. But speaking to faster runners it seemed like a massive jump. So I have started a plan for 3:10 thinking at a sub 3:15 I would be happy. All the paces on the plan seem doable on current form, but I think it's just hard to gauge. I'm then going to try sub 3 later this year or next. As for going barefoot / changing your style, I think I'd do it out of training. I wouldn't risk all that work


 
Posted : 03/01/2013 5:57 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ta. My planned event is actually sold out 😐 so back to the drawing board!


 
Posted : 05/01/2013 1:56 pm