Maxxis Highrollers ...
 

[Closed] Maxxis Highrollers - is 1.9 too small?

22 Posts
16 Users
0 Reactions
95 Views
Posts: 1058
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I know some Maxxis tyres come up much larger than you might expect. Is the 1.9 High roller going to be too skinny for all round use? CRC have them on cheap, and I can't decide if I should pay the extra for the 2.1s.

Cheers


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 11:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

get the 1.9's if u dont like em sell them. nearly new tyres fetch quite a bit


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 11:38 am
Posts: 1058
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Could buy both and send the ones I don't want back... good call!


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the 2.3's are on the skinny side...


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 11:39 am
Posts: 4349
Full Member
 

I find Maxis come up small. I have some 2.1 High Rollers which are much smaller than Specialized 2.0 Captains.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 11:41 am
Posts: 2086
Free Member
 

2.35's come up small... find it pretty much bang on for most of my riding. Sometimes I'll swap the rear one out for a 2.0 Larsen if it's running dry and hard.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 11:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

1.9's might be ok on a road bike I guess 😉


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 12:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i ran 1.9 larsons on my hardtail and wear great pleaty wide for normal off road use. how about one of each? wider one on the back? when i was ridng in mud i switched to a 2.5 high roller on back and left the larson on the front. very good at cutting thru mud not to good at fast sloppy corners


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 12:11 pm
 IA
Posts: 563
Free Member
 

1.9 and 2.1 high rollers are the XC ones, and a very different kettle of fish to the "proper" 2.35+ high rollers.

Don't bother with the 1.9 or 2.1s, if you want something faster than a 2.35 high roller get a different tyre.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 12:17 pm
Posts: 13819
Free Member
 

Mate bought a 2.1 HR the other day, fitted to a flow rim, I don't think it's any wider than my 42c commuter tyres. Even 2.35 HRs are smaller than some 2.1s


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 12:19 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

For me, the worst tyre I've ever bought.

No grip, too narrow, not enough volume.
Vague, horrible, useless piece of tat.

Last quite well though, sadly.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 12:53 pm
Posts: 2086
Free Member
 

Can't say I agree with Rusty - some of the best tyres I've used. Drift very controlled when they do go, fairly fast rolling, plenty of grip in the corners.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 1:06 pm
Posts: 1058
Free Member
Topic starter
 

OK, fairly well slated here. What is a better UST bet for xc duties around 2.1 or 2.2? I have my DH wheels with 2.4 HRs, so I want this set to be lighter and faster. Cheers


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 1:07 pm
Posts: 41708
Free Member
 

OK, fairly well slated here. What is a better UST bet for xc duties around 2.1 or 2.2? I have my DH wheels with 2.4 HRs, so I want this set to be lighter and faster. Cheers

Are they the high roller II? The newer 2.4 carcas is a lot bigger than the older 2.35 which more like a 2.1.

I've got specialized purgatory's at the moment, seem good, work perfectly tubeless, tread works OK mud, dual compound so the harder center rolls well and they corner Ok in the dry. Not as good as a mud tyre and not as good as a dry tyre, but given the state of the local trails they're ideal.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i had some 2.0 a while back and found them too thin...didnt feel confident with thinner tyres 😉


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 1:14 pm
 IA
Posts: 563
Free Member
 

How fast? I'm on an ikon front, crossmark rear at the moment, but that's on the spanky end of things. A bit slower and grippier I'd be on a ignitor front and advantage rear.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 1:20 pm
Posts: 13292
Full Member
 

You sure you need the ust version? What rims are they going on. imo no ust tyre is going to hit the "light" part of your specification too well. The good think about maxxis tyres are they are pretty airtight in standard models (better still excepion series) with a bit of stans fluid to get a seal if its tubeless.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 1:20 pm
Posts: 1058
Free Member
Topic starter
 

xc719 rims. I suppose durability is more important than being super-light. I've been put off my Schwalbe tyres by them wearing out quite quickly, but Maxxis seem to last quite well. There is too much choice!


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have quite a lot of 1.9 and 2.1 Maxxis which you can buy off me, they are just too thin for peaks stuff.

the 1.9" ones are great for something the C2C if you run them at 60psi and just want a little grip off road and something still ok on the road, otherwise id not bother.

But then it depends where you are riding


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 2:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You ever tried Specialized tyres? If its a light fast tyre for dry the Fastrak is OK like a Kenda SB8 but cheaper.

A 2.0 Spesh tyre is big on volume.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 3:11 pm
Posts: 1058
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Bland - thanks, but it's not for road use.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 3:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i have 2.4 highroller II exo front and rear on my crush and they seem about the same if inly a smidge wider than the 2.2 mountain kings they replaced


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 3:41 pm
Posts: 9421
Free Member
 

2.1 older style HRs are small for a '2.1'. 1.9s could be a step too far. I'm not a fan, but I do prefer bigger volume tyres and don't mind the weight. Got some little-used 26" 2.1 HR Lusts here if anyone wants to make me an offer.


 
Posted : 31/07/2012 4:04 pm